Suppressed images selectively affect the dominant percept during binocular rivalry

Journal of Vision

Volumn 11, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1-11

  Stuit, Sjoerd M ^a   Paffen, Chris L E ^a   van der Smagt, Maarten J ^a   Verstraten, Frans A J ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Binocular vision; Detection discrimination; Masking

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891700234     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/11.10.1     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Alais, D., & Blake, R. (Eds.) (2005). Binocular rivalry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Alais, D., & Parker, A. (2006). Independent binocular rivalry processes for motion and form. Neuron, 52, 911-920.
3. Albright, T. D. (1984). Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology, 52, 1106-1130.
4. Andrews, T. J., & Blakemore, C. (2002). Integration of motion information during binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 42, 301-309.
5. Baker, D. H., & Graf, E. W. (2009). On the relation between dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 49, 451-459.
6. Blake, R. (1989). A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review, 96, 145-167.
7. Blake, R., & Camisa, J. (1979). The inhibitory nature of binocular rivalry suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5, 315-323.
8. Blake, R., & Fox, R. (1974). Binocular rivalry suppression: Insensitive to spatial frequency and orientation change. Vision Research, 14, 687-692.
9. Blake, R., & He, S. (2005). Visual adaptation as a tool for studying the neural correlates of conscious visual awareness. In C. Clifford & G. Rhodes (Eds.), Fitting the mind to the world (pp. 281-307). New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
10. Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 3, 13-21.
11. Blake, R., Westendorf, D. H., & Overton, R. (1980). What is suppressed during binocular rivalry? Perception, 9, 223-231.
12. Blake, R., & Wilson, H. (2011). Binocular vision. Vision Research, 51, 754-770.
13. Braddick, O. J., O'Brien, J. M. D., Wattam-Bell, J., Atkinson, J., Hartley, T., & Turner, R. (2001). Brain areas sensitive to coherent visual motion. Perception, 30, 61-72.
14. Braddick, O. J., O'Brien, J. M. D., Wattam-Bell, J., Atkinson, J., & Turner, R. (2000). Form and motion coherence activate independent, but not dorsal/ventral segregated, networks in the human brain. Current Biology, 10, 731-734.
15. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
16. Carlson, T. A., & He, S. (2000). Visible binocular beats from invisible monocular stimuli during binocular rivalry. Current Biology, 10, 1055-1058.
17. Cass, J. R., & Spehar, B. (2005). Dynamics of cross- and iso-surround facilitation suggests distinct mechanisms. Vision Research, 45, 3060-3073.
18. De Valois, R. L., Yund, E. W., & Hepler, N. (1982). The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Research, 22, 531-544.
19. Edwards, M., Badcock, D. R., & Nishida, S. (1996). Contrast sensitivity of the motion system. Vision Research, 36, 2411-2421.
20. Fox, R., & Check, R. (1966). Forced-choice form recognition during binocular rivalry. Psychonomic Science, 6, 471-472.
21. Fox, R., & Check, R. (1968). Detection of motion during binocular rivalry suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 388-395.
22. Freeman, A. W. (2005). Multistage model for binocular rivalry. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 4412-4420.
23. Freeman, A. W., Nguyen, V. A., & Alais, D. (2005). The nature and depth of binocular suppression. In D. Alais & R. Blake (Eds.), Binocular rivalry (pp. 47-62). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Georgeson, M. A., & Georgeson, J. M. (1987). Facilitation and masking of briefly presented gratings: Timecourse and contrast dependence. Vision Research, 27, 369-379.
25. Gilbert, C. D., & Wiesel, T. N. (1990). The influence of contextual stimuli on the orientation selectivity of cells in the primary visual cortex of the cat. Vision Research, 30, 1689-1701.
26. Gilroy, L. A., & Blake, R. (2004). Physics embedded in visual perception of three-dimensional shape from motion. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 921-922.
27. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular integration and functional architecture in the cat's striate cortex. Journal of Physiology, 160, 106-154.
28. Knapen, T., Kanai, R., Brascamp, J., van Boxtel, J., & van Ee, R. (2007). Distance in feature space determines exclusivity in visual rivalry. Vision Research, 47, 3269-3275.
29. Lee, S. (2004). Binocular battles on multiple fronts. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 148-151.
30. Ling, S., Pearson, J., & Blake, R. (2009). Dissociation of neural mechanisms underlying orientation processing in humans. Current Biology, 19, 1458-1462.
31. Müller, R., & Greenlee, M. (1994). Effect of contrast and adaptation on the perception of the direction and speed of drifting gratings. Vision Research, 34, 2071-2092.
32. Nguyen, V. A., Freeman, A. W., & Alais, D. (2003). Increasing depth of binocular rivalry suppression along two visual pathways. Vision Research, 43, 2003-2008.
33. Nguyen, V. A., Freeman, A. W., & Wenderoth, P. (2001). The depth and selectivity of suppression in binocular rivalry. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 348-360.
34. Ooi, T. L., & Loop, M. S. (1994). Visual suppression and its effect upon color and luminance sensitivity. Vision Research, 34, 2997-3003.
35. O'Shea, R. P., & Crassini, B. (1981). The sensitivity of binocular rivalry suppression to changes in orientation assessed by reaction-time and forced-choice techniques. Perception, 10, 283-293.
36. Paffen, C. L. E., Alais, D., & Verstraten, F. A. J. (2005). Center-surround inhibition deepens binocular rivalry suppression. Vision Research, 45, 2642-2649.
37. Paffen, C. L. E., Naber, M., & Verstraten, F. A. J. (2008). The spatial origin of a perceptual transition in binocular rivalry. PloS One, 3, e2311.
38. Pearson, J., & Clifford, C. W. (2005). Suppressed patterns alter vision during binocular rivalry. Current Biology, 15, 2142-2148.
39. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
40. Rodman, H. R., Gross, C. G., & Albright, T. D. (1989). Afferent basis of visual response properties in area MT of the macaque: I. Effects of striate cortex removal. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 2033-2050.
41. Schiller, P. H., Finlay, B. L., & Volman, S. F. (1976). Short-term response variability of monkey striate neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 39, 1288-1319.
42. Silver, M., & Logothetis, N. K. (2007). Temporal frequency and contrast tagging bias the type of competition in interocular switch rivalry. Vision Research, 47, 532-543.
43. Snowden, R. J. (1994). Motion processing in the primate cerebral cortex. In A. T. Smith & R. J. Snowden (Eds.), Visual detection of motion (pp. 51-83). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
44. Snowden, R. J., & Hammett, S. T. (1998). The effects of surround contrast on contrast thresholds, perceived contrast and contrast discrimination. Vision Research, 38, 1935-1945.
45. Snowden, R. J., Treue, S., Erickson, R. G., & Anderson, R. A. (1991). Extension of displacement limits in multiple-exposure sequences of apparent motion. Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 2768-2785.
46. Stuit, S. M., Cass, J., Paffen, C. L. E., & Alais, D. (2009). Orientation-tuned suppression in binocular rivalry reveals general and specific components of rivalry suppression. Journal of Vision, 9(11):17, 1-15, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/11/17, doi:10.1167/9.11.17.
47. Stuit, S. M., Verstraten, F. A. J., & Paffen, C. L. E. (2010). Saliency in a suppressed image affects the spatial origin of perceptual alternations during binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 50, 1913-1921.
48. Treisman, A. (1962). Binocular rivalry and stereoscopic depth perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 23-37.
49. Tsuchiya, N., Koch, C., Gilroy, L. A., & Blake, R. (2006). Depth of interocular suppression associated with continuous flash suppression, flash suppression, and binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision, 6(10):6, 1068-1078, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/6/10/6, doi:10.1167/6.10.6.
50. van de Grind, W. A., van Hof, P., van der Smagt, M. J., & Verstraten, F. A. J. (2001). Slow and fast visual motion channels have independent binocular-rivalry stages. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, 437-443.
51. Vergeer, M., & Van Lier, R. (2010). Feature-based activation and suppression during binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 50, 743-749.
52. Wales, R., & Fox, R. (1970). Increment detection thresholds during binocular rivalry suppression. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 90-94.
53. Watson, A. B., & Pelli, D. G. (1983). QUEST: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 113-120.
54. Westendorf, D. H. (1989). Binocular rivalry and dichoptic masking: Suppressed stimuli do not mask stimuli in a dominating eye. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 485-492.
55. Wheatstone, C. (1838). On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 37, l-394.