The effect of nanotopography on modulating protein adsorption and the fibrotic response

Tissue Engineering - Part A

Volumn 20, Issue 1-2, 2014, Pages 130-138

  Kam, Kimberly R ^a   Walsh, Laura A ^a   Bock, Suzanne M ^b,c   Ollerenshaw, Jeremy D ^c   Ross, Russell F ^c   Desai, Tejal A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c KIMBERLY CLARK CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASPECT RATIO; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; CELL CULTURE; COLLAGEN; ENZYME INHIBITION; FIBROBLASTS; GENE EXPRESSION; MORPHOLOGY; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; NANOIMPRINT LITHOGRAPHY; NANOSTRUCTURES;

CONNECTIVE TISSUE GROWTH FACTOR; EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTORS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES; FIBROBLAST PROLIFERATION; NANOSCALE ARCHITECTURES; NANOSTRUCTURED SURFACE; TISSUE ENGINEERING SCAFFOLD; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTORS;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

COLLAGEN TYPE 1; COLLAGEN TYPE 1 ALPHA 2; COLLAGEN TYPE 3; COLLAGEN TYPE 3 ALPHA 1; CONNECTIVE TISSUE GROWTH FACTOR; EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR; F ACTIN; FIBRINOGEN; FLUORESCEIN ISOTHIOCYANATE; IMMUNOGLOBULIN G; INTEGRIN LINKED KINASE; NANOMATERIAL; POLYPROPYLENE; POLYSTYRENE; PROTEIN; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADSORPTION; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOWN REGULATION; FIBROBLAST; FIBROSIS; GENE EXPRESSION; HYDROPHOBICITY; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; MOUSE; NANOFABRICATION; NANOIMPRINT LITHOGRAPHY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STRESS FIBER; TOPOGRAPHY;

ADSORPTION; ANIMALS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; FIBRINOGEN; FIBROBLASTS; FIBROSIS; FLUORESCEIN-5-ISOTHIOCYANATE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; IMMUNOGLOBULIN G; MICE; MOLECULAR IMPRINTING; NANOPARTICLES; NIH 3T3 CELLS; POLYPROPYLENES; POLYSTYRENES; PROTEINS; SERUM ALBUMIN, BOVINE; WATER;

EID: 84891500193     PISSN: 19373341     EISSN: 1937335X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0772     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Chegini, N. Peritoneal molecular environment, adhesion formation and clinical implication. Front Biosci 7, e91, 2002.
2. Hunter, L.W., Lieske, J.C., Tran, N.V., and Miller, V.M. The association of matrix Gla protein isomers with calcification in capsules surrounding silicone breast implants. Biomaterials 32, 8364, 2011.
3. Giurgiutiu, V. et al. Electromechanical impedance sensor for in vivo monitoring the body reaction to implants. J Invest Surg 17, 257, 2004.
4. Schippers, E., Tittel, A., Ottinger, A., and Schumpelick, V. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy: comparison of adhesionformation after bowel resection in a canine model. Dig Surg 15, 145, 1998.
5. Risbud,M., Hardikar, A., and Bhonde, R. Growth modulation of fibroblasts by chitosan-polyvinyl pyrrolidone hydrogel: Implications for wound management? J. Biosci 25, 25, 2000.
6. Li, Y., Rodrigues, J., and Tomas, H. Injectable and biodegradable hydrogels: gelation, biodegradation and biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev 41, 2193, 2012.
7. Mast, B.A., Diegelmann, R.F., Krummel, T.M., and Cohen, I.K. Hyaluronic acid modulates proliferation, collagen and protein synthesis of cultured fetal fibroblasts. Matrix 13, 441, 1993.
8. Yim, E.K.F. et al. Nanopattern-induced changes in morphology and motility of smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 26, 5405, 2005.
9. Pennisi, C.P. et al. Nanoscale topography reduces fibroblast growth, focal adhesion size and migration-related gene expression on platinum surfaces. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 85, 189, 2011.
10. Kim, D.-H. et al. Mechanosensitivity of fibroblast cell shape and movement to anisotropic substratum topography gradients. Biomaterials 30, 5433, 2009.
11. Karuri, N.W., Porri, T.J., Albrecht, R.M., Murphy, C.J., and Nealey, P.F. Nano- and microscale holes modulate cellsubstrate adhesion, cytoskeletal organization, and -beta1 integrin localization in SV40 human corneal epithelial cells. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience 5, 273, 2006.
12. Qian, T., and Wang, Y. Micro/nano-fabrication technologies for cell biology. Med Biol Eng Comput 48, 1023, 2010.
13. Sharma, G. et al. Polymer particle shape independently influences binding and internalization by macrophages. J Control Release 147, 408, 2010.
14. Chou, S.Y., Krauss, P.R., and Renstrom, P.J. Imprint lithography with 25-nanometer resolution. Science 272, 85, 1996.
15. Chou, S.Y., and Krauss, P.R. Imprint lithography with sub- 10nm feature size and high throughput. Microelectron Eng 35, 237, 1997.
16. Gautieri, A., Vesentini, S., Redaelli, A., and Buehler, M.J. Hierarchical structure and nanomechanics of collagen microfibrils from the atomistic scale up. Nano Lett 11, 757, 2011.
17. Livak, K.J., and Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 (-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 25, 402, 2001.
18. Mabuchi, K. et al. Changes with respect to time in the in vivo adsorption of plasma proteins onto artificial heart blood pumps. ASAIO J 38, M536, 1992.
19. Rixman, M.A., Dean, D., Macias, C.E., and Ortiz, C. Nanoscale intermolecular interactions between human serum albumin and alkanethiol self-assembled monolayers. Langmuir 19, 6202, 2003.
20. Wood, M.A., Bagnaninchi, P., and Dalby, M.J. The beta integrins and cytoskeletal nanoimprinting. Exp Cell Res 314, 927, 2008.
21. Dalby, M.J. Cellular response to low adhesion nanotopographies. Int J Nanomedicine 2, 373, 2007.
22. Dalby, M.J., Yarwood, S.J., Johnstone, H.J., Affrossman, S., and Riehle, M.O. Fibroblast signaling events in response to nanotopography: a gene array study. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience 1, 12, 2002.
23. Roach, P., Farrar, D., and Perry, C.C. Interpretation of protein adsorption: surface-induced conformational changes. J Am Chem Soc 127, 8168, 2005.
24. Misra, R.D.K., Girase, B., Nune, V.K.C., and Xu, W. Cellular interactions and modulated osteoblasts functions mediated by protein adsorption. Adv Eng Mater 14, B247, 2012.
25. Axelsson, I. Characterization of proteins and other macromolecules by agarose gel chromatography. J Chromatogr A 152, 21, 1978.
26. Sjöström, T. et al. Fabrication of pillar-like titania nanostructures on titanium and their interactions with human skeletal stem cells. Acta Biomater 5, 1433, 2009.
27. Lee, J., Chu, B.H., Chen, K.-H., Ren, F., and Lele, T.P. Randomly oriented, upright SiO2 coated nanorods for reduced adhesion of mammalian cells. Biomaterials 30, 4488, 2009.
28. Yang, C., and Svitkina, T. Filopodia initiation: focus on the Arp2/3 complex and formins. Cell Adh Migr 5, 402, 2011.
29. Discher, D.E., Janmey, P., and Wang, Y. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310, 1139, 2005.
30. Hadjipanayi, E., Mudera, V., and Brown, R.A. Close dependence of fibroblast proliferation on collagen scaffold matrix stiffness. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 3, 77, 2009.
31. Wang, N., Butler, J.P., and Ingber, D.E. Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science 260, 1124, 1993.
32. Dalby, M.J. et al. Nanotopographical stimulation of mechanotransduction and changes in interphase centromere positioning. J Cell Biochem 100, 326, 2007.