Response to "The anglerfish deception"

EMBO Reports

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 481-482

  Perry, Joe N ^a   Arpaia, Salvatore ^b   Bartsch, Detlef ^c   Kiss, Jozsef ^d   Messéan, Antoine ^e   Nuti, Marco ^f   Sweet, Jeremy B ^g   Tebbe, Christoph C ^h  

^a Lug's Lane   (United Kingdom)

^b Research Centre Trisaia   (Italy)

^c Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety   (Germany)

^d SZENT ISTVÁN UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^e INRA   (France)

^f UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^g Sweet Environmental Consultants   (United Kingdom)

^h Federal Research Institute of Rural Areas Forestry and Fisheries vTI   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECEPTION; DNA MODIFICATION; EUROPEAN UNION; GENE FLOW; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; NONHUMAN; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT;

ANIMALS; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; EUROPEAN UNION; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; SCIENCE; SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;

LOPHIIFORMES;

EID: 84861895014     PISSN: 1469221X     EISSN: 14693178     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/embor.2012.70     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. Wickson F, Wynne B (2012) EMBO Rep 13: 100-105
2. EFSA Panel GMO (2011) Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants. EFSA J 8: 1879-1989
3. Royal Society (2002) Genetically modified plants for food use and human health-an update. London, UK: The Royal Society. http://royalsociety.org/ uploadedFiles/Royal-Society-Content/policy/publications/2002/9960.pdf
4. Kearns P, Mayers P (1999) No GM conspiracy. Nature 401: 640-641
5. EFSA Panel GMO (2011) Guidance on the Post-Market Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) of genetically modified plants. EFSA J 9: 2316-2355
6. Stakeholder initiatives. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/networks/ stakeholders.htm
7. EFSA updates advice on environmental safety of GM maize 1507 (2011) http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/111118.htm