Intrinsic protein disorder and protein-protein interactions

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 116-127

  Hsu, Wei Lun ^a   Oldfield, Christopher ^a   Meng, Jingwei ^a   Huang, Fei ^a   Xue, Bin ^a,b   Uversky, Vladimir N ^a,b   Romero, Pedro ^a   Dunker, A Keith ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Molecular recognition; Protein interaction; Sequence conservation

Indexed keywords

MOLECULAR RECOGNITION;

BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS; INTRINSICALLY DISORDERED PROTEINS; INTRINSICALLY DISORDERED REGIONS; PROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS; SEQUENCE CONSERVATION; SEQUENCE IDENTITY;

PROTEINS;

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; HUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY;

BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEINS; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

EID: 84891387199     PISSN: 23356928     EISSN: 23356936     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Jeong, H., et al., Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature, 2001. 411 (6833): P. 41-2.
2. Barabasi, A.L. and Z.N. Oltvai, Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet, 2004. 5(2): p. 101-13.
3. Dunker, A.K., et al, Flexible nets. The roles of intrinsic disorder in protein interaction networks. FEBS J, 2005. 272(20): p. 5129-48.
4. Patil, A., K. Kinoshita, and H. Nakamura, Hub promiscuity in protein-protein interaction networks. Int J Mol Sci, 2010. 11(4): p. 1930-43.
5. Kim, P.M., et al, The role of disorder in interaction networks: a structural analysis. Mol Syst Biol, 2008. 4: p. 179.
6. Haynes, C., et al., Intrinsic disorder is a common feature of hub proteins from four eukaryotic interactomes. PLoS Comput Biol, 2006. 2(8): p. e100.
7. Kriwacki, R.W., et al, Structural studies of p21Waf1/Cip1/Sdi1 in the free and Cdk2-bound state: conformational disorder mediates binding diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1996. 93(21): p. 11504-9.
8. Gould, C.M., et al, ELM: the status of the 2010 eukaryotic linear motif resource. Nucleic Acids Res, 2010. 38(Database issue): p. D167-80.
9. Edwards, R.J., N.E. Davey, and D.C. Shields, SLiMFinder: a probabilistic method for identifying overrepresented, convergently evolved, short linear motifs in proteins. PLoS One, 2007. 2(10): p. e967.
10. Dosztanyi, Z., B. Meszaros, and I. Simon, ANCHOR: web server for predicting protein binding regions in disordered proteins. Bioinformatics, 2009. 25(20): p. 2745-6.
11. Mohan, A., et al., Analysis of molecular recognition features (MoRFs). J Mol Biol, 2006. 362(5): p. 1043-59.
12. Oldfield, C.J., et al, Coupled folding and binding with alpha-helix-forming molecular recognition elements. Biochemistry, 2005. 44(37): p. 12454-70.
13. Cheng, Y., et al., Mining alpha-helix-forming molecular recognition features with cross species sequence alignments. Biochemistry, 2007. 46(47): p. 13468-77.
14. Fuxreiter, M., P. Tompa, and I. Simon, Local structural disorder imparts plasticity on linear motifs. Bioinformatics, 2007. 23(8): p. 950-6.
15. Oldfield, C.J., et al, Flexible nets: disorder and induced fit in the associations of p53 and 14-3-3 with their partners. BMC Genomics, 2008. 9 Suppl 1: p. S1.
16. Lowem E.D., et al, Specificity determinants of recruitment peptides bound to phospho-CDK2/cyclin A. Biochemistry, 2002. 41(52): p. 15625-34.
17. Avalos, J.L., et al, Structure of a Sir2 enzyme bound to an acetylated p53 peptide. Mol Cell, 2002. 10(3): p. 523-35.
18. Mujtaba, S., et al., Structural mechanism of the bromodomain of the coactivator CBP in p53 transcriptional activation. Mol Cell, 2004. 13(2): p. 251-63.
19. Rustandi, R.R., D.M. Baldisseri, and D.J. Weber, Structure of the negative regulatory domain of p53 bound to S100B(betabeta). Nat Struct Biol, 2000. 7(7): p. 570-4.
20. Wang, L., et al., X-ray crystal structures of the estrogen-related receptor-gamma ligand binding domain in three functional states reveal the molecular basis of small molecule regulation. J Biol Chem, 2006. 281(49): p. 37773-81.
21. Madauss, K.P., et al, A structural and in vitro characterization of asoprisnil: A selective progesterone receptor modulator. Molecular Endocrinology, 2007. 21(5): p. 1066-1081.
22. Xu, H.E., et al, Structural basis for antagonist-mediated recruitment of nuclear co-repressors by PPAR alpha. Nature, 2002. 415 (6873): P. 813-817.
23. Grishin, N.V. and M.A. Phillips, The subunit interfaces of oligomeric enzymes are conserved to a similar extent to the overall protein sequences. Protein Sci, 1994. 3(12): p. 2455-8.
24. Hasty, J. and J.J. Collins, Protein interactions. Unspinning the web. Nature, 2001. 411 (6833): P. 30-1.
25. Spolar, R.S. and M.T. Record, Jr., Coupling of local folding to site-specific binding of proteins to DNA. Science, 1994. 263 (5148): P. 777-84.
26. Fares, M.A., M.X. Ruiz-Gonzalez, and J.P. Labrador, Protein coadaptation and the design of novel approaches to identify protein-protein interactions. IUBMB Life, 2011. 63(4): p. 264-71.
27. Espinoza-Fonseca, L.M., Aromatic residues link binding and function of intrinsically disordered proteins. Molecular BioSystems, 2011.
28. Tompa, P. and M. Fuxreiter, Fuzzy complexes: polymorphism and structural disorder in protein-protein interactions. Trends Biochem Sci, 2008. 33(1): p. 2-8.
29. Shindyalov, I.N. and P.E. Bourne, Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. Protein Eng, 1998. 11(9): p. 739-47.
30. Shatsky, M., R. Nussinov, and H.J. Wolfson, A method for simultaneous alignment of multiple protein structures. Proteins, 2004. 56(1): p. 143-56.