Arm use in patients with subacute stroke monitored by accelerometry: Association with motor impairment and influence on self-dependence

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 299-304

  Thrane, Gyrd ^a,b   Emaus, Nina ^a   Askim, Torunn ^c   Anke, Audny ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH NORWAY   (Norway)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Accelerometer; ICF; Motor impairment; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ADULT; AGED; ARM; ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; STROKE;

ACCELERATION; ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARM; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); STROKE;

EID: 79953234425     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0676     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Lawrence ES, Coshall C, Dundas R, Stewart J, Rudd AG, Howard R, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population. Stroke 2001; 32: 1279-1284. (Pubitemid 32530408)
2. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou Ho, olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 394-398. (Pubitemid 24134114)
3. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW, III, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 347-354. (Pubitemid 23115348)
4. uswatte G, Foo WL, olmstead H, Lopez K, Holand A, Simms LB. Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1498-1501. (Pubitemid 40909927)
5. Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, Foley NC, BItensky J, Bayley M. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Participation. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 507-528. (Pubitemid 40716304)
6. World Health organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health organization; 2001.
7. Geyh S, Kurt T, Brockow T, Cieza A, Ewert T, Omar Z, et al. Identifying the concepts contained in outcome measures of clinical trials on stroke using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a reference. J Rehabil Med 2004; 36: 56-62. (Pubitemid 39307112)
8. Andrews K, Stewart J. Stroke recovery: he can but does he? Rheumatol Rehabil 1979; 18: 43-48. (Pubitemid 9120787)
9. Uswatte G, Taub E. Implications of the learned nonuse formulation for measuring rehabilitation outcomes: lessons from constraintinduced movement therapy. Rehabil Psychol 2005; 50: 34-42. (Pubitemid 40344139)
10. Lang CE, Wagner JM, Edwards DF, Dromerick AW. upper extremity use in people with hemiparesis in the first few weeks after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther 2007; 31: 56-63.
11. Uswatte G, Miltner WH, Foo B, Varma M, Moran S, Taub E. objective measurement of functional upper-extremity movement using accelerometer recordings transformed with a threshold filter. Stroke 2000; 31: 662-667. (Pubitemid 30131652)
12. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975; 7: 13-31.
13. Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16: 232-240. (Pubitemid 34984898)
14. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA. The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology 2006; 67: 1189-1194. (Pubitemid 44563826)
15. Actigraph GT1M Monitor/Actitrainer and Actilife Lifestyle Monitor Software. user Manual. Forth Walton Beach, Florida: ActuGraph, LCC; 2007.
16. Uwatte G, Giuliani C, Winstein C, Zeringue A, Hobbs L, Wolf SL. Validity of accelerometry for monitoring real-world arm activity in patients with subacute stroke: evidence from the extremity constraint-induced therapy evaluation trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 1340-1345. (Pubitemid 44470751)
17. Vardeberg K, Kolsrud M, Laberg T. Sunnaas Index of ADL. World Fed occupat Ther Bull 1991; 24: 30.
18. Anke AG, Stanghelle JK, Finset A, Roaldsen KS, Pillgram-Larsen J, Fugl-Meyer AR. Long-term prevalence of impairments and disabilities after multiple trauma. J Trauma 1997; 42: 54-61. (Pubitemid 27045052)
19. Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989; 20: 864-870. (Pubitemid 19188240)
20. Lyden PD, Lu M, Levine SR, Brott TG, Broderick J. A modified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for use in stroke clinical trials: preliminary reliability and validity. Stroke 2001; 32: 1310-1317.
21. Williams LS, Yilmaz EY, Lopez-Yunez AM. Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity with the NIH Stroke Scale. Stroke 2000; 31: 858-862. (Pubitemid 30198428)
22. Bohannon RW. Sit-to-stand test for measuring performance of lower extremity muscles. Percept Mot Skills 1995; 80: 163-166.
23. Schaubert KL, Bohannon RW. Reliability and validity of three strength measures obtained from community-dwelling elderly persons. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 717-720. (Pubitemid 41305893)
24. Jette AM, Jette DU, Ng J, Plotkin DJ, Bach MA. Are performance-based measures sufficiently reliable for use in multicenter trials? Musculoskeletal Impairment (MSI) Study Group. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1999; 54: M3-M6. (Pubitemid 29059020)
25. Otchega Y, Harris TB, Hirsch R, Parsons VL, Kington R, Katzoff M. Reliability and prevalence of physical performance examination assessing mobility and balance in older persons in the US: data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48: 1136-1141.
26. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 1991.
27. Sirtori V, Corbetta D, Moja L, Gatti R. Constraint-induced move-ment therapy for upper extremities in stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; CD004433.
28. Chae JM, Labatia IM, Yang GM. upper limb motor function in hemiparesis: concurrent validity of the Arm Motor Ability Test. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 82: 1-8.
29. Viitanen M, Fugl-Meyer KS, Bernspang B, Fugl-Meyer AR. Life satisfaction in long-term survivors after stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med 1988; 20: 17-24.
30. Appelros P, Karlsson GM, Seiger A, Nydevik I. Prognosis for patients with neglect and anosognosia with special reference to cognitive impairment. J Rehabil Med 2003; 35: 254-258. (Pubitemid 37406765)
31. Troiano RP. A timely meeting: objective measurement of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005; 3711 Suppl: S487-S490.
32. Taub E, Uswatte G, Mark VW, Morris DM. The learned nonuse phenomenon: implications for rehabilitation. Eura Medicophys 2006; 42: 241-256.
33. Taub E, Uswatt G. Constraint-Induced Movement therapy: answers and questions after two decades of research. NeuroRehabilitation 2006; 21: 93-95. (Pubitemid 44253284)