Can Renal Mass Biopsy Assessment of Tumor Grade be Safely Substituted for by a Predictive Model?

Journal of Urology

Volumn 182, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 2585-2589

  Jeldres, Claudio ^b   Sun, Maxine ^a   Liberman, Daniel ^b   Lughezzani, Giovanni ^a,d   de la Taille, Alexandre ^c   Tostain, Jacques ^c   Valeri, Antoine ^c   Cindolo, Luca ^d   Ficarra, Vincenzo ^d   Artibani, Walter ^d   Zigeuner, Richard ^c,e   Mejean, Arnaud ^c   Descotes, Jean Luc ^c   Lechevallier, Eric ^c   Mulders, Peter F ^c   Perrotte, Paul ^b   Patard, Jean Jacques ^c   Karakiewicz, Pierre I ^b  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^d VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^e MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

biopsy; carcinoma; Europe; kidney; models; renal cell; statistical

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SURGERY; CLEAR CELL CARCINOMA; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COUGHING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FATIGUE; FEMALE; FEVER; GENDER; GROUPS BY AGE; HEMATURIA; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; KIDNEY TUMOR; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEPHRECTOMY; NIGHT SWEAT; NOMOGRAM; PAPILLARY CARCINOMA; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TUMOR BIOPSY; TUMOR VOLUME; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS; WEIGHT REDUCTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; FORECASTING; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEPHRECTOMY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 71849118577     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.053     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Walz J., Gallina A., Perrotte P., et al. Clinicians are poor raters of life-expectancy before radical prostatectomy or definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 100 (2007) 1254
2. Fuhrman S.A., Lasky L.C., and Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 6 (1982) 655
3. Rioux-Leclercq N., Karakiewicz P.I., Trinh Q.D., et al. Prognostic ability of simplified nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 109 (2007) 868
4. Frank I., Blute M.L., Cheville J.C., et al. An outcome prediction model for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy based on tumor stage, size, grade and necrosis: the SSIGN score. J Urol 168 (2002) 2395
5. Zisman A., Pantuck A.J., Wieder J., et al. Risk group assessment and clinical outcome algorithm to predict the natural history of patients with surgically resected renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 20 (2002) 4559
6. Lechevallier E., Andre M., Barriol D., et al. Fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses with helical CT guidance. Radiology 216 (2000) 506
7. Lebret T., Poulain J.E., Molinie V., et al. Percutaneous core biopsy for renal masses: indications, accuracy and results. J Urol 178 (2007) 1184
8. Wunderlich H., Hindermann W., Al Mustafa A.M., et al. The accuracy of 250 fine needle biopsies of renal tumors. J Urol 174 (2005) 44
9. Neuzillet Y., Lechevallier E., Andre M., et al. Accuracy and clinical role of fine needle percutaneous biopsy with computerized tomography guidance of small (less than 4.0 cm) renal masses. J Urol 171 (2004) 1802
10. Patard J.J., Leray E., Rioux-Leclercq N., et al. Prognostic value of histologic subtypes in renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter experience. J Clin Oncol 23 (2005) 2763
11. Karakiewicz P.I., Trinh Q.D., Rioux-Leclercq N., et al. Collecting duct renal cell carcinoma: a matched analysis of 41 cases. Eur Urol 52 (2007) 1140
12. Karakiewicz P.I., Hutterer G.C., Trinh Q.D., et al. Unclassified renal cell carcinoma: an analysis of 85 cases. BJU Int 100 (2007) 802
13. Motzer R.J., Agarwal N., Beard C., et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: kidney cancer. JNCCN 7 (2009) 618
14. Deane L.A., and Clayman R.V. Review of minimally invasive renal therapies: needle-based and extracorporeal. Urology 68 (2006) 26
15. Frank I., Blute M.L., Cheville J.C., et al. Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol 170 (2003) 2217
16. Lane B.R., Samplaski M.K., Herts B.R., et al. Renal mass biopsy-a renaissance?. J Urol 179 (2008) 20
17. Lane B.R., Babineau D., Kattan M.W., et al. A preoperative prognostic nomogram for solid enhancing renal tumors 7 cm or less amenable to partial nephrectomy. J Urol 178 (2007) 429
18. Giacomo N., Guido M., Walter A., et al. Grading systems in renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 177 (2007) 430
19. Lang H., Lindner V., de Fromont M., et al. Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma: Assessment of 241 patients with > 15-year follow-up. Cancer 103 (2005) 625
20. Ficarra V., Martignoni G., Maffei N., et al. Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system: a multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 103 (2005) 68
21. Al-Aynati M., Chen V., Salama S., et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variability using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 127 (2003) 593
22. Zini L., Perrotte P., Capitanio U., et al. Radical versus partial nephrectomy: effect on overall and noncancer mortality. Cancer 115 (2009) 1465
23. Jeldres C., Patard J.J., Capitanio U., et al. Partial versus radical nephrectomy in patients with adverse clinical or pathologic characteristics. Urology 73 (2009) 1300
24. Wang R., Wolf Jr. J.S., Wood Jr. D.P., et al. Accuracy of percutaneous core biopsy in management of small renal masses. Urology 73 (2009) 586