Selection and stopping in voluntary action: A meta-analysis and combined fMRI study

NeuroImage

Volumn 86, Issue , 2014, Pages 381-391

  Rae, Charlotte L ^a   Hughes, Laura E ^a,b   Weaver, Chelan ^a   Anderson, Michael C ^a,c   Rowe, James B ^a,b,c  

^a MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action selection; Action stopping; Inferior frontal gyrus; Inhibition; Pre supplementary motor area; Stop signal task

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; INFERIOR FRONTAL GYRUS; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRE SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA; PREMOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA; TASK PERFORMANCE; VOLUNTARY ACTION SELECTION; VOLUNTARY ACTION STOPPING; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT; ACTION POTENTIAL; ACTION SELECTION; ACTION STOPPING; ADULT; ANTERIOR INSULA; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFERIOR PARIETAL CORTEX; MALE; MIDDLE FRONTAL GYRUS; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL CORTEX; PARS OPERCULARIS; PARS TRIANGULARIS; VISUAL CORTEX; YOUNG ADULT;

ACTION SELECTION; ACTION STOPPING; FALSE DISCOVERY RATE CLUSTER CORRECTED; FDRC; FMRI; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; INFERIOR FRONTAL GYRUS; INHIBITION; PRE-SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA; PRESMA; REACTION TIME; RT; SSRT; STOP SIGNAL REACTION TIME; STOP SIGNAL TASK;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; VOLITION;

EID: 84891559212     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.012     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Amunts K., Zilles K. Architecture and organizational principles of Broca's region. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2012, 16:418-426.
2. Amunts K., Schleicher A., Burgel U., Mohlberg H., Uylings H.B., Zilles K. Broca's region revisited: cytoarchitecture and intersubject variability. J. Comp. Neurol. 1999, 412:319-341.
3. Amunts K., Lenzen M., Friederici A.D., Schleicher A., Morosan P., Palomero-Gallagher N., Zilles K. Broca's region: novel organizational principles and multiple receptor mapping. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8.
4. Anwander A., Tittgemeyer M., von Cramon D.Y., Friederici A.D., Knosche T.R. Connectivity-based parcellation of Broca's area. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:816-825.
5. Aron A.R., Poldrack R.A. Cortical and subcortical contributions to Stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26:2424-2433.
6. Aron A.R., Robbins T.W., Poldrack R.A. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8:170-177.
7. Aron A.R., Behrens T.E., Smith S., Frank M.J., Poldrack R.A. Triangulating a cognitive control network using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:3743-3752.
8. Boehler C.N., Appelbaum L.G., Krebs R.M., Hopf J.M., Woldorff M.G. The influence of different Stop-signal response time estimation procedures on behavior-behavior and brain-behavior correlations. Behav. Brain Res. 2012, 229:123-130.
9. Botvinick M.M., Cohen J.D., Carter C.S. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8:539-546.
10. Brass M., Haggard P. The what, when, whether model of intentional action. Neuroscientist 2008, 14:319-325.
11. Cai W., Leung H.C. Cortical activity during manual response inhibition guided by color and orientation cues. Brain Res. 2009, 1261:20-28.
12. Cai W., Leung H.C. Rule-guided executive control of response inhibition: functional topography of the inferior frontal cortex. PLoS One 2011, 6:e20840.
13. Chikazoe J., Jimura K., Hirose S., Yamashita K., Miyashita Y., Konishi S. Preparation to inhibit a response complements response inhibition during performance of a stop-signal task. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:15870-15877.
14. Chumbley J.R., Friston K.J. False discovery rate revisited: FDR and topological inference using Gaussian random fields. Neuroimage 2009, 44:62-70.
15. Cisek P., Kalaska J.F. Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 33:269-298.
16. Congdon E., Mumford J.A., Cohen J.R., Galvan A., Canli T., Poldrack R.A. Measurement and reliability of response inhibition. Front. Psychol. 2012, 3:37.
17. Coxon J.P., Van Impe A., Wenderoth N., Swinnen S.P. Aging and inhibitory control of action: cortico-subthalamic connection strength predicts stopping performance. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:8401-8412.
18. Cunnington R., Windischberger C., Moser E. Premovement activity of the pre-supplementary motor area and the readiness for action: studies of time-resolved event-related functional MRI. Hum. Mov. Sci. 2005, 24:644-656.
19. Deiber M.P., Ibanez V., Sadato N., Hallett M. Cerebral structures participating in motor preparation in humans: a positron emission tomography study. J. Neurophysiol. 1996, 75:233-247.
20. Duann J.R., Ide J.S., Luo X., Li C.S. Functional connectivity delineates distinct roles of the inferior frontal cortex and presupplementary motor area in stop signal inhibition. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:10171-10179.
21. Duncan J. The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: mental programs for intelligent behaviour. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14:172-179.
22. Duque J., Olivier E., Rushworth M. Top-down inhibitory control exerted by the medial frontal cortex during action selection under conflict. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2013, 25:1634-1648.
23. Eickhoff S.B., Stephan K.E., Mohlberg H., Grefkes C., Fink G.R., Amunts K., Zilles K. A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage 2005, 25:1325-1335.
24. Eickhoff S.B., Bzdok D., Laird A.R., Kurth F., Fox P.T. Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited. Neuroimage 2012, 59:2349-2361.
25. Filevich E., Kuhn S., Haggard P. Intentional inhibition in human action: the power of 'no'. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2012, 36:1107-1118.
26. Forstmann B.U., Keuken M.C., Jahfari S., Bazin P.L., Neumann J., Schafer A., Anwander A., Turner R. Cortico-subthalamic white matter tract strength predicts interindividual efficacy in stopping a motor response. Neuroimage 2012, 60:370-375.
27. Frank M.J., Samanta J., Moustafa A.A., Sherman S.J. Hold your horses: impulsivity, deep brain stimulation, and medication in parkinsonism. Science 2007, 318:1309-1312.
28. Frith C.D., Friston K., Liddle P.F., Frackowiak R.S. Willed action and the prefrontal cortex in man: a study with PET. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1991, 244:241-246.
29. Hampshire A., Chamberlain S.R., Monti M.M., Duncan J., Owen A.M. The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control. Neuroimage 2010, 50:1313-1319.
30. Hoffstaedter F., Grefkes C., Zilles K., Eickhoff S.B. The "what" and "when" of self-initiated movements. Cereb. Cortex 2013, 23:520-530.
31. Hughes L.E., Barker R.A., Owen A.M., Rowe J.B. Parkinson's disease and healthy aging: independent and interacting effects on action selection. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2010, 31:1886-1899.
32. Hughes L.E., Altena E., Barker R.A., Rowe J.B. Perseveration and choice in Parkinson's disease: the impact of progressive frontostriatal dysfunction on action decisions. Cereb. Cortex 2013, 23:1572-1581.
33. Jahanshahi M., Frith C.D. Willed action and its impairments. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 1998, 15:483-533.
34. Jahfari S., Waldorp L., van den Wildenberg W.P., Scholte H.S., Ridderinkhof K.R., Forstmann B.U. Effective connectivity reveals important roles for both the hyperdirect (fronto-subthalamic) and the indirect (fronto-striatal-pallidal) fronto-basal ganglia pathways during response inhibition. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:6891-6899.
35. Jasinska A.J. Automatic inhibition and habitual control: alternative views in neuroscience research on response inhibition and inhibitory control. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2013, 7:25.
36. Klein-Flugge M.C., Bestmann S. Time-dependent changes in human corticospinal excitability reveal value-based competition for action during decision processing. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:8373-8382.
37. Kriegeskorte N., Mur M., Bandettini P. Representational similarity analysis - connecting the branches of systems neuroscience. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2008, 2:4.
38. Lau H.C., Rogers R.D., Ramnani N., Passingham R.E. Willed action and attention to the selection of action. Neuroimage 2004, 21:1407-1415.
39. Lau H., Rogers R.D., Passingham R.E. Dissociating response selection and conflict in the medial frontal surface. Neuroimage 2006, 29:446-451.
40. Lenartowicz A., Verbruggen F., Logan G.D., Poldrack R.A. Inhibition-related activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus in the absence of inhibitory cues. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:3388-3399.
41. Levy B.J., Wagner A.D. Cognitive control and right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex: reflexive reorienting, motor inhibition, and action updating. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1224:40-62.
42. Logan G.D., Cowan W.B., Davis K.A. On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1984, 10:276-291.
43. Macoveanu J., Hornboll B., Elliott R., Erritzoe D., Paulson O.B., Siebner H., Knudsen G.M., Rowe J.B. Serotonin 2A receptors, citalopram and tryptophan-depletion: a multimodal imaging study of their interactions during response inhibition. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013, 38:996-1005.
44. Mars R.B., Piekema C., Coles M.G., Hulstijn W., Toni I. On the programming and reprogramming of actions. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:2972-2979.
45. Mostofsky S.H., Simmonds D.J. Response inhibition and response selection: two sides of the same coin. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20:751-761.
46. Nachev P., Rees G., Parton A., Kennard C., Husain M. Volition and conflict in human medial frontal cortex. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:122-128.
47. Nachev P., Wydell H., O'Neill K., Husain M., Kennard C. The role of the pre-supplementary motor area in the control of action. Neuroimage 2007, 36(Suppl. 2):T155-T163.
48. Neubert F.X., Mars R.B., Buch E.R., Olivier E., Rushworth M.F. Cortical and subcortical interactions during action reprogramming and their related white matter pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:13240-13245.
49. Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychol. Bull. 1994, 116:220-244.
50. Passingham R.E., Bengtsson S.L., Lau H.C. Medial frontal cortex: from self-generated action to reflection on one's own performance. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14:16-21.
51. Ridderinkhof K.R., Ullsperger M., Crone E.A., Nieuwenhuis S. The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 2004, 306:443-447.
52. Rieger M., Gauggel S. Inhibitory after-effects in the stop signal paradigm. Br. J. Psychol. 1999, 90:509-518.
53. Rowe J.B., Toni I., Josephs O., Frackowiak R.S., Passingham R.E. The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memoryα. Science 2000, 288:1656-1660.
54. Rowe J.B., Hughes L., Nimmo-Smith I. Action selection: a race model for selected and non-selected actions distinguishes the contribution of premotor and prefrontal areas. Neuroimage 2010, 51:888-896.
55. Rushworth M.F. Intention, choice, and the medial frontal cortex. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1124:181-207.
56. Rushworth M.F., Walton M.E., Kennerley S.W., Bannerman D.M. Action sets and decisions in the medial frontal cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8:410-417.
57. Scherbaum S., Fischer R., Dshemuchadse M., Goschke T. The dynamics of cognitive control: evidence for within-trial conflict adaptation from frequency-tagged EEG. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:591-600.
58. Sharp D.J., Bonnelle V., De Boissezon X., Beckmann C.F., James S.G., Patel M.C., Mehta M.A. Distinct frontal systems for response inhibition, attentional capture, and error processing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:6106-6111.
59. Sheth S.A., Mian M.K., Patel S.R., Asaad W.F., Williams Z.M., Dougherty D.D., Bush G., Eskandar E.N. Human dorsal anterior cingulate cortex neurons mediate ongoing behavioural adaptation. Nature 2012, 488:218-221.
60. Swick D., Ashley V., Turken U. Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identicalα Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks. Neuroimage 2011, 56:1655-1665.
61. Turkeltaub P.E., Eickhoff S.B., Laird A.R., Fox M., Wiener M., Fox P. Minimizing within-experiment and within-group effects in activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2012, 33:1-13.
62. van der Meer L., Groenewold N.A., Nolen W.A., Pijnenborg M., Aleman A. Inhibit yourself and understand the other: neural basis of distinct processes underlying Theory of Mind. Neuroimage 2011, 56:2364-2374.
63. Verbruggen F., Logan G.D. Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2008, 12:418-424.
64. Verbruggen F., Logan G.D., Liefooghe B., Vandierendonck A. Short-term after effects of response inhibition: repetition priming or between-trial control adjustmentsα. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2008, 34:413-426.
65. Verbruggen F., Aron A.R., Stevens M.A., Chambers C.D. Theta burst stimulation dissociates attention and action updating in human inferior frontal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:13966-13971.
66. Yamaguchi M., Logan G.D., Bissett P.G. Stopping while going! Response inhibition does not suffer dual-task interference. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2012, 38:123-134.
67. Zandbelt B.B., Bloemendaal M., Hoogendam J.M., Kahn R.S., Vink M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional MRI reveal cortical and subcortical interactions during stop-signal response inhibition. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2013, 25:157-174.
68. Zhang J., Hughes L.E., Rowe J.B. Selection and inhibition mechanisms for human voluntary action decisions. Neuroimage 2012, 63:392-402.