Evaluation of anatomic and morphologic nomogram to predict malignant and high-grade disease in a cohort of patients with small renal masses

Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 37.e17-37.e23

  Bagrodia, Aditya ^a   Harrow, Brian ^a   Liu, Zhuo Wei ^a   Olweny, Ephrem O ^a   Faddegon, Stephen ^a   Yin, Gang ^a   Tan, Yung Khan ^a   Han, Woong Kyu ^a   Lotan, Yair ^a   Margulis, Vitaly ^a   Cadeddu, Jeffrey A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Kidney cancer; Nephrometry; Nomogram; Prediction; Prognostics; RENAL; Renal cell cancer; Validation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KIDNEY BIOPSY; KIDNEY CANCER; KIDNEY TUMOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOMOGRAM; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR VOLUME; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT; ADOLESCENT; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; KIDNEY; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; NEPHRECTOMY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AREA UNDER CURVE; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; NOMOGRAMS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890802462     PISSN: 10781439     EISSN: 18732496     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bagrodia A., Darwish O.M., Rapoport Y., Margulis V. Risk prediction in the management of small renal masses. Curr Opin Urol 2012, 22(5):347-352.
2. Lane B.R., Babineau D., Kattan M.W., Novick A.C., Gill I.S., Zhou M., et al. A preoperative prognostic nomogram for solid enhancing renal tumors 7cm or less amenable to partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2007, 178(2):429-434.
3. Eggener S.E., Rubenstein J.N., Smith N.D., Nadler R.B., Kontak J., Flanigan R.C., et al. Renal tumors in young adults. J Urol 2004, 171(1):106-110.
4. Sun M.R., Ngo L., Genega E.M., Atkins M.B., Finn M.E., Rofsky N.M., et al. Renal cell carcinoma: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation of tumor subtypes-correlation with pathologic findings. Radiology 2009, 250(3):793-802.
5. Alshumrani G., O'Malley M., Ghai S., Metser U., Kachura J., Finelli A., et al. Small (
6. Millet I., Doyon F.C., Hoa D., Thuret R., Merigeaud S., Serre I., et al. Characterization of small solid renal lesions: can benign and malignant tumors be differentiated with CT?. Am J Roentgenol 2011, 197(4):887-896.
7. Kutikov A., Smaldone M.C., Egleston B.L., Manley B.J., Canter D.J., Simhan J., et al. Anatomic features of enhancing renal masses predict malignant and high-grade pathology: a preoperative nomogram using the RENAL nephrometry score. Eur Urol 2011, 60(2):241-248.
8. Kutikov A., Uzzo R.G. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 2009, 182(3):844-853.
9. Wang H.K., Zhu Y., Yao X.D., Zhang S.L., Dai B., Zhang H.L., et al. External validation of a nomogram using RENAL nephrometry score to predict high grade renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2012, 187(5):1555-1560.
10. Olweny E.O., Park S.K., Seideman C.A., Best S.L., Cadeddu J.A. Self-retaining barbed suture for parenchymal repair during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy; initial clinical experience. BJU Int 2011.
11. Stern J.M., Svatek R., Park S., Hermann M., Lotan Y., Sagalowsky A.I., et al. Intermediate comparison of partial nephrectomy and radiofrequency ablation for clinical T1a renal tumours. BJU Int 2007, 100(2):287-290.
12. Frank I., Blute M.L., Cheville J.C., Lohse C.M., Weaver A.L., Zincke H. Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol 2003, 170(6 Pt 1):2217-2220.
13. Russo P. Should elective partial nephrectomy be performed for renal cell carcinoma>4cm in size?. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2008, 5(9):482-483.
14. Thompson R.H., Kurta J.M., Kaag M., Tickoo S.K., Kundu S., Katz D., et al. Tumor size is associated with malignant potential in renal cell carcinoma cases. J Urol 2009, 181(5):2033-2036.
15. Jeldres C., Sun M., Liberman D., Lughezzani G., de la Taille A., Tostain J., et al. Can renal mass biopsy assessment of tumor grade be safely substituted for by a predictive model?. J Urol 2009, 182(6):2585-2589.
16. Schachter L.R., Bach A.M., Snyder M.E., Kattan M.W., Russo P. The impact of tumour location on the histological subtype of renal cortical tumours. BJU Int 2006, 98(1):63-66.
17. Venkatesh R., Weld K., Ames C.D., Figenshau S.R., Sundaram C.P., Andriole G.L., et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal masses: effect of tumor location. Urology 2006, 67(6):1169-1174. [discussion 1174].
18. Chapin B.F., Wood C.G. The RENAL nephrometry nomogram: statistically significant, but is it clinically relevant?. Eur Urol 2011, 60(2):249-251. [discussion 251-242].
19. Lebret T., Poulain J.E., Molinie V., Herve J.M., Denoux Y., Guth A., et al. Percutaneous core biopsy for renal masses: indications, accuracy and results. J Urol 2007, 178(4 Pt 1):1184-1188. [discussion 1188].
20. Volpe A., Mattar K., Finelli A., Kachura J.R., Evans A.J., Geddie W.R., et al. Contemporary results of percutaneous biopsy of 100 small renal masses: a single center experience. J Urol 2008, 180(6):2333-2337.
21. Maturen K.E., Nghiem H.V., Caoili E.M., Higgins E.G., Wolf J.S., Wood D.P. Renal mass core biopsy: accuracy and impact on clinical management. Am J Roentgenol 2007, 188(2):563-570.
22. Wang R., Wolf J.S., Wood D.P., Higgins E.J., Hafez K.S. Accuracy of percutaneous core biopsy in management of small renal masses. Urology 2009, 73(3):586-590. [discussion 590-581].
23. Novara G., Martignoni G., Artibani W., Ficarra V. Grading systems in renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2007, 177(2):430-436.
24. Patard J.J., Leray E., Rioux-Leclercq N., Cindolo L., Ficarra V., Zisman A., et al. Prognostic value of histologic subtypes in renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter experience. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23(12):2763-2771.
25. Wunderlich H., Hindermann W., Al Mustafa A.M., Reichelt O., Junker K., Schubert J. The accuracy of 250 fine needle biopsies of renal tumors. J Urol 2005, 174(1):44-46.
26. Neuzillet Y., Lechevallier E., Andre M., Daniel L., Coulange C. Accuracy and clinical role of fine needle percutaneous biopsy with computerized tomography guidance of small (less than 4.0cm) renal masses. J Urol 2004, 171(5):1802-1805.
27. Lane B.R., Samplaski M.K., Herts B.R., Zhou M., Novick A.C., Campbell S.C. Renal mass biopsy-a renaissance?. J Urol 2008, 179(1):20-27.
28. Bonsib S.M., Gibson D., Mhoon M., Greene G.F. Renal sinus involvement in renal cell carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 2000, 24(3):451-458.
29. Hafez K.S., Novick A.C., Butler B.P. Management of small solitary unilateral renal cell carcinomas: impact of central versus peripheral tumor location. J Urol 1998, 159(4):1156-1160.
30. Black P., Filipas D., Fichtner J., Hohenfellner R., Thuroff J.W. Nephron sparing surgery for central renal tumors: experience with 33 cases. J Urol 2000, 163(3):737-743.
31. Vergouwe Y., Steyerberg E.W., Eijkemans M.J., Habbema J.D. Substantial effective sample sizes were required for external validation studies of predictive logistic regression models. J Clin Epidemiol 2005, 58(5):475-483.