Patient satisfaction after primary total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: An age-dependent analysis

Knee

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 180-184

  Von Keudell, A ^a   Sodha, S ^a   Collins, J ^a   Minas, T ^a   Fitz, W ^a   Gomoll, A H ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Age; Satisfaction; Total knee arthroplasty; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CINCINNATI RATING SCALE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PAIN; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEELING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RECREATION;

AGE; SATISFACTION; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGE FACTORS; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 84892484506     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: 18735800     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Mont M.A., Stuchin S.A., Paley D., Sharkey P.F., Parvisi J., Tria A.J., et al. Different surgical options for monocompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee: high tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty: indications, techniques, results, and controversies. Instr Course Lect 2004, 53:265-283.
2. Lygre S.H., Espehaug B., Havelin L.I., Furnes O., Vollset S.E. Pain and function in patients after primary unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92:2890-2897.
3. Pandit H., Jenkins C., Gill H.S., Barker K., Dodd C.A., Murray D.W. Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011, 93:198-204.
4. Chou D.T., Swamy G.N., Lewis J.R., Badhe N.P. Revision of failed unicompartmental knee replacement to total knee replacement. Knee 2012, 19:356-359.
5. Emerson R.H., Higgins L.L. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:118-122.
6. Furnes O., Espehaug B., Lie S.A., Vollset S.E., Engesaeter L.B., Havelin L.I. Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:519-525.
7. Padgett D.E., Stern S.H., Insall J.N. Revision total knee arthroplasty for failed unicompartmental replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991, 73:186-190.
8. Wynn Jones H., Chan W., Harrison T., Smith T.O., Masonda P., Walton N.P. Revision of medial Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement to a total knee replacement: similar to a primary?. Knee 2012, 19:339-343.
9. Janse A.J., Gemke R.J., Uiterwaal C.S., van der Tweel I., Kimpen J.L., Sinnema G. Quality of life: patients and doctors don't always agree: a meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2004, 57:653-661.
10. Anderson J.G., Wixson R.L., Tsai D., Stulberg S.D., Chang R.W. Functional outcome and patient satisfaction in total knee patients over the age of 75. J Arthroplasty 1996, 11:831-840.
11. Bourne R.B., Chesworth B.M., Davis A.M., Mahomed N.N., Charron K.D. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468:57-63.
12. Noble P.C., Conditt M.A., Cook K.F., Mathis K.B. The John Insall Award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 452:35-43.
13. Bhattacharya R., Scott C.E., Morris H.E., Wade F., Nutton R.W. Survivorship and patient satisfaction of a fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty incorporating an all-polyethylene tibial component. Knee 2012, 19:348-351.
14. Biswal S., Brighton R.W. Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cemented, fixed-bearing prosthesis using minimally invasive surgery. J Arthroplasty 2010, 25:721-727.
15. Felts E., Parratte S., Pauly V., Aubaniac J.M., Argenson J.N. Function and quality of life following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients 60years of age or younger. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010, 96:861-867.
16. Katz J.N., Barrett J., Mahomed N.N., Baron J.A., Wright R.J., Losina E. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and the outcomes of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A:1909-1916.
17. Katz J.N., Losina E., Barrett J., Phillips C.B., Mahomed N.N., Lew R.A., et al. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the United States Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001, 83-A:1622-1629.
18. Paterson J.M., Williams J.I., Kreder H.J., Mahomed N.N., Gunraj N., Wang X., et al. Provider volumes and early outcomes of primary total joint replacement in Ontario. Can J Surg 2010, 53:175-183.
19. Chesworth B.M., Mahomed N.N., Bourne R.B., Davis A.M. Willingness to go through surgery again validated the WOMAC clinically important difference from THR/TKR surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 2008, 61:907-918.
20. Hawker G., Wright J., Coyte P., Paul J., Dittus R., Croxford R., et al. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998, 80:163-173.
21. Heck D.A., Robinson R.L., Partridge C.M., Lubitz R.M., Freund D.A. Patient outcomes after knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 93-110.
22. Robertsson O., Dunbar M., Pehrsson T., Knutson K., Lidgren L. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 2000, 71:262-267.
23. Wylde V., Learmonth I., Potter A., Bettinson K., Lingard E. Patient-reported outcomes after fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial using the Kinemax total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:1172-1179.
24. Lopez-Olivo M.A., Landon G.C., Siff S.J., Edelstein D., Pak C., Kallen M.A., et al. Psychosocial determinants of outcomes in knee replacement. Ann Rheum Dis 2011, 70:1775-1781.
25. Mahomed N.N., Liang M.H., Cook E.F., Daltroy L.H., Fortin P.R., Fossel A.H., et al. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 2002, 29:1273-1279.
26. Lingard E.A., Katz J.N., Wright E.A., Sledge C.B. Predicting the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A:2179-2186.
27. Kurtz S., Ong K., Lau E., Mowat F., Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:780-785.
28. Berger R.A., Meneghini R.M., Jacobs J.J., Sheinkop M.B., Della Valle C.J., Rosenberg A.G., et al. Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:999-1006.
29. Murray D.W., Goodfellow J.W., O'Connor J.J. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998, 80:983-989.
30. Rougraff B.T., Heck D.A., Gibson A.E. A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991, 157-164.
31. Hopper G.P., Leach W.J. Participation in sporting activities following knee replacement: total versus unicompartmental. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008, 16:973-979.
32. WD A., Robertsson O., Lidgren L., Miller L., Davidson D., Graves S. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients aged less than 65. Acta Orthop 2010, 81:90-94.
33. Kamath A.F., Lee G.C., Sheth N.P., Nelson C.L., Garino J.P., Israelite C.L. Prospective results of uncemented tantalum monoblock tibia in total knee arthroplasty: minimum 5-year follow-up in patients younger than 55years. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26:1390-1395.
34. Newman J., Pydisetty R.V., Ackroyd C. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91:52-57.
35. Rosenberg A.G., Barden R.M., Galante J.O. Cemented and ingrowth fixation of the Miller-Galante prosthesis. Clinical and roentgenographic comparison after three- to six-year follow-up studies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990, 71-79.