The spatial origin of a perceptual transition in binocular rivalry

PLoS ONE

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2008, Pages

  Paffen, Chris L E ^a   Naber, Marnix ^a   Verstraten, Frans A J ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; EYE DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; VELOCITY; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; PHOTOSTIMULATION; VISION;

HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 48649095362     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002311     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Crick F, Koch C (1998) Consciousness and neuroscience. Cereb Cortex 8: 97-107.
2. Paffen CLE, Tadin D, te Pas SF, Blake R, Verstraten FAJ (2006) Adaptive center-surround interactions in human vision revealed during binocular rivalry. Vision Res 46: 599-604.
3. Blake R, Logothetis NK (2002) Visual competition. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 13-21.
4. Chong SC, Tadin D, Blake R (2005) Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. J Vis 5: 1004-1012.
5. Meng M, Tong F (2001) Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. J Vis 4: 539-551.
6. Van Ee R, van Dam LCJ, Brouwer GJ (2005) Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bistability. Vision Res 45: 41-55.
7. Blake R (1989) A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychol Rev 96: 145-167.
8. Blake R, O'Shea RP, Mueller TJ (1992) Spatial zones of binocular rivalry in central and peripheral vision. Vis Neurosci 8: 469-478.
9. O'Shea RP, Sims AJH, Govan DG (1997) The effect of spatial frequency and field size on the spread of exclusive visibility in binocular rivalry. Vision Res 27: 175-183.
10. Hollins M (1980) The effect of contrast on the completeness or binocular rivalry suppression. Percept Psychophys 27: 550-556.
11. Hollins M, Hudnell K (1980) Adaptation of the binocular rivalry mechanism, Invest Ophthalmol and Vis Sci 19: 1117-1120.
12. Alais D, Melcher D (2007) Strength and coherence of binocular rivalry depends on shared stimulus complexity. Vision Res 47: 269-279.
13. Wilson HR, Blake R, Lee SH (2001) Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception. Nature 412: 907-910.
14. Lee SH, Blake R, Heeger DJ (2005) Traveling waves of activity in primary visual cortex during binocular rivalry. Nat Neurosci 8: 22-23.
15. Lee SH, Blake R, Heeger DJ (2007) Hierarchy of cortical responses underlying binocular rivalry. Nat Neurosci 10: 1048-1054.
16. Wolfe JM (1984) Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash. Vision Res 21: 471-478.
17. Roelofs CO, Zeeman W (1919) Über den Wettstreit der Konturen. Albert von Graefes Arch Ophthalmol 99: 79-104.
18. Levelt WJ (1966) The alternation process in binocular rivalry. Br Journal Psychol 57: 225-238.
19. Brascamp JW, van Ee R, Noest AJ, Jacobs RH, van den Berg AV (2006) The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise. J Vis 6: 1244-1256.
20. Fahle M (1982) Binocular rivalry: suppression depends on orientation and spatial frequency. Vision Res 22: 787-800.
21. Arnold DH, Grove PM, Wallis TS (2007) Staying focused: a functional account of perceptual suppression during binocular rivalry. J Vis 7: 1-8.
22. Blake R, Zimba L, Williams D (1985) Visual motion, binocular correspondence and binocular rivalry. Biol cybern 52: 391-397.
23. Wade NJ, De Weert CM, Swanston MT (1984) Binocular rivalry with moving patterns. Percept Psychophys 35: 111-122.
24. Levelt WJ (1965) On binocular rivalry. Soesterberg, The Netherlands: Institute for perception. RVO-TNO.
25. Laing CR, Chow CC (2002) A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry. J Comput Neurosci 12: 39-53.
26. Noest AJ, van Ee R, Nijs MM, van Wezel RJA (2007) Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: A low-level neural model. J Vis 7: 1-14.
27. Wilson HR, Blake R, Lee SH (2001) Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception. Nature 412: 907-910.
28. Wilson HR (2003) Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 14499-14503.
29. Campbell FW, Robson JG (1968) Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. J Physiol 197: 551-566.
30. Verstraten FAJ, Fredericksen RE, Van de Grind WA (1994) Movement aftereffect of bi-vectorial transparent motion. Vision Res 31: 349-358.
31. Li Z (2002) A saliency map in primary visual cortex. Trends Cognitive Sci 6: 9-16.
32. Li Z (1999) Visual segmentation by contextual influences via intracortical interactions in primary visual cortex. Network 10: 187-212.
33. Li Z (1999) Contextual influences in V1 as a basis for pop out and asymmetry in visual search. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 10530-10535.
34. Blake R (1989) A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychol Rev 96: 145-167.
35. Tong F, Engel SA (2001) Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature 411: 195-199.
36. Kleinschmidt A, Büchel C, Zeki S, Frackowiak RSJ (1998) Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265: 2427-2433.
37. Lumer ED, Friston KJ, Rees R (1998) Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science 280: 1930-1934.
38. Tong F, Nakayama K, Vaughan JT, Kanwisher N (1998) Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron 21: 753-759.
39. Bonneh Y, Sagi D (1999) Configuration saliency revealed in short duration binocular rivalry. Vision Res 39: 271-281.
40. Koch C, Ullman S (1985) Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. Hum Neurobiol 4: 219-227.
41. Itti L, Koch C (2001) Computational modelling of visual attention. Nat Rev Neurosci 2: 194-203.