Molecular and quantitative trait variation within and among small fragmented populations of the endangered plant species Psilopeganum sinense

Annals of Botany

Volumn 113, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 79-86

  Ye, Qigang ^a   Tang, Feiyan ^a   Wei, Na ^b   Yao, Xiaohong ^a  

^a Wuhan Institute of Botany Chinese Academy of Sciences   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Chinese privet; F ST; genetic drift; local adaptation, habitat fragmentation; neutral microsatellite markers; Psilopeganum sinense; QST; quantitative traits; stabilizing selection

Indexed keywords

ENDANGERED SPECIES; ESTIMATION METHOD; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC MARKER; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PLANT COMMUNITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CHINA; CHINESE PRIVET; ECOSYSTEM; ENDANGERED SPECIES; FST; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; LOCAL ADAPTATION, HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; NEUTRAL MICROSATELLITE MARKERS; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION GENETICS; PSILOPEGANUM SINENSE; QST; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; QUANTITATIVE TRAITS; RUTACEAE; STABILIZING SELECTION;

CHINESE PRIVET; FST; GENETIC DRIFT; LOCAL ADAPTATION, HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; NEUTRAL MICROSATELLITE MARKERS; PSILOPEGANUM SINENSE; QST; QUANTITATIVE TRAITS; STABILIZING SELECTION;

BAYES THEOREM; CHINA; ECOSYSTEM; ENDANGERED SPECIES; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; POPULATION DENSITY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; RUTACEAE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84891502492     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mct255     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Aguilar R, Quesada M, Ashworth L, Herrerias-Diego Y, Lobo J. 2008. Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation in plant populations: Susceptible signals in plant traits and methodological approaches. Molecular Ecology 14: 1811-1820
2. Beaumont MA, NicholsRA.1996. Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. Proceeding of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 263: 1619-1626
3. Bohonak AJ. 2002. IBD (Isolation by Distance): A program for analyses of isolation by distance. Journal of Heredity 93: 153-154
4. Bonnin I, Prosperi JM, Olivieri I. 1996. Genetic markers and quantitative genetic variation in Medicago truncatula (Leguminosae): A comparative analysis of population structure. Genetics 143: 1795-1805
5. Booy G, Hendriks RJJ, Smulders MJM, Van Groenendael JM, Vosman B. 2000. Genetic diversity and the survival of populations. Plant Biology 2: 379-395
6. Caro TM, Laurenson KM. 1994. Ecological and genetic factors in conservation: A cautionary tale. Science 263: 485-486
7. Charlesworth B. 2009. Effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Nature Reviews Genetics 10: 195-205
8. Corander J, Waldmann P, Sillanpää M.2003. Bayesian analysis of genetic differentiation between populations. Genetics 163: 367-374
9. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1987. A rapidDNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15
10. Evanno G, Castella E, Goudet J. 2006. Evolutionary aspects of population structure for molecular and quantitative traits in the freshwater snail Radix balthica. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19: 1071-1082
11. Edelaar P, Björklund M. 2011. If FST does not measure neutral genetic differentiation, then comparing it with QST is misleading. Or is it? Molecular Ecology 20: 1805-1812
12. Fahrig L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 34: 487-515
13. Falconer DS, MackayTFC.1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. London: Longman
14. Frankham R. 1999. Quantitative genetics in conservation biology. Genetics Research 74: 237-244
15. Goudet J, Büchi L. 2006. The effects of dominance, regular inbreeding and sampling design on QST, an estimator of population differentiation for quantitative traits. Genetics 172: 1337-1347
16. Gravuer K, von Wettberg E, Schmitt J. 2005. Population differentiation and genetic variation inform translocation decisions for Liatris scariosa var. novae-Angliae, a rare New England grassland perennial. Biological Conservation 124: 155-167
17. Hendry AP. 2002. QST =,FST? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17: 502
18. Hill WG, Goddard ME, Visscher PM. 2008. Data and theory point to mainly additive genetic variance for complex traits. PloS Genetics 4: Pe1000008
19. Houle D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130: 195-204
20. Johansson M, Primmer CR, Merilä J. 2007. Does habitat fragmentation reduce fitness and adaptability? A case study of the common frog (Rana temporaria). Molecular Ecology 16: 2693-2700
21. Lamy J, Plomion C, Kremer A, Delzon S. 2012. QST, FST as a signature of canalization. Molecular Ecology 21: 5646-5655
22. Lande R. 1988. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241: 1455-1460
23. LandeR. 1992. Neutral theoryof quantitative genetic variance in an island model with local extinction and colonization. Evolution 46: 381-389
24. Leinonen T, ÓHara RB, Cano JM, Merilä J. 2008. Comparative studies of quantitative trait and neutral marker divergence: A meta-Analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21: 1-17
25. Leinonen T, McCairns RJ, ÓHara RB, Merilä J. 2013. QST-FST comparisons: Evolutionary and ecological insights from genomic heterogeneity. Nature Reviews Genetics 14: 179-190
26. López-Fanjul C, Fernández A, Toro MA. 2003. The effect of neutral nonadditive gene action on the quantitative index of population divergence. Genetics 164: 1627-1633
27. Lynch M, Pfrender M, Spitze K, et al. 1999. The quantitative and molecular genetic architecture of a subdivided species. Evolution 53: 100-110
28. Mantel N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27: 209-220
29. McGarigal K, Cushman SA. 2002. Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecological Applications 12: 335-345
30. McKay JK, Latta RG. 2002. Adaptive population divergence: Markers, QTL and traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17: 285-291
31. Merilä J, Crnokrak P. 2001. Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14: 892-903
32. Miller JR, Wood BP, Hamilton MB. 2008. FST and QST under neutrality. Genetics 180: 1023-1037
33. ÓHara RB, Merilä J. 2005. Bias and precision in QST estimates: Problems and some solutions. Genetics 171: 1331-1339
34. Petit C, Freville H, Mignot A, et al. 2001. Gene flowand local adaptation in two endemic plant species. Biological Conservation 100: 21-34
35. PodolskyRH. 2001. Genetic variation for morphological and allozyme variation in relation to population size in Clarkia dudleyana, an endemic annual. Conservation Biology 15: 412-423
36. Pujol B, Wilson AJ, Ross RIC, Pannell Jr. 2008. Are QST-FST comparisons for natural populations meaningful? Molecular Ecology 17: 4782-4785
37. Raymond M, Rousset F. 1995. Genepop, version 1.2: Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248-249
38. Reed DH, Frankham R. 2001. How closely correlated are molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variatioñ A meta-Analysis. Evolution 55: 1095-1103
39. Ritland K. 2002. Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity 88: 221-228
40. Rogell B, Eklund M, Thörngren H, Laurila A, Höglund J. 2010. The effect of selection, drift and genetic variation on life-history trait divergence among insular populations of natterjack toad, Bufo calamita. Molecular Ecology 19: 2229-2240
41. Rohlf FJ. 1998. NTSYSpc Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, version 2.0. Setauket, NY: Exeter Software
42. Slatkin M, Barton NH. 1989. A comparison of three indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow. Evolution 43: 1349-1368
43. Song WH, Li XD, Li XW, Huang HW, Li JQ. 2004. Genetic diversity and conservation strategy of Psilopeganum sinense, a rare species in the Three-Gorges reservoir area. Biodiversity Science 12: 227-236
44. Sork VL, Nason J, Campbell DR, Fernandez JF. 1999. Landscape approaches to historical and contemporary gene flow in plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14: 219-224
45. Spiegelhalter DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Lunn D. 2003.WinBUGS. Ver. 1.4 user manual. Cambridge, UK: MRC Biostatistics Unit. Available at http:// www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/bugs
46. Tang FY. 2008. Population genetic structure and gene flow of Psilopeganum sinensis, a rare and endangered plant in the Three Gorges reservoir area. Doctoral dissertation: Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
47. Tang FY, Ye QG, Yao XH, Huang H. 2008. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in Psilopeganum sinense Hemsl (Rutaceae), an endangered herb endemic to Yangtze River valley. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 227-229
48. Thompson JD. 1999. Population differentiation in Mediterranean plants: Insights into colonization history and the evolution and conservation of endemic species. Heredity 82: 229-236
49. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P. 2004. MICRO-CHECKER: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 535-538
50. Volis S, Yakubov B, Shulgina I, Ward D, Mendlinger S. 2005. Distinguishing adaptive from nonadaptive genetic differentiation: Comparison of QST and FST at two spatial scales. Heredity 95: 466-475
51. Waldmann P, Andersson S. 1998. Comparison of quantitative genetic variation and allozyme diversity within and between populations of Scabiosa canescens and S. columbaria. Heredity 81: 79-86
52. Waldmann P, García-Gil MR, Sillanpää MJ. 2005. Comparing Bayesian estimates of genetic differentiation of molecular markers and quantitative traits: An application to Pinus sylvestris. Heredity 94: 623-629
53. Whitlock MC. 1999. Neutral additive variance in a metapopulation. Genetics Research 74: 215-221
54. Whitlock MC. 2008. Evolutionary inference from QST. Molecular Ecology 17: 1885-1896
55. Willi Y, Van Buskirk J, Schmid B, Fischer M. 2007. Genetic isolation of fragmented populations is exacerbated by drift and selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 534-542
56. Wright S. 1951. The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics 15: 323-354
57. Yang J, Li XD, Li XW, Shi QF, Li JQ. 2007. Analysis of AFLP variation of the endemic and rare species Psilopeganumsinense inCentral China. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research 25: 226-234
58. Yang RC, Yeh FC, Yanchuk AD. 1996. A comparison of isozyme and quantitative genetic variation in Pinus contorta ssp. latifolia by FST. Genetic 142: 1045-1052
59. Young AG, Boyle T, Brown T. 1996. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11: 413-418
60. Zhang Y, Ye QG. 2011.Breeding systemof the endangered speciesPsilopeganum sinense andits pollinationprocess in abotanical garden. PlantScience Journal 29: 599-606