Effective connectivity reveals important roles for both the hyperdirect (fronto-subthalamic) and the indirect (fronto-striatal-pallidal) fronto-basal ganglia pathways during response inhibition

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 31, Issue 18, 2011, Pages 6891-6899

  Jahfari, Sara ^a   Waldorp, Lourens ^a   van den Wildenberg, Wery P M ^a   Scholte, H Steven ^a   Ridderinkhof, K Richard ^a   Forstmann, Birte U ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CAUDATE NUCLEUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FRONTOSTRIATALPALLIDAL TRACT; FRONTOSUBTHALAMIC TRACT; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFERIOR FRONTAL GYRUS; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MOTOR CONTROL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE TRACT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; CORPUS STRIATUM; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; GLOBUS PALLIDUS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEURAL PATHWAYS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME; SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS;

EID: 79955784658     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: 15292401     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5253-10.2011     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: proceedings of the second international symposium on information theory (Petrov BN, Csaki F, eds), pp 267-281. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.
2. Aron AR, Poldrack RA (2006) Cortical and subcortical contributions to stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus. J Neuro-sci 26:2424-2433.
3. Aron AR, Behrens TE, Smith S, Frank MJ, Poldrack RA (2007) Triangulating a cognitive control network using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI. J Neurosci 27:3743-3752.
4. Aron AR (2010) From reactive to proactive and selective control: developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses. Biol Psychiatry. Advance online publication. Retrieved April 12, 2011. doi:10.1016/j. biopsych.2010.07.024.
5. Beckmann CF, Jenkinson M, Smith SM (2003) General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI. Neuroimage 20:1052-1063.
6. Booth JR, Burman DD, Meyer JR, Lei Z, Trommer BL, Davenport ND, Li W, Parrish TB, Gitelman DR, Mesulam MM (2005) Larger deficits in brain networks for response inhibition than for visual selective attention in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). J Child Psychol Psychiatry 46:94-111.
7. Buch ER, Mars RB, Boorman ED, Rushworth MF (2010) A network centered on ventral premotor cortex exerts both facilitatory and inhibitory control over primary motor cortex during action reprogramming. J Neu-rosci 30:1395-1401.
8. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res 33:261-304.
9. Chambers CD, Garavan H, Bellgrove MA (2009) Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 33:631-646.
10. Duann JR, Ide JS, Luo X, Li CS (2009) Functional connectivity delineates distinct roles of the inferior frontal cortex and presupplementary motor area in stop signal inhibition. J Neurosci 29:10171-10179.
11. Eagle DM, Robbins TW (2003) Inhibitory control inrats performing a stop-signal reaction-time task: effects of lesions of the medial striatum and d-amphetamine*1. Behav Neurosci 117:1302-1317.
12. Forstmann BU, Dutilh G, Brown S, Neumann J, von Cramon DY, Ridderink-hof KR, Wagenmakers EJ (2008a) Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:17538-17542.
13. Forstmann BU, Jahfari S, Scholte HS, Wolfensteller U, van den Wildenberg WP, Ridderinkhof KR (2008b) Function and structure of the right inferior frontal cortex predict individual differences in response inhibition: a model-based approach. J Neurosci 28:9790-9796.
14. Forstmann BU, van den Wildenberg WP, Ridderinkhof KR (2008c) Neural mechanisms, temporal dynamics, and individual differences in interference control. J Cogn Neurosci 20:1854-1865.
15. Forstmann BU, Anwander A, Schafer A, Neumann J, Brown S, Wagenmakers EJ, Bogacz R, Turner R (2010) Cortico-striatal connections predict control over speed and accuracy in perceptual decision making. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:15916-15920.
16. Hommel B, Fischer R, Colzato LS, van den Wildenberg WPM, Cellini C (2011) The effect of fMRI (noise) on cognitive control. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform, in press.
17. Isoda M, Hikosaka O (2007) Switching from automatic to controlled action by monkey medial frontal cortex. Nat Neurosci 10:240-248.
18. Isoda M, Hikosaka O (2008) Role for subthalamic nucleus neurons in switching from automatic to controlled eye movement. J Neurosci 28:7209-7218.
19. Jahfari S, Stinear CM, Claffey M, Verbruggen F, Aron AR (2010) Responding with restraint: what are the neurocognitive mechanisms? J Cogn Neu-rosci 22:1479-1792.
20. Li CS, Yan P, Sinha R, Lee TW (2008) Subcortical processes of motor response inhibition during a stop signal task. Neuroimage 41:1352-1363.
21. Logan G, Cowan WB (1984) On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control. Psychol Rev 91:295-327.
22. Mars RB, Shea NJ, Kolling N, Rushworth MFS (2010) Model-based analyses: promises, pitfalls, and example applications to the study of cognitive control. Q J Exp Psychol (Colchester) 29:1-16.
23. Mink JW (1996) The basal ganglia: focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programs. Prog Neurobiol 50:381-425.
24. Mostofsky SH, Simmonds DJ (2008) Response inhibition and response selection: two sides of the same coin. J Cogn Neurosci 20:751-761.
25. Nachev P, Wydell H, O'neill K, Husain M, Kennard C (2007) The role of the pre-supplementary motor area in the control of action. Neuroimage 36:T155-T163.
26. Nambu A, Tokuno H, Takada M (2002) Functional significance of the cortico-subthalamo-pallidal "hyperdirect" pathway. Neurosci Res 43:111-117.
27. Neubert FX, Mars RB, Buch ER, Olivier E, Rushworth MF (2010) Cortical and subcortical interactions during action reprogramming and their related white matter pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:13240-13245.
28. Ridderinkhof KR, Forstmann BU, Wylie SA, Burle B, and van den Wilden-berg, WPM (2011) Neurocognitive mechanisms of action control: resisting the call of the sirens. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Science 2:174-192.
29. Schmajuk M, Liotti M, Busse L, Woldorff MG (2006) Electrophysiological activity underlying inhibitory control processes in normal adults. Neuro-psychologia 44:384-395.
30. Sharp DJ, Bonnelle V, De Boissezon X, Beckmann CF, James SG, Patel MC, Mehta MA (2010) Distinct frontal systems for response inhibition, at-tentional capture, and error processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:6106-6111.
31. Simon JR (1967) Ear preference in a simple reaction-time task. J Exp Psy-chol 75:49-55.
32. Simon JR (1990) The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In: Stimulus-response compatibility: an integrated perspective (Proctor RW, Reeve TG, eds), pp 31-88. Amsterdam: Noord-Holland.
33. Swann N, Tandon N, Canolty R, Ellmore TM, McEvoy LK, Dreyer S, DiSano M, Aron AR (2009) Intracranial EEG reveals a time- and frequency-specific role for the right inferior frontal gyrus and primary motor cortex in stopping initiated responses. J Neurosci 29:12675-12685.
34. van den Wildenberg WP, van Boxtel GJ, van der Molen MW, Bosch DA, Speelman JD, Brunia CH (2006) Stimulation of the subthalamic region facilitates the selection and inhibition of motor responses in Parkinson's disease. J Cogn Neurosci 18:626-636.
35. van den Wildenberg WP, Burle B, Vidal F, van der Molen MW, Ridderinkhof KR, Hasbroucq T (2010) Mechanisms and dynamics of cortical motor inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm: a TMS study. J Cogn Neurosci 22:225-239.
36. Verbruggen F, Logan GD (2009) Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 33:647-661.
37. Verbruggen F, Liefooghe B, Notebaert W, Vandierendonck A (2005) Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition. Acta Psychol (Amst) 120:307-326.
38. Verbruggen F, Aron AR, Stevens MA, Chambers CD (2010) Theta burst stimulation dissociates attention and action updating in human inferior frontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:13966-13971.
39. Waldorp L, Christoffels I, van de Ven V (2011) Effective connectivity of fMRI data using ancestral graphs: dealing with missing regions. Neuro-image 54:2695-2705.
40. Woolrich MW, Ripley BD, Brady M, Smith SM (2001) Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of FMRI data. Neuroimage 14:1370-1386.
41. Woolrich MW, Behrens TE, Beckmann CF, Jenkinson M, Smith SM (2004) Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference. Neuroimage 21:1732-1747.
42. Woolrich MW, Jbabdi S, Patenaude B, Chappell M, Makni S, Behrens T, Beckmann C, Jenkinson M, Smith SM (2009) Bayesian analysis of neu-roimaging data in FSL. Neuroimage 45 [Suppl 1]:S173-S186.
43. Zhang J (2008) On the completeness of orientation rules for causal discovery in the presence of latent confounders and selection bias. Artif Intell 172:1873-1896.