Permeability studies of artificial and natural cancellous bone structures

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 792-799

  Syahrom, Ardiyansyah ^a   Abdul Kadir, Mohammed Rafiq ^a   Abdullah, Jaafar ^b   Öchsner, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b MALAYSIAN NUCLEAR AGENCY   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Cancellous bone; Permeability; Trabecular bone; Transport phenomena

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; BONE; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; FLOW OF FLUIDS; PLATES (STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS);

CANCELLOUS BONE; CANCELLOUS BONE STRUCTURE; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS METHODS; INTRINSIC PERMEABILITY; LINEAR RELATIONSHIPS; MAJOR FACTORS; TRABECULAR BONES; TRANSPORT PHENOMENA;

MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY;

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW; BONE GRAFT; BONE PERMEABILITY; BONE STRUCTURE; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; FLOW RATE; FLUID FLOW; MODEL; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; ORIENTATION; PERMEABILITY; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TRABECULAR BONE;

EID: 84890858805     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: 18734030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.08.011     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Vaccaro AR, Chiba K, Heller JG, Patel TC, Thalgott JS, Truumees E, et al. Bone grafting alternatives in spinal surgery. Spine J 2002;2:206-15.
2. Kaneko TS, Bell JS, Pejcic MR, Tehranzadeh J, Keyak JH. Mechanical properties, density and quantitative CT scan data of trabecular bone with and without metastases. J Biomech 2004;37:523-30.
3. Majumdar S, Kothari M, Augat P, Newitt DC, Link TM, Lin JC, et al. Highresolution magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture and biomechanical properties. Bone 1998;22:445-54.
4. Shim VPW, Yang LM, Liu JF, Lee VS. Characterisation of the dynamic compressive mechanical properties of cancellous bone from the human cervical spine. Int J Impact Eng 2005;32:525-40.
5. Samuel SP. Fluid/solid interactions in cancellous bone [D. Eng.]. United States, Ohio: Cleveland State University; 2004.
6. Pressel T, Bouguecha A, Vogt U, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Behrens B-A, Nolte I, et al. Mechanical properties of femoral trabecular bone in dogs. BioMed Eng OnLine 2005;4:17.
7. Perilli E, Baleani M, Ohman C, Fognani R, Baruffaldi F, Viceconti M. Dependence of mechanical compressive strength on local variations in microarchitecture in cancellous bone of proximal human femur. J Biomech 2008;41:438-46.
8. Nazarian A, Stauber M, Zurakowski D, Snyder BD, Müller R. The interaction of microstructure and volume fraction in predicting failure in cancellous bone. Bone 2006;39:1196-202.
9. Rincón-Kohli L, Zysset P. Multi-axial mechanical properties of human trabecular bone. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2009;8:195-208.
10. Teo JCM, Si-Hoe KM, Keh JEL, Teoh SH. Correlation of cancellous bone microarchitectural parameters from microCT to CT number and bone mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng C 2007;27:333-9.
11. Ford CM, Keaveny TM. The dependence of shear failure properties of trabecular bone on apparent density and trabecular orientation. J Biomech 1996;29:1309-17.
12. Kang Q, An YH, Friedman RF. Mechanical properties and bone densities of canine trabecular bone. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1998;9:263-7.
13. Ciarelli MJ, Goldstein SA, Kuhn JL, Cody DD, Brown MB. Evaluation of orthogonal mechanical properties and density of human trabecular bone from the major metaphyseal regions with materials testing and computed tomography. J Orthop Res 1991;9:674-82.
14. Yerby SA, Bay BK, Toh E, McLain RF, Drews MJ. The effect of boundary conditions on experimentally measured trabecular strain in the thoracic spine. J Biomech 1998;31:891-7.
15. Schoenfeld C, Lautenschlager E, Meyer P. Mechanical properties of human cancellous bone in the femoral head. Med Biol Eng Comput 1974;12:313-7.
16. Badiei A, Bottema MJ, Fazzalari NL. Influence of orthogonal overload on human vertebral trabecular bone mechanical properties. J Bone Miner Res 2007;22:1690-9.
17. Homminga J, McCreadie BR, Ciarelli TE, Weinans H, Goldstein SA, Huiskes R. Cancellous bone mechanical properties from normals and patients with hip fractures differ on the structure level, not on the bone hard tissue level. Bone 2002;30:759-64.
18. Krischak GD, Augat P, Wachter NJ, Kinzl L, Claes LE. Predictive value of bone mineral density and Singh Index for the in vitro mechanical properties of cancellous bone in the femoral head. Clin Biomech 1999;14:346-51.
19. Mitton D, Cendre E, Roux JP, Arlot ME, Peix G, Rumelhart C, et al. Mechanical properties of ewe vertebral cancellous bone compared with histomorphometry and high-resolution computed tomography parameters. Bone 1998;22: 651-8.
20. Nauman EA, Fong KE, Keaveny TM. Dependence of intertrabecular permeability on flow direction and anatomic site. Ann Biomed Eng 1999;27:517-24.
21. Baroud G, Wu JZ, Bohner M, Sponagel S, Steffen T. How to determine the permeability for cement infiltration of osteoporotic cancellous bone. Med Eng Phys 2003;25:283-8.
22. Baroud G, Falk R, Crookshank M, Sponagel S, Steffen T. Experimental and theoretical investigation of directional permeability of human vertebral cancellous bone for cement infiltration. J Biomech 2004;37:189-96.
23. Kohles SS, Roberts JB, Upton ML, Wilson CG, Bonassar LJ, Schlichting AL. Direct perfusion measurements of cancellous bone anisotropic permeability. J Biomech 2001;34:1197-202.
24. Grimm MJ, Williams JL. Measurements of permeability in human calcaneal trabecular bone. J Biomech 1997;30:743-5.
25. Ochia RS, Ching RP. Hydraulic resistance and permeability in human lumbar vertebral bodies. J Biomech Eng 2002;124:533-7.
26. Ochoa JA, Sanders AP, Kiesler TW, Heck DA, Toombs JP, Brandt KD, et al. In vivo observations of hydraulic stiffening in the canine femoral head. J Biomech Eng 1997;119:103-8.
27. Downey DJ, Simkin PA, Taggart R. The effect of compressive loading on intraosseous pressure in the femoral head in vitro. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:871-7.
28. Kim HA, Clement PJ, Cunningham JL. Investigation of cancellous bone architecture using structural optimisation. J Biomech 2008;41:629-35.
29. Accadbled F, Ambard D, de Gauzy JS, Swider P. A measurement technique to evaluate the macroscopic permeability of the vertebral end-plate. Med Eng Phys 2008;30:116-22.
30. Smith E, Gilligan C. Physical activity effects on bone metabolism. Calcif Tissue Int 1991;49:S50-4.
31. Bevill G, Farhamand F, Keaveny TM. Heterogeneity of yield strain in low-density versus high-density human trabecular bone. J Biomech 2009;42:2165-70.
32. Morgan EF, Bayraktar HH, Keaveny TM. Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. J Biomech 2003;36:897-904.
33. McCalden RW, McGeough JA, Court-Brown CM. Age-related changes in the compressive strength of cancellous bone. The relative importance of changes in density and trabecular architecture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79: 421-7.
34. Odgaard A. Three-dimensional methods for quantification of cancellous bone architecture. Bone 1997;20:315-28.
35. Kadir M, Syahrom A, Öchsner A. Finite element analysis of idealised unit cell cancellous structure based on morphological indices of cancellous bone. Med Biol Eng Comput 2010;48:497-505.
36. Morita M, Ebihara A, Itoman M, Sasada T. Progression of osteoporosis in cancellous bone depending on trabecular structure. Ann Biomed Eng 1994;22: 532-9.
37. Yeni YN, Hou FJ, Vashishth D, Fyhrie DP. Trabecular shear stress in human vertebral cancellous bone: intra-and inter-individual variations. J Biomech 2001;34:1341-6.
38. Stauber M, Müller R. Volumetric spatial decomposition of trabecular bone into rods and plates-a new method for local bone morphometry. Bone 2006;38:475-84.
39. Ulrich D, van Rietbergen B, Laib A, Rügsegger P. The ability of three-dimensional structural indices to reflect mechanical aspects of trabecular bone. Bone 1999;25:55-60.
40. Sanz-Herrera J, Garcia-Aznar J, Doblare M. A mathematical model for bone tissue regeneration inside a specific type of scaffold. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2008;7:355-66.
41. Valdes-Parada FJ, Ochoa-Tapia JA, Alvarez-Ramirez J. Validity of the permeability Carman-Kozeny equation: a volume averaging approach. Phys A: Statis Mech Appl 2009;388:789-98.
42. Sanz-Herrera JA, García-Aznar JM, Doblaré M. On scaffold designing for bone regeneration: a computational multiscale approach. Acta Biomater 2009;5:219-29.
43. Gonçalves Coelho P, Rui Fernandes P, Carriço Rodrigues H. Multiscale modeling of bone tissue with surface and permeability control. J Biomech 2011;44: 321-9.
44. Xu W, Zhang H, Yang Z, Zhang J. Numerical investigation on the flow characteristics and permeability of three-dimensional reticulated foam materials. Chem Eng J 2008;140:562-9.
45. Singh R, Lee PD, Lindley TC, Dashwood RJ, Ferrie E, Imwinkelried T. Characterization of the structure and permeability of titanium foams for spinal fusion devices. Acta Biomater 2009;5:477-87.
46. Bhattacharya A, Calmidi VV, Mahajan RL. Thermophysical properties of high porosity metal foams. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 2002;45:1017-31.
47. Innocentini M, Faleiros R, Pisani R, Thijs I, Luyten J, Mullens S. Permeability of porous gelcast scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Porous Mater 2010;17:615-27.
48. Despois J-F, Mortensen A. Permeability of open-pore microcellular materials. Acta Mater 2005;53:1381-8.
49. Moreira EA, Innocentini MDM, Coury JR. Permeability of ceramic foams to compressible and incompressible flow. J Eur Ceram Soc 2004;24:3209-18.
50. Moreira EA, Coury JR. The influence of structural parameters on the permeability of ceramic foams. Braz J Chem Eng 2004;21:23-33.
51. Azzam MIS, Dullien FAL. Calculation of the permeability of porous media from the Navier-Stokes equation. Ind Eng Chem Fund 1976;15:281-5.
52. ®-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Biomech 2009;42:257-60.
53. Reyes LI, Paredes V.R, Gutierrez G. Power law for the permeability in a twodimensional disordered porous medium. Phys A: Statis Mech Appl 1999;274: 391-9.
54. Vossenberg P, Higuera G, van Straten G, van Blitterswijk C, van Boxtel A. Darcian permeability constant as indicator for shear stresses in regular scaffold systems for tissue engineering. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2009;8: 499-507.
55. ® carriers: evaluation by homogenization theory and experimental validation. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;87B:42-8.
56. Hui PW, Leung PC, Sher A. Fluid conductance of cancellous bone graft as a predictor for graft-host interface healing. J Biomech 1996;29:123-32.
57. Sander EA, Shimko DA, Dee KC, Nauman EA. Examination of continuum and micro-structural properties of human vertebral cancellous bone using combined cellular solid models. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2003;2: 97-107.
58. Kohles SS, Roberts JB. Linear poroelastic cancellous bone anisotropy: trabecular solid elastic and fluid transport properties. J Biomech Eng 2002;124:521-6.
59. Mulder L, van Ruijven LJ, Koolstra JH, van Eijden TMGJ. Biomechanical consequences of developmental changes in trabecular architecture and mineralization of the pig mandibular condyle. J Biomech 2007;40:1575-82.
60. Bevill G, Eswaran SK, Gupta A, Papadopoulos P, Keaveny TM. Influence of bone volume fraction and architecture on computed large-deformation failure mechanisms in human trabecular bone. Bone 2006;39:1218-25.
61. Hudelmaier M, Kollstedt A, Lochmüller EM, Kuhn V, Eckstein F, Link TM. Gender differences in trabecular bone architecture of the distal radius assessed with magnetic resonance imaging and implications for mechanical competence. Osteoporos Int 2005;16:1124-33.
62. Kim HS, Al-Hassani STS. A morphological model of vertebral trabecular bone. J Biomech 2002;35:1101-14.
63. Kothari M, Keaveny TM, Lin JC, Newitt DC, Majumdar S. Measurement of intraspecimen variations in vertebral cancellous bone architecture. Bone 1999;25:245-50.
64. Anderson IA, Carman JB. How do changes to plate thickness, length, and faceconnectivity affect femoral cancellous bone's density and surface area? An investigation using regular cellular models. J Biomech 2000;33:327-35.
65. Goulet RW, Goldstein SA, Ciarelli MJ, Kuhn JL, Brown MB, Feldkamp LA. The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech 1994;27:375-7, 9-89.
66. Gefen A, Seliktar R. Comparison of the trabecular architecture and the isostatic stress flow in the human calcaneus. Med Eng Phys 2004;26:119-29.
67. Diederichs G, Link TM, Kentenich M, Schwieger K, Huber MB, Burghardt AJ, et al. Assessment of trabecular bone structure of the calcaneus using multi-detector CT: correlation with microCT and biomechanical testing. Bone 2009;44:976-83.
68. Baum T, Carballido-Gamio J, Huber M, Müller D, Monetti R, Räth C, et al. Automated 3D trabecular bone structure analysis of the proximal femur-prediction of biomechanical strength by CT and DXA. Osteoporosis Int 2010;21: 1553-64.
69. Shi X, Wang X, Niebur G. Effects of loading orientation on the morphology of the predicted yielded regions in trabecular bone. Ann Biomed Eng 2009;37: 354-62.
70. Kadir Mohammed Rafiq Abdul, Syahrom Ardiyansyah, Yusof MAR. Micromodelling and analysis of actual and idealised cancellous structure. In: 4th Kuala Lumpur international conference on biomedical engineering. 2008. p. 32.
71. Wehrli FW, Ford JC, Chung H-W, Wehrli SL, Williams JL, Grimm MJ, et al. Potential role of nuclear magnetic resonance for the evaluation of trabecular bone quality. Calcif Tissue Int 1993;53:S162-9.