Supplier development responsibility and NPD project outcomes: The roles of monetary quantification of differences and supporting-detail gathering

Journal of Product Innovation Management

Volumn 29, Issue , 2012, Pages 103-123

  Wynstra, Finn ^a   Anderson, James C ^b   Narus, James A ^c   Wouters, Marc ^d  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

CONTROL AND MONITORING; DEVELOPMENT TEAMS; MULTIPLE SAMPLES; NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT; VALIDITY ASSESSMENT;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84892383720     PISSN: 07376782     EISSN: 15405885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00948.x     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Anderson, J. C., 2004. From understanding to managing customer value in business markets. In Rethinking marketing: Developing a new understanding of markets, ed., H. Håkansson, D. Harrison, and, A. Waluszewski, 137-159. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
2. Anderson, J. C., and, D. W. Gerbing,. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103 (3): 411-423.
3. Anderson, J. C., and, D. W. Gerbing,. 1991. Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities. Journal of Applied Psychology 76 (5): 732-740.
4. Anderson, J. C., N. Kumar, and, J. A. Narus, 2007. Value merchants: Demonstrating and documenting superior value in business markets. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
5. Anderson, J. C., J. A. Narus, and, W. van Rossum,. 2006. Customer value propositions in business markets. Harvard Business Review 84 (3): 90-99.
6. Bello, D. C., and, D. I. Gilliland, 1997. The effect of output controls, process controls, and flexibility on export channel performance. Journal of Marketing 61 (1): 22-38.
7. Brusoni, S., A. Prencipe, and, K. Pavitt,. 2001. Knowledge specialisation, organisational coupling and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Administrative Science Quarterly 46 (4): 597-621.
8. Carson, S. J., 2007. When to give up control of outsourced new product development. Journal of Marketing 71 (1): 49-66.
9. Challagalla, G. N., and, T. A. Shervani,. 1996. Dimensions and types of supervisory control: Effects on salesperson performance and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing 60 (1): 89-105.
10. Clark, K. B., 1989. Project scope and project performance: The effects of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development. Management Science 35 (10): 1247-1263.
11. Closs, D. J., M. A. Jacobs, M. Swink, and, G. S. Webb,. 2008. Toward a theory of competencies for the management of product complexity: Six case studies. Journal of Operations Management 26 (5): 590-610.
12. Cohen, J., and, P. Cohen,. 1975. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Cooper, R., and, R. Slagmulder,. 1997. Target costing and value engineering. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.
14. Dyer, J. H., and, W. G. Ouchi,. 1993. Japanese-style partnerships: Giving companies a competitive edge. Sloan Management Review 35 (1): 51-63.
15. Eisenhardt, K. M., 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 14 (1): 57-74.
16. Eisenhardt, K. M., and, B. N. Tabrizi,. 1995. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 84-110.
17. Ellram, L. M., 2000. Purchasing and supply management's participation in the target costing process. Journal of Supply Chain Management 36 (2): 39-51.
18. Ellram, L. M., and, S. P. Siferd,. 1998. Total cost of ownership: A key concept in strategic cost management decisions. Journal of Business Logistics 19 (1): 55-84.
19. Galbraith, J. R., 1974. Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces 4: 28-36.
20. Gerbing, D. W., and, J. C. Anderson,. 1988. An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research 25 (2): 186-192.
21. Handfield, R. B., G. L. Ragatz, K. J. Petersen, and, R. M. Monczka,. 1999. Involving suppliers in new product development. California Management Review 42 (1): 59-82.
22. Hartley, J. L., J. E. Meredith, D. McCutcheon, and, K. J. Kamath,. 1997. Suppliers′ contributions to product development: An exploratory survey. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 44 (3): 258-267.
23. Hartley, J. L., B. J. Zirger, and, R. R. Kamath,. 1997. Managing the buyer-supplier interface for on-time performance in product development. Journal of Operations Management 15 (1): 57-70.
24. Heide, J. B., K. H. Wathne, and, A. I. Rokkan,. 2007. Interfirm monitoring, social contracts, and relationship outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research 44: 425-433.
25. Henderson, R., and, K. Clark,. 1990. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1): 9-30.
26. Hoetker, G., 2005. How much you know versus how well I know you: Selecting a supplier for a technically innovative component. Strategic Management Journal 26 (1): 75-96.
27. Hu, L. T., and, P. M. Bentler,. 1998. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods 3 (4): 424-453.
28. Hu, L. T., and, P. M. Bentler,. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6 (1): 1-55.
29. Jöreskog, K. G., 1971. Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika 36 (4): 409-426.
30. ® 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
31. ® 8: User's reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
32. Kamath, R. R., and, J. K. Liker,. 1994. A second look at Japanese product development. Harvard Business Review 72 (6): 154-170.
33. Karlsson, C., R. Nellore, and, K. Söderquist,. 1998. Black box engineering: Redefining the role of product specifications. Journal of Product Innovation Management 15 (6): 534-549.
34. Kato, Y., 1993. Target costing support systems: Lessons from leading Japanese companies. Management Accounting Research 4 (1): 33-47.
35. Kato, Y., G. Böer, and, C. W. Chow,. 1995. Target costing: An integrative management process. Journal of Cost Management 9 (1): 39-51.
36. Kirsch, L., 1996. The management of complex tasks in organizations: Controlling the systems development process. Organization Science 7 (1): 1-21.
37. Koufteros, X. A., T. C. E. Cheng, and, K.-H. Lai,. 2007. "Black-box" and "gray-box" supplier integration in product development: Antecedents, consequences and the moderating role of firm size. Journal of Operations Management 25 (4): 847-870.
38. Koufteros, X. A., M. Vonderembse, and, J. Jayaram,. 2005. Internal and external integration for product development: The contingency effects of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform strategy. Decision Sciences 36 (1): 97-133.
39. Langerak, F., and, E. J. Hultink,. 2005. The impact of new product development acceleration approaches on speed and profitability: Lessons for pioneers and fast followers. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 52 (1): 30-42.
40. Liker, J. K., R. R. Kamath, S. N. Wasti, and, M. Nagamachi,. 1996. Supplier involvement in automotive component design: Are there really large US Japan differences? Research Policy 25 (1): 59-89.
41. Marsh, H. W., K. T. Hau, and, Z. Wen,. 2004. In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff value for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling 11 (3): 320-341.
42. Miles, L. D., 1989. Techniques of value analysis and engineering, 3rd edn. Washington, DC: Lawrence D. Miles Value Foundation.
43. Montoya-Weiss, M. M., and, R. Calantone,. 1994. Determinants of new product performance: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management 11 (5): 397-417.
44. Nishiguchi, T., and, J. Brookfield,. 1997. The evolution of Japanese subcontracting. Sloan Management Review 39 (1): 89-101.
45. Nixon, B., 1998. Research and development performance measurement: A case study. Management Accounting Research 9 (3): 329-355.
46. Ouchi, W. G., 1979. A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science 25 (9): 833-848.
47. Ouchi, W. G., and, M. A. Maguire,. 1975. Organizational control: Two functions. Administrative Science Quarterly 20 (4): 559-569.
48. Parker, D. B., G. A. Zsidisin, and, G. L. Ragatz,. 2008. Timing and extent of supplier integration in new product development: A contingency approach. Journal of Supply Chain Management 44 (1): 71-83.
49. Petersen, K. J., R. B. Handfield, and, G. L. Ragatz,. 2005. Supplier integration into new product development: Coordinating product, process and supply chain design. Journal of Operations Management 23 (3-4): 371-388.
50. Primo, M. A., and, S. D. Amundson,. 2002. An exploratory study of the effects of supplier relationships on new product development outcomes. Journal of Operations Management 20 (1): 33-52.
51. Rabino, S., 2001. The accountant's contribution to product development teams-a case study. Journal of Engineering Technology Management 18 (1): 73-90.
52. Ragatz, G. L., R. B. Handfield, and, K. J. Petersen,. 2002. Benefits associated with supplier integration into product development under conditions of technology uncertainty. Journal of Business Research 55 (5): 389-400.
53. Ragatz, G. L., R. B. Handfield, and, T. V. Scannell,. 1997. Success factors for integrating suppliers into new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14 (3): 190-202.
54. Smith, R. P., and, S. D. Eppinger,. 1997. Identifying controlling features of engineering design iteration. Management Science 43 (3): 276-293.
55. Sobrero, M., and, E. B. Roberts,. 2001. The trade-off between efficiency and learning in interorganizational relationships for product development. Management Science 47 (4): 493-511.
56. Sobrero, M., and, S. Schrader,. 1998. Structuring inter-firm relationships: A meta-analytic approach. Organization Studies 19 (4): 585-615.
57. Song, M., and, C. A. Di Benedetto,. 2008. Supplier's involvement and success of radical new product development in new ventures. Journal of Operations Management 26 (1): 1-22.
58. Spina, G., R. Verganti, and, G. Zotteri,. 2002. Factors influencing co-design adoption: Drivers and internal consistency. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 22 (12): 1354-1366.
59. Takeishi, A., 2002. Knowledge partitioning in the interfirm division of labor: The case of automotive product development. Organization Science 13 (3): 321-338.
60. Tiwana, A., and, M. Keil,. 2007. Does peripheral knowledge complement control? An empirical test in technology outsourcing alliances. Strategic Management Journal 28: 623-634.
61. Van Echtelt, F. E. A., J. Y. F. Wynstra, A. J. Van Weele, and, G. M. Duysters,. 2008. Managing supplier involvement in new product development: A multiple-case study. Journal of Product Innovation Management 25 (2): 180-201.
62. Verma, D., and, K. K. Sinha,. 2002. Toward a theory of project interdependencies in high tech R&D environments. Journal of Operations Management 20 (5): 451-468.
63. Vlaar, P. W. L., F. A. J. van den Bosch, and, H. W. Volberda,. 2006. Coping with problems of understanding in interorganizational relationships: Using formalization as a means to make sense. Organization Studies 27 (11): 1617-1638.
64. Ward, A., J. K. Liker, J. J. Christiano, and, D. K. Sobek II,. 1995. The second Toyota paradox: How delaying decisions can make better cars faster. Sloan Management Review 36: 43-61.
65. Wheelwright, S. C., and, K. B. Clark,. 1992. Revolutionizing product development: Quantum leaps in speed, efficiency, and quality. New York: Free Press.
66. Wouters, M., J. C. Anderson, J. A. Narus, and, F. Wynstra,. 2009. Improving sourcing decisions in NPD projects: Monetary quantification of points of difference. Journal of Operations Management 27 (1): 64-77.
67. Wouters, M., J. C. Anderson, and, J. Y. F. Wynstra,. 2005. The adoption of total cost of ownership for sourcing decisions-a structural equations analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 30 (2): 167-191.
68. Wynstra, J. Y. F., and, E. Ten Pierick,. 2000. Managing supplier involvement in product development: A portfolio approach. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 6 (1): 49-57.
69. Wynstra, F., M. Weggeman, and, A. J. Van Weele,. 2003. Exploring purchasing integration in product development. Industrial Marketing Management 32 (1): 69-83.
70. Young, J. W., 1977. The function of theory in a dilemma of path analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 62 (1): 108-110.
71. Zirger, B. J., and, J. L. Hartley,. 1996. The effect of acceleration techniques on product development time. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 43 (2): 143-152.
72. Zirpoli, F., and, M. Caputo,. 2002. The nature of buyer-supplier relationships in co-design activities-the Italian auto industry case. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 22 (12): 1389-1410.