Assessment of Brazil's research literature

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 601-621

  Schoeneck, David J ^a   Porter, Alan L ^a,b   Kostoff, Ronald N ^c   Berger, Elena M ^b  

^a Search Technology Inc   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Brasil; Brazil; Competitive technical intelligence; R and D trends; Research profiling; Tech mining; Text mining

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; DATABASE; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT;

BRAZIL;

EID: 79960691135     PISSN: 09537325     EISSN: 14653990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2011.585029     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Arruda, M., R. Vermulm, and S. Hollanda. 2006. Inovacao Tecnologica no Brasil: A industria em busca da competitividade global. Sao Paulo, Brazil: ANPEI.
2. Börner, K., C. Chen, and K.W. Boyack. 2003. Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 37: 179-255.
3. Börner, K., J.T. Maru, and R.L. Goldstone. 2004. The simultaneous evolution of author and paper networks. Proceedings National Academies of Science USA, 101(Suppl. 1), pp. 5266-73.
4. Bound, K. 2008. Brazil: The natural knowledge economy. London: Demos. http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/brazil.
5. Chen, H., R.N. Kostoff, C. Chen, J. Zhang, M.S.E. Vogeley, K. Börner, and N. Ma, et al. 2009. AI and global science and technology assessment. IEEE Intelligent Systems 24, no. 4: 68-88.
6. Chesbrough, H.W. 2006. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.
7. European Commission. 2006. European trend chart on innovation. Annual innovation policy trends report for United States, Canada, Mexico and Brazil. www.cordis.lu/trendchart.
8. FINEP. 2006. The Brazilian innovation industry. Presentation at Rio de Janeiro. www.finep.gov.br.
9. Hane, G. 2008. Science, technology, and global reengagement. Issues in Science and Technology 25, no. 1: 85-90.
10. King, C. 2009. Brazilian science on the rise. Science Watch, July/August. http://science.thomsonreuters.com/news/ 2009-10/8552076/.
11. Kostoff, R.N. 2008. Comparison of China/USA science and technology performance. Journal of Informetrics 2, no. 4: 354-63.
12. Kostoff, R.N., R.B. Barth, and C.G.Y. Lau. 2008. Quality vs quantity of publications in nanotechnology field from the Peoples Republic of China. Chinese Science Bulletin 53, no. 8: 1272-80.
13. Kostoff, R.N., and S. Bhattacharya. 2010. Identification of militarily-relevant science and technology. Defense Science Journal 60, no. 3: 259-70.
14. Kostoff, R.N., S. Bhattacharya, and M. Pecht. 2007. Assessment of China's and India's science and technology literature-introduction, background, and approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74, no. 9: 1519-38.
15. Kostoff, R.N., J.A. Block, J.A. Solka, M.B. Briggs, R.L. Rushenberg, J.A. Stump, D. Johnson, and J.R. Wyatt. 2008. Literature-related discovery: Lessons learned, and future research directions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75, no. 2: 276-99 (Special Issue on Literature-related discovery, ed. R.N. Kostoff).
16. Kostoff, R.N., M. Briggs, R. Rushenberg, C.A. Bowles, A.S. Icenhour, K.F. Nikodym, R.B. Barth, and M. Pecht. 2007a. Chinese science and technology-Structure and infrastructure. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74, no. 9: 1539-73.
17. Kostoff, R.N., M. Briggs, R. Rushenberg, D. Johnson, C.A. Bowles, S. Bhattacharaya, A.S. Icenhour, K.F. Nikodym, R.B. Barth, S. Dodbele, and M. Pecht. 2007b. Comparisons of the structure and infrastructure of Chinese and Indian Science and Technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74, no. 9: 1609-30.
18. Kostoff, R.N., D. Johnson, C.A. Bowles, S. Bhattacharaya, A.S. Icenhour, K.F. Nikodym, R.B. Barth, and S. Dodbele. 2007c. Assessment of India's research literature. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74, no. 9: 1574-1608.
19. Kostoff, R.N., D. Johnson, C.A. Bowles, and S. Dodbele. 2006a. Assessment of India's research literature. Federation of American Scientists. Available at http://www.fas.org/irp/world/india/research.pdf.
20. Kostoff, R.N., J.A. Rio, C. Smith, A. Smith, C.S. Wagner, G. Malpohl, G. Karypis, and R. Tshiteya. 2005. The structure and infrastructure of Mexico's science and technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 72, no. 7: 798-814.
21. Kostoff, R.N., R. Tshiteya, C.A. Bowles, and T. Tuunanen. 2006b. The structure and infrastructure of the Finnish research literature. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 18, no. 2: 187-220.
22. OECD. 2008. Science, Technology, and Industry Outlook 2008. Science and Innovation Country Notes. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/18/31/41559606.pdf.
23. Office of Naval Research. 2007. Naval S&T strategic plan. Arlington, VA, USA: Office of Naval Research. http://www. onr.navy.mil/about/docs/0703_naval_st_strategy.pdf.
24. PINTEC. 2003. Pesquisa Industrial de Inovacao Tecnologica. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: The Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE). www.ibge.gov.br.
25. Porter, A.L., and S.W. Cunningham. 2005. Tech mining: Exploiting newtechnologies for competitive advantage. NewYork: Wiley.
26. Porter, A.L., A. Kongthon, and J.-C. Lu. 2002. Research profiling: Improving the literature review. Scientometrics 53: 351-70.
27. Porter, A.L., N.C. Newman, J.D. Roessner, D.M. Johnson, and X.-Y. Jin. 2009. International high tech competitiveness: does China rank #1? Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 21, no. 2: 173-93.
28. Sa, C. 2005. Research policy in emerging economies: Brazil's sector funds. Minerva 43: 245-63.
29. Schoeneck, D.J., A.L. Porter, R.N. Kostoff, and E.M. Berger. 2010. Assessment of Brazil's research literature. DTIC Technical Report Number ADA515318. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center. http://www.dtic. mil/.
30. Youtie, J., P. Shapira, and A.L. Porter. 2008. Nanotechnology publications and citations by leading countries and blocs. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 10, no. 6: 981-86.
31. Zanotto, E.D. 2002. Scientific and technological development in Brazil: The widening gap. Scientometrics 55, no. 3: 411-19.