Diversity in robustness of lactococcus lactis strains during heat stress, oxidative stress, and spray drying stress

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 603-611

  Dijkstra, Annereinou R ^a,b,c   Setyawati, Meily C ^a,b   Bayjanov, Jumamurat R ^d,f   Alkema, Wynand ^a,b,d   Van Hijum, Sacha A F T ^a,b,d,e,f   Bron, Peter A ^a,b,f   Hugenholtz, Jeroen ^c  

^a Kluyver Center for Genomics of Industrial Fermentation   (Netherlands)

^b NIZO FOOD RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e Netherlands Bioinformatics Center   (Netherlands)

^f TOP INSTITUTE FOOD AND NUTRITION   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABC TRANSPORTER; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC; CULTURE COLLECTION; HYPOTHETICAL PROTEIN; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE SYSTEM; SELECTED STRAINS; TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATOR;

ECOSYSTEMS; GENES; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; PROTEINS; SPRAY DRYING;

OXIDATIVE STRESS;

BACTERIUM; ENZYME ACTIVITY; PHENOTYPE; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SURVIVAL; TEMPERATURE TOLERANCE;

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; PHOSPHOENOLPYRUVATE SUGAR PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HEAT SHOCK RESPONSE; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; METABOLISM; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; GENES, BACTERIAL; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; GENETIC VARIATION; HEAT-SHOCK RESPONSE; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PHENOTYPE; PHOSPHOENOLPYRUVATE SUGAR PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE SYSTEM; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84892451538     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03434-13     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bron PA, Kleerebezem M. 2011. Engineering lactic acid bacteria for increased industrial functionality. Bioeng. Bugs 2:80-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/bbug.2.2.13910.
2. Leroy F, De Vuyst L. 2004. Lactic acid bacteria as functional starter cultures for the food fermentation industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 15:67-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2003.09.004.
3. Peighambardoust SH, Golshan Tafti A, Hesari J. 2011. Application of spray drying for preservation of lactic acid starter cultures: a review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 22:215-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2011.01.009.
4. Santivarangkna C, Kulozik U, Foerst P. 2007. Alternative drying processes for the industrial preservation of lactic acid starter cultures. Biotechnol. Prog. 23:302-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bp060268f.
5. Silva J, Freixo R, Gibbs P, Teixeira P. 2011. Spray-drying for the production of dried cultures. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 64:321-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0307.2011.00677.x.
6. Ghandi A, Powell IB, Howes T, Chen XD, Adhikari B. 2012. Effect of shear rate and oxygen stresses on the survival of Lactococcus lactis during the atomization and drying stages of spray drying: a laboratory and pilot scale study. J. Food Eng. 113:194-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.06.005.
7. Santivarangkna C, Kulozik U, Foerst P. 2008. Inactivation mechanisms of lactic acid starter cultures preserved by drying processes. J. Appl. Microbiol. 105:1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03744.x.
8. van Bokhorst-van de Veen H, van Swam I, Wels M, Bron PA, Kleerebezem M. 2012. Congruent strain specific intestinal persistence of Lactobacillus plantarum in an intestine-mimicking in vitro system and in human volunteers. PLoS One 7:e44588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044588.
9. Parente E, Ciocia F, Ricciardi A, Zotta T, Felis GE, Torriani S. 2010. Diversity of stress tolerance in Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus pentosus and Lactobacillus paraplantarum: a multivariate screening study. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 144:270-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.10.005.
10. de Vuyst L. 1994. Nisin production variability between natural Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis strains. Biotechnol. Lett. 16:287-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00134627.
11. Boutrou R, Sepulchre A, Gripon JC, Monnet V. 1998. Simple tests for predicting the lytic behavior and proteolytic activity of lactococcal strains in cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 81:2321-2328. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)70121-3.
12. Ayad EHE, Verheul A, de Jong C, Wouters JTM, Smit G. 1999. Flavour forming abilities and amino acid requirements of Lactococcus lactis strains isolated from artisanal and non-dairy origin. Int. Dairy J. 9:725-735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0958-6946(99)00140-5.
13. Bachmann H, Starrenburg MJ, Dijkstra A, Molenaar D, Kleerebezem M, Rademaker JL, van Hylckama Vlieg JE. 2009. Regulatory phenotyping reveals important diversity within the species Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:5687-5694. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00919-09.
14. Bachmann H, Starrenburg MJ, Molenaar D, Kleerebezem M, van Hylckama Vlieg JE. 2012. Microbial domestication signatures of Lactococcus lactis can be reproduced by experimental evolution. Genome Res. 22:115- 124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.121285.111.
15. Siezen RJ, Bayjanov JR, Felis GE, van der Sijde MR, Starrenburg M, Molenaar D, Wels M, van Hijum SA, van Hylckama Vlieg JE. 2011. Genome-scale diversity and niche adaptation analysis of Lactococcus lactis by comparative genome hybridization using multi-strain arrays. Microb. Biotechnol. 4:383- 402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7915.2011.00247.x.
16. Siezen RJ, Starrenburg MJ, Boekhorst J, Renckens B, Molenaar D, van Hylckama Vlieg JE. 2008. Genome-scale genotype-phenotype matching of two Lactococcus lactis isolates from plants identifies mechanisms of adaptation to the plant niche. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:424-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01850-07.
17. Meijerink M, van Hemert S, Taverne N, Wels M, de Vos P, Bron PA, Savelkoul HF, van Bilsen J, Kleerebezem M, Wells JM. 2010. Identification of genetic loci in Lactobacillus plantarum that modulate the immune response of dendritic cells using comparative genome hybridization. PLoS One 5:e10632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010632.
18. Pretzer G, Snel J, Molenaar D, Wiersma A, Bron PA, Lambert J, de Vos WM, van der Meer R, Smits MA, Kleerebezem M. 2005. Biodiversitybased identification and functional characterization of the mannosespecific adhesin of Lactobacillus plantarum. J. Bacteriol. 187:6128-6136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.187.17.6128-6136.2005.
19. Siezen RJ, Tzeneva VA, Castioni A, Wels M, Phan HT, Rademaker JL, Starrenburg MJ, Kleerebezem M, Molenaar D, van Hylckama Vlieg JE. 2010 Phenotypic and genomic diversity of Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from various environmental niches. Environ. Microbiol. 12:758- 773. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02119.x.
20. Rademaker JL, Herbet H, Starrenburg MJ, Naser SM, Gevers D, Kelly WJ, Hugenholtz J, Swings J, van Hylckama Vlieg JE. 2007. Diversity analysis of dairy and nondairy Lactococcus lactis isolates, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme and (GTG)5-PCR fingerprinting. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:7128-7137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01017-07.
21. Sieuwerts S, de Bok FA, Mols E, de Vos WM, van Hylckama Vlieg JE. 2008 A simple and fast method for determining colony forming units. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 47:275-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02417.x.
22. Bayjanov JR, Molenaar D, Tzeneva V, Siezen RJ, van Hijum SA. 2012. PhenoLink-a web-tool for linking phenotype to omics data for bacteria: application to gene-trait matching for Lactobacillus plantarum strains. BMC Genomics 13:170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-170.
23. Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45:5-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.
24. Godon JJ, Delorme C, Ehrlich SD, Renault P. 1992. Divergence of genomic sequences between Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis and Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:4045-4047.
25. Kelly W, Ward L. 2002. Genotypic vs. phenotypic biodiversity in Lactococcus lactis. Microbiology 148:3332-3333.
26. Wegmann U, O'Connell-Motherway M, Zomer A, Buist G, Shearman C, Canchaya C, Ventura M, Goesmann A, Gasson MJ, Kuipers OP, van Sinderen D, Kok J. 2007. Complete genome sequence of the prototype lactic acid bacterium Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363. J. Bacteriol. 189:3256-3270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.01768-06.
27. Remm M, Storm CE, Sonnhammer EL. 2001. Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons. J. Mol. Biol. 314:1041-1052. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2000.5197.
28. Simpson PJ, Stanton C, Fitzgerald GF, Ross RP. 2005. Intrinsic tolerance of Bifidobacterium species to heat and oxygen and survival following spray drying and storage. J. Appl. Microbiol. 99:493-501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02648.x.
29. Gardiner GE, O'Sullivan E, Kelly J, Auty MA, Fitzgerald GF, Collins JK, Ross RP, Stanton C. 2000. Comparative survival rates of human-derived probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei and L. salivarius strains during heat treatment and spray drying. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:2605-2612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.6.2605-2612.2000.
30. Hartke A, Bouche S, Gansel X, Boutibonnes P, Auffray Y. 1994. Starvation- induced stress resistance in Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis IL1403. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60:3474-3478.
31. Kilstrup M, Jacobsen S, Hammer K, Vogensen FK. 1997. Induction of heat shock proteins DnaK, GroEL, and GroES by salt stress in Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:1826-1837.
32. Rallu F, Gruss A, Ehrlich SD, Maguin E. 2000. Acid- and multistressresistant mutants of Lactococcus lactis: identification of intracellular stress signals. Mol. Microbiol. 35:517-528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01711.x.
33. O'Sullivan E, Condon S. 1997. Intracellular pH is a major factor in the induction of tolerance to acid and other stresses in Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:4210-4215.
34. van de Guchte M, Serror P, Chervaux C, Smokvina T, Ehrlich SD, Maguin E. 2002. Stress responses in lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 82:187-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1020631532202.
35. Archibald FS, Fridovich I. 1981. Manganese and defenses against oxygen toxicity in Lactobacillus plantarum. J. Bacteriol. 145:442-451.
36. Serrano LM. 2008. Oxidative stress response in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1: a functional genomics approach. Ph.D. thesis. Wageningen University and Research Center, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
37. Hasona A, Crowley PJ, Levesque CM, Mair RW, Cvitkovitch DG, Bleiweis AS, Brady LJ. 2005. Streptococcal viability and diminished stress tolerance in mutants lacking the signal recognition particle pathway or YidC2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:17466-17471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0508778102.
38. Giard JC, Verneuil N, Auffray Y, Hartke A. 2002. Characterization of genes homologous to the general stress-inducible gene gls24 in Enterococcus faecalis and Lactococcus lactis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 206:235-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11015.x.
39. Zelazny A, Seluanov A, Cooper A, Bibi E. 1997. The NG domain of the prokaryotic signal recognition particle receptor, FtsY, is fully functional when fused to an unrelated integral membrane polypeptide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94:6025-6029. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.12.6025.
40. van Bokhorst-van de Veen H, Lee IC, Marco ML, Wels M, Bron PA, Kleerebezem M. 2012. Modulation of Lactobacillus plantarum gastrointestinal robustness by fermentation conditions enables identification of bacterial robustness markers. PLoS One 7:e39053. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039053.
41. Broadbent JR, Lin C. 1999. Effect of heat shock or cold shock treatment on the resistance of Lactococcus lactis to freezing and lyophilization. Cryobiology 39:88-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cryo.1999.2190.