Interventions for supporting pregnant women's decision-making about mode of birth after a caesarean

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2013, Issue 7, 2013, Pages

  Horey, Dell ^a   Kealy, Michelle ^a   Davey, Mary Ann ^a   Small, Rhonda ^a   Crowther, Caroline A ^b  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INFORMATION SEEKING; PARENT; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPEAT CESAREAN SECTION; REVIEW; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN; WORKLOAD; CESAREAN SECTION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DELIVERY; FEMALE; META ANALYSIS; PREGNANCY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

CESAREAN SECTION, REPEAT; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 84891680842     PISSN: 14651858     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010041.pub2     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Emmett C, Montgomery A, Murphy D on behalf of the DiAMOND study group. Preferences for mode of delivery after previous caesarean section: what do women want, what do they get and how do they value outcomes?. Health Expectations 2010;14:397-404.
2. Emmett C, Murphy DJ, Patel RR, Fahey T, Jones C, Ricketts IW, et al.on behalf of the DiAMOND study group. Decision-making about mode of delivery after previous caesarean section: development and piloting of two computer-based decision aids. Health Expectations 2007;10:161-72.
3. Emmett C, Shaw A, Montgomery A, Murphy D on behalf of the DiAMOND study group. Women's experience of decision making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: the role of health professionals and information about health risks. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2006;113:1438-45.
4. Frost J, Shaw A, Montgomery A, Murphy DJ. Women's views on the use of decision aids for decision making about the method of delivery following a previous caesarean section: qualitative interview study. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2009; Vol. 116, issue 7:896-905.
5. Hollinghurst S, Emmett C, Peters TJ, Watson H, Fahey T, Murphy DJ, et al.Economic evaluation of the DiAMOND randomized trial: cost and outcomes of 2 decision aids for mode of delivery among women with a previous cesarean section. Medical Decision Making 2010;30:453-63.
6. Montgomery AA, DiAMOND SG. The DiAMOND trial protocol: a randomised controlled trial of two decision aids for mode of delivery among women with a previous caesarean section [ISRCTN84367722]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2004;4:25.
7. Montgomery AA, Emmett CL, Fahey T, Jones C, Ricketts I, Patel RR, et al.Two decision aids for mode of delivery among women with previous caesarean section: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2007;334(7607):1305.
8. Rees K, Shaw A, Bennert K, Emmett C, Montgomery A. Healthcare professionals' views on two computer-based decision aids for women choosing mode of delivery after previous caesarean section: a qualitative study. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2009;116:906-14.
9. Fraser W. Women's mid-pregnancy motivation to attempt VBAC predicts delivery method. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 1994;46:32.
10. Fraser W, Maunsell E, Hodnett E, Moutquin JM. Randomized controlled trial of a prenatal vaginal birth after cesarean section education and support program Childbirth Alternatives Post-Cesarean Study Group. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997;176(2):419-25.
11. Shorten A, Chamberlain M, Shorten B, Kariminia A. Making choices for childbirth: development and testing of a decision-aid for women who have experienced previous caesarean. Patient Education and Counseling 2004;52(3):307-13.
12. Shorten A, Shorten B, Keogh J, West S, Morris J. Making choices for childbirth: a randomized controlled trial of a decision-aid for informed birth after cesarean. Birth 2005;32(4):252-61.
13. Eden KB, Dolan JG, Perrin NA, Kocaoglu D, Anderson N, Case J, et al.Patients were more consistent in randomized trial at prioritizing childbirth preferences using graphic-numeric than verbal formats. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2009;62(4):415-24.
14. Flamm BL, Geiger AM. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: an admission scoring system. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1997;90:907-10.
15. Greene PG, Zeichner A, Roberts NL, Callahan EJ, Granados JL. Preparation for cesarean delivery: a multicomponent analysis of treatment outcome. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 1989;57:484-7.
16. Begley C. Improving the organisation of maternal health service delivery, and optimising childbirth, by increasing vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) through enhanced women-centred care OptiBIRTH. http://isrctn.org/ISRCTN10612254 (accessed 22 July 2013).
17. Wise M. The effect of an antenatal decision aid booklet on rate of vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) in women with previous caesarean section. http://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12611000878976.aspx (accessed June 2012) 2011.
18. Afolabi BB, Lesi AFE, Merah NA. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub2]
19. Alderdice F, McKenna D, Dornan J. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003577]
20. Bekker H, Thornton J, Airey M, Connelly JB, Hewison J, Robinson MB, et al.Informed decision-making: an annotated bibliography and systematic review. Health Technology Assessment 1999;3(1):1-156.
21. Bekker HL. The loss of reason in patient decision aid research: Do checklists damage the quality of informed choice interventions?. Patient Education and Counseling 2010;78(3):357-64.
22. Catling-Paull C, Johnston R, Ryan C, Fourer MJ, Homer CSE. Non-clinical interventions that increase the uptake and success of vaginal birth after caesarean section: a systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2011;67(8):1662-76.
23. Chewning B, Bylund CL, Shah B, Arora NK, Gueguen JA, Makoul G. Patient preferences for shared decisions: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling 2012;86:9-18.
24. Crowther CA, Dodd JM, Hiller JE, Haslam RR, Robinson JS, BAC Study Group. Planned vaginal birth or elective repeat Caesarean: patient preference restricted cohort with nested randomised trial. PLoS Medicine 2012;9(3):e1001192.
25. Dodd J, Crowther C. Vaginal birth after caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean for women with a single prior caesarean birth: a systematic review of the literature. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2004;44:387-91.
26. Dugas M, Shorten A, Dubé E, Wassef M, Bujold E, Chaillet N. Decision aid tools to support women's decision making in pregnancy and birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Science & Medicine 2012;74:1968-78.
27. Durand MA, Stiel M, Boivin J, Elwyn G. Where is the theory? Evaluating the theoretical frameworks described in decision support technologies. Patient Education and Counseling 2008;71(1):125-35.
28. Eden KB, Denman MA, Emeis CL, McDonagh MS, Fu R, Janik RK, et al.Trial of Labor and Vaginal Delivery Rates in Women with a Prior Cesarean. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing 2012;41:583-98.
29. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Rollnick S. Dual equipoise shared decision making: definitions for decision and behaviour support interventions. Implementation Science 2009;4:75.
30. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Volandes A, Edwards A, Montori V. Investing in deliberation: a definition and classification of decision support interventions for people facing difficult health decisions. Medical Decision Making 2010;30:701-11.
31. Elwyn G, Stiel M, Durand MA, Boivin J. The design of patient decision support interventions: addressing the theory-practice gap. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2011;17(4):565-74.
32. Emmett C, Murphy DJ, Patel RR, Fahey T, Jones C, Ricketts IW, et al.Decision-making about mode of delivery after previous caesarean section: development and piloting of two computer-based decision aids. Health Expectations 2007;10:161-72.
33. Emmett C, Montgomery A, Murphy D on behalf of the DiAMOND study group. Preferences for mode of delivery after previous caesarean section: what do women want, what do they get and how do they value outcomes?. Health Expectations 2010;14:397-404.
34. Foureur M, Ryan CL, Nicholl M, Homer C. Inconsistent evidence: analysis of six national guidelines for vaginal birth after cesarean section. Birth 2010;37(1):3-10.
35. Frost J, Shaw A, Montgomery A, Murphy DJ. Women's views on the use of decision aids for decision making about the method of delivery following a previous caesarean section: qualitative interview study. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2009;116(7):896-905.
36. Grobman WA. Rates and prediction of successful vaginal birth after cesarean. Seminars in Perinatology 2010;34:244-8.
37. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
38. Horey D, Weaver J, Russell H. Information for pregnant women about caesarean birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003858.pub2]
39. Kaimal AJ, Kuppermann M. Understanding risk, patient and provider preferences, and obstetrical decision making: approach to delivery after cesarean. Seminars in Perinatology 2010;34:331-6.
40. Khunpradit S, Tavender E, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Wasiak J, Gruen RL. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 6. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub2]
41. Laopaiboon M, Lumbiganon P, Martis R, Vatanasapt P, Somjaivong B. Music during caesarean section under regional anaesthesia for improving maternal and infant outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006914.pub2]
42. Laws P, Li Z, Sullivan EA. Australia's mothers and babies 2008. Perinatal statistics series no. 24. Cat. no. PER 50. Canberra: AIHW, 2010.
43. Lundgren I, Begley C, Gross MM, Bondas T. 'Groping through the fog': a metasynthesis of women's experiences on VBAC (Vaginal birth after Caesarean section). BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2012;12:85.
44. Lydon-Rochelle MT, Cahill AG, Spong CY. Birth after previous cesarean delivery: short-term maternal outcomes. Seminars in Perinatology 2010;34(4):249-57.
45. MacDorman M, Declercq E. Recent trends and patterns in cesarean and vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States. Clinics in Perinatology 2011;38(2):179-92.
46. McClain CS. The making of a medical tradition: vaginal birth after caesarean. Social Science and Medicine 1990;31(2):203-10.
47. McCourt C, Weaver J, Statham H, Beake S, Gamble J, Creedy DK. Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature. Birth 2007;34(1):65-79.
48. Menacker F, Hamilton BE. Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. NCHS Data Brief. no 35. Hyattsville MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2010.
49. Mizunoya F, Nakata M, Kondo T, Yamashita S, Inoue S. Management of vaginal birth after cesarean. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2002;28(5):240-4.
50. Morley, GW. Once a cesarean, always a cesarean?. JAMA 1961;178(12):1128-31.
51. Murray E, Pollack L, White M, Lo B. Clinical decision-making: Patients' preferences and experiences. Patient Education and Counseling 2007;65:189-96.
52. Ng KW, Parsons J, Cyna AM, Middleton P. Spinal versus epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003765.pub2]
53. O'Shea TM, Kiebanoff MA, Signore C. Delivery after previous cesarean: long-term outcomes in the child. Seminars in Perinatology 2010;34(4):281-92.
54. Patel RM, Jain L. Delivery after previous cesarean: short-term perinatal outcomes. Seminars in Perinatology 2010;34(4):272-80.
55. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth after previous caesarean birth. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists February 2007; Vol. Green-top Guideline No. 45.
56. Rees K, Shaw A, Bennert K, Emmett C, Montgomery A. Healthcare professionals' views on two computer-based decision aids for women choosing mode of delivery after previous caesarean section: a qualitative study. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2009;116:906-14.
57. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
58. Rossi AC, D'Addario V. Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2008;199:224-31.
59. Saisto T, Salmela-Aro K, Nurmi JE, Könönen T, Halmesmäki E. A randomized controlled trial of intervention in fear of childbirth. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2001;98(5 Pt 1):820-6.
60. Say R, Robson S, Thomson R. Helping pregnant women make better decisions: a systematic review of the benefits of patient decision aids in obstetrics. BMJ Open 2011;1:e000261.
61. Shorten A, Shorten B, Keogh J, West S, Morris J. Making choices for childbirth: A randomized controlled trial of a decision-aid for informed birth after cesarean. Birth 2005;32(4):252-61.
62. Silver RM. Delivery after previous cesarean: long-term maternal outcomes. Seminars in Perinatology 2010;34(4):258-66.
63. Smaill FM, Gyte GML. Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007482.pub2]
64. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-RovnerM, et al.Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 10. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3]
65. Vlemmix F, Warendorf J, Rosman A, Kok M, Mol B, Morris J, et al.Decision aids to improve informed decision-making in pregnancy care: a systematic review. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2013;120:257-66.
66. Horey D, Davey MA, Small R, Kealy M, Crowther CA. Interventions for supporting women with decisions about mode of birth in a pregnancy after caesarean birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 8. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010041]