Selective Exposure for Better or Worse: Its Mediating Role for Online News' Impact on Political Participation

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 184-196

  Knobloch Westerwick, Silvia ^a   Johnson, Benjamin K ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Elections; Internet; News; Participation; Selective exposure

Indexed keywords

ELECTION; INTERNET USE; MEDIATING ROLES; NEWS; ONLINE NEWS; ONLINE STUDIES; PARTICIPATION; POLITICAL INTEREST; POLITICAL PARTICIPATIONS; SELECTIVE EXPOSURE;

EID: 84892511170     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10836101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jcc4.12036     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adobe. (n.d.). Authorware. Retrieved from http://www.adobe.com/products/authorware/
2. ANES. (n.d.) Questions asked in ANES surveys [WWW document]. Retrieved from http://www.electionstudies.org/resources/questions/questions.htm
3. Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4. Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707-731. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
5. Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2010). The shifting foundations of political communication: Responding to a defense of the media effects paradigm. Journal of Communication, 60(1), 35-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01471.x
6. Bimber, B. (1998). The Internet and political transformation: Populism, community, and accelerated pluralism. Polity, 31(1), 133-160. doi: 10.2307/3235370
7. Boulianne, S. (2009). Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26(2), 193-211. doi: 10.1080/10584600902854363
8. Boulianne, S. (2011). Stimulating or reinforcingpolitical interest: Using panel data to examine reciprocal effects between news media andpolitical interest. Political Communication, 28(2), 147-162. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2010.540305
9. Dilliplane, S. (2011). All the news you want to hear: The impact of partisan news exposure on political participation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(2), 287-316. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfr006
10. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11. Frey, D. (1982). Different levels of cognitive dissonance, information seeking, and information avoidance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(6), 1175-1183. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.43.6.1175
12. Garrett, R. K. (2009a). Echo chambers online? Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 265-285. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x
13. Garrett, R. K. (2009b). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59(4), 676-699. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x
14. Giles, M. W., & Dantico, M. K. (1982). Political participation and neighborhood social context revisited. American Journal of Political Science, 26(1), 144-150. doi: 10.2307/2110844
15. Glynn, C. J., Hayes, A. F., & Shanahan, J. (1997). Perceived support for one's opinions and willingness to speak out: A meta-analysis of survey studies on the "spiral of silence." Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(3), 452-463. doi: 10.1086/297808
16. Holbert, R. L., Garrett, R. K., & Gleason, L. S. (2010). A new era of minimal effects? A response to Bennett and Iyengar. Journal of Communication, 60(1), 15-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01470.x
17. Huckfeldt, R. R. (1979). Political participation and the neighborhood social context. American Journal of Political Science, 23(3), 579-592.
18. Johnson, T. J., Zhang, W., & Bichard, S. L. (2011). Voices of convergence or conflict? A path analysis investigation of selective exposure to political websites. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 449-469. doi: 10.1177/0894439310379962
19. Klapper, J. T. (1960). The effects of mass communication. New York, NY: The Free Press.
20. Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Kleinman, S. B. (2012). Preelection selective exposure: confirmation bias versus informational utility. Communication Research, 39(2), 170-193. doi: 10.1177/0093650211400597
21. Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Meng, J. (2011). Reinforcement of the political self through selective exposure to political messages. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 349-368. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01543.x
22. Krueger, B. S. (2002). Assessing the potential of Internet political participation in the United States: A resource approach. American Politics Research, 30(5), 476-498. doi: 10.1177/1532673X02030005002
23. Kull, S., Ramsay, C., & Lewis, E. (2003). Misperceptions, the media, and the Iraq War. Political Science Quarterly, 118(4), 569-598.
24. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people's choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
25. MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding, and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1(4), 173-181. doi: 10.1023/A:1026595011371
26. Matthes, J. (2012). Exposure to counterattitudinal news coverage and the timing of voting decisions. Communication Research, 39(2), 147-169. doi: 10.1177/0093650211402322
27. McClurg, S. D. (2006). The electoral relevance of political talk: Examining disagreement and expertise effects in social networks on political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 737-754. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00213.x
28. McLeod, J. M., Daily, K., Guo, Z., Eveland, W. P., Jr., Bayer, J., Yang, S., & Wang, H. (1996). Community integration, local media use, and democratic processes. Communication Research, 23(2), 179-209. doi: 10.1177/009365096023002002
29. McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16(3), 315-336. doi: 10.1080/105846099198659
30. Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838-855. doi: 10.2307/3088437
31. Newspaper Association of America. (n.d.). Aggregated U.S. newspaper web site audience. Retrieved from http://www.naa.org/Trends-and-Numbers/Newspaper-Websites/Newspaper-Web-Audience.aspx
32. Nir, L., & Druckman, J. N. (2008). Campaign mixed-message flows and timing of vote decision. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(3), 326-346. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edn035
33. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x
34. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
35. Purcell, K., Rainie, L., Mitchell, A., Rosenstiel, T., & Olmstead, K. (2010). Understanding the participatory news consumer: How Internet and cell phone users have turned news into a social experience. Washington, DC: The Pew Internet & American Life Project.
36. Stroud, N. J. (2007). Media effects, selective exposure, and Fahrenheit 9/11. Political Communication, 24(4), 415-432. doi: 10.1080/10584600701641565
37. Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556-576. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
38. Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39. Taylor, A. B., MacKinnon, D. P., & Tein, J.-Y. (2008). Test of the three-path mediated effect. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 241-269. doi: 10.1177/1094428107300344
40. Tew, M. D., & McGraw, K. O. (2002). The accuracy of response timing by Authorware programs. Retrieved from http://www.psych.uni.edu/psychexps/scrapbook/timing_2002.pdf
41. Weber, L. M., Loumakis, A., & Bergman, J. (2003). Who participates and why? An analysis of citizens on the Internet and the mass public. Social Science Computer Review, 21(1), 26-42. doi: 10.1177/0894439302238969