Actigraphic measurement of motor deficits in acute ischemic stroke

Cerebrovascular Diseases

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 533-540

  Gebruers, N ^a,b   Truijen, S ^a   Engelborghs, S ^a,b,c,d   Nagels, G ^b,c,e   Brouns, R ^b,c   De Deyn, P P ^a,b,c  

^a Hogeschool Antwerpen   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^e National Multiple Sclerosis Center   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Accelerometry; Actigraphy; Fugl Meyer Assessment; National Institute of Health Stroke Scale; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETRY; ACTIMETRY; ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; AGED; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; FUGL MEYER ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH STROKE SCALE; POLYSOMNOGRAPHY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ACCELERATION; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARM; BIOMECHANICS; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOVEMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE;

EID: 53049083107     PISSN: 10159770     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000160210     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ancoli-Israel S, Cole R, Alessi C, Chambers M, Moorcroft W, Pollak CP: The role of actigraphy in the study of sleep and circadian rhythms. Sleep 2003; 26: 342-392.
2. Nagels G, Engelborghs S, Vloeberghs E, Van Dam D, Pickut BA, De Deyn PP: Actigraphic measurement of agitated behaviour in dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006; 21: 388-393.
3. Nagels G, Engelborghs S, Vloeberghs E, Lemmens W, Pickut BA, De Deyn PP: Correlation between actigraphy and nurses' observation of activity in dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2007; 22: 84-86.
4. Kos D, Nagels G, D'Hooghe MB, Duquet W, Ilsbroukx S, Delbeke S, Kerckhofs E: Measuring activity patterns using actigraphy in multiple sclerosis. Chronobiol Int 2007; 24: 345-356.
5. Uswatte G, Foo WL, Olmstead H, Lopez K, Holand A, Simms LB: Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1498-1501.
6. Uswatte G, Giuliani C, Winstein C, Zeringue A, Hobbs L, Wolf SL: Validity of accelerometry for monitoring real-world arm activity in patients with subacute stroke: evidence from the extremity constraint-induced therapy evaluation trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 1340-1345.
7. Uswatte G, Miltner WH, Foo B, Varma M, Moran S, Taub E: Objective measurement of functional upper-extremity movement using accelerometer recordings transformed with a threshold filter. Stroke 2000; 31: 662-667.
8. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA: The motor activity log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology 2006; 67: 1189-1194.
9. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Vignolo M, McCulloch K: Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity motor activity log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke 2005; 36: 2493-2496.
10. Siekierka-Kleiser EM, Kleiser R, Wohlschlager AM, Freund HJ, Seitz RJ: Quantitative assessment of recovery from motor hemineglect in acute stroke patients. Cerebrovasc Dis 2006; 21: 307-314.
11. Goldstein LB, Jones MR, Matchar DB, Edwards LJ, Hoff J, Chilukuri V, Armstrong SB, Horner RD: Improving the reliability of stroke subgroup classification using the trial of org 10172 in acute stroke treatment (toast) criteria. Stroke 2001; 32: 1091-1098.
12. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C: Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet 1991; 337: 1521-1526.
13. Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE 3rd: Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. Toast. Trial of org 10,172 in acute stroke treatment. Stroke 1993; 24: 35-41.
14. Tei H, Uchiyama S, Ohara K, Kobayashi M, Uchiyama Y, Fukuzawa M: Deteriorating ischemic stroke in 4 clinical categories classified by the Oxfordshire community stroke project. Stroke 2000; 31: 2049-2054.
15. Chen KY, Bassett DR Jr: The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005; 37:S490-S500.
16. Moran DS, Heled Y, Gonzalez RR: Metabolic rate monitoring and energy expenditure prediction using a novel actigraphy method. Med Sci Monit 2004; 10:MT117-MT120.
17. Lyden PD, Hantson L: Assessment scales for the evaluation of stroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 1998; 7: 113-127.
18. Kasner SE: Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 603-612.
19. Bessenyei M, Fekete I, Csiba L, Bereczki D: Characteristics of 4 stroke scales for the detection of changes in clinical signs in the acute phase of stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2001; 10: 70-78.
20. Josephson SA, Hills NK, Johnston SC: NIH stroke scale reliability in ratings from a large sample of clinicians. Cerebrovasc Dis 2006; 22: 389-395.
21. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S: The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975; 7: 13-31.
22. Deakin AHH, Pomeroy VM: Rough guide to the Fugl-Meyer assessment. Physiotherapy 2003; 89: 751-763.
23. Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE: The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16: 232-240.
24. DeGraba TJ, Hallenbeck JM, Pettigrew KD, Dutka AJ, Kelly BJ: Progression in acute stroke: value of the initial NIH stroke scale score on patient stratification in future trials. Stroke 1999; 30: 1208-1212.
25. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC: Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebralartery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 354: 191-196.
26. Croarkin E, Danoff J, Barnes C: Evidencebased rating of upper-extremity motor function tests used for people following a stroke. Phys Ther 2004; 84: 62-74.
27. Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Kim IH, di Bella P, Johnson G: Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer test, action research arm test and box and block test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19: 404-411.
28. Millis SR, Straube D, Iramaneerat C, Smith EV Jr, Lyden P: Measurement properties of the national institutes of health stroke scale for people with right- and left-hemisphere lesions: further analysis of the clomethiazole for acute stroke study-ischemic (class-I) trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 302-308.
29. de Niet M, Bussmann JB, Ribbers GM, Stam HJ: The stroke upper-limb activity monitor: its sensitivity to measure hemiplegic upperlimb activity during daily life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 1121-1126.
30. Schasfoort FC, Bussmann JB, Stam HJ: Correlation between a novel upper limb activity monitor and four other instruments to determine functioning in upper limb complex regional pain syndrome type I. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 108-114.