Nucleotide specificity of DNA binding of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor: ARNT complex is unaffected by ligand structure

Toxicological Sciences

Volumn 137, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 102-113

  DeGroot, Danica E ^a   Denison, Michael S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Ah receptor; Dioxin; DRE; TCDD

Indexed keywords

2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZO PARA DIOXIN; 3 METHYLCHOLANTHRENE; AROMATIC HYDROCARBON RECEPTOR; BETA NAPHTHOFLAVONE; INDIRUBIN; KYNURENINE; MIVOTILATE; NUCLEOTIDE; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE; DNA; HYPOXIA INDUCIBLE FACTOR 1BETA; INDOLE DERIVATIVE; LIGAND; THIAZOLE DERIVATIVE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; DNA BINDING; DNA STRUCTURE; GUINEA PIG; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; IN VITRO STUDY; INCUBATION TIME; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; AGONISTS; ANIMAL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; DNA RESPONSIVE ELEMENT; GENETIC TRANSFECTION; METABOLISM; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REPORTER GENE; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; TUMOR CELL LINE;

CAVIA;

ANIMALS; ARYL HYDROCARBON RECEPTOR NUCLEAR TRANSLOCATOR; BETA-NAPHTHOFLAVONE; BINDING SITES; CELL LINE, TUMOR; DNA; GENES, REPORTER; GUINEA PIGS; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; INDOLES; KYNURENINE; LIGANDS; METHYLCHOLANTHRENE; MICE; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RECEPTORS, ARYL HYDROCARBON; RESPONSE ELEMENTS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN; THIAZOLES; TRANSFECTION;

EID: 84891329790     PISSN: 10966080     EISSN: 10960929     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kft234     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bacsi, S. G., Reisz-Porszasz, S., and Hankinson, O. (1995). Orientation of the heterodimeric aryl hydrocarbon (dioxin) receptor complex on its asymmetric DNA recognition sequence. Mol. Pharmacol. 47, 432-438.
2. Bank, P. A., Yao, E. F., Phelps, C. L., Harper, P. A., and Denison, M. S. (1992). Species-specific binding of transformed Ah receptor to a dioxin responsive transcriptional enhancer. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 228, 85-94.
3. Crooks, G. E., Hon, G., Chandonia, J. M., and Brenner, S. E. (2004). WebLogo: A sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 14, 1188-1190.
4. DeGroot, D., He, G., Fraccalvieri, D., Bonati, L., Pandini, A. and Denison, M. S. (2011). AHR Ligands: Promiscuity in binding and diversity in response. In The AH Receptor in Biology and Toxicology (R. Pohjanvirta, Ed.), pp. 63-79. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.
5. Denison, M. S., Elferink, C. F., and Phelan, D. (1998a). The Ah receptor signal transduction pathway. In Toxicant-Receptor Interactions in the Modulation of Signal Transduction and Gene Expression (M. S. Denison and W. G. Helferich, Eds.), pp. 3-33. Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia, PA.
6. Denison, M. S., Fisher, J. M., and Whitlock, J. P., Jr. (1988). The DNA recognition site for the dioxin-Ah receptor complex. Nucleotide sequence and functional analysis. J. Biol. Chem. 263, 17221-17224.
7. Denison, M. S., and Nagy, S. R. (2003). Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor by structurally diverse exogenous and endogenous chemicals. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 43, 309-334.
8. Denison, M. S., Rogers, J. M., Rushing, S. R., Jones, C. L., Tetangco, S. C., and Heath-Pagliuso, S. (2002). Analysis of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) signal transduction pathway. In Current Protocols in Toxicology (M. D. Maines, L. G. Costa, D. J. Reed, S. Sassa, and I. G. Sipes, Eds.), pp. 4.8.1-4.8.45. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
9. Denison, M. S., Seidel, S. D., Rogers, W. J., Ziccardi, M., Winter, G. M., and Heath-Pagliuso, S. (1998b). Natural and synthetic ligands for the Ah receptor. In Molecular Biology of the Toxic Response (A. Puga and K. B. Wallace, Eds.), pp. 393-410. Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia, PA.
10. Denison, M. S., Soshilov, A. A., He, G., DeGroot, D. E., and Zhao, B. (2011). Exactly the same but different: Promiscuity and diversity in the molecular mechanisms of action of the aryl hydrocarbon (dioxin) receptor. Toxicol. Sci. 124, 1-22.
11. Dere, E., Lo, R., Celius, T., Matthews, J., and Zacharewski, T. R. (2011). Integration of genome-wide computation DRE search, AhR ChIP-chip and gene expression analyses of TCDD-elicited responses in the mouse liver. BMC Genomics 12, 365.
12. DiNatale, B. C., Schroeder, J. C., Francey, L. J., Kusnadi, A., and Perdew, G. H. (2010). Mechanistic insights into the events that lead to synergistic induction of interleukin 6 transcription upon activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and inflammatory signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 24388-24397.
13. Elferink, C. J., Gasiewicz, T. A., and Whitlock, J. P., Jr. (1990). Protein-DNA interactions at a dioxin-responsive enhancer. Evidence that the transformed Ah receptor is heteromeric. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 20708-20712.
14. Gillesby, B. E., Stanostefano, M., Porter, W., Safe, S., Wu, Z. F., and Zacharewski, T. R. (1997). Identification of a motif within the 5' regulatory region of pS2 which is responsible for AP-1 binding and TCDD-mediated suppression. Biochemistry 36, 6080-6089.
15. Gorman, C. M., Moffat, L. F., and Howard, B. H. (1982). Recombinant genomes which express chloramphenicol acetyltransferase in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2, 1044-1051.
16. Goryo, K., Suzuki, A., Del Carpio, C. A., Siizaki, K., Kuriyama, E., Mikami, Y., Kinoshita, K., Yasumoto, K., Rannug, A., Miyamoto, A., et al. (2007). Identification of amino acid residues in the Ah receptor involved in ligand binding. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 354, 396-402.
17. Gouédard, C., Barouki, R., and Morel, Y. (2004). Dietary polyphenols increase paraoxonase 1 gene expression by an aryl hydrocarbon receptor-dependent mechanism. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 5209-5222.
18. Hestermann, E. V., and Brown, M. (2003). Agonist and chemopreventative ligands induce differential transcriptional cofactor recruitment by aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 7920-7925.
19. Huang, G., and Elferink, C. J. (2012). A novel nonconsensus xenobiotic response element capable of mediating aryl hydrocarbon receptor-dependent gene expression. Mol. Pharmacol. 81, 338-347.
20. Jones, P. B., Durrin, L. K., Galeazzi, D. R., and Whitlock, J. P., Jr. (1986). Control of cytochrome P1-450 gene expression: Analysis of a dioxin-responsive enhancer system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83, 2802-2806.
21. Kinehara, M., Fukuda, I., Yoshida, K., and Ashida, H. (2009). Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated induction of the cytosolic phospholipase A(2)alpha gene by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in mouse hepatoma Hepa-1c1c7 cells. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 108, 277-281.
22. Krishnan, V., Porter, W., Santostefano, M., Wang, X., and Safe, S. (1995). Molecular mechanism of inhibition of estrogen-induced cathepsin D gene expression by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in MCF-7 cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 6710-6719.
23. Lo, R., and Matthews, J. (2012). High-resolution genome-wide mapping of AHR and ARNT binding sites by ChIP-Seq. Toxicol. Sci. 130, 349-361.
24. Lusska, A., Shen, E., and Whitlock, J. P., Jr. (1993). Protein-DNA interactions at a dioxin-responsive enhancer. Analysis of six bona fide DNA-binding sites for the liganded Ah receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 6575-6580.
25. Matikainen, T., Perez, G. I., Jurisicova, A., Pru, J. K., Schlezinger, J. J., Ryu, H. Y., Laine, J., Sakai, T., Korsmeyer, S. J., Casper, R. F., et al. (2001). Aromatic hydrocarbon receptor-driven Bax gene expression is required for premature ovarian failure caused by biohazardous environmental chemicals. Nat. Genet. 28, 355-360.
26. Murray, I. A., Flaveny, C. A., Chiaro, C. R., Sharma, A. K., Tanos, R. S., Schroeder, J. C., Amin, S. G., Bisson, W. H., Kolluri, S. K., and Perdew, G. H. (2011). Suppression of cytokine-mediated complement factor gene expression through selective activation of the Ah receptor with 3',4'-dimethoxy-a-naphthoflavone. Mol. Pharmacol. 79, 508-519.
27. Neuhold, L. A., Shirayoshi, Y., Ozato, K., Jones, J. E., and Nebert, D. W. (1989). Regulation of mouse CYP1A1 gene expression by dioxin: Requirement of two cis-acting elements during induction. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 2378-2386.
28. Ochs, S. D., Liu, J., Fernando, T. M., Fecher, R. A., and Sulentic, C. E. (2012). A dioxin response element in the multiple cloning site of the pGL3 luciferase reporter influences transcriptional activity. Toxicol. In Vitro 26, 979-984.
29. Oesch-Bartlomowicz, B., Huelster, A., Wiss, O., Antoniou-Lipfert, P., Dietrich, C., Arand, M., Weiss, C., Bockamp, E., and Oesch, F. (2005). Aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation by cAMP vs. dioxin: Divergent signaling pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 9218-9223.
30. Opitz, C. A., Litzenburger, U. M., Sahm, F., Ott, M., Tritschler, I., Trump, S., Schumacher, T., Jestaedt, L., Schrenk, D., Weller, M., et al. (2011). An endogenous tumour-promoting ligand of the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Nature 478, 197-203.
31. Rogers, J. M., and Denison, M. S. (2000). Recombinant cell bioassays for endocrine disruptors: Development of a stably transfected human ovarian cell line for the detection of estrogenic and anti-estrogenic chemicals. In Vitr. Mol. Toxicol. 13, 67-82.
32. Saatcioglu, F., Perry, D. J., Pasco, D. S., and Fagan, J. B. (1990). Aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor DNA-binding activity. Sequence specificity and Zn2+ requirement. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 9251-9258.
33. Sartor, M. A., Schnekenburger, M., Marlowe, J. L., Reichard, J. F., Wang, Y., Fan, Y., Ma, C., Karyala, S., Halbleib, D., Liu, X., et al. (2009). Genomewide analysis of aryl hydrocarbon receptor binding targets reveals an extensive array of gene clusters that control morphogenetic and developmental programs. Environ. Health Perspect. 117, 1139-1146.
34. Shen, E. S., and Whitlock, J. P., Jr. (1992). Protein-DNA interactions at a dioxin-responsive enhancer. Mutational analysis of the DNA-binding site for the liganded Ah receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 6815-6819.
35. Swanson, H. I., Chan, W. K., and Bradfield, C. A. (1995). DNA binding specificities and pairing rules of the Ah receptor, ARNT, and SIM proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26292-26302.
36. Vogel, C. F., Sciullo, E., Li, W., Wong, P., Lazennec, G., and Matsumura, F. (2007). RelB, a new partner of aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated transcription. Mol. Endocrinol. 21, 2941-2955.
37. Whelan, F., Hao, N., Furness, S. G., Whitelaw, M. L., and Chapman-Smith, A. (2010). Amino acid substitutions in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand binding domain reveal YH439 as an atypical AhR activator. Mol. Pharmacol. 77, 1037-1046.
38. Wright, W. E., Binder, M., and Funk, W. (1991). Cyclic amplification and selection of targets (CASTing) for the myogenin consensus binding site. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 4104-4110.
39. Xing, Y., Nukaya, M., Satyshur, K. A., Jiang, L., Stanevich, V., Korkmaz, E. N., Burdette, L., Kennedy, G. D., Cui, Q., and Bradfield, C. A. (2012). Identification of the Ah-receptor structural determinants for ligand preferences. Toxicol. Sci. 129, 86-97.
40. Yao, E. F., and Denison, M. S. (1992). DNA sequence determinants for binding of transformed Ah receptor to a dioxin-responsive enhancer. Biochemistry 31, 5060-5067.
41. Zhang, S., Rowlands, C., and Safe, S. (2008). Ligand-dependent interactions of the Ah receptor with coactivators in a mammalian two-hybrid assay. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 227, 196-206.
42. Zhao, B., Degroot, D. E., Hayashi, A., He, G., and Denison, M. S. (2010). CH223191 is a ligand-selective antagonist of the Ah (Dioxin) receptor. Toxicol. Sci. 117, 393-403.