A simple scoring system for outcome prediction of ischemic stroke

Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

Volumn 124, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 334-342

  Muscari, A ^a   Puddu, G M ^a   Santoro, N ^a   Zoli, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Ischemic stroke; NIHSS; Outcome; Prognosis; Rankin scale; Scoring system; Stroke unit

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BOLOGNA OUTCOME ALGORITHM FOR STROKE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; MALE; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH STROKE SCALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXYGEN THERAPY; PARALYSIS; PREDICTION; RANKIN SCALE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; URINARY CATHETER; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE; THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY;

EID: 80053560669     PISSN: 00016314     EISSN: 16000404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01479.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Lyden P, Lu M, Jackson C et al. Underlying structure of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: results of a factor analysis. NINDS tPA Stroke Trial Investigators. Stroke 1999;30:2347-54.
2. Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II. Prognosis. Scott Med J 1957;2:200-15.
3. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet 1991;337:1521-6.
4. Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke: definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST: Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke 1993;24:35-41.
5. Fiorelli M, Alpérovitch A, Argentino C et al. Prediction of long-term outcome in the early hours following acute ischemic stroke. Italian Acute Stroke Study Group. Arch Neurol 1995;52:250-5.
6. Hénon H, Godefroy O, Leys D et al. Early predictors of death and disability after acute cerebral ischemic event. Stroke 1995;26:392-8.
7. Baird AE, Dambrosia J, Janket S et al. A three-item scale for the early prediction of stroke recovery. Lancet 2001;357:2095-9.
8. Hallevi H, Albright KC, Martin-Schild SB et al.; VISTA investigators. Recovery after ischemic stroke: criteria for good outcome by level of disability at day 7. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009;28:341-8.
9. Wade DT, Hewer RL. Outlook after an acute stroke: urinary incontinence and loss of consciousness compared in 532 patients. Q J Med 1985;56:601-8.
10. Di Carlo A, Lamassa M, Pracucci G et al. Stroke in the very old: clinical presentation and determinants of 3-month functional outcome: a European perspective. European BIOMED Study of Stroke Care Group. Stroke 1999;30:2313-9.
11. Johnston KC, Connors AF Jr, Wagner DP, Knaus WA, Wang X, Haley EC Jr. A predictive risk model for outcomes of ischemic stroke. Stroke 2000;31:448-55.
12. Counsell C, Dennis M, McDowall M, Warlow C. Predicting outcome after acute and subacute stroke: development and validation of new prognostic models. Stroke 2002;33:1041-7.
13. Weimar C, König IR, Kraywinkel K, Ziegler A, Diener HC; German Stroke Study Collaboration. Age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score within 6hours after onset are accurate predictors of outcome after cerebral ischemia: development and external validation of prognostic models. Stroke 2004;35:158-62.
14. Hand PJ, Wardlaw JM, Rivers CS et al. MR diffusion-weighted imaging and outcome prediction after ischemic stroke. Neurology 2006;66:1159-63.
15. Jeng JS, Huang SJ, Tang SC, Yip PK. Predictors of survival and functional outcome in acute stroke patients admitted to the stroke intensive care unit. J Neurol Sci 2008;270: 60-6.
16. Kissela B, Lindsell CJ, Kleindorfer D et al. Clinical prediction of functional outcome after ischemic stroke: the surprising importance of periventricular white matter disease and race. Stroke 2009;40:530-6.
17. Adams HP Jr, Davis PH, Leira EC et al. Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke: a report of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST). Neurology 1999;53:126-31.
18. Wilson JT, Hareendran A, Grant M et al. Improving the assessment of outcomes in stroke: use of a structured interview to assign grades on the modified Rankin Scale. Stroke 2002;33:2243-6.
19. Janssen PM, Visser NA, Dorhout Mees SM, Klijn CJ, Algra A, Rinkel GJ. Comparison of telephone and face-to-face assessment of the modified Rankin Scale. Cerebrovasc Dis 2010;29:137-9.
20. Capelle LG, Vlak MH, Algra A, Rinkel GJ. Comparison of patient and proxy responses on risk factors for stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 2010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01389.x.
21. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29-36.
22. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983;148:839-43.
23. Appelros P, Stegmayr B, Terént A. A review on sex differences in stroke treatment and outcome. Acta Neurol Scand 2010;121:359-69.