Patients were more consistent in randomized trial at prioritizing childbirth preferences using graphic-numeric than verbal formats

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Eden, Karen B ^a   Dolan, James G ^b,c   Perrin, Nancy A ^a   Kocaoglu, Dundar ^d   Anderson, Nicholas ^e   Case, James ^a   Guise, Jeanne Marie ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNITY HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d Portland State University   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Decision aid; Decision support techniques; Patient preferences; Pregnancy; Vaginal birth after cesarean

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CHILDBIRTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PERINATAL PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY;

EID: 60549115780     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. In: Institute of Medicine (Ed). Envisioning the national health care quality report (2000), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
2. In: Institute of Medicine (Ed). Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century (2001), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
3. Martin J.A., Hamilton B.E., Sutton P.D., Ventura S.J., Menacker F., and Kirmeyer S. Births: final data for 2004. Natl Vital Stat Rep 55 1 (2006)
4. Guise J.-M., Berlin M., McDonagh M., Osteweil P., Nygren P., and Helfand M. Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean: a systematic review. Obstet Gynec 103 3 (2004) 420-429
5. Guise J.-M., McDonagh M., Hashima J., Kraemer D., Eden K.B., Berlin M., et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC). Evidence report/technology assessment no. 71 (2003), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD
6. Guise J.-M., McDonagh M., Osteweil P., Nygren P., Chan B., and Helfand M. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous cesarean section. Br Med J 329 7456 (2004) 19-25
7. Mankuta D.D., Leshno M.M., Menasche M.M., and Brezis M.M. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: trial of labor or repeat cesarean section? A decision analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189 (2003) 714-719
8. Eden K.B., Hashima J.N., Osterweil P., Nygren P., and Guise J.M. Childbirth preferences after cesarean birth: a review of the evidence. Birth 31 (2004) 50-62
9. Fraser W., Maunsell E., Hodnett E., and Moutquin J.M. Randomized controlled trial of a prenatal vaginal birth after cesarean section education and support program. Childbirth alternatives post-cesarean study group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176 2 (1997) 419-425
10. Kirk E.P., Doyle K.A., Leigh J., and Garrard M.L. Vaginal birth after cesarean or repeat cesarean section: medical risks or social realities?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162 6 (1990) 1398-1403 discussion 1403-5
11. Kline C.R., Martin D.P., and Deyo R.A. Health consequences of pregnancy and childbirth as perceived by women and clinicians. Obstet & Gynecol 92 5 (1998) 842-848
12. Martin J.N., Harris B.A., Huddleston J.F., Morrison J.C., Propst M.G., Wiser W.L., et al. Vaginal delivery following previous cesarean birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 146 3 (1983) 255-263
13. McClain C.S. The making of a medical tradition: vaginal birth after cesarean. Social Sci Med 31 2 (1990) 203-210
14. Meier P.R., and Porreco R.P. Trial of labor following cesarean section: a two-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 144 6 (1982) 671-678
15. Melnikow J., Romano P., Gilbert W.M., Schembri M., Keyzer J., and Kravitz R.L. Vaginal birth after cesarean in California. Obstet Gynecol 98 3 (2001) 421-426
16. Fawcett J., Tulman L., and Spedden J. Responses to vaginal birth after cesarean section. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 23 3 (1994) 253-259
17. Gamble J.A., and Creedy D.K. Women's preference for a cesarean section: incidence and associated factors. Birth 28 2 (2001) 101-110
18. Lau T.K., Wong S.H., and Li C.Y. A study of patient's acceptance towards vaginal birth after cesarean section. Austr NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 36 2 (1996) 155-158
19. Murphy M.C., and Harvey S.M. Choice of a childbirth method after cesarean. Women Health 15 2 (1989) 67-85
20. Gamble J.A., and Creedy D.K. Women's request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature. Birth 27 4 (2000) 256-263
21. Shorten A., Shorten B., Keogh J., West S., and Morris J. Making choices for childbirth: a randomized controlled trial of a decision-aid for informed birth after cesarean. Birth 32 4 (2005) 252-261
22. Murphy D., and Liebling R. Cohort study of maternal views on future mode of delivery after operative delivery in the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188 (2003) 542-548
23. Montgomery A., Emmett C., Fahey T., Jones C., Ricketts I., Patel R., et al. Two decision aids for mode of delivery among women with previous caesarean section: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J June 23 (2007) 334
24. O'Connor A.M., Stacey D., Entwistle V., Llewellyn-Thomas H., Rovner D., Holmes-Rovner M., et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions (cochrane review) vol. 4 (2003), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK
25. O'Connor A.M., Bennett C., Stacey D., Barry M.J., Col N.F., Eden K.B., et al. Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the international patient decision aid standards collaboration? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Decis Making 27 5 (2007) 554-574
26. Lamers L., Stalmeier P., Krabbe P., and Busschbach J. Inconsistencies in TTO and VAS values for EQ-5D health states. Med Decis Making 26 Mar-Apr (2006) 173-181
27. Badia X., Roset M., and Herdman M. Inconsistent responses in three preference-elicitation methods for health states. Social Sci Med (1999) 943-950
28. Kocaoglu D. A participative approach to program evaluation. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 30 3 (1983)
29. Forman E., and Gass S. The analytic hierarchy process: an exposition. Oper Res 49 4 (2005) 469-486
30. O'Connor A.M. Decisional conflict scale, © 1993. 4th edition (1999), Loeb Health Research Institute, Ottawa
31. Cleland D.I., and Kocaoglu D. Engineering management (1981), McGraw-Hill
32. Dolan J.G., and Frisina S. Randomized controlled trial of a patient decision aid for colorectal cancer screening. Med Decis Making 22 (2002) 125-139
33. Huizingh E., and Vrolijk H. A comparison of verbal and numerical judgments in the analytic hierarchy process. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 70 3 (1997) 237-247
34. Saaty R.W. The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used?. Math Model 9 3-5 (1987) 161-176
35. O'Connor A.M. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making 15 (1995) 25-30
36. O'Connor A.M. Decision conflict scale, © 1993 (updated 2006) (2006), Ottawa Health Research Institute (University of Ottawa)
37. Drake E., Engler-Todd L., O'Connor A.M., Surh L.C., and Hunter A. Development and evaluation of a decision aid for prenatal testing for women of advanced maternal age. J Genet Couns 8 4 (1999) 217-233
38. Comeau C. Evaluation of a decision aid for family members considering long term care options for their relative with dementia (2001), University of Ottawa, Ottawa
39. Sun Q. Predicting downstream effects of high decisional conflict: meta-analysis of the decisional conflict scale (2004), University of Ottawa, Ottawa
40. Gattellari M., and Ward J. Men's reactions to disclosed and undisclosed opportunistic PSA screening for prostate cancer. Med J Aust 182 8 (2005) 386-389
41. Bruin de Bruin W., Fischbeck P., Stiber N., and Fischhoff B. What number is "Fifty-Fifty"?: Redistributing excessive 50% responses in elicited probabilities. Risk Anal 22 4 (2002) 713-723
42. Dolan P., and Kind P. Inconsistency and health state valuations. Social Sci Med 42 2 (1996) 609-615
43. Howe M., Brainard C., and Reyna V. Development of long-term retention (1992), Springer-Verlag, New York
44. Reyna V. How people make decisions that involve risk: a dual-processes approach. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 13 2 (2004) 60-66
45. Markovits H., and Dumas C. Developmental patterns in understanding social and physical transitivity. J Exp Child Psychol 73 (1999) 95-114
46. Salkeld G., Solomon M., Butow P., and Short L. Discrete-choice experiment to measure patient preferences for the surgical management of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 92 (2005) 742-747
47. Cairns J., van der Pol M., and Lloyd A. Decision making heuristics and the elicitation of preferences: being fast and frugal about the future. Health Econ 11 (2002) 655-658
48. Brandstatter E., Girgerenzer G., and Hartwig R. The priority heuristic: making choices without trade-offs. Psychol Rev 113 2 (2006) 409-432