Do cooperative environmental planning mandates produce good plans? Empirical results from the New Zealand experience

Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 643-664

  Berke, P R ^a   Crawford, J ^b   Dixon, J ^c   Ericksen, N ^d  

^a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^b Planning Consultants Ltd   (New Zealand)

^c MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COOPERATIVE SECTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; NATIONAL STRATEGY;

NEW ZEALAND;

EID: 0032693282     PISSN: 02658135     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/b260643     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Baer W C, 1997, "General plan evaluation criteria: an approach to making better plans" Journal of the American Planning Association 63(3) 329-344
2. Berke P, 1995, "Evaluating environmental plan quality: the case of planning for sustainable development in New Zealand" Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 37 155-169
3. Berke P, French S, 1994, "The influence of state planning mandates on local plan quality" Journal of Planning Education and Research 13 237-250
4. Talen E, 1996, "Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning" Journal of Planning Education and Research 10 248-259
5. Vitousek P, Mooney H, Lubchenco J, Melillo J, 1997, "Beyond global warming: ecology and global change" Science 222 494-499
6. Wilson R, 1982 From Manapouri to Aromoana: The Battle for New Zealand's Environment (Earthworks Press, Waiwera, Auckland)