The use of ammonium formate as a mobile-phase modifier for LC-MS/MS analysis of tryptic digests

Journal of Biomolecular Techniques

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 187-197

  Johnson, Darryl ^a   Boyes, Barry ^a,b   Orlando, Ron ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b Advanced Materials Technology Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Liquid chromatography; Mass spectrometry; Proteomics; Tandem mass spectrometry

Indexed keywords

AMMONIUM FORMATE; FORMIC ACID;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; ELECTROSPRAY MASS SPECTROMETRY; IONIC STRENGTH; MASS SPECTROMETER; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PEPTIDE ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; REVERSED PHASE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY;

LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEOMICS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; DOGS; FORMATES; MALE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PEPTIDES; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; PROTEOMICS; SERUM ALBUMIN, BOVINE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 84891512161     PISSN: 15240215     EISSN: 19434731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7171/jbt.13-2404-005     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Domon B, Aebersold R. Mass spectrometry and protein analysis. Science 2006;312:212-217.
2. Anderson NL, Anderson NG. The human plasma proteome. Mol Cell Proteomics 2002;1:845-867.
3. Chen CH. Review of a current role of mass spectrometry for proteome research. Anal Chim Acta 2008;624:16-36.
4. Righetti PG, Castagna A, Herbert B, Reymond F, Rossier JS. Prefractionation techniques in proteome analysis. Proteomics 2003;3:1397-1407.
5. Issaq HJ, Conrads TP, Janini GM, Veenstra TD. Methods for fractionation, separation and profiling of proteins and peptides. Electrophoresis 2002;23:3048-3061.
6. Fairchild JN, Walworth MJ, Horváth K, Guiochon G. Correlation between peak capacity and protein sequence coverage in proteomics analysis by liquid chromatography-mass spectrome-try/mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 2010;1217:4779-4783.
7. Wang X, Stoll DR, Schellinger AP, Carr PW. Peak capacity optimization of peptide separations in reversed-phase gradient elution chromatography: fixed column format. Anal Chem 2006;78:3406-3416.
8. Salisbury JJ. Fused-core particles: a practical alternative to sub-2 micron particles. J Chromatogr Sci 2008;46:883-886.
9. Fekete S, Fekete J, Ganzler K. Characterization of new types of stationary phases for fast liquid chromatographic applications. J Pharmaceut Biomed Anal 2009;50:703-709.
10. Schuster SA, Boyes BE, Wagner BM, Kirkland JJ. Fast high performance liquid chromatography separations for proteomic applications using Fused-Core® silica particles. J Chromatogr A 2012;1228:232-241.
11. Nguyen DT, Guillarme D, Rudaz S, Veuthey JL. Fast analysis in liquid chromatography using small particle size and high pressure. J Separat Sci 2006;29:1836-1848.
12. Schuster S, Wagner B, Boyes B, Kirkland J.Wider pore superficially porous particles for peptide separations by HPLC. J Chro-matogr Sci 2010;48:566-571.
13. Marchetti N, Guiochon G. High peak capacity separations of peptides in reversed-phase gradient elution liquid chromatogra-phy on columns packed with porous shell particles. J Chromatogr A 2007;1176:206-216.
14. Kirkland JJ, Langlois TJ, DeStefano JJ. Fused core particles for HPLC columns. Am Lab 2007;39:18-21.
15. Apffel A, Fischer S, Goldberg G, Goodley PC, Kuhlmann FE. Enhanced sensitivity for peptide mapping with electrospray liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in the presence of signal suppression due to trifluoroacetic acid-containing mobile phases. J Chromatogr A 1995;712:177-190.
16. Gustavsson SÅ, Samskog J, Markides KE, Långström B. Studies of signal suppression in liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry using volatile ion-pairing reagents. J Chromatogr A 2001;937:41-47.
17. Eshraghi J, Chowdhury SK. Factors affecting electrospray ion-ization of effluents containing trifluoroacetic acid for high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 1993;65:3528-3533.
18. Mirza UA, Chait BT. Effects of anions on the positive ion electrospray ionization mass spectra of peptides and proteins. AnalChem 1994;66:2898-2904.
19. McCalley DV. Effect of buffer on peak shape of peptides in reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 2004;1038:77-84.
20. McCalley DV. Comparison of peak shapes obtained with volatile (mass spectrometry-compatible) buffers and conventional buffers in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography of bases on particulate and monolithic columns. J Chromatogr A 2003;987:17-28.
21. Huber CG, Premstaller A, Kleindienst G. Evaluation of volatile eluents and electrolytes for high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and capillary electrophoresis-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry of proteins: II. Capillary electrophoresis. J Chromatogr A 1999;849: 175-189.
22. McCalley DV. Some practical comparisons of the efficiency and overloading behaviour of sub-2 [xm porous and sub-3 fxm shell particles in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 2011;1218:2887-2897.
23. McCalley DV. Rationalization of retention and overloading behavior of basic compounds in reversed-phase HPLC using low ionic strength buffers suitable for mass spectrometric detection. Anal Chem 2003;75:3404-3410.
24. Buckenmaier SM, McCalley DV, Euerby MR. Overloading study of bases using polymeric RP-HPLC columns as an aid to rationalization of overloading on silica-ODS phases. Anal Chem 2002;74:4672-4681.
25. McCalley DV. The challenges of the analysis of basic compounds by high performance liquid chromatography: some possible approaches for improved separations. J Chromatogr A 2010; 1217:858-880.
26. Cox G, Snyder L. Preparative high-performance liquid chroma-tography under isocratic conditions: III. The consequences of two adjacent bands having unequal column capacities. J Chro-matogr A 1989;483:95-110.
27. Eble J, Grob R, Antle P, Snyder L. Simplified description of high-performance liquid chromatographic separation under overload conditions, based on the Craig distribution model: II. Effect of isotherm type, and experimental verification of computer simulations for a single band. J Chromatogr A 1987;384: 45-79.
28. Snyder L, Cox G, Antle P. A simplified description of HPLC separation under overload conditions. A synthesis and extension of two recent approaches Chromatographia 1987;24:82-96.
29. Johnson D, Boyes B, Fields T, Kopkin R, Orlando R. Optimi-zation of data-dependent acquisition parameters for coupling high-speed separations with LC-MS/MS for protein identifications. J Biomol Tech 2013;24:62-72.