Global civil society: The progress of post-Westphalian politics

Annual Review of Political Science

Volumn 15, Issue , 2012, Pages 101-119

  Dryzek, John S ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

global governance; nongovernmental organizations; public spheres; transnational democracy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861444049     PISSN: 10942939     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-042010-164946     Document Type: Review

References (83)

1. Amoore L, Langley P. 2004. Ambiguities of global civil society. Rev. Int. Stud. 30:89-110
2. Anderson K. 2000. The Ottawa Convention banning landmines, the role of international non-governmental organizations and the idea of international civil society. Eur. J. Int. Law 11(1):91-120
3. Anderson K, Rieff D. 2005. "Global civil society": a sceptical view. In Global Civil Society 2004/2005, ed. H Anheier, M Glasius, M Kaldor, pp. 26-39. London: Sage
4. Anheier HK. 2007. Reflections on the concept and measurement of global civil society. Voluntas 18:1-15
5. Arato A. 1993. Interpreting 1989. Soc. Res. 60:609-46
6. Bäckstrand K. 2008. Accountability of networked climate governance: the rise of transnational climate partnerships. Glob. Env. Polit. 8(3):74-102
7. Bartelson J. 2006. Making sense of global civil society. Eur. J. Int. Relat. 12(3):371-95
8. Bell S, Hindmoor A. 2009. Rethinking Governance: The Centrality of the State in Modern Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
9. Bernhard M. 1996. Civil society after the first transition: dilemmas of post-communist democratization in Poland and beyond. Communist Post-Communist Stud. 29(3):309-30
10. Bohman J. 2007. Democracy Across Borders: From Dêmos to Dêmoi. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
11. Bowden B. 2006. Civil society, the state, and the limits to global civil society. Glob. Soc. 20(2):155-78
12. Braithwaite J. 2007. Contestatory citizenship, deliberative denizenship. In Common Minds, ed. G Brennan, F Jackson, R Goodin, M Smith, pp. 161-81. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
13. Brassett J, SmithW. 2010. Deliberation and global civil society: agency, arena, affect. Rev. Int. Stud. 36:413-30
14. BrownC. 2000. Cosmopolitan world citizenship and global civil society. Crit. Rev. Int. Soc. Polit. Phil. 3(1):7-26
15. Brown LD. 2007. Civil society legitimacy and accountability: issues and challenges. Work. Pap. No. 32, Hauser Cent. Int. Dev., HarvardUniv.
16. Carr DL, Norman S. 2008. Global civil society? The Johannesburg World Summit on Sustainable Development. Geoforum 39:358-71
17. Chambers S, Kopstein J. 2001. Bad civil society. Polit. Theory 29:837-65
18. Chambers S, Kopstein J. 2006. Civil society and the state. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory, ed. JS Dryzek, B Honig, A Phillips, pp. 363-81. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
19. Chandhoke N. 2002. The limits of global civil society. In Global Civil Society 2002, ed. H Anheier, M Glasius, M Kaldor, pp. 35-53. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
20. CochranM. 2008. International public spheres, deliberation and normative power: the case of theWomen's International League for Peace and Freedom. Presented at Annu.Meet. Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc., 104th, Boston, Aug. 28-31
21. Cohen J, Arato A. 1992. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
22. Coleman WD, Wayland S. 2006. The origins of global civil society and nonterritorial governance: some empirical reflections. Glob. Governance 12:241-61
23. Comor E. 2001. The role of communication in global civil society: forces, processes, prospects. Int. Stud. Q 45:389-408
24. Coppedge M, Gerring J. 2011. Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: a new approach. Perspect. Polit. 9(2):247-67
25. Corry TO. 2006. Global civil society and its discontents. Voluntas 17(4):303-24
26. Cox RW. 2008. The point is not just to explain the world but to change it. In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, ed. C Reus-Smit, D Snidal, pp. 84-93. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
27. Dryzek JS. 2006. Deliberative Global Politics: Discourse and Democracy in a Divided World. Cambridge, UK: Polity
28. Dryzek JS, Downes D, Hunold C, Schlosberg D, Hernes H-K. 2003. Green States and Social Movements: Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
29. Dryzek JS, Niemeyer S. 2008. Discursive representation. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 102:481-93
30. Falk R. 1998. Global civil society: perspectives, initiatives, movements. Oxf. Dev. Stud. 26(1):99-110
31. Falk R, Strauss A. 2001. Toward global parliament. For. Aff. 80(1):212-20
32. Finnemore M, Sikkink K. 2001. Taking stock: the constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 4:391-416
33. Gadafy S al-I. 2008. The role of civil society in the democratisation of global governance institutions: from "soft power" to collective decision-making? Unpub. PhD thesis, London School Econ. Polit. Sci.
34. Gallie WB. 1956. Essentially contested concepts. Proc. Aristotelian Soc. 56:121-46
35. GlasiusM. 2009. What is global justice andwho decides?Civil society and victim responses to the International Criminal Court. Hum. Rights Q. 31:496-520
36. Goodhart M. 2005. Civil society and the problem of global democracy. Democratization 12(1):1-21
37. Grant RW, Keohane RO. 2005. Accountability and the abuse of power in world politics. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 99:29-44
38. Heins V. 2004. Civil society's barbarisms. Eur. J. Soc. Theory 7:499-517
39. Heins V. 2005. Global civil society as politics of faith. In Global Civil Society: Contested Futures, ed. G Baker, D Chandler, pp. 186-201. London: Routledge
40. Held D. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Nation-State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge, UK: Polity
41. Huntington SP. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order.New York: Simon&Schuster
42. Jaeger H-M. 2007. "Global civil society" and the political depoliticization of global governance. Int. Polit. Sociol. 1:257-77
43. Jänicke M. 1996. Democracy as a condition for environmental policy success: the importance of noninstitutional factors. In Democracy and the Environment: Problems and Prospects, ed. WM Lafferty, J Meadowcroft, pp. 71-85. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
44. Jordan L, van Tuijl P, eds. 2006. NGO Accountability: Politics, Principles and Innovations. London: Earthscan
45. Kaldor M. 2003. Global Civil Society: An Answer to War. Cambridge, UK: Polity
46. Kaldor M. 2007. New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. Cambridge, UK: Polity. 2nd ed.
47. Katz H. 2006. Gramsci, hegemony, and global civil society networks. Voluntas 17:333-48
48. Keck ME. 2003. Governance regimes and the politics of discursive representation. In Transnational Activism in Asia, ed. N Piper, A Uhlin, pp. 43-60. London: Routledge
49. Keck ME, Sikkink K. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
50. Keane J. 2003. Global Civil Society? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
51. Keane J. 2009. The Life andDeath of Democracy. London: Simon & Schuster
52. Khagram S, Riker JV, Sikkink K. 2002. Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks and Norms. Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
53. Lipschutz R. 1992. Reconstructing world politics: the emergence of global civil society. Millennium 21(3):389-420
54. Lipschutz R. 2005. Global civil society and global governmentality: resistance, reform, or resignation? In Global Civil Society: Contested Futures, ed. G Baker, D Chandler, pp. 171-85. London: Routledge
55. Lipschutz R, Mayer J. 1996. Global Civil Society and Global Environmental Governance: The Politics of Nature from Place to Planet. Albany: State Univ. New York Press
56. Mansbridge J. 2009. A "selection model" of political representation. J. Polit. Phil. 17(4):369-98
57. Montanero L. 2008. The democratic legitimacy of "self- authorized" representatives. Presented at Workshop on Rethinking Representation: A North-South Dialogue, Bellagio, Italy, Sep. 30-Oct. 3
58. Munck R. 2006. Globalization and Contestation: The New Great Counter-Movement. London: Routledge
59. Newell P. 2000. Climate for Change: Non-state Actors and the Global Politics of the Greenhouse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
60. Omelicheva MY. 2009. Global civil society and democratization of world politics: a bona fide relationship or illusory liaison? Int. Stud. Rev. 11:109-32
61. Payne RA. 2001. Persuasion, frames and norm construction. Eur. J. Int. Rel. 7(1):37-61
62. Pettit P. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
63. Pettit P. 2006. Two-dimensional democracy and the international domain. The Monist 89(2):301-24
64. Pitkin HF. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
65. Price R. 1998. Reversing the gun sights: transnational civil society targets land mines. Int. Org. 52(3):613-44
66. Reus-Smit C.Snidal D. 2008 Oxford Handbook of International Relations Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
67. Rhodes RAW. 1997. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity, and Accountability. Buckingham, UK: Open Univ. Press
68. Rosenau JN, Czempiel E-O. 1992. Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
69. Saward M. 2009. Authorisation and authenticity: representation and the unelected. J. Polit. Phil. 17:1-22
70. Saward M. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
71. Schlummer-Schulte S. 2001. The impact of civil society on theWorld Bank, the InternationalMonetary Fund, and the World Trade Organization: the case of the World Bank. ILSA J. Int. Comp. Law 7:399-428
72. Scholte JA. 2002. Civil society and democracy in global governance. Glob. Governance 8:281-304
73. Scholte JA. 2007. Civil society and the legitimation of global governance. J. Civil Soc. 3:305-26
74. Sending OJ, Neumannn IB. 2006. Governance to govermentality: analyzing NGOs, states, and power. Int. Stud. Q. 50:651-72
75. Smith J. 1998. Global civil society? Transnational social movements and social capital. Am. Behav. Sci. 42(1):93-107
76. Smith J, Wiest D. 2005. The uneven geography of global civil society: national and global influences on transnational association. Soc. Forces 84(2):621-52
77. StevensonH. 2011. Representing "the peoples"? Post-neoliberal states in the international climate negotiations.Work. Pap. 2011/1, Cent. Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance, Australian Natl. Univ.
78. Stiglitz J. 2002. Globalization and its Discontents. New York: W.W. Norton
79. Taylor R. 2002. Interpreting global civil society. Voluntas 13(4):339-47
80. von Frantzius I. 2004. World Summit on Sustainable Development Johannesburg 2002: a critical assessment of the outcomes. Environ. Polit. 13:467-73
81. Wapner P. 2002. Introductory essay: paradise lost? NGOs and global accountability. Chicago J. Int. Law 3(1):155-60
82. Weinstein MM, Charnovitz S. 2001. The greening of the WTO. For. Aff. 80(6):147-56
83. Willetts P. 2006. TheCardoso report on theUNand civil society: functionalism, global corporatism, or global democracy? Glob. Governance 12:305-24