Evaluating the SWAT's snow hydrology over a Northern Quebec watershed

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1858-1873

  Troin, Magali ^a   Caya, Daniel ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b Consortium Ouranos ^*  (Canada)

Author keywords

Canada; Model performance; Runoff; Snowmelt modeling; SWAT

Indexed keywords

CANADA; MODEL PERFORMANCE; SNOWMELT MODEL; SOIL AND WATER ASSESSMENT TOOL; STREAMFLOW SIMULATIONS; SWAT; WATER QUALITY INFORMATION; WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT;

CALIBRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; MELTING; RAIN; RUNOFF; SNOW; SNOW MELTING SYSTEMS; STREAM FLOW; WATER QUALITY; WATER RESOURCES;

CATCHMENTS;

CATCHMENT; HYDROLOGY; RAINFALL; RUNOFF; SNOW COVER; SNOWMELT; STREAMFLOW; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

CANADA; OUTARDES RIVER; QUEBEC [CANADA];

EID: 84892436812     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9730     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Ahl RS, Woods SW, Zuuring HR. 2008. Hydrologic calibration and validation of SWAT in a Snowdominated Rocky Mountain Watershed, Montana. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 44: 1-21.
2. Aizen VB, Aizen E, Glazirin G, Loaiciga HA. 2000. Simulation of daily runoff in Central Asian alpine watersheds. Journal of Hydrology 238: 15-34.
3. Anderson JA. 1967. Computer application to system analysis, Lower Mekong River. U.S. Army Engineer Division: North Pacific, Portland, Oregon.
4. Anderson EA. 1976. A point energy and mass balance model of snow cover. NOAA Technical Report NWS 19, US Dept. of Commerce, National Weather Service.
5. Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR. 1998. Large area hydrologic modelling and assessment-Part I: model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34: 73-89.
6. Arnold J, Muttiah R, Srinivasan R, Allen P. 2000. Regional estimation of base flow and groundwater recharge in the upper Mississippi basin. Journal of Hydrology 227: 21-40.
7. ASCE. 1993. Criteria for evaluation of watershed models. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 119: 429-442.
8. Cassel EA, Pangburn T. 1990. Interactive modeling of cold regions watersheds with SSARR. Northern Hydrology: selected perspectives. Natural Health Research Institute Symposium 6: 363-377.
9. Cundy TW, Brooks KN. 1981. Calibrating and verifying the SSARR model, Missouri River Watershed study. Water Resources Bulletin 17: 775-782.
10. Debele B, Srinivasan R. 2005. Comparison of the performances of temperature-index and process based energy budget snowmelt estimation approaches in the SWAT model. Texas A&M University, Spatial Sciences Laboratory, College Station, TX, 1-40.
11. Debele B, Srinivasan R, Gosain AK. 2009. Comparison of Process-Based and Temperature-Index Snowmelt Modeling in SWAT. Water Resources Management, 24: 1065-1088. DOI 10.1007/s11269-009-9486-2.
12. Fassnacht SR, Soulis ED, Kouwen N. 1999. Algorithm application to improve weather radar snowfall estimates for winter hydrologic modelling. Hydrological Processes 13: 3017-3039.
13. Fohrer N, Haverkamp S, Frede HG. 2005. Assessment of the effects of land use patterns on hydrologic landscape functions: development of sustainable land use concepts for low mountain range areas. Hydrological Processes 19: 659-672.
14. Fontaine TA, Cruickshank TS, Arnold JG, Hotchkiss RH. 2002. Development of a snowfall-snowmelt routine for mountainous terrain for the soil water assessment tool (SWAT). Journal of Hydrology 262: 209-223.
15. Fortin V. 2000. Le modèle météo-apport HSAMI: historique, théorie et application. Varennes: Institut de recherche d'Hydro-Québec.
16. Fortin JP, Turcotte R, Massicote S, Moussa R, Fitzback J, Villeneuve JP. 2001. Distributed watershed model compatible with remote sensing and GIS data. I.: Description of model. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 6: 91-99.
17. Gassman PW, Reyes MR, Green CH, Arnold JG. 2007. The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 50: 1211-1250.
18. Ghavidelfar S, Alvankar SR, Razmkhad A. 2011. Comparison of the lumped and quasi-distributed Clark runoff models in simulating flood hydrographs on a semi-arid watershed. Water Resources Management 25: 1775-1790.
19. van Griensven A, Francos A, Bauwens W. 2002. Sensitivity analysis and autocalibration of an integral dynamic model for river water quality. Water Science and Technology 45: 325-332.
20. van Griensven A, Meixner T, Grunwald S, Bishop T, Di Luzio M, Srinivasan R. 2006. A global sensitivity analysis method for the parameters of multi-variable watershed models. Journal of Hydrology 324: 10-23.
21. Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Yapo PO. 1999. Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: Comparison with multilevel expert calibration. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 4: 135-143.
22. Jain SK, Goswami A, Saraf AK. 2010. Snowmelt runoff modelling in a Himalayan Basin with the aid of satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 31: 6603-6618.
23. Kang N. 1978. Sensibility of parameters of the SSARR model. Journal of Hydraulic Research 16: 1-25.
24. Kite GW, Egar D. 1974. Canadian Contribution to UNESCO World Catalogue of Very Large Floods. Water Resources Branch, Environment Canada, Environment Canada, Inland Waters Directorate, Water Resources Branch: Ottawa; 182.
25. Koivusalo H, Kakkonen T. 2002. Snow processes in a forest clearing and in a coniferous forest. Journal of Hydrology 262: 145-164.
26. Lee SJ, Maeng SJ, Kim HS, Na AI. 2011. Analysis of runoff in the Han River Basin by SSARR model considering agricultural water. Paddy Water Environ, 10: 265-280. DOI 10.1007/s10333-011-0278-y.
27. Legates DR, McCabe GJ. 1999. Evaluating the use of "goodness-of-fit" measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resources Research 35: 233-241.
28. Lemonds PJ, McCray JE. 2007. Modeling hydrology in a small rocky mountain watershed serving large urban populations. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43: 875-887.
29. Lévesque E, Anctil F, van Griensven A, Beauchamp N. 2008. Evaluation of streamflow simulation by SWAT model for two small watersheds under snowmelt and rainfall. Hydrological Sciences Journal 53: 961-976.
30. Luce CH, Tarboton DG. 2004. The application of depletion curves for parameterization of subgrid variability of snow. Hydrological Processes 18: 1409-1422.
31. Luo Y, Arnold J, Allenand P, Chen X. 2011. Baseflow simulation of SWAT model in an inland river basin in Tianshan Mountains, Northwest China. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussion 8: 10397-10424.
32. Marsh P. 1998. Snow-cover properties and processes. International conference on snow hydrology, the integration of physical, chemical and biological systems. Brownsville: Vermont, USA.
33. Martinec J, Rango A, Roberts RT. 2008. Snowmelt runoff model (SRM) user's manual. New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico; 175.
34. Mekis E, Vincent LA. 2011. An overview of the second generation adjusted daily precipitation dataset for trend analysis in Canada. Atmosphere-Ocean 49: 163-177.
35. ème congrès de l'ACFAS, Sherbrooke: Canada.
36. Meselhe EA, Habib EH, Oche OC, Gautam S. 2009. Sensitivity of conceptual and physically based hydrologic models to temporal and spatial rainfall sampling. Journal of Hydrological Engineering. Doi:doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:7(711).
37. Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL. 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 50: 885-900.
38. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV. 1970. River flow forcasting through conceptual models part I - A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10: 282-290.
39. Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR. 2001. Soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) theoretical documentation. Blackland Research Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station: Temple, TX; 781.
40. Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR, King KW. 2002. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation. Version 2000, Texas Water Resources Institutes, College Station, Texas, USA.
41. Peterson JR, Hamlett JM. 1998. Hydrologic calibration of the SWAT model in a watershed containing fragipan soils. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34: 531-544.
42. Rango A, Dewalle D. 2008. Snowmelt-runoff model (SRM). In Principles of snow hydrology, Dewalle D, Rango A (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, NY; 306-364.
43. Richardson CW, Wright DA. 1984. WGEN: a model for generating daily weather variables. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Research Service, ARS-8. 83.
44. Robison CP. 2008. Lake Hiawassee Minimum flows and levels hydrologic methods. Report for the St. Johns River Water Management District, INTERA: Palatka, Florida.
45. Rockwood DN, Kuehl DW. 1993. Interactive calibration for the SSARR watershed model. Proceedings of the sixty-first annual Western Snow Conference, 273-281.
46. Santhi C, Arnold JG, Williams JR, Dugas WA, Srinivasan R, Hauck LM. 2001. Validation of the SWAT model on a large river basin with point and nonpoint sources. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37: 1169-1188.
47. SCS (Soil Conservation Service). 1972. National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, U.S. Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC.
48. Sharpley AN, Williams JR. 1990. EPIC-Erosion Productivity Impact Calculator, 1. Model documentation. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Research Service, Tech. Bull. 1768.
49. Shi P, Chen C, Srinivasan R, Zhang X, Cai T, Fang X, Qu S, Chen X, Li Q. 2011. Evaluating the SWAT model for hydrological modeling in the Xixian watershed and a comparison with the XAJ model. Water Resources Management 25: 2595-2612.
50. Singh J, Knapp HV, Demissie M. 2004. Hydrologic modelling of the Iroquois River watershed using HSPF and SWAT. ISWS CR 2004-08. Champaign, I11: Illinois State.
51. Smedema LK, Rycroft DW. 1983. Land drainage-planning and design of agricultural drainage systems. Cornell University Press: Ithica, N.Y.
52. Stehr A, Debels P, Arumi JL, Romero F, Alcayaga H. 2009. Combining the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and MODIS imagery to estimate monthly flows in a datascarce Chilean Andean basin. Hydrological Sciences Journal 54: 1053-1067.
53. Sun H, Cornish PS. 2005. Estimating shallow groundwater recharge in the headwaters of the Liverpool plains using SWAT. Hydrological Processes 19: 795-807.
54. Tapsoba D, Fortin V, Anctil F, Haché M. 2005. Apport de la technique de krigeage avec dérive externe pour une cartographie raisonnée de l'équivalent en eau de la neige: Application aux bassins de la rivière Gatineau. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 32: 289-297.
55. USACE. 1987. SSARR Model-Streamflow Synthesis And Reservoir Regulation. User's manual.
56. USACE. 1991. SSARR Model-Streamflow Synthesis And Reservoir Regulation. User's manual.
57. Valeo C, Ho CLI. 2004. Modeling urban snowmelt runoff. Journal of Hydrology 299: 237-251.
58. Van Liew MW, Arnold JG, Garbrecht JD. 2003. Hydrologic simulation on agricultural watersheds: Choosing between two models. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 46: 1539-1551.
59. Wang X, Melesse AM. 2005. Evaluation of the SWAT model's snowmelt hydrology in a northwestern Minnesota watershed. American Society of Agricultural Engineers 48: 1-18.
60. Williams JR. 1969. Flood routing with variable travel time or variable storage coefficients. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 12: 100-103.
61. Winchell M, Srinivasan R, Di Luzio M, Arnold J. 2007. ArcSWAT Interface for SWAT 2005. User's guide, 1-436.
62. Wu K, Johnston CA. 2007. Hydrologic response to climatic variability in a Great Lakes Watershed: a case study with the SWAT model. Journal of Hydrology 337: 187-199.
63. Wu K, Xu YJ. 2006. Evaluation of the applicability of the SWAT model for coastal watersheds in southern Luisiana. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 42: 1247-1260.
64. Zhang X, Srinivasan R, Debele B, Hao F. 2008. Runoff simulation of the headwaters of the Yellow River using the SWAT model with three snowmelt algorithms. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 44: 48-61.