Civil society participation in global governance: Insights from climate politics

European Journal of Political Research

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 18-36

  Böhmelt, Tobias ^a   Koubi, Vally ^a,b   Bernauer, Thomas ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Civil society; Climate change; Global governance; Social network analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891955791     PISSN: 03044130     EISSN: 14756765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12016     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Beck, N., Katz, J.N. & Tucker, R. (1998). Taking time seriously: Time-series cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science 42(4): 1260-1288.
2. Bernauer, T. & Betzold, C. (2012). Civil society in global environmental governance. Journal of Environment and Development 21(1): 62-66.
3. Bernauer, T., Böhmelt, T. & Koubi, V. (2013). Is there a democracy-civil society paradox in global environmental governance? Global Environmental Politics 13(1): 88-107.
4. Bernhagen, P. (2013).When do politicians listen to lobbyists (and who benefits when they do)? European Journal of Political Research 52(1): 20-43.
5. Bernstein, S. (2005). Legitimacy in global environmental governance. Journal of International Law and International Relations 1(1-2): 139-166.
6. Betsill, M. & Corell, E. (eds) (2008). NGO diplomacy: The influence of nongovernmental organizations in international environmental negotiations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Biermann, F. & Gupta, A. (2011). Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: A research framework. Ecological Economics 70(11): 1856-1864.
8. Bodin, Ö. & Prell,C. (2011). Social networks and natural resource management: Uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Böhmelt,T. (2013).A closer look at the information provision rationale: Civil society participation in states' delegations at the UNFCCC. Review of International Organizations 8(1): 55-80.
10. Borgatti, S.P. et al. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323(5916): 892-895.
11. Brambor, T., Clark, W.R. & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analysis. Political Analysis 14(1): 63-82.
12. Cao, X. (2009). Networks of intergovernmental organizations and convergence in domestic economic policies. International Studies Quarterly 53(4): 1095-1130.
13. Cao, X. (2010). Networks as channels of policy diffusion: Explaining worldwide changes in capital taxation, 1998-2006. International Studies Quarterly 54(3): 823-854.
14. Cao, X. & Prakash, A. (2012). Trade competition and environmental regulations: Domestic political constraints and issue visibility. Journal of Politics 74(1): 66-82.
15. Castiglione,D. (1998). Civil society. In P. Newman (ed.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
16. Clark, A.M., Friedman, E.J. & Hochstetler, K. (1998). The sovereign limits of global civil society: A comparison of NGO participation in the UN world conference on the environment, human rights and women. World Politics 51(1): 1-35.
17. Clark, J. (1995). The state, popular participation and the voluntary sector. World Development 23(4): 593-601.
18. Congleton, R.D. (1992). Political institutions and pollution control. Review of Economics and Statistics 74(3): 412-421.
19. Dellas, E. (2011). CSD water partnerships: Privatization, participation and legitimacy. Ecological Economics 70(11): 1916-1923.
20. Dombrowski, K. (2010). Filling the gap? An analysis of nongovernmental organizations' responses to participation and representation deficits in global climate governance. International Environmental Agreements 10(4): 397-416.
21. Dorussen, H. & Ward, H. (2008). Intergovernmental organizations and the Kantian peace: A network perspective. Journal of Conflict Resolution 52(2): 189-212.
22. Dryzek, J.S. (2012). Global civil society: The progress of post-Westphalian politics. Annual Review of Political Science 15(1): 1-19.
23. Dryzek, J.S.& Stevenson, H. (2011). Democracy and global earth system governance. Ecological Economics 70(11): 1865-1874.
24. Economy, E. (2004). The river runs black:The environmental challenge to China's future. Ithaca,NY:Cornell University Press.
25. Freeman, L.C., Borgatti, S.P. & White,D.R. (1991). Centrality in valued graphs:A measure of betweenness based on network flow. Social Networks 13(2): 141-154.
26. Grant, R.W. & Keohane, R.O. (2005). Accountability and abuses of power in world politics. American Political Science Review 99(1): 29-43.
27. Grossman, G.M. & Krueger, A.B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(2): 353-377.
28. Gulbrandsen, L.H. (2008). The role of science in environmental governance: Competing knowledge producers in Swedish and Norwegian forestry. Global Environmental Politics 8(2): 99-122.
29. Gulbrandsen, L.H. & Andresen, S. (2004). NGO influence in the implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: Compliance, flexibility mechanisms and sinks. Global Environmental Politics 4(4): 54-75.
30. Haas, P.M. (1999). Social constructivism and the evolution of multilateral environmental governance. In A. Prakash & J.A. Hart (eds), Globalization and governance. London: Routledge.
31. Hafner-Burton, E. & Montgomery, A. (2006). Power positions: International organizations, social networks and conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50(1): 3-27.
32. Hafner-Burton, E., Kahler, M. & Montgomery, A. (2009). Network analysis for international relations. International Organization 63(3): 559-592.
33. Hafner-Burton, E.,Von Stein, J. & Gartzke, E. (2008). International organizations count. Journal of Conflict Resolution 52(2): 175-188.
34. Howell, L.D. (2011). International country risk guide methodology. East Syracuse, NY: PRS Group.
35. Johnson, E. & Prakash, A. (2007). NGO research program:A collective action perspective. Policy Sciences 40(3): 221-240.
36. Keck, M. & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders:Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
37. Keohane, R.O. (2011). Global governance and legitimacy. Review of International Political Economy 18(1): 99-109.
38. King, G., Tomz, M. & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44(2): 347-361.
39. Kingsbury, B. (2007). Global environmental governance as administration: Implications for international law. In D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée & E. Hey (eds), Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Lipset, S.M. (1983). Political man: The social bases of politics. London: Heinemann.
41. Maoz, Z. (2010). Networks of nations: The evolution, structure and impact of international networks, 1816-2001. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Marshall, M.G. & Jaggers, K. (2002). POLITY IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800-2002. Dataset user's manual. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
43. Mason, M.R. (2008). The governance of transnational environmental harm: Addressing new modes of accountability/responsibility. Global Environmental Politics 8(3): 8-24.
44. Mendelsohn, R., Dinar, A. & Williams, L. (2006). The distributional impact of climate change on rich and poor countries. Environment and Development Economics 11(2): 159-178.
45. Nye, J. (2001). Globalization's democratic deficit:How to make international institutions more accountable. Foreign Affairs 80(4): 2-6.
46. Paterson, M. (1996). Global warming and global politics. London: Routledge.
47. Pevehouse, J.C., Nordstrom, T. & Warnke, K. (2004). The COW-2 international organizations dataset, version 2.0. Conflict Management and Peace Science 21(2): 101-119.
48. Putnam, R. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization 42(3): 427-460.
49. Raustiala, K. (1997). States, NGOs and international environmental institutions. International Studies Quarterly 41(4): 719-740.
50. Risse-Kappen, T. (1995). Bringing transnational relations back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Ruggie, R. (1986). Continuity and transformation in the world polity:Toward a neorealist synthesis. In R.O. Keohane (ed.), Neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia University Press.
52. Schouten, G. & Glasbergen P. (2011). Creating legitimacy in global private governance: The case of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil. Ecological Economics 70(11): 1891-1899.
53. Seleden, T. & Song, D. (1994). Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27(2): 147-162.
54. Sell, S.K. & Prakash, A. (2004). Using ideas strategically:The contest between business and NGO networks in intellectual property rights. International Studies Quarterly 48(1): 143-175.
55. Singer,D. (1988). Reconstructing the Correlates ofWar dataset on material capabilities of states, 1816-1985. International Interactions 14(2): 115-132.
56. Stasavage, D. (2004). Open-door or closed-door? Transparency in domestic and international bargaining. International Organization 58(4): 667-703.
57. Steffek, J. & Ferretti, M.P. (2009). Accountability or good decisions? The competing goals of civil society participation in international governance. Global Society 23(1): 37-57.
58. Steffek, J. & Nanz, P. (2007). Emerging patterns of civil society participation in global and European governance. In J. Steffek, C. Kissling & P. Nanz (eds), Civil society participation in European and global governance:A cure for the democratic deficit? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
59. Thomann, L. (2007). The ILO, tripartism and NGOs:Do too many cooks really spoil the broth? In J. Steffek, C. Kissling & P. Nanz (eds), Civil society participation in European and global governance:A cure for the democratic deficit? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
60. Torfason, M.T. & Ingram, P. (2010). The global rise of democracy:A network account. American Sociological Review 75(3): 355-377.
61. Vabulas, F. (2011). When and why do intergovernmental organizations grant formal access to NGOs? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago typescript.
62. Von Stein, J. (2008). The international law and politics of climate change. Journal of Conflict Resolution 52(2): 243-268.
63. Ward, H. (2006). International linkages and environmental sustainability: The effectiveness of the regime network. Journal of Peace Research 43(2): 149-166.
64. Ward, H. (2008). Liberal democracy and sustainability. Environmental Politics 17(3): 386-409.
65. Ward, H. & Cao, X. (2012). Domestic and international influences on green taxation. Comparative Political Studies 45(9): 1075-1103.
66. Ward, M.D., Stovel, K. & Sacks, A. (2011). Network analysis and political science. Annual Review of Political Science 14(1): 245-264.
67. Weiss, T.G. & Gordenker, L. (1996). NGOs, the UN and global governance. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.