Quantification of aortic flow by phase-contrast magnetic resonance in patients with bicuspid aortic valve

European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 77-84

  Muzzarelli, S ^a,b   Monney, P ^b   O'Brien, K ^c   Faletra, F ^a   Moccetti, T ^a   Vogt, P ^b   Schwitter, J ^b  

^a DIVISION OF CARDIOLOGY   (Switzerland)

^b LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

aortic valve regurgitation; bicuspid aortic valve; flow; phase contrast magnetic resonance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AORTA FLOW; ARTICLE; BICUSPID AORTIC VALVE; BLOOD FLOWMETRY; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE OUTFLOW TRACT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; MALE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PHASE CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AORTIC VALVE REGURGITATION; BICUSPID AORTIC VALVE; FLOW; PHASE-CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

ADULT; AORTIC VALVE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; STROKE VOLUME;

EID: 84891391007     PISSN: 20472404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jet129     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Caruthers SD, Lin SJ, Brown P, Watkins MP, Williams TA, Lehr KA et al. Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography. Circulation 2003;108:2236-43.
2. Debl K, Djavidani B, Seitz J, NitzW, Schmid FX, Muders F et al. Planimetry of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2005;40: 631-6.
3. Gabriel RS, Renapurkar R, Bolen MA, Verhaert D, Leiber M, Flamm SD et al. Comparison of severity of aortic regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 2011;108:1014-20.
4. Garcia J, Kadem L, Larose E, Clavel MA, Pibarot P. Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for the estimation of effective orifice area in aortic stenosis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011; 13:25.
5. Gelfand EV, Hughes S, Hauser TH, Yeon SB, Goepfert L, KissingerKVet al. Severity of mitral and aortic regurgitation as assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimizing correlation with Doppler echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2006;8:503-7.
6. Kupfahl C, Honold M, Meinhardt G, Vogelsberg H, Wagner A, Mahrholdt H et al. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques. Heart 2004;90:893-901.
7. O'Brien KR, Gabriel RS, Greiser A, Cowan BR, Young AA, Kerr AJ. Aortic valve stenotic area calculation from phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance: the importance of short echo time. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2009;11:49.
8. Tanaka K, Makaryus AN, Wolff SD. Correlation of aortic valve area obtained by the velocity-encoded phase contrast continuity method to direct planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007;9:799-805.
9. Myerson SG, d'Arcy J, Mohiaddin R, Greenwood JP, Karamitsos TD, Francis JM et al. Aortic regurgitation quantification using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: association with clinical outcome. Circulation 2012;126:1452-60.
10. Hope MD, Hope TA, Meadows AK, Ordovas KG, Urbania TH, Alley MT et al. Bicuspid aortic valve: four-dimensional MR evaluation of ascending aortic systolic flow patterns. Radiology 2010;255:53-61.
11. Kilner PJ, Gatehouse PD, Firmin DN. Flow measurement by magnetic resonance: a unique asset worth optimising. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007;9:723-8.
12. Nordmeyer S, Riesenkampff E, Messroghli D, Kropf S, Nordmeyer J, Berger F et al. Four-dimensional velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging improves blood flow quantification in patients with complex accelerated flow. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;37:208-16.
13. O'Brien KR, Cowan BR, Jain M, Stewart RA, Kerr AJ, Young AA. MRI phase contrast velocity and flow errors in turbulent stenotic jets. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28: 210-8.
14. Kozerke S, Schwitter J, Pedersen EM, Boesiger P. Aortic and mitral regurgitation: quantification using moving slice velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14: 106-12.
15. Gatehouse PD, Rolf MP, Graves MJ, Hofman MB, Totman J, Werner B et al. Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2010; 12:5.
16. Sigovan M, Hope MD, Dyverfeldt P, Saloner D. Comparison of four-dimensional flow parameters for quantification of flow eccentricity in the ascending aorta. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;34:1226-30.
17. Chernobelsky A, Shubayev O, Comeau CR,Wolff SD. Baseline correction of phase contrast images improves quantification of blood flow in the great vessels. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007;9:681-85.
18. Lankhaar JW, Hofman MB, Marcus JT, Zwanenburg JJ, Faes TJ, Vonk-Noordegraaf A. Correction of phase offset errors in main pulmonary artery flow quantification. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:73-9.
19. O'Brien KR, Myerson SG, Cowan BR, Young AA, Robson MD. Phase contrast ultrashort TE: a more reliable technique for measurement of high-velocity turbulent stenotic jets. Magn Reson Med 2009;62:626-36.
20. Dyverfeldt P, Sigfridsson A, Kvitting JP, EbbersT. Quantification of intravoxel velocity standard deviation and turbulence intensity by generalizing phase-contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:850-858.
21. O'Brien K. PhD thesis in Bioengineering, The Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland 2009. https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/ handle/2292/4488.