Protein coadaptation and the design of novel approaches to identify protein-protein interactions

IUBMB Life

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 264-271

  Fares, Mario A ^a,b   Ruiz González, Mario X ^a   Labrador, Juan Pablo ^b  

^a Ciudad Politécnica de la Innovación   (Spain)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

coadaptation; coevolution; protein interaction; yeast 2 hybrid

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; EPHRIN; EPHRIN RECEPTOR; LIGAND; ORPHAN NUCLEAR RECEPTOR; PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE; RECEPTOR;

BIOLOGY; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL VIABILITY; COEVOLUTION; EUKARYOTIC CELL; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; GENE CLUSTER; GENE DUPLICATION; GENOME ANALYSIS; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; IMMUNE RESPONSE; METABOLISM; PLANT FUNGUS INTERACTION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REVIEW; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SYMBIOSIS; TRANSLOCATION LINE;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; HUMANS; INTERCELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; SYMBIOSIS;

EID: 79954553641     PISSN: 15216543     EISSN: 15216551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/iub.455     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Albert, R., Jeong, H., and, Barabasi, A. L., (2000) Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 406, 378-382. (Pubitemid 30625551)
2. Goh, C. S., Milburn, D., and, Gerstein, M., (2004) Conformational changes associated with protein-protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14, 104-109. (Pubitemid 38258244)
3. Edwards, A. M., Kus, B., Jansen, R., Greenbaum, D., and, Greenblatt, J., et al. (2002) Bridging structural biology and genomics: assessing protein interaction data with known complexes. Trends Genet. 18, 529-536. (Pubitemid 35287028)
4. Rigaut, G., Shevchenko, A., Rutz, B., Wilm, M., Mann, M., et al. (1999) A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 1030-1032. (Pubitemid 29474865)
5. Puig, O., Caspary, F., Rigaut, G., Rutz, B., Bouveret, E., et al. (2001) The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. Methods 24, 218-229. (Pubitemid 32846428)
6. Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., et al. (2000) A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403, 623-627. (Pubitemid 30103994)
7. Ito, T., Chiba, T., Ozawa, R., Yoshida, M., Hattori, M., et al. (2001) A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4569-4574. (Pubitemid 32295017)
8. Zhu, H., Bilgin, M., Bangham, R., Hall, D., Casamayor, A., et al. (2001) Global analysis of protein activities using proteome chips. Science 293, 2101-2105. (Pubitemid 32848060)
9. Gavin, A. C., Aloy, P., Grandi, P., Krause, R., Boesche, M., et al. (2006) Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440, 631-636.
10. Krogan, N. J., Cagney, G., Yu, H., Zhong, G., Guo, X., et al. (2006) Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 440, 637-643.
11. Sowa, M. E., Bennett, E. J., Gygi, S. P., and, Harper, J. W., (2009) Defining the human deubiquitinating enzyme interaction landscape. Cell 138, 389-403.
12. Bandyopadhyay, D., Huan, J., Liu, J., Prins, J., Snoeyink, J., et al. (2010) Functional neighbors: inferring relationships between nonhomologous protein families using family-specific packing motifs. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 14, 1137-1143.
13. Fraser, H. B., Hirsh, A. E., Steinmetz, L. M., Scharfe, C., and, Feldman, M. W., (2002) Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science 296, 750-752. (Pubitemid 34442006)
14. Hahn, M. W., and, Kern, A. D., (2005) Comparative genomics of centrality and essentiality in three eukaryotic protein-interaction networks. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 803-806. (Pubitemid 40471393)
15. Bloom, J. D., and, Adami, C., (2003) Apparent dependence of protein evolutionary rate on number of interactions is linked to biases in protein-protein interactions data sets. BMC Evol. Biol. 3, 21.
16. Pal, C., Papp, B., and, Hurst, L. D., (2003) Genomic function: rate of evolution and gene dispensability. Nature 421, 496-497; discussion 497-498.
17. Hahn, M. W., Conant, G. C., and, Wagner, A., (2004) Molecular evolution in large genetic networks: does connectivity equal constraint? J. Mol. Evol. 58, 203-211. (Pubitemid 38183972)
18. Duret, L., and, Mouchiroud, D., (2000) Determinants of substitution rates in mammalian genes: expression pattern affects selection intensity but not mutation rate. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 68-74. (Pubitemid 30056993)
19. Pal, C., Papp, B., and, Hurst, L. D., (2001) Does the recombination rate affect the efficiency of purifying selection? The yeast genome provides a partial answer. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 2323-2326. (Pubitemid 33134362)
20. Rocha, E. P., and, Danchin, A., (2004) An analysis of determinants of amino acids substitution rates in bacterial proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 108-116. (Pubitemid 38233524)
21. Ingvarsson, P. K., (2007) Gene expression and protein length influence codon usage and rates of sequence evolution in Populus tremula. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 836-844. (Pubitemid 46355807)
22. Whitfield, L. S., Lovell-Badge, R., and, Goodfellow, P. N., (1993) Rapid sequence evolution of the mammalian sex-determining gene SRY. Nature 364, 713-715. (Pubitemid 23273122)
23. Rausher, M. D., Miller, R. E., and, Tiffin, P., (1999) Patterns of evolutionary rate variation among genes of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 266-274. (Pubitemid 29091683)
24. Alvarez-Ponce, D., Aguade, M., and, Rozas, J., (2009) Network-level molecular evolutionary analysis of the insulin/TOR signal transduction pathway across 12 Drosophila genomes. Genome Res. 19, 234-242.
25. Ehrlich, P. R., and, Raven, P. H., (1964) Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18, 586-608.
26. Thompson, J. N., (1994) The Coevolutionary Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
27. Atchley, W. R., Wollenberg, K. R., Fitch, W. M., Terhalle, W., and, Dress, A. W., (2000) Correlations among amino acid sites in bHLH protein domains: an information theoretic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 164-178. (Pubitemid 30057002)
28. Gloor, G. B., Martin, L. C., Wahl, L. M., and, Dunn, S. D., (2005) Mutual information in protein multiple sequence alignments reveals two classes of coevolving positions. Biochemistry 44, 7156-7165. (Pubitemid 40656660)
29. Fares, M. A., (2006) Computational and statistical methods to explore the various dimensions of protein evolution. Curr. Bioinform. 1, 207-217.
30. Lovell, S. C., and, Robertson, D. L., (2010) An integrated view of molecular coevolution in protein-protein interactions. Mol. Biol. Evol.
31. Tillier, E. R., and, Lui, T. W., (2003) Using multiple interdependency to separate functional from phylogenetic correlations in protein alignments. Bioinformatics 19, 750-755. (Pubitemid 36511899)
32. Pollock, D. D., Taylor, W. R., and, Goldman, N., (1999) Coevolving protein residues: maximum likelihood identification and relationship to structure. J. Mol. Biol. 287, 187-198. (Pubitemid 29134806)
33. Choi S. S., Li, W., and, Lahn, B. T., (2005) Robust signals of coevolution of interacting residues in mammalian proteomes identified by phylogeny-aided structural analysis. Nat. Genet. 37, 1367-1371. (Pubitemid 41722194)
34. Pazos, F., and, Valencia, A., (2008) Protein co-evolution, co-adaptation and interactions. EMBO J 27, 2648-2655.
35. Juan, D., Pazos, F., and, Valencia, A., (2008) Co-evolution and co-adaptation in protein networks. FEBS Lett. 582, 1225-1230.
36. Tillier, E. R., and, Charlebois, R. L., (2009) The human protein coevolution network. Genome Res. 19, 1861-1871.
37. Brose, K., Bland, K. S., Wang, K. H., Arnott, D., Henzel, W., et al. (1999) Slit proteins bind Robo receptors and have an evolutionarily conserved role in repulsive axon guidance. Cell 96, 795-806. (Pubitemid 29165083)
38. Kidd, T., Bland, K. S., and, Goodman, C. S., (1999) Slit is the midline repellent for the robo receptor in Drosophila. Cell 96, 785-794. (Pubitemid 29165082)
39. Drescher, U., (2002) Eph family functions from an evolutionary perspective. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12, 397-402. (Pubitemid 34722917)
40. Mellott, D. O., and, Burke, R. D., (2008) The molecular phylogeny of eph receptors and ephrin ligands. BMC Cell Biol. 9, 27.
41. Zlotnik, A., Yoshie, O., and, Nomiyama H., (2006) The chemokine and chemokine receptor superfamilies and their molecular evolution. Genome Biol. 7, 243.
42. Labrador, J. P., Brambilla, R., and, Klein, R., (1997) The N-terminal globular domain of Eph receptors is sufficient for ligand binding and receptor signaling. EMBO J 16, 3889-3897. (Pubitemid 27281005)
43. Himanen, J.-P., and, Nikolov, D. B., (2003) Eph signaling: a structural view. Trends Neurosci. 26, 46-51. (Pubitemid 35463373)
44. Pazos, F., Olmea, O., and, Valencia, A., (1997) A graphical interface for correlated mutations and other protein structure prediction methods. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13, 319-321.
45. Davis, B. H., Poon, A. F., and, Whitlock, M. C., (2009) Compensatory mutations are repeatable and clustered within proteins. Proc. Biol. Sci.
46. Dolan, J., Walshe, K., Alsbury, S., Hokamp, K., O'Keeffe, S., et al. (2007) The extracellular leucine-rich repeat superfamily; a comparative survey and analysis of evolutionary relationships and expression patterns. BMC Genomics 8, 320.
47. Kurusu, M., Cording, A., Taniguchi, M., Menon, K., Suzuki, E., et al. (2008) A screen of cell-surface molecules identifies leucine-rich repeat proteins as key mediators of synaptic target selection. Neuron 59, 972-985.
48. Hong, W., Zhu, H., Potter, C. J., Barsh, G., Kurusu, M., et al. (2009) Leucine-rich repeat transmembrane proteins instruct discrete dendrite targeting in an olfactory map. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1542-1550.
49. Bary, A. D., (1879) Die Erscheinung der Symbiose. Strassburg.
50. Dale, C., and, Moran, N. A., (2006) Molecular interactions between bacterial symbionts and their hosts. Cell 126, 453-465. (Pubitemid 44163611)
51. Dale, C., Young, S. A., Haydon, D. T., and, Welburn, S. C., (2001) The insect endosymbiont Sodalis glossinidius utilizes a type III secretion system for cell invasion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 1883-1888. (Pubitemid 32165592)
52. Medina, M., and, Sachs, J. L., (2010) Symbiont genomics, our new tangled bank. Genomics 95, 129-137.
53. Sexton, J. A., and, Vogel, J. P., (2002) Type IVB secretion by intracellular pathogens. Traffic 3, 178-185. (Pubitemid 34555475)
54. Buttner, D., and, He, S. Y., (2009) Type III protein secretion in plant pathogenic bacteria. Plant. Physiol. 150, 1656-1664.
55. Marchetti, M., Capela, D., Glew, M., Cruveiller, S., Chane-Woon-Ming, B., et al. (2010) Experimental evolution of a plant pathogen into a legume symbiont. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000280.
56. Radutoiu, S., Madsen, L. H., Madsen, E. B., Felle, H. H., Umehara, Y., et al. (2003) Plant recognition of symbiotic bacteria requires two LysM receptor-like kinases. Nature 425, 585-592. (Pubitemid 37280137)
57. Parniske, M., (2008) Arbuscular mycorrhiza: the mother of plant root endosymbioses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 406, 763-775.
58. Defossez, E., Djieto-Lordon, C., McKey, D., Selosse, M. A., and, Blatrix, R., (2010) Plant-ants feed their host plant, but above all a fungal symbiont to recycle nitrogen. Proc. Biol. Sci.
59. Leroy, C., Séjalon-Delmas, J. A., Ruiz-González, M. X., Gryta, H., et al. (2011) Trophic mediation by a fungus in an ant-plant mutualism. J. Ecol. 99, 583-590.
60. Williamson, V. M., and, Gleason, C. A., (2003) Plant-nematode interactions. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6, 327-333. (Pubitemid 36964859)
61. Jones, J. D., and, Dangl, J. L., (2006) The plant immune system. Nature 444, 323-329. (Pubitemid 44764102)