Organized crime legislation in the european union: Harmonization and approximation of criminal law, national legislations and the EU framework decision on the fight against organized crime

Organized Crime Legislation in the European Union: Harmonization and Approximation of Criminal Law, National Legislations and the EU Framework Decision on the Fight Against Organized Crime

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-189

  Calderoni, Francesco ^a  

^a NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892234042     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04331-4     Document Type: Book

References (229)

1. Adem E (ed) (2003) Transnational organised crime: perspectives on global security. Routledge, New York.
2. Alegre S (2005) Mutual trust - lifting the mask. In: De Kerchove G, Weyembergh A (eds) La Confiance Mutuelle dans l'É space pénal Européen/Mutual trust in the European criminal area. E ́ ditions de l'Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, pp 40-45.
3. Aleo S (2002) The definition and repression of organized crime. In: Longo F (ed) The European Union and the challenge of transnational organised crime: Towards a common police and judicial approach. Dott. A. Giuffrè Editore, Milano, pp 61-75.
4. Aleo S (2003) Sul problema della definizione della criminalità organizzata alla luce della convenzione di Palermo. Rassegna penitenziaria e criminologica 1:1-37.
5. Ambos K (2005) Is the development of a common substantive criminal law for Europe possible? Some preliminary reflections. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 12 (2):173-191.
6. Antoniou G, Streteanu F (2007) Roumanie. Revue internationale de droit pénal 78(3-4):247-256 Rapports nationaux.
7. Asp P (2005) Mutual recognition and the development of criminal law cooperation within the EU. In: Husabø EJ, Strandbakken A (eds) Harmonization of criminal law in Europe, vol 3, Supranational criminal law: capita selecta. Intersentia, Antwerpen, pp 23-40.
8. Asp P (2007) Sweden. Revue internationale de droit pénal 78(3-4):273-280 Rapports nationaux.
9. Athanassopoulou E (ed) (2005) Fighting organized crime in Southeast Europe. Routledge, New York.
10. Bäckman J (1998) The inflation of crime in Russia. In: Organised crime & crime prevention - what works? Rapport fra NSfK:S 40. forskerseminar. Espoo, Finland 1998. Scandinavian Research Council for Criminology, København, pp 20-34.
11. Baker E (2003) The legal regulation of transnational organised crime: Opportunities and limitations. In: Edwards A, Gill P (eds) Transnational organised crime: perspectives on global security. Routledge, New York.
12. Balestrieri A, Giraldi C (2000) Introduzione allo studio del diritto penale irlandese: I principi. Cedam, Padova.
13. Bartone N (2003) Mandato di arresto europeo e tipicità nazionale del reato: Analisi strutturale comparata dei reati di frode/truffa nelle sovvenzioni, criminalità informatica, furto, racket/estorsione, riciclaggio, associazione per delinquere in Italia, Francia, Germania, Spagna. Giuffrè, Milano.
14. Bay J (1998) Definitions of organized crime in the European Union: A criminological perspective. In: Organised crime & crime prevention - what works? Rapport fra NSfK:S 40. forskerseminar. Espoo, Finland 1998. Scandinavian Research Council for Criminology, København, pp 20-34.
15. Beale SS, Safwat A (2004) What developments in Western Europe tell us about American Critiques of corporate criminal liability? Buffalo Criminal Law Review 8(1):89-163.
16. Bernardi A (2002) La disciplina prevista dal nuovo codice penale francese in tema di criminalità organizzata. In: Strategie di contrasto alla criminalità organizzata nella prospettiva di diritto comparato. Cedam, Padova, pp 33-93.
17. Bernardi A (2007) Le rôle du troisième pilier dans l'européanisation du droit pénal: Un bilan synthétique à la veille de la réforme des traitées. Revue de Science Criminelle et de Droit Pénal Comparé 4:713-737.
18. Bernardi A (2008) "Nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege" between European law and national law. In: Cherif Bassiouni M, Militello V, Satzger H (eds) European cooperation in penal matters: issues and perspectives. Cedam, Padova, pp 87-117.
19. Blakesley CL (1998) General report: The criminal justice systems facing the challenge of organized crime. In: Les systèmes pénaux à l'épreuve du crime organisé/The criminal justice systems facing the challenge of organised crime. Special issue of Revue internationale de droit pénal 69(1-2):69-100.
20. Boldova Pasamar MÁ, Rueda Martín MA ́ (2006) La Lucha Contra la Criminalidad Organizada en Españ a. Paper presented at the XVII International Congress of Comparative Law, Utrecht, 16-22 July 2006.
21. Boodman M (1991) The myth of harmonization of laws. The American Journal of Comparative Law 39(4):699-724.
22. Bosly HD (2006) La lutte contre la criminalité grave et organisée: L'évolution récente de la législation belge. Revue pénitentiaire et de droit pénal 1(Janvier-Mars):69- 86.
23. Bruggeman W(2001) International law enforcement co-operation: A critical assessment. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 9:283-290.
24. Bruinsma G, Bernasco W (2004) Criminal groups and transnational illegal markets: A more detailed examination on the basis of social network theory. Crime, Law and Social Change 41:79-94.
25. Buruma Y (1997) Pays-Bas/Netherlands. Revue internationale de droit pénal 68(3-4):909-937.
26. Cadoppi A (1996) Omnis definitio in iure periculosa?: Il problema delle definizioni legali nel diritto penale. Cedam, Padova.
27. Cadoppi A, McCall Smith A (1995) Introduzione allo studio del diritto penale scozzese. Cedam, Padova.
28. Calderoni F (2008) A definition that could not work: The EU framework decision on the fight against organised crime. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 16:265-282.
29. Castaldo AR (2002) La risposte pénale contre la criminalité organisée en droit italien. In: Manacorda S (ed) L'infraction d'organisation criminelle en Europe: (Allemagne - Espagne - France - Italie - Union Européenne). Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, pp 191-225.
30. Castells M (2003) The global criminal economy. In: McLaughlin E, Gordon H, Muncie J (eds) Criminological perspectives: Essential readings. Sage, London, pp 516-526.
31. Cedras J (1998) France. In: Les systèmes pénaux à l'épreuve du crime organisé/The criminal justice systems facing the challenge of organised crime. Special issue of Revue internationale de droit pénal 69(1-2):341-367.
32. Centre for International Crime Prevention (1999) National legislation on organized crime. Centre for International Crime Prevention, Vienna.
33. Cesoni ML (ed) (2004) Criminalité Organisée: Des représentations sociales aux définitions juridiques. Georg Editeur, Genève.
34. Cesoni ML (2005) Les dispositifs de lutte contre les organisations criminelles: une législation sous influence? Academia Press, Gent.
35. Chamilothoris I (2006) Les règles de fond sur la lutte contre le crime organisé/Fight against organised crime in criminal law. Paper presented at the XVII international congress of comparative law, Utrecht, 2006.
36. Combeaud S (2006) La première réussite pour le princie de reconnaissance mutuelle: Le mandat d'arrêt européen. Revue internationale de droit pénal 77(1-2):131-142.
37. Corn E (2007) Il silenzioso ritorno dell'ergastolo in spagna. La risposta sanzionatoria contro la criminalità organizzata offerta dalla Ley organica 7/2003. In: Fornasari G (ed) Modelli sanzionatori per il contrasto alla criminalità organizzata. Un'analisi di diritto comparato. Università degli Studi di Trento, Trento, pp 13-90.
38. Cornils K, Greve V (2004) Denmark on the road to organised crime. In: Fijnaut C, Paoli L (eds) Organised crime in Europe: concepts, patterns and control policies in the European Union and beyond. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 853-878.
39. Corstens G, Pradel J (2002) European criminal law. Kluwer Law International, The Hague.
40. Council of Europe (2004) Effectiveness of provisions on membership in criminal organisations. Organised crime - Best Practice Survey no 7. Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
41. Council of the European Union (1997) Doc. 6204/2/97 Enfopol 35 Rev 2 of 21 April 1997.
42. Council of the European Union (2005) Doc. 9864/05 of 8 June 2005.
43. Council of the European Union (2006a) Doc. 12279/06 of 28 September 2006.
44. Council of the European Union (2006b) Doc. 9067/06 of 10 May 2006.
45. Criminalità transnazionale fra esperienze e risposte penali globali. Atti del III Convegno Internazionale promosso dal Centro Studi Giuridici "Francesco Carrara" Lucca. Dott. A. Giuffrè Editore, Milano.
46. Csonka P (2006) Les perspectives futures du droit pénal de l'Union Européenne. Revue internationale de droit pénal 77(1-2):347-350.
47. De Biolley S, Weyembergh A (2006) L'évaluation dans le cadre du troisième pilier du traité sur l'Union européenne. In: Weyembergh A, De Biolley S (eds) Comment évaluer le droit pénal européen? Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, pp 75-98.
48. De Doelder H, Tiedemann K (eds) (1996) La criminalisation du comportement collectif/Criminal liability of corporations. XIVe Congrès international de droit comparé/XIVth international congress of comparative law, Kluwer Law International, The Hague.
49. De Hert P, Pitto E (2006) Evaluation in the context of enlargement. In:Weyembergh A, De Biolley S (eds) Comment évaluer le droit pénal européen? Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, pp 163-195.
50. De Nauw A, Deruyck F (1998) Belgique/Belgium. In: Les systèmes pénaux à l'épreuve du crime organisé/The criminal justice systems facing the challenge of organised crime. Special issue of Revue internationale de droit pénal 69(1-2):165-243.
51. Delmas-Marty M (ed) (1997) Corpus juris: Portant dispositions pénales pour la protection des intérêts financiers de l'Union européenne = introducing penal provisions for the purpose of the financial interests of the European Union. Economica, Paris.
52. Delmas-Marty M, Vervaele JAE (eds) (2000) The implementation of the Corpus Juris in the Member States: penal provisions for the protection of European Finances. Intersentia, Antwerp 4 vols.
53. Den Boer M (2002a) Law-enforcement cooperation and transational organized crime in Europe. In: Berdal M, Serrano M (eds) Transnational organized crime and international security: business as usual? Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, pp 103-116.
54. Den Boer M(ed) (2002b) Organised crime: A catalyst in the Europeanisation of national police and prosecution agencies? European Institute of Public Administration, Maastricht.
55. Di Nicola A (2006) La criminalità economica organizzata: Le dinamiche dei fenomeni, una nuova categoria concettuale e le sue implicazioni di policy. FrancoAngeli, Milano.
56. Dolman MM (2007) Netherlands. Revue internationale de droit pénal 78(3-4):213-246 Rapports nationaux.
57. Edwards A, Gill P (2002) Crime as enterprise? The case of "transnational organised crime". Crime, Law and Social Change 37:203-223.
58. Elvins M (2003) Europe's response to transnational organised crime. In: Edwards A, Gill P (eds) Transnational organised crime: perspectives on global security. Routledge, New York, pp 28-41.
59. European Union (1998) Joint action of 21 December 1998 adopted by the council on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on making it a criminal offence to participate in a criminal organisation. 98/733/JHA. OJ L 351 of 29/12/1998.
60. European Union (1999) Joint position of 29 March 1999 defined by the council on the proposed United Nations convention against organised crime. 99/235/JHA. OJ L 87 of 31/03/1999.
61. European Commission (2001) Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the council on the criminal-law protection of the community's financial interests. COM 272.
62. European Union (2001) Council decision of 8 December 2000 on the signing, on behalf of the European Community, of the United Nations Convention against transnational organised crime and its protocols on combating trafficking in persons, especially women and children, and the smuggling of migrants by land, air and sea. 2001/87/EC. OJ L 30 of 01/02/2001.
63. European Commission (2004) Communication from the commission to the council and the European Parliament on measures to be taken to combat terrorism and other forms of serious crime, in particular to improve exchanges of information. COM 221.
64. European Union (2004) Council decision of 29 April 2004 on the Conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the United Nations Convention against transnational organised crime. 2004/579/EC. OJ L 261 of 06/08/2004.
65. European Commission (2005) Proposal for a council framework decision on the fight against organised crime. COM 6.
66. European Parliament (2005) Fight against organised crime: European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a council framework decision on the fight against organised crime. P6-TA 0405. OJ C 272 of 9/11/2006.
67. European Commission (2006) Communication from the commission to the council and the European Parliament: Evaluation of EU policies on freedom, security and justice. COM 332.
68. European Commission (2008a) Communication from the Commission on the creation of a Forum for discussing EU justice policies and practice. COM 38.
69. European Commission (2008b) JAI-Acquis: October 2008. Consolidated and completely revised new version.
70. Fabrizy EE (2007) Austria. Revue internationale de droit pénal 78(3-4):3-11 Rapports nationaux.
71. Fava F (2007) Il sistema sanzionatorio austriaco in materia di criminalità organizzata. In: Fornasari G (ed) Modelli sanzionatori per il contrasto alla criminalità organizzata. Un'analisi di diritto comparato. Università degli Studi di Trento, Trento, pp 149-168.
72. Fehér L, Geller BJ (1998) Hongrie/Hungary. In: Les systèmes pénaux à l'épreuve du crime organisé/The criminal justice systems facing the challenge of organised crime. Special issue of Revue internationale de droit penal 69(1-2):389-404.
73. Fijnaut C (2004) Police co-operation and the area of freedom, security and justice. In: Walker N (ed) Europe's area of freedom, security and justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 241-282.
74. Fijnaut C (2008) Controlling organised crime and terrorism in the European Union. In: Bassiouni MC, Militello V, Satzger H (eds) European cooperation in penal matters: issues and perspectives. Cedam, Padova, pp 243-263.
75. Fijnaut C, Paoli L (2004) Introduction to part III: The initiatives of the European Union and the Council of Europe. In: Fijnaut C, Paoli L (eds) Organised crime in Europe: concepts, patterns and control policies in the European Union and beyond, vol 4, Studies of organised crime. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 625-640.
76. Fijnaut C, Bovenkerk F, Bruinsma G (1998) Organized crime in the Netherlands. Kluwer Law International, The Hague.
77. Finckenauer JO (2005) Problems of definition: what is organized crime? Trends in Organized Crime 8(3, Spring):63-83.
78. Fiore S (2007) Partecipazione ad un gruppo criminale organizzato. In: Rosi E (ed) Criminalità organizzata transnazionale e sistema penale italiano: La Convenzione ONU di Palermo. IPSOA, Milano.
79. Fletcher M, Löö f R, Gilmore B (2008) EU criminal law and justice, Elgar European Law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton.
80. Flore D (1999) Une Justice pénale européenne après Amsterdam. Journal des tribunaux - Droit européen 60:121-129.
81. Flore D (2001) Reconnaissance mutuelle, double incrimination et territorialité. In: Kerchove G, Weyembergh A (eds) La reconnaissance mutuelle des décisions judiciaires pénales dans l'Union européenne. Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, pp 65-77.
82. Flyghed J (2002) Sweden. In: Den Boer M (ed) Organised crime: A catalyst in the Europeanisation of national police and prosecution agencies? European Institute of Public Administration, Maastricht, pp 159-177.
83. Fontanaud D (2007) Criminalité Organisée. Revue internationale de droit pénal 77:193-199.
84. Fornasari G (2002) Le strategie di contrasto alla criminalità organizzata: Aspetti comparatistici nell'esperienza europeo-continentale. In: Fornasari G (ed) Strategie di contrasto alla criminalità organizzata nella prospettiva di diritto comparato. Cedam, Padova, pp 173-198.
85. Fransen B, Beldé J, Vermeulen G (2005) European and international legislation. In: Vermeulen G (ed) EU standards in witness protection and collaboration with justice. Maklu, Antwerpen and Apeldoorn, pp 19-78.
86. Gallagher P (2009) Future developments in judicial cooperation in criminal matters. ERA Forum 9:495-517.
87. Genson R (2005) Un nouveau programme pluriannuel pour consolider l'espace de liberté sécurité et de justice: Le Programme de la Haye (2005-2010). Revue du Marché commun et de l'Union européenne 486:172-176.
88. Gilmore B (2006) Introduction. Revue internationale de droit pénal 77(1-2):15-22.
89. Girault C (2007) France. Revue internationale de droit pénal 78(3-4):117-140 Rapports nationaux.
90. Giudicelli-Delage G (2002) La risposte pénale contre la criminalité organisée en droit français. In: Manacorda S (ed) L'infraction d'organisation criminelle en Europe: (Allemagne - Espagne - France - Italie - Union Européenne). Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, pp 111-190.
91. Giudicelli-Delage G, Manacorda S (eds) (2005) L'intégration pénale indirecte: Interactions entre droit pénal et coopération judiciaire au seins de l'Union européenne. Société de législation comparée, Paris.
92. Gonzàles Rus JJ, Palma Herrera JM (2002) Trattamento penale della criminalità organizzata nel diritto penale spagnolo. In: Strategie di contrasto alla criminalità organizzata nella prospettiva di diritto comparato. Cedam, Padova.
93. Grasso G (2002) Harmonisation of the national penal systems: A possible objective for the European Union? In: Longo F (ed) The European Union and the challenge of transnational organised crime: Towards a common police and judicial approach. Dott. A. Giuffrè Editore, Milano, pp 93-108.
94. Hagan FE (2006) "Organized Crime" and "organized crime": indeterminate problems of definition. Trends in Organized Crime 9(4, Summer):127-137.
95. Harding C (1996) Criminal liability of corporations - United Kingdom. In: de Doelder H, Tiedemann K (eds) La criminalisation du comportement collectif/Criminal liability of corporations. Kluwer Law International, The Hague, pp 369-382.
96. Harding C (2005) The offence of belonging: capturing participation in organised crime. Criminal Law Review 690-700.
97. Heikinheimo S (1998) Finlande/Finland. In: Les systèmes pénaux à l'épreuve du crime organisé/The criminal justice systems facing the challenge of organised crime. Special issue of Revue internationale de droit pénal 69(1-2):327-339.
98. Hess H (1998) Mafia & mafiosi. Origin, power and myth. New York University Press, New York.
99. Hirst M (2003) Jurisdiction and the ambit of the criminal law. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
100. Husabø EJ, Strandbakken A (eds) (2005) Harmonization of criminal law in Europe, vol 3, Supranational criminal law: capita selecta. Institute for Security Studies, Antwerpen.
101. Jacobs BA (1998) Researching crack dealers: dilemmas and contradictions. In: Ferrell J, Hamm MS (eds) Ethnography at the edge: crime, deviance and field research. Northeastern University Press, Boston, pp 1-18.
102. Jakulin V (1998) Slovénie/Slovenia. In: Les systèmes pénaux à l'épreuve du crime organisé/The criminal justice systems facing the challenge of organised crime. Special issue of Revue internationale de droit pénal 69(1-2):501-511.
103. Jonathan Hafen (1992) International extradition: issues arising under the dual criminality, 1992 Brigham Young University Law Review 191.
104. Joutsen M (2002a) International cooperation against transational organized crime: The general development. In: UNAFEI (ed) Resource material series no. 59. UNAFEI, Tokyo, pp 345-363.
105. Joutsen M (2002b) International cooperation against transational organized crime: The practical experience of the European Union. In: UNAFEI (ed) Resource material series no. 59. UNAFEI, Tokyo, pp 394-416.
106. Joutsen M (2002c) International cooperation against transational organized crime: criminalising participation in an organized criminal group. In: UNAFEI (ed) Resource material series no. 59. UNAFEI, Tokyo, pp 417-428.
107. Joutsen M (2005) International instruments on cooperation in responding to transnational crime. In: Reichel P (ed) Handbook of transnational crime and justice. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 255-274.
108. Joutsen M(2006) The European Union and cooperation in criminal matters: The search for balance. HEUNI papers, vol 25. HEUNI, Helsinki.
109. Kaiafa-Gbandi M (2001) The development towards harmonization within criminal law in the European Union - A citizen's perspective. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 9(4):239-263.
110. Karsai K, Végvári R (2007) Hungary. Revue internationale de droit pénal 78(3-4):175-188 Rapports nationaux.
111. Keijzer N (2005) The double criminality requirement. In: Blekxtoon R, van Ballegooij W (eds) Handbook on the European arrest warrant. TMC Asser, Den Haag, pp 137-163.
112. Kinzig J (2006) Les règles de fond sur la lutte contre le crime organisé. Fight against organised crime in criminal law. Paper presented at the XVII international congress of comparative law, Utrecht, 2006.
113. Kleemans E, van de Bunt H (2003) The social organisation of human trafficking. In: Siegel D, van de Bunt H, Zaitch D (eds) Global organized crime: Trends and developments, Studies of organised crime. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 97-104.
114. Klip A (2002) Definitions of harmonisation. In: Klip AH, van derWilt HG (eds) Harmonisation and harmonising measures in criminal law. Royal Netherlands Academy of Science, Amsterdam, pp 23-29.
115. Klip A (2005) The constitution for Europe and criminal law: A step not far enough. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 12(2):115-123.
116. Kruize P (2002) Denmark. In: Den BoerM(ed) Organised crime: A catalyst in the Europeanisation of national police and prosecution agencies? European Institute of Public Administration, Maastricht, pp 159-177.
117. Kühne H-H (2006) Terrorism rediscovered: The issue of politically inspired criminality. In: Freilich JD, Guerette RT (eds) Migration, culture conflict, crime and terrorism. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 13-19.
118. Lahti R, Sahavirta R (2007) Finland. Revue internationale de droit pénal 78(3-4):101-116 Rapports nationaux.
119. Laudati A (2006) I delitti transnazionali: Nuovi modelli di incriminazione e di procedimento all'interno dell'Unione Europea. Diritto penale e processo 4:401-405.
120. Lavenex S (2007) Mutual recognition and the monopoly of force: limits of the single market analogy. Journal of European Public Policy 14(5):762-779.
121. L'élargissement des formes de préparation et de participation/Expanding forms of preparatory acts and participation (2007) Section I Droit pénal général/General part - Colloque préparatoire La Coruña, 5-8 Septembre 2007/Preparatory Colloquium La Coruña, 5-8 September 2007. Special issue of Revue internationale de droit pénal 78(3-4).
122. Lemoine P (2007) Le délit d'association de malfaiteurs et la circostance de bande organisée. Revue pénitentiaire et de droit pénal 2(Avril-Juin):277-290.
123. Les systèmes pénaux à l'épreuve du crime organisé/The criminal justice systems facing the challenge of organised crime (1997) Section I Droit pénal général/General part - Colloque préparatoire Naples 18-20 Septembre 1997/Preparatory Colloquium Naples, September 18-20, 1997. Special issue of Revue internationale de droit pénal 68(3-4).
124. Les systèmes pénaux à l'épreuve du crime organisé/The criminal justice systems facing the challenge of organised crime (1998a) Section II Droit pénal spécial/Special part - Colloque préparatoire Alexandrie 8-12 Novembre 1997/Preparatory Colloquium Alexandrie November 9-12, 1997. Special issue of Revue internationale de droit pénal 69(1-2).
125. Les systèmes pénaux à l'épreuve du crime organisé/The criminal justice systems facing the challenge of organised crime (1998b) Section III Procédure pénale/Procedural part - Colloque préparatoire Guadalajara 14-17 Octobre 1997/Preparatory Colloquium Guadalajara October 14-17, 1997. Special issue of Revue internationale de droit pénal 69(3-4).
126. Les systèmes pénaux à l'épreuve du crime organisé/The criminal justice systems facing the challenge of organised crime (1999a) Section IV Droit pénal international/international criminal law - Colloque préparatoire Utrecht (Pays-Bas) 13-16 Mai 1998/Preparatory Colloquium Utrecht (the Netherlands) May 13-16, 1998. Special issue of Revue internationale de droit pénal 70(1-2).
127. Les systèmes pénaux à l'épreuve du crime organisé/The criminal justice systems facing the challenge of organised crime (1999b) Résolutions/Resolutions - XVIe congrès international de droit pénal/XVIth international congress of penal law - Budapest September 5-11, 1999. Special issue of Revue internationale de droit pénal 70(3-4).
128. Levi M, Smith A (2002) A comparative analysis of organised crime conspiracy legislation and practice and their relevance to England and Wales. Home Office Online Report, vol 17/02. Home Office, London.
129. Licci G (2007) Les règles de fond sur la lutte contre le crime organisé dans l'ordre juridique italien. Revue pénitentiaire et de droit pénal 3(Juillet-Septembre):635-657.
130. Lilie H (1998) Allemagne/Germany. In: Les systèmes pénaux à l'épreuve du crime organisé/The criminal justice systems facing the challenge of organised crime. Special issue of Revue internationale de droit pénal 69(1-2):139-154.
131. Maduro MP (2007) So close and yet so far: The paradoxes of mutual recognition. Journal of European Public Policy 14(5):814-825.
132. Makarenko T (2004) The crime-terror continuum: Tracing the interplay between transnational organised crime and terrorism. Global Crime 6(1):129-145.
133. Manacorda S (2002a) La risposte pénale contre la criminalité organisée dans le droit de l'Union Européenne. In: Manacorda S (ed) L'infraction d'organisation criminelle en Europe: (Allemagne - Espagne - France - Italie - Union Européenne). Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
134. Manacorda S (ed) (2002b) L'infraction d'organisation criminelle en Europe: (Allemagne - Espagne - France - Italie - Union Européenne). Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
135. Manacorda S (2003) La fattispecie-tipo della 'organizzazione criminale' nel diritto dell'Unione Europea. In: Patalano V (ed) Nuove strategie per la lotta al crimine organizzato transnazionale. Giappichelli, Torino, pp 273-348.
136. Manacorda S (2005a) Introduction. L'intégration pénale indirecte: Une première définition. In: Giudicelli-Delage G, Manacorda S (eds) L'intégration pénale indirecte: interactions entre droit pénal et coopération judiciaire au seins de l'Union européenne. Société de législation comparée, Paris, pp 21-30.
137. Manacorda S (2005b) Le mandat d'arrêt européen et l'harmonisation substantielle: Le rapprochement des incriminations. In: Giudicelli-Delage G, Manacorda S (eds) L'intégration pénale indirecte: interactions entre droit pénal et coopération judiciaire au seins de l'Union européenne. Société de législation comparée, Paris, pp 33-91.
138. Manacorda S (2007a) La consolidation de l'Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice: Vers une "mise à l'écart" du rapprochement pénal? Revue de Science Criminelle et de Droit Pénal Comparé 4:899-909.
139. Manacorda S (2007b) L'exception à la double incrimination dans le mandat d'arrêt européen et le principe de legalité. Cahiers de droit européen 43: 149-177.
140. Manacorda S (2008) La parabole de l'harmonisation pénale: A ̀ propos des dynamiques d'intégration normative relatives à l'organisation criminelle. In: Delmas-Marty M, Pieth M, Sieber U (eds) Collection de l'UMR de droit comparé de Paris, vol 15, Les chemins de l'harmonisation pénale: harmonising criminal law. Société de législation, Paris, pp 269-287.
141. McLean D (2007) Transnational organized crime: A commentary on the UN convention and its protocols. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
142. Michelini G, Polimeni G (2007) Il fenomeno del crimine transnazionale e la Conventione delle Nationi Unite contro il crimine organizzato transnazionale. In: Rosi E (ed) Criminalità organizzata transnazionale e sistema penale italiano: La Convenzione ONU di Palermo. IPSOA, Milano.
143. Militello V (2001) Participation in a criminal organisation as a model of European criminal offence. In: Militello V, Huber B (eds) Towards a European criminal law against organised crime: proposals and summaries of the Joint European Project to counter organised crime. Iuscrim, Freiburg, pp 15-41.
144. Militello V, Huber B (eds) (2001) Towards a European criminal law against organised crime: proposals and summaries of the Joint European Project to counter organised crime. Iuscrim, Freiburg.
145. Militello V, Paoli L, Arnold J (eds) (2000) Il crimine organizzato come fenomeno transnatzionale: Forme di manifestazione, prevenzione e repressione in Italia, Germania e Spagna. Iuscrim, Freiburg.
146. Mitsilegas V (2001) Defining organised crime in the European Union: The limits of European Criminal Law in an Area of "freedom, security and justice.". European Law Review 26:565-581.
147. Mitsilegas V (2009) EU criminal law. Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland.
148. Nelken D (1998) Globalizzazione del crimine e giustizia penale: Ambiti e problemi. Dei delitti e delle pene 2:75-102.
149. Nelken D (2006) White-collar and corporate crime. In: Maguire M, Morgan R, Reiner R (eds) Oxford handbook of criminology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
150. Nelles U (2002) Definitions of harmonisation. In: Klip AH, Van Der Wilt HG (eds) Harmonisation and harmonising measures in criminal law. Royal Netherlands Academy of Science, Amsterdam, pp 23-29.
151. Nilsson HG (2001) Mutual trust and mutual recognition of our differences: A personal view. In: Kerchove G, Weyembergh A (eds) La reconnaissance mutuelle des décisions judiciaires pénales dans l'Union européenne. Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, pp 155-159.
152. Nilsson HG (2006) From classical judicial cooperation to mutual recognition. Revue internationale de droit pénal 77(1-2):53-58.
153. Nuotio K (2005) Harmonization of criminal sanctions in the european union - criminal law science fiction. In: Husabø EJ, Strandbakken A (eds) Harmonization of criminal law in Europe, vol 3, Supranational criminal law: capita selecta. Intersentia, Antwerpen, pp 79-101.
154. OECD (2006) Czech Republic: phase 2 - report on the application o the convention on combating bribery of foreign public officials in international business transactions and the 1997 recommendation on combating bribery in international business transactions.
155. stcentury strategy to defeat organised crime. Home Office, London.
156. Olger P (1998) Pays-Bas/Netherlands. In: Les systèmes
157. Orlova AV (2008) A comparison of the Russian and Canadian experiences with defining "organized crime.". Trends in Organized Crime 11(2):99-134.
158. Orlova AV, Moore JW (2005) "Umbrellas" or "Building Blocks?": defining international terrorism and transnational organized crime in international law. Houston Journal of International Law 27:267-310.
159. th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
160. Paoli L (2002) The paradoxes of organized crime. Crime, Law and Social Change 37:51-97.
161. Paoli L, Fijnaut C (2004a) General introduction. In: Fijnaut C, Paoli L (eds) Organised crime in Europe: concepts, patterns and control policies in the European Union and beyond. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1-18.
162. Paoli L, Fijnaut C (2004b) Introduction to part I: The history of the concept. In: Fijnaut C, Paoli L (eds) Organised crime in Europe: concepts, patterns and control policies in the European Union and beyond. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 21-46.
163. Paoli L, Fijnaut C (2006) Organised crime and its control policies. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 14(3):307-327.
164. Passas N (2002) Cross-border crime and the interface between legal and illegal actors. In: van Duyne PC, von Lampe K, Passas N (eds) Upperworld and underworld in cross-border crime. Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen, pp 11-41.
165. Peccioli A (2005) Unione Europea e criminalità transnazionale: Nuovi sviluppi. Giappichelli, Torino.
166. Peers S (2004) Mutual recognition and criminal law in the European Union: has the council got it wrong? Common Market Law Review 41:5-36.
167. nd edn, Oxford EC Law Library. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
168. Pelser CM (2008) Preparations to commit a crime: The Dutch approach to inchoate offences. Utrecht Law Review 4(3):57-80.
169. Perron W (2005) Perspectives of the harmonization of criminal law and criminal procedure in the European Union. In: Husabø EJ, Strandbakken A (eds) Harmonization of criminal law in Europe, vol 3, Supranational criminal law: capita selecta. Intersentia, Antwerpen, pp 5-22.
170. Picotti L (2007) General report. Revue internationale de droit pénal 78(3-4):405-452.
171. Pitto E (2005) Mutual trust and enlargement. In: De Kerchove G, Weyembergh A (eds) La Confiance Mutuelle dans l'É space pénal Européen/Mutual trust in the European criminal area. Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, pp 47-68.
172. Plecas D, Préfontaine DC, Chin V, Dandurand Y (2001) Criminalizing participation in a criminal organization: The experience of selected jurisdictions. A report prepared for the Department of Justice Canada. International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy, Vancouver.
173. Potter GW (1994) Criminal organizations: vice, racketeering, and politics in an American city. Waveland Press, Prospect Heights.
174. Pradel J (2006) Les règles de fond sur la lutte contre le crime organisé. Revue pénitentiaire et de droit pénal 3(September):517-535.
175. Programme of measures to implement the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters. (2001/C 12/02) (2001) OJ C 12 of 15/01/2001.
176. Ram C (2001) The United Nations convention against transnational organized crime and its protocols. Forum on Crime and Society 1(2):135-145.
177. Rosi E (ed) (2007) Criminalità organizzata transnazionale e sistema penale italiano: La Convenzione ONU di Palermo. IPSOA, Milano.
178. Sarmiento D (2008) European Union: The European arrest warrant and the quest for constitutional coherence. International Journal of Constitutional Law 6(1):171-183.
179. Sheptycki J (2002) Global law enforcement as a protection racket: some sceptical notes on transnational organised crime as an object of global governance. In: Edwards A, Gill P (eds) Transnational organised crime: perspectives on global security. Routledge, New York, pp 42-58.
180. Sicurella R (2000) Criminal law special part: Articles 1-8. In: Delmas-Marty M, Vervaele JAE (eds) The implementation of the Corpus Juris in the Member States: penal provisions for the protection of European finance, vol 1. Intersentia, Antwerpen.
181. Silva Sanchez J-M (2002) La risposte pénale contre les organisations criminelles en droit allemand. In:Manacorda S (ed) L'infraction d'organisation criminelle en Europe: (Allemagne - Espagne - France - Italie - Union Européenne). Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, pp 59-110.
182. Smith B, Wallace W (2001) Constitutional deficits of EU justice and home affairs: Transparency, accountability and judicial control. In: Monar J, WesselsW(eds) The European Union after the Treaty of Amsterdam. Continuum, New York, pp 125-149.
183. Spencer JR (2002) Why is the harmonisation of penal law necessary? In: Klip AH, Van Der Wilt HG (eds) Harmonisation and harmonising measures in criminal law. Royal Netherlands Academy of Science, Amsterdam.
184. Spinellis D (1997) Grèce/Greece. Revue internationale de droit pénal 68(3-4):813-831.
185. Spinellis D (2002) Harmonisation and harmonising measures in criminal law: Objections to harmonisation and future perspectives. In: Klip AH, Van Der Wilt HG (eds) Harmonisation and harmonising measures in criminal law. Royal Netherlands Academy of Science, Amsterdam, pp 87-93.
186. Standing A (2003) Rival views on organised crime. Monograph, Publications. Institute for Security Studies. http://www.iss.co.za/index.php? link-id=3&slink-id=427&link-type=12&slink-type=12&tmpl-id=3. 23 Oct 2006.
187. Stessens G (2002) The principle of mutual confidence between judicial authorities in the area of freedom, justice and security. In: De Kerchove G, Weyembergh A (eds) L'É space Pénal Européen: Enjeux et Perspectives. E ́ ditions de l'Université de Bruxelles, Brussels, pp 93-103.
188. Storbeck J (2003) The European Union and enlargement: challenge and opportunity for Europol in the fight against international crime. European Foreign Affairs Review 8:283-288.
189. Streteanu F (2005) Les règles de fond sur la lutte contre le crime organisé en Roumanie. Paper presented at the XVII international congress of comparative law, Utrecht, 2006.
190. Symeonidou-Kastanidou E (2007) Towards a new definition of organised crime in the European Union. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 15(1):83-103.
191. Tadic FM (2002) How harmonious can harmonisation be? A theoretical approach towards harmonisation of (criminal) law. In: Klip AH, Van Der Wilt HG (eds) Harmonisation and harmonising measures in criminal law. Royal Netherlands Academy of Science, Amsterdam, pp 1-21.
192. Tak PJP (2000) Bottlenecks in international police and judicial cooperations in the EU. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 8(4):343-360.
193. Tampere European Council 15 and 16 October 1999: Presidency conclusions (1999) http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/tam-en.htm.
194. The Hague programme: strengthening freedom, security and justice in the European Union. OJ C 53 of 03/03/2005.
195. ndedn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
196. Traest P (2006) Les règles de fond sur la lutte contre le crime organisé. In: Dirix E, Leleu Y-H (eds) The Belgian reports at the congress of Utrecht of the international academy of comparative law. Bruylant, Bruxelles.
197. nd edn. Giuffrè, Milano.
198. United Nations Offices on Drugs and Crime (2004) Legislative guides for the implementation of the United Nations Convention against transnational organized crime and the protocols thereto. United Nations, New York.
199. Valsamis Mitsilegas, (2006) The Constitutional Implications of Mutual Recognition in Criminal Matters in the EU, 43 Common Market Law Review 1277.
200. van de Bunt H (2004) Organised crime policies in the Netherlands. In: Fijnaut C, Paoli L (eds) Organised crime in Europe: concepts, patterns and control policies in the European Union and beyond, vol 4, Studies of organised crime. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 677-717.
201. Van Der Wilt H (2002) Some critical reflections on the process of harmonisation. In: Klip AH, Van Der Wilt HG (eds) Harmonisation and harmonising measures in criminal law. Royal Netherlands Academy of Science, Amsterdam, pp 77-86.
202. van Duyne PC (2004) The creation of a threat image: media, policy making and organised crime. In: van Duyne PC, Jager M, von Lampe K, Newell JL (eds) Threats and phantoms of organised crime, corruption and terrorism. Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen, pp 21-50.
203. van Duyne PC (2006) Introduction: counting clouds and measuring organised crime. In: The organisation of crime for profit: conduct, law and measurement. Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen.
204. van Duyne PC, von Lampe K, Passas N (eds) (2002) Upperworld and underworld in cross-border crime. Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen.
205. van Duyne PC, Jager M, von Lampe K, Newell JL (eds) (2004) Threats and phantoms of organised crime, corruption and terrorism. Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen.
206. Vander Beken T (2002) Freedom, security and justice in the European Union. In: Klip AH, Van Der Wilt HG (eds) Harmonisation and harmonising measures in criminal law. Royal Netherlands Academy of Science, Amsterdam, pp 95-101.
207. Verbruggen F, Fijnaut C (1997) Belgique/Belgium. Revue internationale de droit pénal 68 (3-4):628-687.
208. Verbruggen F, Fijnaut C, Traest P (2007) Belgique. Revue internationale de droit pénal 78 (3-4):13-40 Rapports nationaux.
209. Vermeulen G (2002a) New developments in EU criminal policy regarding cross-border crime. In: van Duyne PC, von Lampe K, Passas N (eds) Upperworld and underworld in cross-border crime. Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen, pp 114-139.
210. Vermeulen G (2002b) Where do we currently stand with harmonisation in Europe? In: Klip AH, Van Der Wilt HG (eds) Harmonisation and harmonising measures in criminal law. Royal Netherlands Academy of Science, Amsterdam, pp 65-76.
211. Vinciguerra S (1992) Introduzione allo studio del diritto penale inglese: I principi. Cedam, Padova.
212. Vinciguerra S (2002) Diritto penale inglese comparato. Cedam, Padova.
213. Vlassis D (2002) The UN convention against transnational organized crime. In: Transnational organized crime and international security: business as usual? Lynne Rienner Publishing, Boulder, pp 83-94.
214. Vogel J (2002) Why is the harmonisation of penal law necessary? A comment. In: Klip AH, Van Der Wilt HG (eds) Harmonisation and harmonising measures in criminal law. Royal Netherlands Academy of Science, Amsterdam, pp 55-64.
215. Vogel J (2005) The European integrated criminal justice system and its constitutional framework. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 12(2):125-147.
216. Volk K (2002) La risposte pénale contre les organisations criminelles en droit allemand. In: Manacorda S (ed) L'infraction d'organisation criminelle en Europe: (Allemagne - Espagne - France - Italie - Union Européenne). Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, pp 7-57.
217. von Lampe K (2002) Afterword: Organized crime research in perspective. In: Upperworld and underworld in cross-border crime. Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen, pp 189-198.
218. von Lampe K, van Dijck M, Hornsby R, Markina A, Verpoest K (2006) Organised crime is. . . findings from a cross-national review of literature. In: van Duyne PC, Maljevic A, van Dijck M, von Lampe K, Newell JL (eds) The organisation of crime for profit: conduct, law and measurement. Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen.
219. Walker N (2004) In search of the area of freedom, security and justice: A constitutional Odyssey. In: Walker N (ed) Europe's area of freedom, security and justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1-37.
220. Weigend T (1997) General report: The criminal justice systems facing the challenge of organized crime. Revue internationale de droit pénal 68(3-4):523-546.
221. Weisser B (2007) Germany. Revue internationale de droit pénal 78(3-4):141-169 Rapports Nationaux.
222. nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
223. Wenin R (2007) La criminalità organizzata nell'esperienza giuridica tedesca. In: Fornasari G (ed) Modelli sanzionatori per il contrasto alla criminalità organizzata. Un'analisi di diritto comparato. Università degli Studi di Trento, Trento, pp 234-278.
224. Weyembergh A (2001) La reconnaissance mutuelle des décisions judiciaires en matière pénale entre les Etats membres de l'Union européenne: Mise en perspective. In: Kerchove G. Weyembergh A (eds) La reconnaissance mutuelle des décisions judiciaires pénales dans l'Union européenne. Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, pp 25-63.
225. Weyembergh A (2005a) Approximation of criminal laws, the constitutional treaty and the Hague programme. Common Market Law Review 42:1567-1597.
226. Weyembergh A (2005b) The functions of approximation of penal legislation within the European Union. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 12(2):149-172.
227. Weyembergh A (2006) Le rapprochement des incriminations et des sanctions pénales. Revue internationale de droit pénal 77:185-192.
228. Weyembergh A, De Biolley S (eds) (2006) Comment évaluer le droit pénal européen? Bruxelles.
229. Wright A (2006) Organised crime. Willan Publishing, Portland.