Further disorientation in the hall of mirrors

Public Understanding of Science

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 60-70

  Wynne, Brian ^a,b  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

idolatry; meanings of science; political economy of science; public meanings; reinvented public deficit models; scientism

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; HERMENEUTICS; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POLITICS; PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLIC POLICY; SCIENCE;

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; HERMENEUTICS; HUMANS; POLITICS; PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLIC POLICY; SCIENCE;

EID: 84892469250     PISSN: 09636625     EISSN: 13616609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963662513505397     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Arendt HThe Promise of Politics. New York: Schocken Books; 2005:.
2. Atkinson R.Rights and responsibilities in scientific research.Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 1978;34 (10): 10-14.
3. Barnes B,Bloor DRationality and Relativism. Hollis MLukes S, ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 1982:1-47.
4. Natural Order. Barnes BShapin S, ed. London: SAGE; 1979:.
5. BeddingtonJ (2011) Declare gross intolerance of bad science. Research Fortnight, 16February. Available at: http://www.researchresearch.com/index.php?option=com_news&template=rr_2col&view=article&articleId=1032320 (accessed 15 August 2013).
6. Bensaude-Vincent B.A genealogy of the increasing gap between science and the public.Public Understanding of Science. 2001;10:99-113.
7. Bensaude-Vincent B.A historical perspective on science and its 'others'.Isis. 2009;100:359-368.
8. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) (2010) Synthetic Biology Dialogue. June. Swindon: UK BBSRC. Available at: http://www.bbsrc.ac.uk/web/FILES/Reviews/1006-synthetic-biology-dialogue.pdf (accessed August 2013).
9. Bloor DKnowledge as Social Order: Rethinking the Sociology of Barry Barnes. Mazzotti M, ed. London: Ashgate; 2008:1-23.
10. Burke D.GM food and crops: What went wrong in the UK?.EMBO Reports. 2004;5:432-436.
11. Aspects of Scientism. Cameron IEdge D, ed. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1982:.
12. ChilversJMacnaghtenP (2011) The Future of Science Governance: A Review of Public Concerns. London: Sciencewise-ERC. Available at: http://www.sciencewise-erc.org.uk (accessed 24 August 2013).
13. Collins H.Stages in the empirical programme of relativism.Social Studies of Science. 1981;11:3-10.
14. COPUS Looks Forward: The Next Five Years. London: Royal Society, Committee on the Public Understanding of Science; 1992:.
15. Doubleday R,Wynne BReframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age. Jasanoff S, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2010:239-261.
16. Douglas MImplicit Meanings. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1975:.
17. Edelman MPolitics as Symbolic Action. London: Allyn and Bacon; 1971:.
18. FeltUWynneB (2007) Science and Governance: Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Expert Working Group report (Felt, rapporteur; Wynne, chair), D-G Research, Brussels, EUR 22750. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/.society/./european-knowledge-society_en.pdf.
19. Glover A. Keynote address to ESRC STEPS Centre Annual Symposium, Whose Expertise Counts?; 2013University of Sussex, UK; 2013.
20. Gross P,Levitt NHigher Superstition: The Academic Left and its Quarrels with Science. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1994:.
21. Hulme MWhy We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009:.
22. Irwin A,Wynne BMisunderstanding Science? Public Reconstructions of Science and Technology. London: Cambridge University Press; 1996:.
23. Jasanoff SA House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths about Science Science, Technology, and Human Values. Koertge N, ed. 1999:495-500.
24. Kuntz M.The post-modern assault on science: If all truths are equal, who cares what science has to say?.EMBO Reports. 2012;13 (10): 885-889.
25. Lacey HValues and Objectivity in Science: The Current Controversy about Transgenic Crops. Raynham, MA: Lexington Books; 2005:.
26. Latour BOn the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2010:.
27. Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Latour BWeibel P, ed. Karlsruhe, Germany Cambridge, MA: Centre for Art and Democracy MIT Press; 2005:.
28. Leach M,Scoones I,Stirling ADynamic Sustainabilities: Technology, Environment, and Social Justice. London: Earthscan; 2010:.
29. Lynch MScience Wars. Ross A, ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1996:238-258.
30. Lynch M.Scientism and philosophism: Comment on Gabriel Stolzenberg's 'kinder, gentler, science wars'.Social Studies of Science. 2004;34 (1): 93-98.
31. May R.Evidence to the UK House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology, inquiry into Science and Society. 2000 2000;volume 2:.
32. Mirowski PScience-Mart: Privatizing American Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2011:.
33. Murky manoeuvres: Editorial. 2012;491 (7422): 7.
34. NurseP (2011) Science under attack. BBC Horizon [television programme], 22January. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00ddylw (accessed 17 August 2013).
35. Oyama SOntogenies of Information. 1985] 2000) Ontogenies of Information, 2nd edn.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Durham, NC: Duke University Press; [1985] 2000:.
36. Perry JN,Arpaia S,Bartsch D,Kiss J,Messean M,Nuti M,Sweet J.Response to 'The anglerfish deception'.EMBO Reports. 2012;13 (6): 481-482.
37. Quist D,Heinemann J,Myhr A,Aslaksen I,Funtowicz SLate Lessons from Early Warnings: Science, Precaution, Innovation. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency; 2013:458-485.
38. The Public Understanding of Science. London: Royal Society; 1985:.
39. Rudy A,Coppin D,Konefal J,Shaw B,Ten Eyck T,Harris C,Busch LUniversities in the Age of Corporate Science: The UC Berkeley-Novartis Controversy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press; 2007:.
40. Shackley S,Wynne B.Representing uncertainties in global climate change science and policy: Boundary-ordering devices and authority.Science, Technology, and Human Values. 1996;21:275-302.
41. Shapin S,Schaffer SLeviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1985:.
42. Science and Society. London: HMSO; 2000:.
43. Van Loqueren G,Baret P.How agricultural research systems shape a technological regime that develops genetic engineering but locks out agroecological innovations.Research Policy. 2009;38 (6): 971-983.
44. Weart SNuclear Fear: A History of Images. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1988:.
45. Welsh I,Wynne B.Science, scientism and imaginaries of publics in the UK: Passive objects, incipient threats.Science as Culture. 2013;:.
46. Wickson F,Wynne B.The anglerfish deception.EMBO Reports. 2012;13 (2): 100-106.
47. Wynne BRationality and Ritual: The Windscale Inquiry and Nuclear Decisions in Britain. Chalfont St. Giles: British Society for the History of Science; [1982] 2011:.
48. Wynne B.Knowledges in context.Science, Technology, and Human Values. 1991;11:1-19.
49. Wynne B.Public understanding of science research: New horizons or hall of mirrors?.Public Understanding of Science. 1992;1 (1): 37-43.
50. Wynne B.Public uptake of science: A case for institutional reflexivity.Public Understanding of Science. 1993;2:321-337.
51. Wynne B.SSK's identity parade: Signing-up, off-and-on.Social Studies of Science. 1996;26 (2): 357-391.
52. Wynne B.Public engagement as means of restoring trust in science? Hitting the notes, but missing the music.Community Genetics. 2006;10 (5): 211-220.
53. Wynne B.Strange weather, again: Climate science as political art.Theory, Culture and Society. 2010;27 (2-3): 289-305.
54. Wynne B,Wickson F.Reply to J.N. Perry et al. 2012;13 (6): 482-483.