The impact of attentional, linguistic, and visual features during object naming

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 4, Issue DEC, 2013, Pages

  Clarke, Alasdair D F ^a   Coco, Moreno I ^a,b   Keller, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Eye movements; Naming; Object perception; Overt attention; Scene perception; Visual saliency

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891689422     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00927     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Almeida, J., Knobel, M., Finkbeiner, M., and Caramazza, A. (2007). The locus of the frequency effect in picture naming: when recognizing is not enough. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14, 1177-1182. doi: 10.3758/BF03193109.
2. Asher, M. F., Tolhurst, D. J., Troscianko, T., and Gilchrist, I. D. (2013). Regional effects of clutter on human target detection performance. J. Vis. 13, 1-15. doi: 10.1167/13.5.25.
3. Baayen, R., Davidson, D., and Bates, D. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J. Mem. Lang. 59, 390-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.
4. Baayen, R., Piepenbrock, R., and Gulikers, L. (1996). Celex2 Computer Software Manual. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
5. Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., and Tily, H. J. (2013). Random-effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. J. Mem. Lang. 68, 255-278. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
6. Borji, A., Sihite, D. N., and Itti, L. (2012). "Salient object detection: a benchmark," in ECCV, Vol. 2, eds F. Andrew, L. Svetlana, P. Pietro, S. Yoichi, and S. Cordelia (Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer), 414-429.
7. Burnard, L. (1995). Users Guide for the British National Corpus. Oxford, UK: British National Corpus Consortium, Oxford University Computing Service.
8. Choi, M. J., Lim, J. J., Torralba, A., and Willsky, A. S. (2010). "Exploiting hierarchical context on a large database of object categories," in IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), (San Francisco, CA).
9. Damian, M., Vigliocco, G., and Levelt, W. (2001). Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words. Cognition 81, B77-B86. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00135-4.
10. Einhäuser, W., Rutishauser, U., and Koch, C. (2008a). Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli. J. Vis. 8, 1-19. doi: 10.1167/8.2.2.
11. Einhäuser, W., Spain, M., and Perona, P. (2008b). Objects predict fixations better than early saliency. J. Vis. 8, 18.1-18.26. doi: 10.1167/8.14.18.
12. Elazary, L., and Itti, L. (2008). Interesting objects are visually salient. J. Vis. 8, 1-15. doi: 10.1167/8.3.3.
13. Gordon, R. T. (2004). Attentional allocation during the perception of scenes. J. Exp. Psychol. 30, 760-777. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.760.
14. Griffin, Z., and Bock, K. (1998). Constraint, word frequency, and the relationship between lexical processing levels in spoken word production. J. Mem. Lang. 38, 313-338. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2547.
15. Griffin, Z., and Bock, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychol. Sci. 11, 274-279. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00255.
16. Henderson, J., Chanceaux, M., and Smith, T. J. (2009). The influence of clutter on real-world scene search: evidence from search efficiency and eye movements. J. Vis. 9, 1-8. doi: 10.1167/9.1.32.
17. Hocking, J., McMahon, K., and Zubicaray, G. d. (2009). Semantic context and visual feature effects in object naming: an fMRI study using arterial spin labeling. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21, 1571-1583. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21114.
18. Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., and Van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye Tracking: A Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures. Chapter 8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Hwang, A. D., Wang, H.-C., and Pomplun, M. (2011). Semantic guidance of eye movements in real-world scenes. Vision Res. 51, 1192-1205. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.03.010.
20. Irwin, D. E., and Zelinsky, G. J. (2002). Eye movements and scene perception: memory for things observed. Percept. Psychophys. 64, 882-895. doi: 10.3758/BF03196793.
21. Itti, L., Koch, C., and Niebur, E. (1998). A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20, 1254-1259. doi: 10.1109/34.730558.
22. Landauer, T., Foltz, P., and Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Dis. Process. 25, 259-284. doi: 10.1080/01638539809545028.
23. Leek, E. C., Cristino, F., Conlan, L. I., Patterson, C., Rodriguez, E., and Johnston, S. J. (2012). Eye movement patterns during the recognition of three-dimensional objects: preferential fixation of concave surface curvature minima. J. Vis. 12:7. doi: 10.1167/12.1.7.
24. Masciocchi, C. M. M., Mihalas, S., Parkhurst, D., and Niebur, E. (2009). Everyone knows what is interesting: salient locations which should be fixated. J. Vis. 9, 25.1-25.22. doi: 10.1167/9.11.25.
25. Meyer, S. A., Sleiderink, A., and Levelt, W. (1998). Viewing and naming objects: eye movements during noun phrase production. Cognition 66, B25-B33. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00009-2.
26. Miller, G. A. (1995). Wordnet: a lexical database for english. Commun. ACM 38, 39-41. doi: 10.1145/219717.219748.
27. Nuthmann, A., and Henderson, J. M. (2010). Object-based attentional selection in scene viewing. J. Vis. 10, 1-19. doi: 10.1167/10.8.20.
28. Rosenholtz, R., Li, Y., and Nakano, L. (2007). Measuring visual clutter. J. Vis. 7, 1-21. doi: 10.1167/7.2.17.
29. Spain, M., and Perona, P. (2008). "Some objects are more equal than others: measuring and predicting importance," in Computer Vision-ECCV 2008, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5302, eds D. Forsyth, P. Torr, and A. Zisserman (Marseille; Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer), 523-536.
30. Spain, M., and Perona, P. (2010). Measuring and predicting object importance. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 91, 59-76. doi: 10.1007/s11263-010-0376-0.
31. Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Eberhard, K., and Sedivy, J. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268, 632-634. doi: 10.1126/science.7777863.
32. Tatler, B. W. (2007). The central fixation bias in scene viewing: selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions. J. Vis. 7, 1-17. doi: 10.1167/7.14.4.
33. Toet, A. (2011). Computational versus psychophysical bottom-up image saliency: a comparative evaluation study. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 33, 2131-2146. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2011.53.
34. Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M., and Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of attention in natural scenes: the role of global features on object search. Psychol. Rev. 113, 766-786. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.766.
35. Walther, D., and Koch, C. (2006). Modeling attention to salient proto-objects. Neural Netw. 19, 1395-1407. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.10.001.
36. Wang, H.-C., Hwang, A. D., and Pomplun, M. (2010). Object frequency and predictability effects on eye fixation durations in real-world scene viewing. J. Eye Mov. Res. 3, 1-10. Available online at: http://www.jemr.org/online/3/3/3.
37. Zelinsky, G., and Murphy, G. (2000). Synchronizing visual and language processing. Psychol. Sci. 11, 125-131. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00227.
38. Zelinsky, G. J., and Loschky, L. C. (2005). Eye movements serialize memory for objects in scenes. Percept. Psychophys. 67, 676-690. doi: 10.3758/BF03193524.