User perception of adapting video quality

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 64, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 637-647

  Cranley, Nicola ^a   Perry, Philip ^a   Murphy, Liam ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Evaluation methodology; Perception; Subjective and objective quality; Video quality

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; DECISION MAKING; IMAGE CODING; OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS; VIDEO SIGNAL PROCESSING;

ADAPTATION; EVALUATION/METHODOLOGY; SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE QUALITY; VIDEO QUALITY;

IMAGE QUALITY;

EID: 33646399779     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: 10959300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alpert, T., Evain, J.P., 1997. European Broadcasting Union Technical Review, 1997. Subjective quality evaluation-The SSCQE and DSCQE methodologies. http://www.ebu.ch/trev_271-evain.pdf.
2. Bouch, A., Wilson, G., Sasse, M.A., 2001. A 3-dimensional approach to assessing end-user quality of service. In: Proceedings of the London Communications Symposium, September 10-11, 2001, pp. 47-50.
3. Conklin G., Greenbaum G., et al. Video coding for streaming media delivery on the Internet. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 11 3 (2001) 2001
4. Cranley, N., Murphy, L., Perry, P., 2003. User-perceived quality aware adaptive delivery of MPEG-4 content. In: Proceedings of the NOSSDAV'03, Monterey, CA, June, 2003.
5. Cranley N., Murphy L., and Perry P. Perceptual Quality Adaptation (PQA) Algorithm for 3 gp and Multi-tracked MPEG-4 Content over Wireless IP Networks (2004), PIMRC, Barcelona, Spain
6. Cranley, N., Murphy, L., Perry, P., 2004b. Content-based adaptation for streamed multimedia. In: MMNS 2004, San Diego, CA, October, 2004.
7. de Ridder H., and Hamberg R. Continuous assessment of image quality. SMPTE Journal (1997) 123-128
8. Efford N. Digital Image Processing Using Java (2000), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. 0201596237
9. Feamster, N., Bansal, D., Balakrishnan, H., 2001. On the interactions between layered quality adaptation and congestion control for streamed video. In: Proceedings of Packet Video 2001.
10. Ghinea, G., Thomas, J.P., Fish, R.S., 1999. Multimedia, network protocols and users-bridging the gap. In: Proceedings of ACM Multimedia '99. Orlando, FL, 1999, pp. 473-476.
11. Institute for Telecommunication Sciences, 2002. Technical Report. ITU-T and Related US Standards Development. http://its.bldrdoc.gov/tpr/2002/itu_related_standards.pdf.
12. ITU-R Recommendation BT.500-7, 1990. Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures.
13. ITU-T Recommendation J.143, 2000. User requirements for objective perceptual video quality measurements in digital cable television.
14. ITU-T Recommendation J.144, 2001. Objective perceptual video quality measurement techniques for digital cable television in the presence of a full reference.
15. ITU-T Recommendation J.148, 2003. Requirements for an objective perceptual multimedia quality model.
16. ITU-T Recommendation J.149, 2004, Method for specifying accuracy and cross-calibration of video quality metrics (VQM).
17. ITU-T Recommendation P.910, 1999. Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications.
18. Kim, J.G., Wang, Y., Chang, S.F., 2003. Content-adaptive utility-based video adaptation. In: IEEE ICME 2003, Balitmore, July 2003.
19. Krasic, C., Walpole, J., Feng, W.-C., 2003. Quality adaptive media streaming by priority drop. In: Proceedings of the NOSSDAV'03, Monterey, CA, 1-4 June 2003.
20. Levine M.W. Fundamentals of Sensation and Perception. third ed. (2000), Oxford University Press, Oxford
21. Masry, M., Hemami, S.S., 2002. Models for the perceived quality of low bit rate video. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Rochester, NY, September 2002.
22. Pereira F., and Ebrahimi T. The MPEG-4 Book (2002), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 0130616214
23. Pinson, M., Wolf, S., 2003. Comparing subjective video quality testing methodologies.In: SPIE Video Communications and Image Processing Conference, Lugano, Switzerland, July 2003.
24. Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., Jacobson, V., 1996. RTP: a transport protocol for real-time applications. In: RFC 1889, January 1996.
25. Turletti T., and Huitema C. Videoconferencing on the Internet. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 4 3 (1996) 340-351
26. van den Branden Lambrecht, C.J., Verscheure, O., 1996. Perceptual quality measure using a spatio-temporal model of the human visual system. In: Proceedings of the SPIE 96, San Jose, CA.
27. Venkitaraman, N., Kim, T., Lee, K.-W., Lu, S., Bharghavan, V., 1999. Design and evaluation of congestion control algorithms in the future Internet. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMETRICS'99, Atlanta, GA, May 1999.
28. Verscheure, O., Frossard, P., Hamdi, M., 1998. MPEG-2 video services over packet networks: joint effect of encoding rate and data loss on user-oriented QoS. In: Proceedings of the NOSSDAV 98, Cambridge, England, July 1998.
29. VQEG Test Sequences, 2004. ftp:its.bldrdoc.gov or ftp:crc.ca.
30. Wang, Y., Kim, J.G., Chang, S.F., 2003. Content-based utility function prediction for real-time MPEG-4 transcoding. In: ICIP 2003, September 14-17, 2003, Barcelona, Spain.
31. Watson A., and Sasse M.A. Evaluating audio and video quality in low-cost multimedia conferencing systems. Interacting with Computers 8 3 (1996) 255-275
32. Watson, A., Sasse, M.A., 1998. Measuring perceived quality of speech and video in multimedia conferencing applications. In: Proceedings of ACM Multimedia '98, 12-16 September 1998, Bristol, England, pp. 55-60.
33. Winkler, S., 2000. Vision models and quality metrics for image processing applications. Ph.D. Thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lousanne, EPFL, 2000.
34. Wolf, S., Pinson, M., 2002. NTIA Report 02-392: Video Quality Measurement Techniques. Institute for Telecommunication Sciences. http://its.bldrdoc.gov/index.php.
35. Yu, Z., Wu, H.R., 2000. Human visual system based objective digital video quality metrics. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Signal Processing of IFIP World Computer Conference, 2 August 2000, pp. 1088-1095.