3D conductive nanocomposite scaffold for bone tissue engineering

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 167-181

  Shahini, Aref ^a   Yazdimamaghani, Mostafa ^b   Walker, Kenneth J ^b   Eastman, Margaret A ^c   Hatami Marbini, Hamed ^d   Smith, Brenda J ^e   Ricci, John L ^f   Madihally, Sundar V ^b   Vashaee, Daryoosh ^a   Tayebi, Lobat ^b,g  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NSF Program on Therapeutic and Diagnostic Devices and Biomaterials   (United States)

^c Department of Chemistry ^*  (United States)

^d School of Mechanical and Aero space Engineering   (United States)

^e OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g Oklahoma State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioactive glass nanoparticles; Bone scaffold; Conductive polymers; Conductive scaffold; Gelatin; PEDOT: PSS

Indexed keywords

GELATIN; GLASS; MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD; NANOCOMPOSITE; POLY(3,4 ETHYLENEDIOXYTHIOPHENE); POLY(4 STYRENE SULFONATE); POLYMER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIODEGRADABILITY; BONE TISSUE; CELL MEMBRANE CONDUCTANCE; CELL VIABILITY; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; FRACTURE HEALING; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VITRO STUDY; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; MOLECULAR STABILITY; NANOENGINEERING; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; THERMOGRAVIMETRY; TISSUE ENGINEERING; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

BIOACTIVE GLASS NANOPARTICLES; BONE SCAFFOLD; CONDUCTIVE POLYMERS; CONDUCTIVE SCAFFOLD; GELATIN; PEDOT:PSS;

BONE DEVELOPMENT; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS, CULTURED; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84891546270     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: 11782013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S54668     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Fukada E, Yasuda I. On the piezoelectric effect of bone. J Phys Soc Jpn. 1957;12(10):1158-1162.
2. Isaacson BM, Bloebaum RD. Bone bioelectricity: what have we learned in the past 160 years? J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;95(4):1270-1279.
3. Ryaby JT. Clinical effects of electromagnetic and electric fields on fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;(Suppl 355):S205-S215.
4. Bassett CA, Pawluk RJ, Pilla AA. Augmentation of bone repair by inductively coupled electromagnetic fields. Science. 1974;184(4136): 575-577.
5. Darendeliler MA, Darendeliler A, Sinclair PM. Effects of static magnetic and pulsed electromagnetic fields on bone healing. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1997;12(1):43-53.
6. Meng S, Rouabhia M, Zhang Z. Electrical stimulation modulates osteoblast proliferation and bone protein production through heparin-bioactivated conductive scaffolds. Bioelectromagnetics. 2013;34(3):189-199.
7. Martino CF, Belchenko D, Ferguson V, Nielsen-Preiss S, Qi HJ. The effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on the cellular activity of SaOS-2 cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 2008;29(2):125-132.
8. Ozawa H, Abe E, Shibasaki Y, Fukuhara T, Suda T. Electric fields stimulate DNA synthesis of mouse osteoblast-like cells (MC3T3-E1) by a mechanism involving calcium ions. J Cell Physiol. 1989;138(3):477-483.
9. Wang Z, Clark CC, Brighton CT. Up-regulation of bone morphogenetic proteins in cultured murine bone cells with use of specific electric fields. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(5):1053-1065.
10. Torricelli P, Fini M, Giavaresi G, Botter R, Beruto D, Giardino R. Biomimetic PMMA-based bone substitutes: a comparative in vitro evaluation of the effects of pulsed electromagnetic field exposure. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;64(1):182-188.
11. Meng S, Zhang Z, Rouabhia M. Accelerated osteoblast mineralization on a conductive substrate by multiple electrical stimulation. J Bone Miner Metab. 2011;29(5):535-544.
12. Munch E, Franco J, Deville S, Hunger P, Saiz E, Tomsia AP. Porous ceramic scaffolds with complex architectures. JOM (1989). 2008;60(6): 54-58.
13. Chen QZ, Thompson ID, Boccaccini AR. 45S5 Bioglass-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27(11):2414-2425.
14. Yoshikawa H, Myoui A. Bone tissue engineering with porous hydroxyapatite ceramics. J Artif Organs. 2005;8(3):131-136.
15. Guimard NK, Gomez N, Schmidt CE. Conducting polymers in biomedical engineering. Prog Polym Sci. 2007;32:876-921.
16. Mozafari M, Mehraien M, Vashaee D, Tayebi L. Electroconductive nanocomposite scaffolds: a new strategy into tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. In: Ebrahimi F, editor. Nanocomposites: New Trends and Developments. Rijeka: InTech; 2012:369-392.
17. Li MY, Guo Y, Wei Y, MacDiarmid AG, Lelkes PI. Electrospinning polyaniline-contained gelatin nanofibers for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials. 2006;27(13):2705-2715.
18. Shao S, Zhou S, Li L, et al. Osteoblast function on electrically conductive electrospun PLA/MWCNTs nanofibers. Biomaterials. 2011;32(11):2821-2833.
19. Supronowicz PR, Ajayan PM, Ullmann KR, Arulanandam BP, Metzger DW, Bizios R. Novel current-conducting composite substrates for exposing osteoblasts to alternating current stimulation. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;59(3):499-506.
20. Liu Y, Cui H, Zhuang X, et al. Nano-hydroxyapatite surfaces grafted with electroactive aniline tetramers for bone-tissue engineering. Macromol Biosci. 2013;13(3):356-365.
21. Cui H, Liu Y, Deng M, et al. Synthesis of biodegradable and electroactive tetraaniline grafted poly(ester amide) copolymers for bone tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13(9):2881-2889.
22. Luo SC, Ali EM, Tansil NC, et al. Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) nanobiointerfaces: thin, ultrasmooth, and functionalized PEDOT films with in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility. Langmuir. 2008;24(15):8071-8077.
23. Kim DR, Abidian M, Martin D. Synthesis and characterization of conducting polymers grown in hydrogels for neural applications. In: Wong JY, Plant AL, Schmidt CE, et al, editors. Architecture and Application of Biomaterials and Biomolecular Materials, Boston, MA, December 1-4, 2003. Warrendale, PA: Materials Research Society; 2004:55-60.
24. Groenendaal L, Jonas F, Freitag D, Pielartzik H, Reynolds JR. Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) and its derivatives: past, present, and future. Adv Mater. 2000;12(7):481-494.
25. Schweizer TM. Electrical Characterization and Investigation of the Piezoresistive Effect of PEDOT:PSS Thin Films [Master's Thesis]. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology; 2005.
26. Wu X, Liu Y, Li X, et al. Preparation of aligned porous gelatin scaffolds by unidirectional freeze-drying method. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(3): 1167-1177.
27. Mao JS, Zhao LG, Yin YJ, Yao KD. Structure and properties of bilayer chitosan-gelatin scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2003;24(6):1067-1074.
28. Mozafari M, Rabiee M, Azami M, Maleknia S. Biomimetic formation of apatite on the surface of porous gelatin/bioactive glass nanocomposite scaffolds. Appl Surf Sci. 2010;257(5):1740-1749.
29. Cerruti MG. Characterization of Bioactive Glasses. Effect of the Immersion in Solutions That Simulate Body Fluids [PhD Thesis]. Turin: University of Turin; 2004.
30. Kozielski M, Buchwald T, Szybowicz M, Blaszczak Z, Piotrowski A, Ciesielczyk B. Determination of composition and structure of spongy bone tissue in human head of femur by Raman spectral mapping. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2011;22(7):1653-1661.
31. Mozafari M, Moztarzadeh F, Rabiee M, et al. Development of macroporous nanocomposite scaffolds of gelatin/bioactive glass prepared through layer solvent casting combined with lamination technique for bone tissue engineering. Ceramics International. 2010;36(8):2431-2439.
32. Mozafari M, Moztarzadeh F, Tahriri M. Investigation of the physico-chemical reactivity of a mesoporous bioactive SiO2-CaO-P2O5 glass in simulated body fluid. J Non Cryst Solids. 2010;356(28-30): 1470-1478.
33. Timkovich R. Detection of the stable addition of carbodiimide to proteins. Anal Biochem. 1977;79(1-2):135-143.
34. Wu L, Zhang H, Zhang J, Ding J. Fabrication of three-dimensional porous scaffolds of complicated shape for tissue engineering. I. Compression molding based on flexible-rigid combined mold. Tissue Eng. 2005;11(7-8):1105-1114.
35. Yin K, Zhu Z. One-pot" synthesis, characterization, and NH3 sensing of Pd/PEDOT:PSS nanocomposite. Synth Met. 2010;160(9-10): 1115-1118.
36. Seo KI, Chung IJ. Reaction analysis of 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene with potassium persulfate in aqueous solution by using a calorimeter. Polymer. 2000;41(12):4491-4499.
37. Iyer P, Walker KJ, Madihally SV. Increased matrix synthesis by fibroblasts with decreased proliferation on synthetic chitosan-gelatin porous structures. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109(5):1314-1325.
38. Crispin X, Marciniak S, Osikowicz W, et al. Conductivity, morphology, interfacial chemistry, and stability of poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene)-poly(styrene sulfonate): a photoelectron spectroscopy study. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys. 2003;41(21):2561-2583.
39. Timpanaro S, Kemerink M, Touwslager FJ, De Kok MM, Schrader S. Morphology and conductivity of PEDOT/PSS films studied by scanning-tunneling microscopy. Chem Phys Lett. 2004;394(4-6):339-343.
40. Adriaensens P, Carleer R, Storme L, Vanderzande D, Gelan J. Morphological study of a poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/polystyrenesulfonic acid mixture by solid state 13C-CP/MAS NMR relaxometry. Polymer. 2002;43(25):7003-7006.
41. Donald JE, Kulp DW, DeGrado WF. Salt bridges: geometrically specific, designable interactions. Proteins. 2011;79(3):898-915.
42. Russell VA, Etter MC, Ward MD. Guanidinium parasubstituted benzenesulfonates: competitive hydrogen bonding in layered structures and the design of nonlinear optical materials. Chem Mater. 1994;6(8):1206-1217.
43. Salgado AJ, Coutinho OP, Reis RL. Bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future trends. Macromol Biosci. 2004;4(8):743-765.
44. Yang S, Leong KF, Du Z, Chua CK. The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part 1. Traditional factors. Tissue Eng. 2001;7(6): 679-689.
45. Whang K, Healy KE, Elenz DR, et al. Engineering bone regeneration with bioabsorbable scaffolds with novel microarchitecture. Tissue Eng. 1999;5(1):35-51.
46. Perez-Pariente J, Balas F, Roman J, Salinas AJ, Vallet-Regi M. Influence of composition and surface characteristics on the in vitro bioactivity of SiO2-CaO-P2O5-MgO sol-gel glasses. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;47(2):170-175.
47. Peramo A, Urbanchek MG, Spanninga SA, Povlich LK, Cederna P, Martin DC. In situ polymerization of a conductive polymer in acellular muscle tissue constructs. Tissue Eng Part A. 2008;14(3):423-432.
48. Markovsky E, Baabur-Cohen H, Eldar-Boock A, et al. Administration, distribution, metabolism and elimination of polymer therapeutics. J Control Release. 2012;161(2):446-460.
49. Domb AJ, Kumar N, Ezra A, editors. Chapter 16 in Biodegradable Polymers in Clinical Use and Clinical Development. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
50. Kadajji VG, Betageri GV. Water soluble polymers for pharmaceutical applications. Polymers. 2011;3(4):1972-2009.
51. Omiecinski CJ, Vanden Heuvel JP, Perdew GH, Peters JM. Xenobiotic metabolism, disposition, and regulation by receptors: from biochemical phenomenon to predictors of major toxicities. Toxicol Sci. 2011;120(Suppl 1):S49-S75.
52. Coleman MD. Human Drug Metabolism: An Introduction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2005.
53. Owens DE 3rd, Peppas NA. Opsonization, biodistribution, and pharmacokinetics of polymeric nanoparticles. Int J Pharm. 2006;307(1): 93-102.
54. Buck RP. Kinetics of bulk and interfacial ionic motion: microscopic bases and limits for the nernst-planck equation applied to membrane systems. J Memb Sci. 1984;17(1):1-62.
55. Levin M. Large-scale biophysics: ion flows and regeneration. Trends Cell Biol. 2007;17(6):261-270.
56. Levin M. Bioelectric mechanisms in regeneration: unique aspects and future perspectives. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2009;20(5):543-556.
57. Levin M. Bioelectromagnetics in morphogenesis. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003;24(5):295-315.
58. Peres JA, Lamano T. Strategies for stimulation of new bone formation: a critical review. Braz Dent J. 2011;22(6):443-448.
59. Antonova E, Le TK, Burge R, Mershon J. Tibia shaft fractures: costly burden of nonunions. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:42.
60. Galkowski V, Petrisor B, Drew B, Dick D. Bone stimulation for fracture healing: what's all the fuss? Indian J Orthop. 2009;43(2):117-120.
61. Rose PI, Gross S. High-resolution proton magnetic resonance studies of gelatin solution and gels. Journal of Photographic Science. 1975; 23(2):59-67.