A linguistic approach to assess the dynamics of design team preference in concept selection

Research in Engineering Design

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 75-92

  Dong, Andy ^a   Sarkar, Somwrita ^b   Yang, Maria C ^c   Honda, Tomonori ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision based design; Ranking alternatives; Social choice

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS; MARKOV PROCESSES;

CONCEPT SELECTION; DECISION BASED DESIGN; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; LINGUISTIC APPROACH; LINGUISTIC MODELING; RANKING ALTERNATIVES; SOCIAL CHOICE; TIME-VARYING CHANGES;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84891851983     PISSN: 09349839     EISSN: 14356066     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00163-013-0165-1     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Dong A (2009) The language of design: theory and computation. Springer, London
2. Dong A, Kleinsmann M, Valkenburg R (2009) Affect-in-cognition through the language of appraisals. Des Stud 30(2):138-153
3. Dym CL, Wood WH, Scott MJ (2002) Rank ordering engineering designs: pairwise comparison charts and Borda counts. Res Eng Design 13(4):236-242 (Pubitemid 35458412)
4. Frey D, Herder P, Wijnia Y, Subrahmanian E, Katsikopoulos K, Clausing D (2009) The pugh controlled convergence method: model-based evaluation and implications for design theory. Res Eng Design 20(1):41-58
5. Frishammar J, Floren H, Wincent J (2011) Beyond managing uncertainty: Insights from studying equivocality in the fuzzy front end of product and process innovation projects. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 58(3):551-563
6. Garbuio M, Lovallo D (2011) The under-appreciated role of quality conversations in strategic decision-making. In: 71st annual meeting of the academy of management AoM 2011. Academy of Management
7. Gigone D, Hastie R (1997) The impact of information on small group choice. J Pers Soc Psychol 72(1):132-140
8. Hayes AF, Krippendorff K (2007) Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Commun Methods Meas 1(1):77-89
9. Ji H, Yang M, Honda T (2012) An approach to the extraction of preference-related information from design team language. Res Eng Design 23(2):85-103
10. Kahneman D, Lovallo D, Sibony O (2011) Before you make that big decision. Harv Bus Rev 89(6):50-60
11. Kim J, Wilemon D (2002) Focusing the fuzzy frontend in new product development. R&D Manag 32(4):269-279
12. Le Dantec CA, Do EYL (2009) The mechanisms of value transfer in design meetings. Design Stud 30(2):119-137
13. Martin JR, White PRR (2005) The language of evaluation: appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan, New York
14. Paolacci G, Chandler J, Ipeirotis PG (2010) Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. Judgm Decis Mak 5(5):411-419
15. Pugh S (1991) Total design: integrated methods for successful product engineering. Addison-Wesley, Reading
16. Reich Y (2010) My method is better! Res Eng Design 21(3):137-142
17. Scott MJ, Antonsson EK (1998) Aggregation functions for engineering design trade-offs. Fuzzy Sets Syst 99(3):253-264 (Pubitemid 128654971)
18. Sorokin A, Forsyth D (2008) Utility data annotation with amazon mechanical turk. In: IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, 2008. CVPRW'08, pp 1-8. doi: 10.1109/CVPRW.2008. 4562953
19. Subasic P, Huettner A (2001) Affect analysis of text using fuzzy semantic typing. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 9(4):483-496 (Pubitemid 32933037)
20. Thurston DL (1991) A formal method for subjective design evaluation with multiple attributes. Res Eng Design 3:105-122
21. Thurston DL (2001) Real and misconceived limitations to decision based design with utility analysis. J Mech Design 123(2):176-182 (Pubitemid 33716196)
22. Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2004) Product design and development, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York
23. Wasiak J, Hicks BJ, Newnes L, Dong A (2010) Understanding engineering email: the development of a taxonomy for identifying and classifying engineering work. Res Eng Design 21(1):43-64
24. Wasiak J, Hicks BJ, Newnes L, Loftus C, Dong A, Burrow L (2011) Managing by e-mail: what e-mail can do for engineering project management. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 58(3):445-456
25. Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
26. Whitelaw C, Garg N, Argamon S (2005) Using appraisal groups for sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management, CIKM'05, pp. 625-631. ACM, New York, NY, USA. doi: 10.1145/1099554.1099714 (Pubitemid 44022238)