Mechanical properties of cancer cytoskeleton depend on actin filaments to microtubules content: Investigating different grades of colon cancer cell lines

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 373-379

  Pachenari, M ^a   Seyedpour, S M ^a   Janmaleki, M ^b   Shayan, S Babazadeh ^c   Taranejoo, S ^b   Hosseinkhani, H ^d  

^a IRAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^d NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Cancer cell mechanics; Finite element analysis; Micropipette aspiration; Rate of deformability

Indexed keywords

ACTIN MICROFILAMENTS; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; CANCER CELLS; CANCER PROGRESSION; FLUORESCENCE INTENSITIES; MICROPIPETTE ASPIRATION; VISCO-ELASTIC PARAMETERS; WESTERN-BLOT ANALYSIS;

BIOMECHANICS; CELL CULTURE; DISEASES; ELASTIC MODULI; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; PROTEINS;

CELLS;

ALBENDAZOLE;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION; BIOMECHANICS; CANCER CELL CULTURE; CANCER GRADING; COLON CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS; MICROPIPETTE ASPIRATION; MICROTUBULE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PHASE TRANSITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VALIDATION PROCESS; VISCOELASTICITY; WESTERN BLOTTING; YOUNG MODULUS;

CANCER CELL MECHANICS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MICROPIPETTE ASPIRATION; RATE OF DEFORMABILITY;

ACTIN CYTOSKELETON; ACTINS; ALBENDAZOLE; BLOTTING, WESTERN; CELL MOVEMENT; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; CYTOSKELETON; ELASTIC MODULUS; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HT29 CELLS; HUMANS; MICROTUBULES; VISCOSITY;

EID: 84891836092     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: 18732380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.11.020     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abdolahad M., Sanaee Z., Janmaleki M., Mohajerzadeh S., Abdollahi M., Mehran M. Vertically aligned multiwall-carbon nanotubes to preferentially entrap highly metastatic cancerous cells. Carbon 2012, 50:2010-2017.
2. Badley R.A., Woods A., Carruthers L., Rees D.A. Cytoskeleton changes in fibroblast adhesion and detachment. J. Cell Sci. 1980, 43:379-390.
3. Bao G., Suresh S. Cell and molecular mechanics of biological materials. Nat. Mater. 2003, 2:715-725.
4. Brangwynne C.P., MacKintosh F.C., Kumar S., Geisse N.A., Talbot J., Mahadevan L., Parker K.K., Ingber D.E., Weitz D.A. Microtubules can bear enhanced compressive loads in living cells because of lateral reinforcement. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 173:733-741.
5. Brooks D.E. The biorheology of tumor cells. Biorheology 1983, 21:85-91.
6. Chu S.W., Badar S., Morris D.L., Pourgholami M.H. Potent inhibition of tubulin polymerisation and proliferation of paclitaxel-resistant 1A9PTX22 human ovarian cancer cells by albendazole. Anticancer Res. 2009, 29:3791-3796.
7. Coughlin M.F., Bielenberg D.R., Lenormand G., Marinkovic M., Waghorne C.G., Zetter B.R., Fredberg J.J. Cytoskeletal stiffness, friction, and fluidity of cancer cell lines with different metastatic potential. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2013, 30:237-250.
8. Creekmore A.L., Silkworth W.T., Cimini D., Jensen R.V., Roberts P.C., Schmelz E.M. Changes in gene expression and cellular architecture in an ovarian cancer progression model. PloS One 2011, 6:e17676.
9. Cross S.E., Jin Y.-S., Tondre J., Wong R., Rao J., Gimzewski J.K. AFM-based analysis of human met.astatic cancer cells. Nanotechnology 2008, 19:384003.
10. Darling E.M., Zauscher S., Block J.A., Guilak F. A thin-layer model for viscoelastic, stress-relaxation testing of cells using atomic force microscopy: do cell properties reflect metastatic potentialα. Biophys. J. 2007, 92:1784-1791.
11. Evans E., Yeung A. Apparent viscosity and cortical tension of blood granulocytes determined by micropipet aspiration. Biophys. J. 1989, 56:151-160.
12. Gavet O., Pines J. Progressive activation of CyclinB1-Cdk1 coordinates entry to mitosis. Dev. Cell 2010, 18:533-543.
13. Gilden J., Krummel M.F. Control of cortical rigidity by the cytoskeleton: emerging roles for septins. Cytoskeleton 2010, 67:477-486.
14. Guck J., Schinkinger S., Lincoln B., Wottawah F., Ebert S., Romeyke M., Lenz D., Erickson H.M., Ananthakrishnan R., Mitchell D. Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence. Biophys. J. 2005, 88:3689-3698.
15. Guilak F., Tedrow J.R., Burgkart R. Viscoelastic properties of the cell nucleus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000, 269:781-786.
16. Hochmuth R.M. Micropipette aspiration of living cells. J. Biomech. 2000, 33:15-22.
17. Hur S.C., Henderson-MacLennan N.K., McCabe E.R., Di Carlo D. Deformability-based cell classification and enrichment using inertial microfluidics. Lab on a Chip 2011, 11:912-920.
18. Janmey P.A., Euteneuer U., Traub P., Schliwa M. Viscoelastic properties of vimentin compared with other filamentous biopolymer networks. J. Cell Biol. 1991, 113:155-160.
19. Kemmner W. Currently used markers for CTC isolation-advantages, limitations and impact on cancer prognosis. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2011, 1:102.
20. Ketene A.N., Schmelz E.M., Roberts P.C., Agah M. The effects of cancer progression on the viscoelasticity of ovarian cell cytoskeleton structures. Nanomed.: Nanotechnol., Biol. Med. 2012, 8:93-102.
21. Korb T., Schlüter K., Enns A., Spiegel H.-U., Senninger N., Nicolson G.L., Haier J. Integrity of actin fibers and microtubules influences metastatic tumor cell adhesion. Exp. Cell Res. 2004, 299:236-247.
22. Kumar S., Weaver V.M. Mechanics, malignancy, and metastasis: the force journey of a tumor cell. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2009, 28:113-127.
23. Lekka M., Pogoda K., Gostek J., Klymenko O., Prauzner-Bechcicki S., Wiltowska-Zuber J., Jaczewska J., Lekki J., Stachura Z. Cancer cell recognition - mechanical phenotype. Micron 2012, 43:1259-1266.
24. Lim C., Zhou E., Quek S. Mechanical models for living cells - a review. J. Biomech. 2006, 39:195-216.
25. Lindberg U., Karlsson R., Lassing I., Schutt C.E., Höglund A.-S. The microfilament system and malignancy. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2008, 18:2-11.
26. Mahmood T., Yang P.-C. Western blot: technique, theory, and trouble shooting. N. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2012, 4:429.
27. Mikolajczyk S.D., Millar L.S., Tsinberg P., Coutts S.M., Zomorrodi M., Pham T., Bischoff F.Z., Pircher T.J. Detection of EpCAM-negative and cytokeratin-negative circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood. J. Oncol. 2011, Article ID 252361, 10 pp.
28. Ochalek T., Nordt F.J., Tullberg K., Burger M.M. Correlation between cell deformability and metastatic potential in B16-F1 melanoma cell variants. Cancer Res. 1988, 48:5124-5128.
29. Pokorný J., Vedruccio C., Cifra M., Kučera O. Cancer physics: diagnostics based on damped cellular elastoelectrical vibrations in microtubules. Eur. Biophys. J. 2011, 40:747-759.
30. Rebelo L., de Sousa J., Mendes Filho J., Radmacher M. Comparison of the viscoelastic properties of cells from different kidney cancer phenotypes measured with atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology 2013, 24:055102.
31. Sato H., Suzuki M. Deformability and viability of tumor cells by transcapillary passage, with reference to organ affinity of metastasis in cancer. Fundam. Asp. Metastasis 1976, 311-317. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
32. Sato M., Ohshima N., Nerem R. Viscoelastic properties of cultured porcine aortic endothelial cells exposed to shear stress, Journal of biomechanics. J. Biomech. 1996, 29:461-467.
33. Sun Z., Aubry M.-C., Deschamps C., Marks R.S., Okuno S.H., Williams B.A., Sugimura H., Pankratz V.S., Yang P. Histologic grade is an independent prognostic factor for survival in non-small cell lung cancer: an analysis of 5018 hospital-and 712 population-based cases. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2006, 131:1014-1020.
34. Suresh S. Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. Acta Mater. 2007, 55:3989-4014.
35. Talmadge J.E., Fidler I.J. AACR centennial series: the biology of cancer metastasis: historical perspective. Cancer Res. 2010, 70:5649-5669.
36. Tan S., Pan W., Ma G., Cai N., Leong K., Liao K. Viscoelastic behaviour of human mesenchymal stem cells. BMC Cell Biol. 2008, 9:40.
37. Taniguchi S.i. Suppression of cancer phenotypes through a multifunctional actin-binding protein, calponin, that attacks cancer cells and simultaneously protects the host from invasion. Cancer Sci. 2005, 96:738-746.
38. Theret D.P., Levesque M., Sato M., Nerem R., Wheeler L. The application of a homogeneous half-space model in the analysis of endothelial cell micropipette measurements. J. Biomech. Eng. 1988, 110:190-199.
39. Tong L., Zhao Y., Huff T.B., Hansen M.N., Wei A., Cheng J.X. Gold nanorods mediate tumor cell death by compromising membrane integrity. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19:3136-3141.
40. Trickey W.R., Lee G.M., Guilak F. Viscoelastic properties of chondrocytes from normal and osteoarthritic human cartilage. J. Orthop. Res. 2000, 18:891-898.
41. Watanabe T., Noritake J., Kaibuchi K. Regulation of microtubules in cell migration. Trends Cell Biol. 2005, 15:76-83.
42. Weiss L., Dimitrov D.S. A fluid mechanical analysis of the velocity, adhesion, and destruction of cancer cells in capillaries during metastasis. Cell Biophys. 1984, 6:9-22.
43. Yamazaki D., Kurisu S., Takenawa T. Regulation of cancer cell motility through actin reorganization. Cancer Sci. 2005, 96:379-386.
44. Yang C., Hoelzle M., Disanza A., Scita G., Svitkina T. Coordination of membrane and actin cytoskeleton dynamics during filopodia protrusion. PloS One 2009, 4:e5678.
45. Zhao Y., Fang W.-S., Pors K. Microtubule stabilising agents for cancer chemotherapy. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2009, 19:607-622.