Using dynamic sketches to enhance preservice secondary mathematics teachers' understanding of limits of sequences

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 65-96

  Cory, Beth L ^a   Garofalo, Joe ^b  

^a SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Advanced mathematical thinking; Calculus Analysis; Computers; Content knowledge; Instructional technology; Preservice teacher education

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551603820     PISSN: 00218251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5951/jresematheduc.42.1.0065     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers & Education, 33, 131-152.
2. Ainsworth, S. E., Bibby, P. A., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Information technology and multiple representations: New opportunities-New problems. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 6(1), 93-105.
3. Bartle, R. G., & Sherbert, D. R. (1982). Introduction to real analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
4. Blackwell, A., & Rodden, K. (2003). Preface to this electronic edition. In I. E. Sutherland, Sketchpad: A man-machine graphical communication system (Technical Report No. 574, pp. 3-5). Cambridge, UK: The University of Cambridge. Retrieved August 9, 2010, from http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/techreports/ UCAM-CL-TR-574.pdf
5. Brenner, M. E., Mayer, R. E., Mosely, B., Brar, T, Duran, R., Reed, B. S., et al. (1997). Learning by understanding: The role of multiple representations in the learning of algebra. American Educational Research Journal, 34,663-689. (Pubitemid 127355207)
6. Clark, D. B. (2006). Longitudinal conceptual change in students' understanding of thermal equilibrium: An examination of the process of conceptual restructuring. Cognition and Instruction, 24, 467-563.
7. Clements, C, Pantozzi, R., & Steketee, S. (2002). Exploring calculus with The Geometer's Sketchpad. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
8. Cooley, L. A. (1997). Evaluating student understanding in a calculus course enhanced by a computer algebra system. Primus: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 7,308-316.
9. Cornu, B. (1991). Limits. In D.Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 153-166). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
10. Cory, B. (2006). Using dynamic sketches to enhance secondary preservice mathematics teachers' understanding of limit (Doctoral dissertation). Dissertation Abstracts International, 66(09), 3241A.
11. Cory, B. (2009). Visualizing limits of sequences using dynamic sketches. On-Math Online Journal of School Mathematics, 7(1).
12. Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Nichols, D., Schwingendorf, K., Thomas, K., & Vidakovic, D. (1996). Understanding the limit concept: Beginning with a coordinated process scheme. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15,167-192.
13. Davis, R. B., & Vinner, S. (1986). The notion of limit: Some seemingly unavoidable misconception stages. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 5,281-303.
14. De Jong, T. (2005). The guided discovery principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 215-229). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. DiSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105-225.
16. Dreyfus, T. (1990). Advanced mathematical thinking. In P. Nesher & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics and cognition: A research synthesis by the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 113-134). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Dubinsky, E., Elterman, F., & Gong, K. (1988). The students' construction of quantification. For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(2), 44-51.
18. Eisenberg, E., & Dreyfus, T. (1991). On the reluctance to visualize in mathematics. In W. Zimmerman & S. Cunningham (Eds.), Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics (MAA Notes, No. 19, pp. 25-37). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
19. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittcock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
20. Estes, K. A. (1990). Graphics technologies as instructional tools in applied calculus: Impact on instructor, students, and conceptual and procedural achievement. (Doctoral dissertation). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(04), 1147A.
21. Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Graham, K. (1994). Research in calculus learning: Understanding of limits, derivatives, and integrals. In J. Kaput & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research issues in undergraduate mathematics learning: Preliminary analyses and results (MAA Notes, No. 33, pp. 31-45). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
22. Fischbein, E., Tirosh, D., & Melamed, U. (1981). Is it possible to measure the intuitive acceptance of a mathematical statement? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12,491-512.
23. Goldenberg, E. P., Scher, D., & Feurzeig, N. (2008). What lies behind dynamic interactive geometry software? In G. W. Blume & M. K. Heid (Eds.), Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Volume 2. Cases and perspectives (pp. 53-87). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
24. Goldin, G. (2002). Representation in mathematical learning and problem solving. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 197-218). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Hammer, D. (1996). Misconceptions or p-prims: How may alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 97-127. (Pubitemid 126416353)
26. Hegarty, M. (2004). Dynamic visualizations and learning: Getting to the difficult questions. Learning and Instruction, 74,343-351.
27. Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65-97). New York: Mac-millan.
28. Heid, M. K. (1988). Resequencing skills and concepts in applied calculus using the computer as a tool. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19,3-25.
29. Kaput, J. I (1989). Linking representations in the symbolic systems of algebra. In S. Wagner & C. Kieran (Eds.), Research agenda for mathematics education: Vol. 4. Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra (pp. 167-194). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Kidron, I., & Zehavi, N. (2002). The role of animation in teaching the limit concept. The International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, 9,205-227.
31. Jackiw, N. (2002). The Geometer's Sketchpad (Version 4.03). [Computer software]. Berkeley, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
32. Laborde, C, & Laborde, J.-M. (2008). The development of a dynamical geometry environment: Cabri-Geometre. In G. W. Blume & M. K. Heid (Eds.), Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Volume 2. Cases and perspectives (pp. 31-52). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
33. Mamona-Downs, J. (2001). Letting the intuitive bear on the formal: A didactical approach for the understanding of the limit of a sequence. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48,259-288.
34. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge.
35. Monaghan, J. (1991). Problems with the language of limits. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11(3), 20-24.
36. Moore, R. C. (1994). Making the transition to formal proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 249-266.
37. Núnez, R. (2004). Do real numbers really move? Language, thought, and gesture: The embodied cognitive foundations of mathematics. In J. G. Carbonell & J. Siekmann (Series Eds.), E Iida, R. Pfeifer, L. Steels, & Y. Kuniyoshi (Vol. Eds.), Lecture notes in artificial intelligence: Vol. 3139. Embodied artificial intelligence: International seminar, Dagstuhl Castle, Germany, July 7-11, 2003. Revised selected papers (pp. 54-73). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
38. Özdemir, G., & Clark, D. B. (2007). An overview of conceptual change theories. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, & Technology Education, 3, 351-361. Retrieved December 9, 2009, from http://www.ejmste.com
39. Parks, V W. (1995). Impact of a laboratory approach supported by "Mathematica" on the conceptualization of limit in a first calculus course. (Doctoral dissertation). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(10), 3872A.
40. Pinto, M. M. E, & Tall, D. O. (1999). Student constructions of formal theory: Giving and extracting meaning. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 65-73). Haifa, Israel: Technion Printing Center.
41. Pinto, M. M. E, & Tall, D. (2002). Building formal mathematics on visual imagery: A case study and a theory. For the Learning of Mathematics, 2.2(1), 2-10.
42. Plass, J., Homer, B., and Hayward, E. (2009). Design factors for educationally effective animations and simulations. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21,31-61.
43. Porzio, D. T. (1994). The effects of differing technological approaches to calculus on students' use and understanding of multiple representations when solving problems (Doctoral dissertation). Dissertation Abstracts International, 5.5(10), 3128A.
44. Scher, D. (2000). Lifting the curtain: The evolution of The Geometer's Sketchpad [Electronic Version]. The Mathematics Educator, 10(1), 1-48. Retrieved August 9, 2010, from http://math.coe.uga.edu/tme/issues/v10n2/4scher.pdf
45. Sierpinska, A. (1987). Humanities students and epistemological obstacles related to limits. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18,371-397.
46. Smith, J. P., Ill, diSessa, A. A., Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3,115-163.
47. Szydlik, J. E. (2000). Mathematical beliefs and conceptual understanding of the limit of a function. Journal for Research in Mathematical Education, 31,258-276.
48. Tall, D. (1991). Intuition and rigor: The role of visualization in calculus. In W. Zimmerman & S. Cunningham (Eds.), Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics (MAA Notes, No. 19, pp. 105-119). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
49. Tall, D. (1994). Real mathematics, rational computers and complex people. In L. Lum (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth Annual International Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematics (pp. 243-258). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
50. Tall, D. (2003). Using technology to support an embodied approach to learning concepts in mathematics. [Electronic version]. In L. M. Carvalho & L. C. Guimaraes (Eds.), Historia e Tecnologia no Ensino da Matematica, 1, (pp. 1-28). Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: Federal University of Rio Di Janiero (UFRG). Retrieved March 5, 2009, from http://www.warwick.ac.uk/stafBDavid.Tall/ downloads.html
51. Tall, D. O. & Schwarzenberger, R. L. E. (1978). Conflicts in the learning of real numbers and limits. Mathematics Teaching, 82,44-49.
52. Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits ad continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151-169.
53. The College Board. (2006). Advanced Placement report to the nation [Data file]. Retrieved August 2, 2006, from http://www.collegeboard.com/prod- downloads/about/news-info/ap/2006/2006-ap-report-nation.pdf
54. The College Board. (2009a). AP examination volume changes (1999-2009) [Data file]. Retrieved January 8, 2009, from http://search.collegeboard.com/ servlet/counter?n=0&col=&qt=examination+volume+changes+1999+2009& url=HTTP%3A%2F%2Fprofessionals.collegeboard.com%2Fprofdownload%2Fexam-volume- change-09.pdf
55. The College Board. (2009b). Calculus AB Calculus BC course description. New York: Author. Retrieved January 8, 2009, from http://apcentral.collegeboard. com/apc/public/repository/ap-calcu-lus-course-description.pdf
56. Vinner, S. (1989). The avoidance of visual considerations in calculus students. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 11(1-2), 149-156.
57. Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2002). Extending example spaces as a learning/teaching strategy in mathematics. In A. D. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 377-385). Norwich, UK: University of East Anglia.
58. Williams, S. R. (1991). Models of limit held by college calculus students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22,219-236.
59. Zimmerman, W. (1991). Visual thinking in calculus. In W. Zimmerman & S. Cunningham (Eds.), Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics (MAA Notes, No. 19, pp. 127-137). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.