A comparison of local hazard mitigation plan quality in six states, USA

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 122, Issue , 2014, Pages 89-99

  Lyles, Ward ^a   Berke, Philip ^b   Smith, Gavin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

Disaster mitigation act; Hazard mitigation; Plan evaluation; Plan quality; Planning policy

Indexed keywords

DISASTERS;

DISASTER MITIGATION; HAZARD MITIGATIONS; PLAN EVALUATION; PLAN QUALITY; PLANNING POLICIES;

HAZARDS;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECONOMIC PLANNING; HAZARD MANAGEMENT; MIGRATION DETERMINANT; NATURAL HAZARD; PLANNING PROCESS; STATE ROLE; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84892161094     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.010     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Baer W.C. General plan evaluation criteria - an approach to making better plans. Journal of the American Planning Association 1997, 63(3):329-345.
2. Beatley T., Brower D., Schwab A. An Introduction to Coastal Zone Management 2002, Island Press, Washington, DC.
3. Berke P.R. Reducing natural hazard risks through state growth management. Journal of the American Planning Association 1998, 64(1):76-87.
4. Berke P.R., French S.P. The influence of state planning mandates on local plan quality. Journal of Planning Education and Research 1994, 13:237.
5. Berke P.R., Roenigk D., Kaiser E., Burby R. Enhancing plan quality: evaluating the role of state planning mandates for natural hazard mitigation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 1996, 39(1):79-96.
6. Berke P.R., Dixon J., Ericksen N. Coercive and cooperative intergovernmental mandates: a comparative analysis of Florida and New Zealand environmental plans. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 1997, 24:451-468.
7. Berke P.R., Crawford J., Dixon J., Ericksen N. Do cooperative environmental planning mandates produce good plans? Empirical results from the New Zealand experience. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 1999, 26:643-664.
8. Berke P.R., Godschalk D.R., Kaiser E.J. Urban Land Use Planning 2006, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL. 5th ed.
9. Berke P.R., Smith G., Lyles W. Planning for resiliency: evaluation of state hazard mitigation plans under the Disaster Mitigation Act. Natural Hazards Review 2012, 13:139-150.
10. Berke P., Godschalk D.R. Searching for the good plan: a meta-analysis of plan quality studies. Journal of Planning Literature 2009, 23(3):227-240.
11. Berke P., Spurlock D., Hess G., Band L. Local comprehensive plan quality and regional ecosystem protection: the case of the Jordan Lake watershed, North Carolina, USA. Land Use Policy 2013, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.08.009.
12. Brody S.D. Are we learning to make better plans? A longitudinal analysis of plan quality associated with natural hazards. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2003, 23(2):191.
13. Brody S.D., Kang J.E., Bernhardt S. Identifying factors influencing flood mitigation at the local level in Texas and Florida: The role of organizational capacity. Natural Hazards 2010, 52:167-184.
14. Bunnell G., Jepson E.J. The effect of mandated planning on plan quality: a fresh look at what makes "a good plan". Journal of the American Planning Association 2011, 77(4):338-353.
15. Burby R.J., May P.J. Making Governments Plan 1997, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
16. Burby R.J., Beatley T., Berke P.R., Deyle R.E., French S.P., Godschalk D.R., Kaiser E.J., Kartez J.D., May P.J., Olshansky R., Paterson R.G., Platt R.H. Unleashing the power of planning to create disaster-resistant communities. Journal of the American Planning Association 1999, 65(3):247-258.
17. Burby R.J. Making plans that matter - citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association 2003, 69(1):33-49.
18. Dalton L.C., Burby R.J. Mandates, plans, and planners: building local commitment to development management. Journal of the American Planning Association 1994, 60(4):444-461.
19. Department of Homeland Security Office of the Inspector General Survey of Hazard Mitigation Planning. OIG-12-109 2012.
20. Deyle R.E., Smith R.A. Local government compliance with state planning mandates: the effects of state implementation in Florida. Journal of the American Planning Association 1998, 64(4):457-469.
21. Edwards M.M., Haines A. Evaluating smart growth: implications for small communities. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2007, 27:49-64.
22. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance Under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 2004, Blue Book, Washington, DC.
23. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance Under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 2008, Blue Book, Washington, DC.
24. Feiock R.C. Rational choice and regional governance. Journal of Urban Affairs 2007, 29(1):47-63.
25. Florida Department of Community Affairs State of Florida Hazard Mitigation Plan 2007, Florida Department of Community Affairs, Tallahassee, FL.
26. Godschalk D.R., Brower D.J., Beatley T. Catastrophic Coastal Storms: Hazard Mitigation and Development Management 1989, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
27. Godschalk D.R., Beatley T., Berke P., Brower D., Kaiser E. Natural Hazard Mitigation: Recasting Disaster Policy and Planning 1999, Island Press, Washington, DC.
28. Hopkins L.D. Urban Development: The Logic of Making Plans 2001, Island Press, Washington, DC.
29. International Federation of Red Cross Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) Better laws, safer communities? Emerging themes on how legislation can support disaster risk reduction 2013.
30. Kang J.E., Peacock W.G., Husein R. An assessment of coastal zone hazard mitigation plans in Texas. Journal of Disaster Research 2010, 5(5):520-528.
31. Kartez J.D., Faupel C.E. Comprehensive Hazard Management and the Role of Cooperation Between Local Planning Departments and Emergency Management Offices 1994, Unpublished technical report, Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center at Texas A&M, College Station, TX.
32. Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology 2004, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
33. Lyles W., Berke P., Smith G. Do planners matter? Examining factors driving incorporation of land use approaches into hazard mitigation plans. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2013, (forthcoming). 10.1080/09640568.2013.768973.
34. May P.J., Burby R.J., Ericksen N.J., Handmer J.W., Dixon J.E., Michaels S., Smith D.I. Environmental Management and Governance: Intergovernmental Approaches to Hazards and Sustainability 1996, Routledge, London/New York.
35. Mileti D.S. Disasters By Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States 1999, Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC.
36. National Research Council (NRC) Facing Hazards and Disasters: Understanding Human Dimensions 2006, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
37. NOAA (National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration) Population Trends Along the Coastal United States 1980-2008 2004, Available at: http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/programs/mb/pdfs/coastal_pop_trends_complete.pdf.
38. Nolon J. Climate change and sustainable development: the quest for green communities. Planning and Environmental Law 2009, 61(10):3-7.
39. North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety State of North Carolina Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan 2007.
40. Norton R.K. Local commitment to state-mandated planning in coastal North Carolina. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2005, 25(2):149-171.
41. Norton R.K. Using content analysis to evaluate local master plans and zoning codes. Land Use Policy 2008, 25:432-454.
42. Olonilua O.O., Ibitayo O. Toward multihazard mitigation: an evaluation of FEMA-approved hazard mitigation plans under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000. Journal of Emergency Management 2011, 9(1):37-49.
43. Public Entity Risk Institute PERI Presidential Disaster Declaration site 2012, http://www.peripresdecusa.org/mainframe.htm (accessed 25.09.12).
44. Schneider M., Scholz J., Lubell M., Mindruta D., Edwardsen M. Building consensual institutions: networks and the national estuary program. American Journal of Political Science 2003, 47(1):143-158.
45. Scholz J.T., Berardo R., Kile B. Do networks solve collective action problems? Credibility, search, and collaboration. The Journal of Politics 2008, 70(02):393-406.
46. Schwab J.C. Survey of State Land-Use and Natural Hazards Planning Laws, 2009 2009, Available at http://www.disastersafety.org/publications/view.asp?id=8021 (accessed 10.05.10).
47. Schwab J.C. Hazard Mitigation: Integrating Best Practices into Planning (PAS 560) 2010, American Planning Association PAS, Chicago, IL.
48. Smith G. Planning for sustainable and disaster resilient communities. Natural Hazards Analysis: Reducing the Impact of Disasters 2009, 221-247. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. J. Pine (Ed.).
49. Smith G. Planning for Post-Disaster Recovery: A Review of the United States Disaster Assistance Framework 2011, Island Press, Washington, DC.
50. Smith G.P., Lyles W., Berke P.R. The role of hazard mitigation planning in building local capacity and commitment: a tale of six states. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 2013, 31(2):178-203.
51. Stevens M.R., Lyles W., Berke P.R. Measuring and reporting intercoder reliability in plan quality evaluation research. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2013, (forthcoming). 10.1177/0739456X13513614.
52. Tang Z., Lindell M.K., Prater C.S., Brody S.D. Measuring Tsunami planning capacity on U.S. pacific coast. Natural Hazards Review 2008, 91-100.
53. Teubner G. Substantive and reflexive elements in modern law. Law and Society Review 1983, 17:239-289.
54. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN ISDR) Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters 2005.