The European union and enlargement: Challenge and opportunity for europol in the fight against international crime

European Foreign Affairs Review

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 283-288

  Storbeck, Jürgen ^a  

^a Europol   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747809870     PISSN: 13846299     EISSN: 18758223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.54648/eerr2003020     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. W. Kok, Enlarging the European Union: Achievements and Challenges (European University Institute, San Domenico di Fiesole, Italy, 2003), p. 2.
2. For further discussion on Europol's legal basis see N. Lavranos, 'Europol and the Fight Against Terrorism' (2003) 8 EFA Rev, pp. 259-275.
3. See, for instance, A. Ott and K. Inglis (eds), Handbook on European Enlargement: A Commentary on the Enlargement Process (TMC Asser Press, The Hague, 2002).
4. Drugs in Focus: Bimonthly Briefing of the EMCDDA, March-April 2003, .
5. The European Parliament's Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs felt it necessary to 'reiterate' the 'absolute priorities of combating fraud and corruption', Opinion on the conclusions of the negotiations on enlargement in Copenhagen, 11 March 2003, European Parliament 2003/2014(INI) para. 21 (18).
6. 'There appears to be a widespread consensus that corruption in Central and European countries is a more serious problem than in other countries of the OECD including existing EU member states.' Open Society Institute, Monitoring the EU Accession Process: Corruption and Anti-corruption Policy (2002) p. 31.