Probability evaluations, expectations, and choices

The Science of Reason: A Festschrift for Jonathan St B.T. Evans

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 37-51

  Girotto, Vittorio ^a   Gonzalez, Michel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY IUAV OF VENICE   (Italy)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891278237     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Barbey, A. K., & Sloman, S.A. (2007). Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 241-254.
2. Barth, H., Le Mont, K., Lipton, J., & Spelke, E. S. (2005). Abstract number and arithmetic in preschool children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 102, 14116-14121.
3. David, F. N. (1962). Games, gods and gambling. A history of probability and statistical ideas. London: Griffin.
4. Evans, J. St B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 454-459.
5. Evans, J. St B. T. (2008). Dual process accounts of reasoning, judgments and social-cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278
6. Evans, J. St B. T., & Elqayam, S. (2007). Dual-processing explains base-rate neglect, but which dual-process theory and how? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 261-262.
7. Evans, J. St B. T., Handley, S. J., Perham, N., Over, D. E., & Thompson, V. A. (2000). Frequency versus probability formats in statistical word problems. Cognition, 77, 197-213.
8. Evans, J. St B. T., & Over, D. E. (1996). Rationality and reasoning. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
9. Franklin, J. (2001). The science of conjecture. Evidence and probability before Pascal. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10. Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (2007). The role of representation in Bayesian reasoning: Correcting common misconceptions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 264-267.
11. Girotto, V., & Gonzalez, M. (2001). Solving probabilistic and statistical problems: A matter of information structure and question form. Cognition, 78, 247-276.
12. Girotto, V., & Gonzalez, M. (2002). Chances and frequencies in probabilistic reasoning: Rejoinder to Hoffrage, Gigerenzer, Krauss, and Martignon. Cognition, 84, 353-359.
13. Girotto, V., & Gonzalez, M. (2005). Probabilistic reasoning and combinatorial analysis. In V. Girotto & P. N. Johnson-Laird (Eds.), The shape of reason (pp. 161-175). New York: Psychology Press.
14. Girotto, V., & Gonzalez, M. (2006). Norms and intuitions about chance. In L. Smith & J. Vonèche (Eds.), Norms in human development (pp. 220-236). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Girotto, V., & Gonzalez, M. (2008). Children's understanding of posterior probability. Cognition, 106, 325-344.
16. Gonzalez, M., & Girotto, V (2010). Eliciting probabilities: When choices and expectations disagree. Manuscript submitted for publication.
17. Gordon, P. (2004). Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science, 306, 496-499.
18. Huygens, C. (1714). Libellus de ratiociniis in ludo aleae, or, The value of all chances in games of fortune (W Browne, Trans.). London: S. Keimer. (Original work published 1657) Retrieved February 5, 2010, from http://www.stat.ucla.edu/history/ huygens.pdf
19. Johnson-Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V, Sonino-Legrenzi, M., & Caverni, J. P. (1999). Naive probability: A model theory of extensional reasoning. Psychological Review, 106, 62-88.
20. Kahneman, D., & Frederick S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgement. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972) Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
22. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values and frames. In D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choice, values, and frames (pp. 1-16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Reprinted from American Psychologist, 1984, 39, 341-350)
23. Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1971). Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 46-55.
24. Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science, 306, 499-503.
25. Pighin, S., Girotto, V., Gonzalez, M., Savadori, L., & Barilli, E., (2005). How to achieve a better understanding of test accuracy in prenatal diagnosis. Paper presented at the Society for Judgement and Decision-Making Annual Conference, Toronto, Canada, 12-14 November.
26. Ramsey, F. P. (1964). Truth and probability. In H. E. Kyburg Jr & H. E. Smokler (Eds.), Studies in subjective probability (pp. 61-92). New York: Wiley. (Original work published 1931)
27. Shafir, E., Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1993). Reason-based choices. Cognition, 49, 11-36.
28. Shakespeare, W (2008). The two gentlemen of Verona. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Originally published 1590)
29. Shakespeare, W. (2008). Twelfth night. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Originally published 1601)
30. Sloman, S. A. (1996) The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22.
31. Slovic, P. (1995). The construction of preference. American Psychologist, 50, 364-371.
32. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-726.
33. Teglas, E., Girotto, V., Gonzalez, M., & Bonatti, L. L. (2007). Intuitions of probabilities shape expectations about the future at 12 months and beyond. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 104, 19156-19159.
34. Tversky, A., & Griffin, D. (1991). Endowment and contrast in judgments of wellbeing. In R. Zeckhauser (Ed.), Strategy and choice (pp. 297-318). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.