Narratives of Science Outreach in Elite Contexts of Academic Science

Science Communication

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 81-105

  Johnson, David R ^a   Ecklund, Elaine Howard ^a   Lincoln, Anne E ^b  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

codification; gender; outreach; science communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892449969     PISSN: 10755470     EISSN: 15528545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1075547013499142     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abbott A.Status and strain in the professions.American Journal of Sociology. 1981;86:918-835.
2. Abbott A.The system of professions: An essay on the expert division of labor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1988:.
3. Andrews E.,Weaver A.,Hanley D.,Shamatha J. H.,Melton G.Scientists and public outreach: Participation, motivations, and impediments.Journal of Geoscience Education. 2005;53:281-293.
4. Association of American Universities. (2012). Facts and figures. Retrieved from www.aau.edu/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=13460.
5. Bauer M.Controversial medical and agri-food biotechnology: A cultivation analysis.Public Understanding of Science. 2002;11:93-111.
6. Beck U.Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1992:.
7. Bellas M. L.Emotional labor in academia: The case of professors.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1999;561:96-110.
8. Bentley P.,Kyvik S.Academic staff and public communication: A survey of popular science publishing across 13 countries.Public Understanding of Science. 2011;20:48-63.
9. Besley J. C.,Nisbet M.How scientists view the public, the media and the political process.Public Understanding of Science. 2011;:.
10. Besley J. C.,Tanner A. H.What science communication scholars think about training scientists to communicate.Science Communication. 2011;33:239-263.
11. Boltanski L.,Maldidier P.Carrière scientifique, morale scientifique et vulgarization.Social Science Information. 1970;9 (3): 99-118.
12. Burchell K.,Franklin S.,Holden K.Public culture as professional science: Final report of the ScoPE project (Scientists on Public Engagement: From Communication to Deliberation?). London, England: London School of Economics and Political Science; 2009:.
13. Burns T. W.,O'Connor D. J.,Stocklmayer S. M.Science communication: A contemporary definition.Public Understanding of Science. 2003;12:183-202.
14. Cole J.,Cole S.Social stratification in science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1973:.
15. Corley E. A,Kim Y.,Scheufele D. A.Leading US nano-scientists' perceptions about media coverage and the public communication of scientific research findings.Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2011;13:7041-7055.
16. Correll S.Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations.American Sociological Review. 2004;69:93-113.
17. Davies S. R.Constructing communication: Talking to scientists about talking to the public.Science Communication. 2008;29:413-434.
18. De Rond M.,Miller A. N.Publish or perish: Bane or boon of academic life?.Journal of Management Inquiry. 2005;14:321-329.
19. Dragojlovic N.,Einsiedel E.Playing God or just unnatural? Religious beliefs and approval of synthetic biology.Public Understanding of Science. 2012;:.
20. Dunwoody S.,Ryan M.Scientific barriers to the popularization of science in the mass media.Journal of Communication. 1985;35:26-42.
21. Ecklund E. H.Science vs. religion: What scientists really think. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2010:.
22. Ecklund E. H.,Lincoln A. E,Tansey C.Gender segregation in elite academic science.Gender & Society. 2012;26:693-717.
23. Enders J.,De Weert E.The changing face of academic life: Analytical and comparative perspectives. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009:.
24. Evans J. H.Epistemological and moral conflict between religion and science.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 2011;50:707-727.
25. Evans M. S.Defining the public, defining sociology: Hybrid science-public relations and boundary-work in early American Sociology.Public Understanding of Science. 2009;18:5-22.
26. Gubrium J. F.,Holstein J. A.Analyzing narrative reality. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009:.
27. Hackett E. J.Science as a vocation in the 1990s: The changing organizational culture of academic science.Journal of Higher Education. 1990;61:241-279.
28. Hartz J.,Chappell R.Worlds apart: How the distance between science and journalism threatens America's future. Nashville, TN: First Amendment Center; 1997:.
29. Herken G.Cardinal choices: Presidential science advising from the atomic bomb to SDI. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1992:.
30. Hermanowicz J.The stars are not enough. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1998:.
31. Hermanowicz J.Lives in science: How institutions affect academic careers. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2009:.
32. Jensen P.A statistical picture of popularization activities and their evolutions in France.Public Understanding of Science. 2011;20:26-36.
33. Jensen P.,Rouquier J. B.,Kreimers P.,Croissant Y.Scientists connected with society are more active academically.Science and Public Policy. 2008;35:527-541.
34. Kevles D.The physicists: the history of a scientific community in modern America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978:.
35. Kim C.,Fortner R. W.Great Lakes scientists' perspectives on K-12 education collaboration.Journal of Great Lakes Research. 2008;34:98-108.
36. Long J. S.,Fox M. F.Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism.Annual Review of Sociology. 1995;21:45-71.
37. Martín-Sempere M. J.,Garzón-García B.,Rey-Rocha J.Scientists' motivation to communicate science and technology to the public: Surveying participants at the Madrid Science Fair.Public Understanding of Science. 2008;17:349-367.
38. Mathews D. J. H.,Kalfoglou A.,Hudson K.Geneticists' views on science policy formation and public outreach.American Journal of Medical Genetics. 2005;137:161-169.
39. Merton R.,Zuckerman H.The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Merton R. K., ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1973:497-559.
40. Morus I. R.When physics became king. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2009:.
41. Research-doctorate programs in the United States: Continuity and change. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1995:.
42. National Science Board. (2004). Science and engineering indicators 2004. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind04/c7/c7h.htm.
43. National Science Foundation. (2007). Merit review broader impacts criterion: Representative activities. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gove/pubs/gpg/broaderimpacts.pdf.
44. Peters H.,Brossard D.,de Cheveigné S.,Dunwoody S.,Kallfass M.,Miller S.,Shoji T.Interactions with the mass media.Science. 2008;321:204-205.
45. Pew Research Center. (2009). Public praises science; scientists fault public, media. Retrieved from http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/528.pdf.
46. Poliakoff E.,Webb T. L.What factors predict scientists' intentions to participate in public engagement of science activities?.Science Communication. 2007;29:242-263.
47. Reskin B.Scientific productivity and the reward structure of science.American Sociological Review. 1977;42:491-504.
48. Roos P.,Reskin B.Occupational desegregation in the 1970s: Integration and economic equity?.Sociological Perspectives. 1992;35:69-91.
49. Survey of factors affecting science communication. London, England: Author; 2006:.
50. Schuster J.,Finkelstein M. J.The American faculty: The restructuring of academic work and careers. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2006:.
51. Shanley P.,Lopez C.Out of the loop: Why research rarely reaches policy makers and the public and what can be done.Biotropica. 2009;41:535-544.
52. Shermer M. B.The view of science: Stephen Jay Gould as historian of science and scientific historian, popular scientist and scientific popularizer.Social Studies of Science. 2002;32:489-524.
53. Slaughter S.,Leslie L.Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1997:.
54. Smith-Doerr L.Women's work: Gender equality vs. hierarchy in the life sciences. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner; 2004:.
55. Steinberg R. J.,Figart D. M.Emotional labor since the managed heart.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1999;561:8-26.
56. Torres-Albero C.,Fernández-Esquinas M.,Rey-Rocha J.,Martín-Sempere M. J.Dissemination practices in the Spanish research system: Scientists trapped in a golden cage.Public Understanding of Science. 2011;20:12-25.
57. von Roten F.Gender differences in scientists' public outreach and engagement activities.Science Communication. 2011;33:52-75.
58. Yearley S.Making systematic sense of public discontents with expert knowledge: Two analytical approaches and a case study.Public Understanding of Science. 2000;9:105-122.
59. Zorn T. E,Roper J.,Weaver C. K.,Rigby C.Influence in science dialogue: Individual attitude changes as a result of dialogue between laypersons and scientists.Public Understanding of Science. 2010;21:848-864.