Aortic valve stenotic area calculation from phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance: The importance of short echo time

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  O'Brien, Kieran R ^a   Gabriel, Ruvin S ^b   Greiser, Andreas ^c   Cowan, Brett R ^b   Young, Alistair A ^b   Kerr, Andrew J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^c SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE OUTFLOW TRACT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; HEART VENTRICLE; HOSPITALIZATION; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; TIME;

AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; HEART VENTRICLES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PULMONARY ARTERY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE VOLUME; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 74049152552     PISSN: 10976647     EISSN: 1532429X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-11-49     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for valvular heart disease: technique and validation. PJ Cawley JH Maki CM Otto, Circulation 2009 119 468 478 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.742486 19171869
2. Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: how does it compare to current diagnostic standards? AS John T Dill RR Brandt M Rau W Ricken G Bachmann CW Hamm, J Am Coll Cardiol 2003 42 519 526 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00707-1 12906983
3. Practical Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Quantification of Aortic Valve Stenosis: Comparison With Echocardiography. SD Caruthers SJ Lin P Brown MP Watkins TA Williams KA Lehr SA Wickline, Circulation 2003 108 2236 2243 10.1161/01.CIR.0000095268.47282.A1 14568899
4. A Simplified Continuity Equation Approach to the Quantification of Stenotic Bicuspid Aortic Valves using Velocity-Encoded Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. S-C Yap R-J van Geuns FJ Meijboom SW Kirschbaum JS McGhie ML Simoons PJ Kilner JW Roos-Hesselink, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2007 9 899 906 10.1080/10976640701693717 18066750
5. MRI phase contrast velocity and flow errors in turbulent stenotic jets. KR O'Brien BR Cowan M Jain RAH Stewart AJ Kerr AA Young, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2008 28 210 218 10.1002/jmri.21395 18581344
6. The effects of random directional distributed flow in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. CB Ahn SY Lee O Nalcioglu ZH Cho, Med Phys 1987 14 43 48 10.1118/1.596093 3561335
7. MA Bernstein KF King XJ Zhou, Handbook of MRI Pulse Sequences Elsevier Academic Press 2004
8. Aortic valve pressure gradients in patients with aortic valve stenosis: quantification with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. AC Eichenberger R Jenni GK von Schulthess, AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993 160 971 977 8470612
9. Effects of turbulence on signal intensity in gradient echo images. AJ Evans RA Blinder RJ Herfkens CE Spritzer DO Kuethe EK Fram LW Hedlund, Invest Radiol 1988 23 512 518 3170139
10. Turbulent flow effects on NMR imaging: measurement of turbulent intensity. JH Gao JO Gore, Med Phys 1991 18 1045 1051 10.1118/1.596645 1961145
11. Effects of intravoxel velocity distributions on the accuracy of the phase-mapping method in phase-contrast MR angiography. CA Hamilton PR Moran P Santago SA Rajala, J Magn Reson Imaging 1994 4 752 755 10.1002/jmri.1880040520 7981522
12. Valve and great vessel stenosis: assessment with MR jet velocity mapping. PJ Kilner DN Firmin RS Rees J Martinez DJ Pennell RH Mohiaddin SR Underwood DB Longmore, Radiology 1991 178 229 235 1984310
13. Magnetic resonance jet velocity mapping in mitral and aortic valve stenosis. PJ Kilner CC Manzara RH Mohiaddin DJ Pennell MG Sutton DN Firmin SR Underwood DB Longmore, Circulation 1993 87 1239 1248 8462150
14. Rapid quantitation of high-speed flow jets. KS Nayak BS Hu DG Nishimura, Magn Reson Med 2003 50 366 372 10.1002/mrm.10538 12876713
15. Quantification of complex flow using MR phase imaging - a study of parameters influencing the phase/velocity relation. F Stahlberg L Sondergaard C Thomsen O Henriksen, Magn Reson Imaging 1992 10 13 23 10.1016/0730-725X(92) 90368-A 1545672
16. Accuracy of phase-contrast flow measurements in the presence of partial-volume effects. C Tang DD Blatter DL Parker, J Magn Reson Imaging 1993 3 377 385 10.1002/jmri.1880030213 8448400
17. MRI of blood flow: correlation of image appearance with spin-echo phase shift and signal intensity. PE Valk JD Hale LE Crooks L Kaufman MS Roos DA Ortendahl CB Higgins, AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986 146 931 939 3485910
18. Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. MA Quinones CM Otto M Stoddard A Waggoner WA Zoghbi Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of E, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2002 15 167 184 10.1067/mje.2002.120202 11836492
19. BS Massey, Mechanics of fluids Van Nostrand Reinhold Company 3 1975
20. Left ventricular mass and volume: fast calculation with guide-point modeling on MR images. AA Young BR Cowan SF Thrupp WJ Hedley LJ Dell'Italia, Radiology 2000 216 597 602 10924592
21. Correction of phase offset errors in main pulmonary artery flow quantification. JW Lankhaar MB Hofman JT Marcus JJ Zwanenburg TJ Faes A Vonk-Noordegraaf, J Magn Reson Imaging 2005 22 73 79 10.1002/jmri.20361 15971181
22. Jets associated with stenotic valvular disease. GL Nayler DN Firmin DB Longmore, J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986 10 715 722 10.1097/00004728-198609000- 00001 3528245
23. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. RO Bonow BA Carabello C Kanu AC de Leon Jr DP Faxon MD Freed WH Gaasch BW Lytle RA Nishimura PT O'Gara RA O'Rourke CM Otto PM Shah JS Shanewise SC Smith Jr AK Jacobs CD Adams JL Anderson EM Antman DP Faxon V Fuster JL Halperin LF Hiratzka SA Hunt BW Lytle R Nishimura RL Page B Riegel, Circulation 2006 114 84 231 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.176857 16880336
24. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques. C Kupfahl M Honold G Meinhardt H Vogelsberg A Wagner H Mahrholdt U Sechtem, Heart 2004 90 893 901 10.1136/hrt.2003.022376 15253962
25. Review of hydrodynamic principles for the cardiologist: applications to the study of blood flow and jets by imaging techniques. AP Yoganathan EG Cape HW Sung FP Williams A Jimoh, J Am Coll Cardiol 1988 12 1344 1353 3170977
26. Mapping of turbulent intensity by magnetic resonance imaging. JC Gatenby JC Gore, J Magn Reson B 1994 104 119 126 10.1006/jmrb.1994.1064 8049864
27. Mechanisms of signal loss in magnetic resonance imaging of stenoses. JC Gatenby TR McCauley JC Gore, Med Phys 1993 20 1049 1057 10.1118/1.597001 8413012
28. H Feigenbaum W Armstrong T Ryan, Feigenbaum's Echocardiography Lea & Febiger 6 2004
29. Baseline correction of phase contrast images improves quantification of blood flow in the great vessels. A Chernobelsky O Shubayev CR Comeau SD Wolff, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007 9 681 685 10.1080/10976640601187588 17578724
30. Haghi D, Suselbeck T, Fluechter S, Kalmar G, Schroder M, Kaden JJ, Poerner T, Borggrefe M, Papavassiliu T: A hybrid approach for quantification of aortic valve stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography: comparison to right heart catheterization and standard echocardiography. Clin Res Cardiol 2006, 95:162-167.