Neuroanatomic correlates of the feature-salience hierarchy in face processing: An fMRI -adaptation study

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 274-283

  Lai, Joshua ^a   Pancaroglu, Raika ^a   Oruc, Ipek ^a   Barton, Jason J S ^a   Davies Thompson, Jodie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Eyes; Face recognition; Mouth; Neuroimaging

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN FUNCTION; FACE; FACIES; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUSIFORM FACE AREA; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEUROANATOMY; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; RECOGNITION; SUPERIOR TEMPORAL SULCUS;

EYES; FACE RECOGNITION; MOUTH; NEUROIMAGING;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890814811     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.10.016     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Andrews T.J., Davies-Thompson J., Kingstone A., Young A.W. Internal and external features of the face are represented holistically in face-selective regions of visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30(9):3544-3552.
2. Andrews T.J., Ewbank M.P. Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe. Neuroimage 2004, 23(3):905-913.
3. Axelrod V. The fusiform face area: In quest of holistic face processing. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30(26):8699-8701.
4. Baker, E. (1967). Perceiver variables involved in the recognition of faces. University of London.
5. Barton J.J.S Structure and function in acquired prosopagnosia: Lessons from a series of ten patients with brain damage. Journal of Neuropsychology 2008, 2:197-225.
6. Barton J.J.S., Hanif H., Ashraf S. Relating visual to verbal semantic knowledge: The evaluation of object recognition in prosopagnosia. Brain 2009, 132(Pt 12):3456-3466.
7. Bukach C.M., Le Grand R., Kaiser M.D., Bub D.N., Tanaka J.W. Preservation of mouth region processing in two cases of prosopagnosia. Journal of Neuropsychology 2008, 2(Pt 1):227-244.
8. Caldara R., Schyns P., Mayer E., Smith M.L., Gosselin F., Rossion B. Does prosopagnosia take the eyes out of face representations? Evidence for a defect in representing diagnostic facial information following brain damage. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17(10):1652-1666.
9. Davies-Thompson J., Gouws A., Andrews T.J. An image-dependent representation of familiar and unfamiliar faces in the human ventral stream. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47(6):1627-1635.
10. Davies-Thompson, J., Newling, K., & Andrews, T. J. (2012). Image-invariant responses in face-selective regions do not explain the perceptual advantage for familiar face recognition. Cerebral Cortex.
11. de Renzi E. Prosopagnosia in two patients with CT scan evidence of damage confined to the right hemisphere. Neuropsychologia 1986, 24:385-389.
12. Fisher GH, RL C. Recognizing human faces. Applied Ergonomics 1975, 6:104-109.
13. Fox C.J., Hanif H.M., Iaria G., Duchaine B.C., Barton J.J.S Perceptual and anatomic patterns of selective deficits in facial identity and expression processing. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49(12):3188-3200.
14. Fox C.J., Iaria G., Barton J.J.S Defining the face processing network: Optimization of the functional localizer in fMRI. Human Brain Mapping 2009, 30(5):1637-1651.
15. Fox C.J., Moon S.Y., Iaria G., Barton J.J.S. The correlates of subjective perception of identity and expression in the face network: An fMRI adaptation study. Neuroimage 2009, 44(2):569-580.
16. Galvan A., Hare T.A., Parra C.E., Penn J., Voss H., Glover G., et al. Earlier development of the accumbens relative to orbitofrontal cortex might underlie risk-taking behavior in adolescents. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26(25):6885-6892.
17. Garneau, M. (1973). The visual perception of facial images. University of London.
18. Gauthier I., Tarr M.J., Moylan J., Skudlarski P., Gore J.C., Anderson A.W. The fusiform "face area" is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12(3):495-504.
19. Gazzaniga M., Smylie C. Facial recognition and brain asymmetries: Clues to underlying mechanisms. Annals of Neurology 1983, 13:536-540.
20. Gilad S., Meng M., Sinha P. Role of ordinal contrast relationships in face encoding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009, 106(13):5353-5358.
21. Gosselin F., Schyns P. Bubbles: A technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks. Vision Research 2001, 41:2261-2271.
22. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Edelman S., Avidan G., Itzchak Y., Malach R. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron 1999, 24(1):187-203.
23. Grill-Spector K., Malach R. fMR-adaptation: A tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychologica (Amsterdam) 2001, 107(1-3):293-321.
24. Harris A., Aguirre G.K. The representation of parts and wholes in face-selective cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20(5):863-878.
25. Harris A., Aguirre G.K. Neural tuning for face wholes and parts in human fusiform gyrus revealed by FMRI adaptation. Journal of Neurophysiology 2010, 104(1):336-345.
26. Henderson J.M., Williams C.C., Falk R.J. Eye movements are functional during face learning. Memory and Cognition 2005, 33(1):98-106.
27. Hillger L., Koenig O. Separable mechanisms in face processing: Evidence from hemispheric specialization. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1991, 3:42-58.
28. Hoffman E., Haxby J. Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3:80-84.
29. James T.W., Arcurio L.R., Gold J.M. Inversion effects in face-selective cortex with combinations of face parts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2013, 25(3):455-464.
30. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., Chun M.M. The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience 1997, 17(11):4302-4311.
31. Kourtzi Z., Kanwisher N. Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science 2001, 293(5534):1506-1509.
32. Le Grand R., Mondloch C.J., Maurer D., Brent H.P. Expert face processing requires visual input to the right hemisphere during infancy. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 1108-1112.
33. Liu J., Harris A., Kanwisher N. Perception of face parts and face configurations: An FMRI study. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 22(1):203-211.
34. Malcolm G.L., Lanyon L.J., Fugard A.J., Barton J.J.S. Scan patterns during the processing of facial expression versus identity: An exploration of task-driven and stimulus-driven effects. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(8):2 1-2 9.
35. Matthews M.L. Discrimination of Identi-Kit constructions of faces: Evidence for dual processing strategy. Perception and Psychophysics 1978, 23:153-161.
36. McCarthy G., Puce A., Belger A., Allison T. Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 1999, 9(5):431-444.
37. Morein-Zamir S., Chua R., Franks I., Nagelkerke P., Kingstone A. Predictability influences stopping and response control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33(1):149-162.
38. Pitcher D., Walsh V., Yovel G., Duchaine B. TMS evidence for the involvement of the right occipital face area in early face processing. Current Biology 2007, 17(18):1568-1573.
39. Puce A., Allison T., Bentin S., Gore J.C., McCarthy G. Temporal cortex activation in humans viewing eye and mouth movements. Journal of Neuroscience 1998, 18(6):2188-2199.
40. Richler J., Gauthier I. When intuition fails to align with data: A reply to Rossion (2013). Visual Cognition 2013, 21(2):254-276.
41. Rickham p Human experimentation. Code of ethics of the World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. British Medical Journal 1964, 2:177.
42. Rossion B. The composite face illusion: A whole window into our understanding of holistic face perception. Visual Cognition 2013, 21(2):139-253.
43. Rossion B., Dricot L., Devolder A., Bodart J.M., Crommelinck M., De Gelder B., et al. Hemispheric asymmetries for whole-based and part-based face processing in the human fusiform gyrus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12(5):793-802.
44. Rotshtein P., Henson R., Treves A., Driver J., Dolan R. Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8(1):107-113.
45. Schwarzlose R., Baker I., Kanwisher N. Separate Face and Body Selectivity on the Fusiform Gyrus. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 27(41):11055-11059.
46. Schwarzlose R., Swisher J., Dang S., Kanwisher N. The distribution of category and location information across object-selective regions in human visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2008, 105(11):4447-4452.
47. Schiltz C., Dricot L., Goebel R., Rossion B. Holistic perception of individual faces in the right middle fusiform gyrus as evidenced by the composite face illusion. Journal of Vision 2010, 10(2):25 21-16.
48. Schiltz C., Rossion B. Faces are represented holistically in the human occipito-temporal cortex. Neuroimage 2006, 32(3):1385-1394.
49. Schyns P., Bonnar L., Gosselin F. Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information. Psychological Science 2002, 13:402-409.
50. Sergent J., Bindra D. Differential hemispheric processing of faces: Methodological considerations and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin 1981, 89:541-554.
51. Shepherd J., Davies G., Ellis H. Studies of cue saliency. Perceiving and remembering faces 1981, 105-131. Academic Press, London. G. Davies, H. Ellis, J. Shepherd (Eds.).
52. Smith M.L., Cottrell G.W., Gosselin F., Schyns P.G. Transmitting and decoding facial expressions. Psychology Science 2005, 16(3):184-189.
53. Tjan B.S., Braje W.L., Legge G.E., Kersten D. Human efficiency for recognizing 3-D objects in luminance noise. Vision Research 1995, 35(21):3053-3069.
54. Townsend J.T., Ashby F.G. The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes 1983, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
55. Vinette C., Gosselin F., Schyns P.G. Spatio-temporal dynamics of face recognition in a flash: It's in the eyes. Cognitive Science 2004, 28(2):289-301.
56. Weiner K.S., Sayres R., Vinberg J., Grill-Spector K. fMRI-adaptation and category selectivity in human ventral temporal cortex: Regional differences across time scales. Journal of Neurophysiology 2010, 103(6):3349-3365.
57. Yin R. Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969, 81:141-145.
58. Young A.W., Hay D.C., McWeeny K.H., Flude B.M., Ellis A.W. Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features. Perception 1985, 14(6):737-746.
59. Young A.W., Hellawell D., Hay D.C. Configurational information in face perception. Perception 1987, 16(6):747-759.
60. Yovel G., Kanwisher N. The neural basis of the behavioral face-inversion effect. Current Biology 2005, 15(24):2256-2262.
61. Yue X., Cassidy B., Devaney K., Holt D., Tootell R. Lower-level Stimulus Features Strongly Influences Responses in the Fusiform Face Area. Cerebral Cortex 2011, 21(1):35-47.