Developing a predictive model of quality of experience for internet video

Computer Communication Review

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 339-350

  Balachandran, Athula ^a   Sekar, Vyas ^b   Akella, Aditya ^c   Seshan, Srinivasan ^a   Stoica, Ion ^d   Zhang, Hui ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

human factors; measurement; peformance; video quality

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX RELATIONSHIPS; DATA-DRIVEN APPROACH; PEAK SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; PEFORMANCE; PREDICTIVE MODELING; QUALITY OF EXPERIENCE (QOE); SYSTEMATIC FRAMEWORK; VIDEO QUALITY;

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; INTERNET; MEASUREMENTS; NETWORK ARCHITECTURE;

QUALITY OF SERVICE;

EID: 84891596166     PISSN: 01464833     EISSN: 19435819     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2534169.2486025     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Buyer's Guide: Content Delivery Networks. http://goo.gl/B6gMK.
2. Cisco study. http://goo.gl/tMRwM.
3. Driving Engagement for Online Video. http://goo.gl/pO5Cj.
4. Microsoft Smooth Streaming. http://goo.gl/6JOXh.
5. P.800 : Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality. http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-P.800-199608-I/en.
6. P.910 : Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications. http://goo.gl/QjFhZ.
7. Peak signal to noise ratio. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak-signal-to- noise-ratio.
8. SPEC philosophy. http://www.spec.org/spec/#philosophy.
9. Turbobytes: How it works. http://www.turbobytes.com/products/optimizer/.
10. Video quality metrics. http://goo.gl/Ga9Xz.
11. Vqeg. http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/vqeg/vqeg-home.aspx.
12. S. Akhshabi, L. Anantakrishnan, C. Dovrolis, and A. C. Begen. What Happens when HTTP Adaptive Streaming Players Compete for Bandwidth? In Proc. NOSSDAV, 2012.
13. S. Akhshabi, A. Begen, and C. Dovrolis. An Experimental Evaluation of Rate Adaptation Algorithms in Adaptive Streaming over HTTP. In MMSys, 2011.
14. R. H. Allen and R. D. Sriram. The Role of Standards in Innovation. Elsevier: Technology Forecasting and Social Change, 2000.
15. A. Balachandran, V. Sekar, A. Akella, S. Seshan, I. Stoica, and H. Zhang. A quest for an internet video quality-of-experience metric. In Hotnets, 2012.
16. K. Chen, C. Huang, P. Huang, and C. Lei. Quantifying skype user satisfaction. In SIGCOMM, 2006.
17. S. Chikkerur, V. Sundaram, M. Reisslein, and L. J. Karam. Objective video quality assessment methods: A classification, review, and performance comparison. In IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 2011.
18. N. Cranley, P. Perry, and L. Murphy. User perception of adapting video quality. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2006.
19. H. Deng, G. Runger, and E. Tuv. Bias of importance measures for multi-valued attributes and solutions. In ICANN, 2011.
20. F. Dobrian, V. Sekar, A. Awan, I. Stoica, D. A. Joseph, A. Ganjam, J. Zhan, and H. Zhang. Understanding the impact of video quality on user engagement. In Proc. SIGCOMM, 2011.
21. J. Esteban, S. Benno, A. Beck, Y. Guo, V. Hilt, and I. Rimac. Interactions Between HTTP Adaptive Streaming and TCP. In Proc. NOSSDAV, 2012.
22. A. Finamore, M. Mellia, M. Munafo, R. Torres, and S. G. Rao. Youtube everywhere: Impact of device and infrastructure synergies on user experience. In Proc. IMC, 2011.
23. A. Halevy, P. Norvig, and F. Pereira. The unreasonable effectiveness of data. InIEEE Intelligent Systems, 2009.
24. L. Huang, J. Jia, B. Yu, B. G. Chun, P. Maniatis, and M. Naik. Predicting Execution Time of Computer Programs Using Sparse Polynomial Regression. In Proc. NIPS, 2010.
25. A. Khan, L. Sun, and E. Ifeachor. Qoe prediction model and its applications in video quality adaptation over umts networks. In IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2012.
26. S. S. Krishnan and R. K. Sitaraman. Video stream quality impacts viewer behavior: inferring causality using quasi-experimental designs. In IMC, 2012.
27. B. Liu, M. Hu, and W. Hsu. Intuitive Representation of Decision Trees Using General Rules and Exceptions. In Proc. AAAI, 2000.
28. X. Liu, F. Dobrian, H. Milner, J. Jiang, V. Sekar, I. Stoica, and H. Zhang. A case for a coordinated internet video control plane. In SIGCOMM, 2012.
29. A. Mahimkar, Z. Ge, A. Shaikh, J. Wang, J. Yates, Y. Zhang, and Q. Zhao. Towards Automated Performance Diagnosis in a Large IPTV Network. In Proc. SIGCOMM, 2009.
30. V. Menkvoski, A. Oredope, A. Liotta, and A. C. Sanchez. Optimized online learning for qoe prediction. In BNAIC, 2009.
31. T. Mitchell. Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill.
32. R. K. P. Mok, E. W. W. Chan, X. Luo, and R. K. C. Chang. Inferring the QoE of HTTP Video Streaming from User-Viewing Activities . In SIGCOMM W-MUST, 2011.
33. L. Plissonneau and E. Biersack. A Longitudinal View of HTTP Video Streaming Performance. In MMSys, 2012.
34. I. Sodagar. The MPEG-DASH Standard for Multimedia Streaming Over the Internet. IEEE Multimedia, 2011.
35. H. H. Song, Z. Ge, A. Mahimkar, J. Wang, J. Yates, Y. Zhang, A. Basso, and M. Chen. Q-score: Proactive Service Quality Assessment in a Large IPTV System. In Proc. IMC, 2011.
36. M. Watson. Http adaptive streaming in practice. In MMSys - Keynote, 2011.
37. I. H. Witten and E. Frank. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, 2000.
38. C. Wu, B. Li, and S. Zhao. Diagnosing Network-wide P2P Live Streaming Inefficiencies. In Proc. INFOCOM, 2009.
39. W. Xu, L. Huang, A. Fox, D. Patterson, and M. Jordan. Detecting large-scale system problems by mining console logs. In Proc. SOSP, 2009.
40. H. Yin et al. Inside the Bird's Nest: Measurements of Large-Scale Live VoD from the 2008 Olympics.
41. H. Yu, D. Z. B. Y. Zhao, and W. Zheng. Understanding User Behavior in Large-Scale Video-on-Demand Systems. In Proc. Eurosys, 2006.