Probabilistic model of bone structure based on CT scan data and validation of simulation results using the finite cell method

Safety, Reliability, Risk and Life-Cycle Performance of Structures and Infrastructures - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, ICOSSAR 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 2017-2024

  Luque, J ^a   Papaioannou, I ^a   Straub, D ^a   Ruess, M ^b   Schillinger, D ^c  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOCORRELATION COEFFICIENT; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCAN; EMPIRICAL RELATIONSHIPS; FINITE CELL METHOD; HOMOGENIZED MATERIAL; ISOTROPIC MATERIALS; PROBABILISTIC MODELING; SPATIAL VARIABILITY;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENSITY (SPECIFIC GRAVITY); RELIABILITY; SAFETY ENGINEERING;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84892414327     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Cody D, Hou FJ, Divine GW, Fyhrie DP, 2000. Short term in vivo study of proximal femoral finite element modeling. Annals Biomedical Engineering 28, 408-414.
2. Grande E, 2013. Double Experimental Procedure for Model- Specific Finite Element Analysis of the Human Femur and Trabecular Bone. PhD thesis, Technische Universität München.
3. Kanit T, Guyen FN, Forest S, Jeulin D, Reed M, Singleton S, 2006. Apparent and effective physical properties of heterogeneous materials: Representativity of samples of two materials from food industry. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 195, pp. 3960-3982.
4. Keller T, 1994. Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. Journal of Biomechanics 27, 1159-1168.
5. Lotz JC, Gerhart TN, Hayes WC, 1990. Mechanical properties of trabecular bone from the proximal femur: A quantitative CT study. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., 14(1), pp. 107-114.
6. Ruess M, Schillinger D, Bazilevs Y, Varduhn V, Rank E, 2013.Weakly Enforced Essential Boundary Conditions for NURBS-embedded and trimmed NURBS geometries on the basis of the Finite Cell Method. accepted for publication, Int'l Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering.
7. Ruess M, Tal D, Trabelsi N, Yosibash Z, Rank E, 2012. The finite cell method for bone simulations: Verification and validation. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 11(3): 425-437.
8. Schillinger D, Ruess M, Zander N, Bazilevs Y, Düster A, Rank E, 2012. Small and large deformation analysis with the p- And B-spline versions of the Finite Cell Method. Computational Mechanics 50(4): 445-478.
9. QCT PRO™ 2008. Bone Mineral Densitometry Software, CT Calibration Phantom. Mindways Software, Inc. Version 4.2.3 - Revision 20070717C.
10. Vanmarcke, E. 2010. Random Fields, Analysis and Synthesis. World Scientific Publishing.
11. Wirtz DC, Schiffers N, Pandorf T, Radermacher K, Weichert D, Forst R, 2000. Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur. Biomechanics 33, pp. 1325-1330.
12. Yang Z, Ruess M, Kollmannsberger S, Düster A, Rank E, 2012. An efficient integration technique for the voxelbased Finite Cell Method. Int'l Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 91(5), pp. 457-471.
13. Yosibah Z, Padan R, Joskowicz L, Milgrom C, 2007. A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in-vitro experiments. Biomechanical Engineering 129(3), pp. 297-309.