Accuracy of Percutaneous Core Biopsy in Management of Small Renal Masses

Urology

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 586-590

  Wang, Rou ^a   Wolf Jr , J Stuart ^a   Wood Jr , David P ^a   Higgins, Ellen J ^a   Hafez, Khaled S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HEMATOMA; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KIDNEY BIOPSY; KIDNEY TUMOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORE BIOPSY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR BIOPSY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 60549113885     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.519     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Hollingsworth J.M., Miller D.C., Daignault S., et al. Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect. J Natl Cancer Inst 98 (2006) 1331-1334
2. Hara I., Miyake H., Hara S., et al. Role of percutaneous image-guided biopsy in the evaluation of renal masses. Urol Int 67 (2001) 199-202
3. Lebret T., Poulain J.E., Moinie V., et al. Percutaneous core biopsy for renal masses: indications, accuracy and results. J Urol 178 (2007) 1184-1188
4. Neuzillet Y., Lechevallier E., Andre M., et al. Accuracy and clinical role of fine needle percutaneous biopsy with computerized tomography guidance of small (less than 4.0 cm) renal masses. J Urol 171 (2004) 1802-1805
5. Wood B.J., Khan M.A., McGovern F., et al. Imaging guided biopsy of renal masses: indications, accuracy and impact on clinical management. J Urol 161 (1999) 1470-1474
6. Wunderlich H., Hindermann W., Mustafa A., et al. The accuracy of 250 fine needle biopsies of renal tumors. J Urol 174 (2005) 44-46
7. Lechevallier E., Andre M., Barriol D., et al. Fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses with helical CT guidance. Radiology 216 (2000) 506-510
8. Caoili E.M., Bude R.O., Higgins E.J., et al. Evaluation of sonographically guided percutaneous core biopsy of renal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179 (2002) 373-378
9. Eshed I., Elias S., and Sidi A.A. Diagnostic value of CT-guided biopsy of indeterminate renal masses. Clin Radiol 59 (2004) 262-267
10. Maturen K.E., Nghiem H.V., Caoili E.M., et al. Renal mass core biopsy: accuracy and impact on clinical management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188 (2007) 563-570
11. Lane B.R., Samplaski M.K., Herts B.R., et al. Renal mass biopsy-a renaissance?. J Urol 179 (2008) 20-27
12. Volpe A., Kachura J.R., Geddie W.R., et al. Techniques, safety and accuracy of sampling of renal tumors by fine needle aspiration and core biopsy. J Urol 178 (2007) 379-386
13. Kunkle D.A., Egleston B.L., and Uzzo R.G. Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma-a meta-analysis and review. J Urol 179 (2008) 1227-1233
14. Frank I., Blute M.L., Cheville J.C., et al. Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol 170 (2003) 2217-2220
15. Volpe A., Panzarella T., Rendon R.A., et al. The natural history of incidentally detected small renal masses. Cancer 100 (2004) 738-745
16. Lane B.R., and Gill I.S. 5-Year outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 177 (2007) 70-74
17. Huang W.C., Levey A.S., Serio A.M., et al. Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 7 (2006) 735-740
18. Lucas S.M., Stern J.M., Adibi M., et al. Renal function outcomes in patients treated for renal masses smaller than 4 centimetres by ablative and extirpative techniques. J Urol 179 (2008) 75-80
19. Shah R.B., Bakshi N., Hafez K.S., et al. Image-guided biopsy in the evaluation of renal mass lesions in contemporary urological practice: indications, adequacy, clinical impact, and limitations of the pathological diagnosis. Hum Pathol 36 (2005) 1309-1315
20. Vasudevan A., Davies R.J., Shannon B.A., et al. Incidental renal tumours: the frequency of benign lesions and the role of preoperative core biopsy. BJU Int 97 (2006) 946-949
21. Nagy A., Buzogany I., and Kovacs G. Microsatellite allelotyping differentiates chromophobe renal cell carcinomas from renal oncocytomas and identifies new genetic changes. Histopathology 44 (2004) 542-546
22. Brunelli M., Eble J.N., Zhang S., et al. Eosinophilic and classic chromophobe renal cell carcinomas have similar frequent losses of multiple chromosomes from among chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, and 17, and this pattern of genetic abnormality is not present in renal oncocytoma. Mod Pathol 18 (2005) 161-169
23. Barocas D.A., Rohan S.M., Kao J., et al. Diagnosis of renal tumors on needle biopsy specimens by histological and molecular analysis. J Urol 176 (2006) 1957-1962
24. Barocas D.A., Mathew S., DelPizzo J.J., et al. Renal cell carcinoma sub-typing by histopathology and fluorescence in situ hybridization on a needle-biopsy specimen. BJU Int 99 (2007) 290-295
25. Takahashi M., Rhodes D.R., Furge K.A., et al. Gene expression profiling of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: gene identification and prognostic classification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98 (2001) 9754-9759