Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic doppler echocardiography for the estimation of effective orifice area in aortic stenosis

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Garcia, Julio ^a,b   Kadem, Lyes ^b   Larose, Eric ^a   Clavel, Marie Annick ^a   Pibarot, Philippe ^a  

^a LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AORTA STENOSIS; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE OUTFLOW TRACT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; AGED; AORTA VALVE; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HOSPITALIZATION; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; AGED; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE VOLUME; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 80053525712     PISSN: 10976647     EISSN: 1532429X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-25     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, et al. Circulation 2006 114 84 e231 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.176857 16880336 (Pubitemid 44268973)
2. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J, et al. Eur Heart J 2007 28 2 230 68 17259184 (Pubitemid 46276943)
3. Paradoxical low flow, low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P, et al. Circulation 2007 115 2856 2864 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668681 17533183 (Pubitemid 46869673)
4. Silent and apparent cerebral embolism after retrograde catheterisation of the aortic valve in valvular stenosis: a prospective, randomised study. Omran H, Schmidt H, Hackenbroch M, et al. Lancet 2003 361 9365 1241 6 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12978-9 12699950 (Pubitemid 36428577)
5. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Valvular Heart Disease: Technique and Validation. Cawley PJ, Maki JH, Otto CM, Circulation 2009 119 468 478 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.742486 19171869
6. Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography. Caruthers SD, Lin SJ, Brown P, et al. Circulation 2003 108 2236 2243 10.1161/01.CIR.0000095268.47282.A1 14568899 (Pubitemid 37363041)
7. A simplified continuity equation approach to the quantification of stenotic bicuspid aortic valves using velocity-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Yap SC, van Geuns RJ, Meijboom FJ, et al. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007 9 899 906 10.1080/10976640701693717 18066750 (Pubitemid 350232925)
8. Correlation Analysis of Stenotic Aortic Valve Flow Patterns Using Phase Contrast MRI. Waters EA, Caruthers SD, Wickline SA, Annals of Biomed Eng 2005 33 878 887 10.1007/s10439-005-2865-9 (Pubitemid 40997674)
9. A hybrid approach for quantification of aortic valve stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography: comparison to right heart catheterization and standard echocardiography. Hagui D, Suselbeck T, Fluechter S, et al. Clin Res Cardiol 2006 95 162 167 10.1007/s00392-006-0355-1 16598529 (Pubitemid 43333790)
10. Aortic valve stenotic area calculation from phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance: the importance of short echo time. O'Brien KR, Gabriel RS, Greiser A, et al. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2009 11 49 10.1186/1532-429X-11-49 19925667
11. Assessment of Aortic Valve Area in Aortic Stenosis Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Tomography: Comparison with Echocardiography. Malyar NM, Schlosser T, Barkhausen J, et al. Cardiology 2008 109 126 134 10.1159/000105554 17713328
12. Comparison of dual-source computed tomography for the quantification of the aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis versus transthoracic echocardiography and invasive hemodynamic assessment. Ropers D, Ropers U, Marwan M, et al. Am J Cardiol 2009 104 11 1561 7 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.07.024 19932793
13. Comparison of Aortic Valve Area Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Dual-Source Computed Tomography. Bruder O, Jochims M, Hunold P, et al. Acta Radiol 2009 50 6 645 51 10.1080/02841850902902540 19452337
14. What do you mean by aortic valve area: geometric orifice area, effective orifice area, or gorlin area? Garcia D, Kadem L, J Heart Valve Dis 2006 15 5 601 8 17044363
15. What our eyes see is not necessarily what our heart feels. Pibarot P, Larose E, Cardiology 2008 109 2 122 5 10.1159/000105553 17713327
16. Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of E: Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. Quinones MA, Otto CM, Stoddard M, et al. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002 15 167 184 10.1067/mje.2002.120202 11836492
17. In vivo Velocity and Flow Errors Quantification by Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Garcia J, Kadem L, Larose E, Pibarot P, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008 2008 1377 1380 19162924
18. Assessment of aortic stenosis severity: when the gradient does not fit with the valve area. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Heart 2010 96 1431 1433 10.1136/hrt.2010.195149 20813724
19. New Approches to Quantifying Aortic Stenosis Severity. Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P, Akins C, Current Cardiology Reports 2008 10 91 97 10.1007/s11886-008-0017-1 18417008
20. Determining Aortic Stenosis Severity: What to Do When Measuring Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Diameter Is Difficult. Johnson MA, Moss RR, Munt B, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009 22 452 453 10.1016/j.echo.2009.03.018 19450741
21. Remodelling of the aortic root in severe tricuspid aortic stenosis: implications for trascatheter aoritc valve implantation. Stolzmann P, Knight J, Desbiolles L, et al. Eur Radiol 2009 19 1316 1323 10.1007/s00330-009-1302-0 19190915
22. Size-adjusted left ventricular outflow tract diameter reference values: a safeguard for the evaluation of the severity of aortic stenosis. Leye M, Brochet E, Lepage L, et al. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009 22 445 451 10.1016/j.echo.2009.02.007 19307102
23. Determination of aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography using the continuity equation: a critical evaluation. Baumgartner H, Kratzer H, Helmreich G, et al. Cardiology 1990 77 101 111 10.1159/000174590 2397487 (Pubitemid 20211048)
24. Differences in aortic valve area measured with CT planimetry and echocardiography (continuity equation) are related to divergent estimates of left ventricular outflow tract area. Halpern EJ, Mallya R, Sewell M, et al. AJR Am Roentgenol 2009 192 1668 1673 10.2214/AJR.08.1986
25. Three-dimensional imaging of the aortic valve and aortic root with computed tomography: new standards in an era of transcatheter valve repair/implantation. Schoenhagen P, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR, et al. Eur Heart J 2009 30 2079 2086 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp260 19561340
26. Demonstration of left ventricular outflow tract eccentricity by 64-slice multi-detector CT. Doddamani S, Grushko MJ, Makaryus AN, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009 25 175 181 10.1007/s10554-008-9362-9 18770012
27. Effect of Three-Dimensional Valve Shape on the Hemodynamics of Aortic Stenosis: Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Stereolithography and Patient Studies. Gilon D, Cape GC, Handschumacher MD, Song JK, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002 40 1479 86 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02269-6 12392840 (Pubitemid 35192875)
28. Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis. Minners J, Allgeier M, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, et al. Eur Heart J 2008 29 8 1043 8 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm543 18156619 (Pubitemid 351844672)
29. Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatement. Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P, Carabello B, Eur Heart J 2010 31 281 289 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp361 19737801
30. Crossing the Aortic Valve in Severe Aortic Stenosis: No Longer Acceptable? Chambers J, Bach D, Dumesnil JG, et al. J Heart Valve Dis 2004 12 5 344 6