Predictive value of upper-limb accelerometry in acute stroke with hemiparesis

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 50, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1099-1106

  Gebruers, Nick ^a,b,c   Truijen, Steven ^a,b,c   Engelborghs, Sebastiaan ^b,d   De Deyn, Peter P ^a,b,d,e  

^a Hogeschool Antwerpen   (Belgium)

^b Hospital Network Antwerp   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^e UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Accelerometry; Activity measure; Ambulatory monitoring; Hemiparesis; Modified rankin scale; Paresis; Prediction; Recovery; Stroke; Upper limb

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETRY; AMBULATORY MONITORING; HEMIPARESIS; MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE; PARESIS; STROKE; UPPER LIMBS;

FORECASTING; HUMAN REHABILITATION EQUIPMENT; RECOVERY; RESEARCH;

ACCELEROMETERS;

ACCELEROMETRY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANKIN SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ACCELEROMETRY; ACTIVITY MEASURE; AMBULATORY MONITORING; HEMIPARESIS; MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE; PARESIS; PREDICTION; RECOVERY; STROKE; UPPER LIMB;

ACCELEROMETRY; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; PARESIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE; TIME FACTORS; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84890829334     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 19381352     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2012.09.0166     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Chen KY, Bassett DR Jr. The technology of accelerometrybased activity monitors: Current and future. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11 Suppl):S490-500. [PMID:16294112] http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000185571.49104.82
2. Ancoli-Israel S, Cole R, Alessi C, Chambers M, Moorcroft W, Pollak CP. The role of actigraphy in the study of sleep and circadian rhythms. Sleep. 2003;26(3):342-92. [PMID:12749557]
3. Gebruers N, Vanroy C, Truijen S, Engelborghs S, De Deyn PP. Monitoring of physical activity after stroke: A systematic review of accelerometry-based measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(2):288-97. [PMID:20159136] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.025
4. Uswatte G, Foo WL, Olmstead H, Lopez K, Holand A, Simms LB. Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: An objective measure of upperextremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(7):1498-1501. [PMID:16003690] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.01.010
5. Uswatte G, Giuliani C, Winstein C, Zeringue A, Hobbs L, Wolf SL. Validity of accelerometry for monitoring realworld arm activity in patients with subacute stroke: Evidence from the extremity constraint-induced therapy evaluation trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(10):1340-45. [PMID:17023243] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.06.006
6. Uswatte G, Miltner WH, Foo B, Varma M, Moran S, Taub E. Objective measurement of functional upper-extremity movement using accelerometer recordings transformed with a threshold filter. Stroke. 2000;31(3):662-67. [PMID:10700501] http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.31.3.662
7. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA. The Motor Activity Log-28: Assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology. 2006;67(7):1189-94. [PMID:17030751] http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000238164.90657.c2
8. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Vignolo M, McCulloch K. Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke. 2005;36(11):2493-96. [PMID:16224078] http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000185928.90848.2e
9. Gebruers N, Truijen S, Engelborghs S, Nagels G, Brouns R, De Deyn PP. Actigraphic measurement of motor deficits in acute ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26(5):533-40. [PMID:18836264] http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000160210
10. Stinear C. Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(12):1228-32. [PMID:21035399] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70247-7
11. Chen SY, Winstein CJ. A systematic review of voluntary arm recovery in hemiparetic stroke: Critical predictors for meaningful outcomes using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2009;33(1):2-13. [PMID:19265766] http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0b013e318198a010
12. Hendricks HT, van Limbeek J, Geurts AC, Zwarts MJ. Motor recovery after stroke: A systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(11):1629-37. [PMID:12422337] http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.35473
13. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31. [PMID:1135616]
14. Deakin A, Hill H, Pomeroy VM. Rough guide to the Fugl-Meyer Assessment: Upper limb section. Physiotherapy. 2003;89(12):751-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60502-0
15. Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of motor recovery after stroke: A critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16(3):232-40. [PMID:12234086] http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154596802401105171
16. Quinn TJ, Dawson J, Walters MR, Lees KR. Exploring the reliability of the modified Rankin Scale. Stroke. 2009; 40(3):762-66. [PMID:19131664] http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.522516
17. Banks JL, Marotta CA. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin Scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke. 2007;38(3): 1091-96. [PMID:17272767] http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000258355.23810.c6
18. Wilson JT, Hareendran A, Hendry A, Potter J, Bone I, Muir KW. Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale across multiple raters: Benefits of a structured interview. Stroke. 2005;36(4):777-81. [PMID:15718510] http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000157596.13234.95
19. Uyttenboogaart M, Stewart RE, Vroomen PC, De Keyser J, Luijckx GJ. Optimizing cutoff scores for the Barthel index and the modified Rankin Scale for defining outcome in acute stroke trials. Stroke. 2005;36(9):1984-87. [PMID:16081854] http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000177872.87960.61
20. Muscari A, Puddu GM, Santoro N, Zoli M. A simple scoring system for outcome prediction of ischemic stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2011;124(5):334-42. [PMID:21241255] http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01479.x
21. Urwyler SA, Schuetz P, Fluri F, Morgenthaler NG, Zweifel C, Bergmann A, Bingisser R, Kappos L, Steck A, Engelter S, Müller B, Christ-Crain M, Katan M. Prognostic value of copeptin: One-year outcome in patients with acute stroke. Stroke. 2010;41(7):1564-67. [PMID:20508186] http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.584649
22. Hallevi H, Albright KC, Martin-Schild SB, Barreto AD, Morales MM, Bornstein N, Ifejika NL, Shuaib A, Grotta JC, Savitz SI; VISTA Investigators. Recovery after ischemic stroke: Criteria for good outcome by level of disability at day 7. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;28(4):341-48. [PMID:19628935] http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000229552
23. Nijland RH, van Wegen EE, Harmeling-van der Wel BC, Kwakkel G; EPOS Investigators. Presence of finger extension and shoulder abduction within 72 hours after stroke predicts functional recovery: early prediction of functional outcome after stroke: the EPOS cohort study. Stroke. 2010; 41(4):745-50. [PMID:20167916] http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.572065
24. Lang CE, Wagner JM, Edwards DF, Dromerick AW. Upper extremity use in people with hemiparesis in the first few weeks after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31(2):56-63. [PMID:17558358] http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0b013e31806748bd
25. Thrane G, Emaus N, Askim T, Anke A. Arm use in patients with subacute stroke monitored by accelerometry: Association with motor impairment and influence on self-dependence. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(4):299-304. [PMID:21347506] http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0676