Orientation-tuned suppression in binocular rivalry reveals general and specic components of rivalry suppression

Journal of Vision

Volumn 9, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1-15

  Stuit, Sjoerd M ^a   Cass, John ^b   Paffen, Chris L E ^a   Alais, David ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Binocular rivalry; Orientation; Spatial frequency; Suppression; Vision

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449732372     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/9.11.1     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Alais, D., & Melcher, D. (2007). Strength and coherence of binocular rivalry depends on shared stimulus complexity. Vision Research, 47, 269-279.
2. Alais, D., O'Shea, R. P., Mesana-Alais, C., &Wilson, I. G. (2000). On binocular alternation. Perception, 29, 1437-1445.
3. Alais, D., & Parker, A. (2006). Independent binocular rivalry processes for motion and form. Neuron, 52, 911-920.
4. Andrews, T. J., & Blakemore, C. (2002). Integration of motion information during binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 42, 301-309.
5. Apthorp, D., Wenderoth, P., & Alais, D. (2009). Motion streaks in fast motion rivalry cause orientation- selective suppression. Journal of Vision, 9(5):10, 1-14, http://journalofvision.org/9/5/10/, doi:10.1167/9.5.10.
6. Bhardwaj, R., O'Shea, R. P., Alais, D., & Parker, A. (2008). Probing visual consciousness: Rivalry between eyes and images. Journal of Vision, 8(11):2, 1-13, http://journalofvision.org/8/11/2/, doi:10.1167/ 8.11.2.
7. Blake, R. (1989). A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review, 96, 145-167.
8. Blake, R. (2001). A primer on binocular rivalry, including current controversies. Brain and Mind, 2, 5-38.
9. Blake, R., & Camisa, J. (1977). Temporal aspects of spatial vision in the cat. Experimental Brain Research, 28, 325-333.
10. Blake, R., & Fox, R. (1974). Binocular rivalry suppression: Insensitive to spatial frequency and orientation change. Vision Research, 14, 687-692.
11. Blake, R., & Holopigian, K. (1985). Orientation selectivity in cats and humans assessed by masking. Vision Research, 25, 1459-1467.
12. Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 3, 13-21.
13. Blake, R., Westendorf, D. H., & Overton, R. (1980). What is suppressed during binocular rivalry? Perception, 9, 223-231.
14. Blakemore, C., & Campbell, F. W. (1969). On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. The Journal of Physiology, 203, 237-260.
15. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
16. Breese, B. B. (1909). Binocular Rivalry. Psychological Review, 16, 410-415.
17. Carlson, T. A., & He, S. (2000). Visible binocular beats from invisible monocular stimuli during binocular rivalry. Current Biology, 10, 1055-1058.
18. Desimone, R., Albrecht, T. D., Gross, C. G., & Bruce, C. (1984). Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque. Journal of Neuro- science, 4, 2051-2062.
19. Desimone, R., Schein, S. J., Moran, J., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1985). Contour, color and shape analysis beyond the striate cortex. Vision Research, 25, 441-452.
20. De Valois, R. L., Albrecht, D. G., & Thorell, L. G. (1982). Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in the macaque visual cortex. Vision Research, 22, 545-559.
21. De Valois, R. L., Yund, E. W., & Hepler, N. (1982). The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Research, 22, 531-544.
22. Fox, R., & Check, R. (1966). Forced-choice form recognition during binocular rivalry. Psychonomic Science, 6, 471-472.
23. Fox, R., & Check, R. (1968). Detection of motion during binocular rivalry suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 388-395.
24. Fox, R., & Check, R. (1972). Independence between binocular rivalry suppression duration and magnitude of suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 283-289.
25. Freeman, A. W. (2005). Multistage model for binocular rivalry. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 4412-4420.
26. Govenlock, S. W., Taylor, C. P., Sekuler, A. B., & Bennett, P. J. (2009). The effect of aging on the orientational selectivity of the human visual system. Vision Research, 49, 164-172.
27. Jones, H. E., Grieve, K. L., Wang, W., & Sillito, A. M. (2001). Surround suppression in primate V1. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86, 2011-2028.
28. Julesz, B., & Miller, J. E. (1975). Independent spatial frequency tuned channels in binocular fusion and rivalry. Perception, 4, 125-143.
29. Lee, S. (2004). Binocular battles on multiple fronts. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 148-151.
30. Lee, S. H., & Blake, R. (1999). Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 39, 1447-1454.
31. Logothetis, N. K., Leopold, D. A., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?. Nature, 380, 621-624.
32. Moutoussis, K., Keliris, G. A., Kourtzi, Z., & Logothetis, N. K. (2005). A binocular rivalry study of motion perception in the human brain. Vision Research, 45, 2231-2243.
33. Nguyen, V. A., Freeman, A. W., & Alais, D. (2003). Increasing depth of binocular rivalry suppression along two visual pathways. Vision Research, 43, 2003-2008.
34. Nguyen, V. A., Freeman, A. W., & Wenderoth, P. (2001). The depth and selectivity of suppression in binocular rivalry. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 348-360.
35. O'Shea, R. P., & Crassini, B. (1981). The sensitivity of binocular rivalry suppression to changes in orientation assessed by reaction-time and forced-choice techniques. Perception, 10, 283-293.
36. Ooi, T. L., & Loop, M. S. (1994). Visual suppression and its effect upon color and luminance sensitivity. Vision Research, 34, 2997-3003.
37. Paffen, C. L. E., Alais, D., & Verstraten, F. A. J. (2005). Center-surround inhibition deepens binocular rivalry suppression. Vision Research, 45, 2642-2649.
38. Paffen, C. L. E., Tadin, D., Te Pas, S. F., Blake, R., & Verstraten, F. A. J. (2006). Adaptive center-surround interactions in human vision revealed during binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 46, 599-604.
39. Pearson, J., & Clifford, C. W. (2005). Suppressed patterns alter vision during binocular rivalry. Current Biology, 15, 2142-2148.
40. Pearson, J., Tadin, D., & Blake, R. (2007). The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual rivalry. Journal of Vision, 7(7):2, 1-11, http://journalofvision.org/7/7/2/, doi:10.1167/7.7.2.
41. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
42. Polonsky, A., Blake, R., Braun, J., & Heeger, D. J. (2000). Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1153-1159.
43. Silver, M., & Logothetis, N. K. (2007). Temporal frequency and contrast tagging bias the type of competition in interocular switch rivalry. Vision Research, 47, 532-543.
44. Smith, E. L., Levi, D. M., Harwerth, R. S., & White, J. M. (1982). Color vision is altered during the suppression phase of binocular rivalry. Science, 218, 802-804.
45. Tong, F., & Engel, S. A. (2001). Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature, 411, 195-199.
46. Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Vaughan, J. T., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron, 21, 753-759.
47. Treisman, A. M. (1962). Binocular rivalry and stereoscopic depth perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 23-37.
48. Wales, R., & Fox, R. (1970). Increment detection thresholds during binocular rivalry suppression. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 90-94.
49. Walker, J. T. (1978). Interface device for encoding a digital image for a CRT display. United States Patent, 4, 121, 283.
50. Watson, A. B., & Pelli, D. G. (1983). QUEST: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 113-120.
51. Wheatstone, C. (1838). On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 37, l-394.
52. Wilson, H. R. (2003). Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 14499-14503.
53. Wilson, H. R., & Gelb, D. J. (1984). Modied line element theory for spatial frequency and width discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science 1, 124-131.