The politics of data use

Teachers College Record

Volumn 114, Issue 11, 2012, Pages

  Henig, Jeffrey R ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890688094     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Aaron, H. (1978). Professors and politics: The Great Society in perspective. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
2. Austen-Smith, D. (1997). Interest groups: Money, information and influence. In D. C. Mueller (Ed.), Perspectives on public choice (pp. 296-321). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1963). Decisions and nondecisions: An analytical framework. American Political Science Review, 57(3), 632-642.
4. Bachrach, P., & Morton, S. B. (1962). Two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947-952.
5. Balla, S. J. (2001). Interstate professional associations and the diffusion of policy innovations. American Politics Research, 29(3), 221-245.
6. Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84, 395-415.
7. Bowman, A. O. M., & Kearney, R. C. (1988). Dimensions of state government capability. Western Political Quarterly, 41(2), 341-362.
8. Brennan, J. F. (2009). New York City public school performance before and after mayoral control. In L. Haimson & A. Kjellberg (Eds.), New York City under Bloomberg and Klein: What parents, teachers, and policymakers need to know (pp. 105-114). New York, NY: Lulu.
9. Bridges, A., & Kronick, R. (1999). Writing the rules to win the game: The middle-class regimes of municipal reformers. Urban Affairs Review, 34(5), 691-706.
10. Burch, P. (2009). Hidden markets: The new education privatization. New York, NY: Routledge.
11. Cobb, M. D., & Kuklinski, J. H. (1997). Changing minds: Political arguments and political persuasion. American Journal of Political Science, 41(4), 88-121.
12. Coburn, C. E., Honig, M. I., & Stein, M. K. (in press). What's the evidence on districts' use of evidence? In J. Bransford, L. Gomez, D. Lam, & N. Vye (Eds.), Research and practice: Towards a reconciliation. Cambridge MA: Harvard Education Press.
13. Coburn, C. E., Toure, J., & Yamashita, M. (2009). Evidence, interpretation, and persuasion: Instructional decision making at the district central office. Teachers College Record 111(4), 1115-1161.
14. Coburn, C. E., & Turner, E. O. (2010, January 30). Data use and educational improvement: Toward a research agenda. Paper prepared for the Spencer Foundation Initiative on Data use and Educational Improvement, working draft.
15. Cohen-Vogel, L., Ingle, W. K., Levine, A. A., & Spence, M. (2008). The "spread" of meritbased college aid: Politics, policy consortia, and interstate competition. Education Policy, 22(3), 339-362.
16. Crenson, M. A. (1972). The un-politics of air pollution: A study of non-decisionmaking in the cities. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
17. DeBonis, M. (2009, March 6). Fund and games: Inside Michelle Rhee's official schedule. Washington City Paper. Retrieved from http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/ display.php?id=36893
18. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
19. Dror, Y. (1967). Policy analysts: A new professional role in government service. Public Administration Review, 27(3), 197-203.
20. Edelman, M. J. (2001). The politics of misinformation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Farkas, S. (1992). Educational reform: The players and the politics. New York, NY: Public Agenda Foundation.
22. Fung, A., Graham, M., & Weil, D. (2007). Full disclosure: The perils and promise of transparency. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23. Gilens, M. (1995). Racial attitudes and opposition to welfare. Journal of Politics, 57(4), 994-1014.
24. Gray, V. (1973). Innovations in the states: A diffusion study. American Political Science Review, 67, 1174-1185.
25. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (2001). Special interest politics. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
26. Grumm, J. (1971). The effects of legislative structure on legislative performance. In R. Hofferbert & I. Sharkansky (Eds.), State and urban politics: Readings in comparative public policy (pp. 298-322). Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
27. Hayes, M. T. (1992). Incrementalism and public policy. New York, NY: Longman.
28. Hayes, S. P. (1964). The politics of reform in muncipal government in the Progressive Era. Pacific Northwest Quarterly, 55, 157-169.
29. Hemphill, C., & Nauer, K. (2010). Managing by the numbers: Empowerment and accountability in New York City's schools. New York, NY: The New School, Center for New York City Affairs.
30. Henig, J. R. (2008). Spin cycle: How research is used in policy debates: the case of charter schools. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation/Century Foundation.
31. Henig, J. R. (2009). The politics of localism in an era of centralization, privatization, and choice. NSSE Yearbook, 108(1), 112-129.
32. Henig, J. R. (2010a). Portfolio management and diverse provider models as contracting regimes. In K. E. Bulkley, J. R. Henig, & H. M. Levin (Eds.), Between public and private: Politics, governance, and the new portfolio models for urban school reform (pp. 27-52). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
33. Henig, J. R. (2010b). The contemporary context of public engagement: The new political grid. In M. Orr & J. Rogers (Eds.), Public engagement for public education (pp. 52-85). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
34. Henig, J. R., Hula, R. C., Orr, M., & Pedescleaux, D. S. (1999). The color of school reform. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35. Henig, J. R., & Rich, W. C. (Eds.). (2004). Mayors in the middle: Politics, race, and mayoral control of urban schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. Hess, F. M. (1998). Spinning wheels: The politics of urban school reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
37. Hess, F. M. (Ed.). (2008). When research matters: How scholarship influences education policy. Cambridge MA: Harvard Education Press.
38. Honig, M. I. (2008). District central offices as learning organizations: How sociocultural and organizational learning theories elaborate district central office administrators' participation in teaching and learning. American Journal of Education, 114, 627-664.
39. Honig M. I., & Coburn, C. (2007). Evidence-based decision making in school district central offices: Toward a policy and research agenda. Educational Policy, 22(4), 578-608.
40. Hula, K. (1999). Lobbying together: Interest group coalitions in legislative politics. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
41. Jacobs, L. R., & Shapiro, R. Y. (2000). Politicians don't slander: Political manipulation and the loss of democratic responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago.
42. Jones, B. D. (1995). Reconceiving decision-making in democratic politics: Attention, choice, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Jones, B. D. (1999). Bounded rationality. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 297-321.
44. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
45. Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.
46. Klein, J. (2011). The failure of American schools. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/06/the-failure-of-americanschools/ 8497/
47. Lasswell, H. D. (1970). The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy Sciences, 1(1), 3-14.
48. LeLoup, L. T. (1978). Reassessing the mediating impact of legislative capability. American Political Science Review, 72(2), 616-621.
49. Lieberman, R. C. (1998). Shifting the color line: Race and the American welfare state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of "muddling through." Public Administration Review, 19, 79-88.
51. Lindblom, C. E. (1990). Inquiry and change: The troubled attempt to understand and shape society. New Haven, CT, and New York, NY: Yale University Press and Russell Sage Foundation Press.
52. Lineberry, R. L., & Fowler, E. P. (1967). Reformism and public policies in American cities. American Political Science Review, 61, 701-716.
53. Lowi, T. J. (1967). Machine politics: Old and new. Public Interest, 9, 83-92.
54. Malbin, M. J. (1980). Congress, policy analysis, and natural gas deregulation: A parable about fig leaves. In R. A. Goldwin (Ed.), Bureaucrats, policy analysis, statesmen: Who leads? (pp. 62-87). Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute.
55. Marsh, J. A., Pane, J. F., & Hamilton, L. S. (2006). Making sense of data-driven decision making in education: Evidence from recent RAND research. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
56. McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R., & Weingast, B. R. (1987). Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 3, 243-277.
57. McCubbins, M. D., & Schwartz, T. (1984). Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrols versus fire alarms. American Journal of Political Science, 28(1), 165-179.
58. McDonnell, L. M. (2005). Assessment and accountability from the policymaker's perspective. NSSE Yearbook, 104(2), 35-54.
59. McDonnell, L. M. (2009). Repositioning politics in education's circle of knowledge. Educational Researcher, 38(6), 417-427.
60. McLaughlin, M. J. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementaion. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 171-178.
61. Mintrom, M., & Vergari, S. (1998). Policy networks and innovation diffusion. Journal of Politics, 60, 126-148.
62. Mitnick, B. M. (1975). The theory of agency: The policing "paradox" and regulatory behavior. Public Choice, 24, 27-42.
63. Moe, T. M. (1984). The new economics of organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28(4), 739-777.
64. Moe, T. M. (2011). Special interest: Teachers unions and America's public schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
65. Mooney, C. Z. (1994). Measuring U.S. state legislative professionalism: An evaluation of five indices. State and Local Government Review, 26(2), 70-78.
66. Mosteller, F., & Boruch, R. (Eds.). (2002). Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
67. Mutz, D. C., Brody, R. A., & Sniderman, P. M. (Eds.). (1996). Political persuasion and attitude change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
68. Nathan, R. P. (2000). Social science in government: The role of policy researchers. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute Press.
69. Novick, D. (Ed.). (1965). Program budgeting: Program analysis and the federal budget. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
70. Orr, M., & Johnson, V. C. (Eds.). (2008). Power in the city: Clarence Stone and the politics of inequality. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
71. Pallas, A., & Jennings, J. (2009). "Progress" reports. In L. Haimson & A. Kjellberg (Eds.), New York City under Bloomberg and Klein: What parents, teachers, and policymakers need to know (pp. 99-104). New York, NY: Lulu.
72. Patashnik, E. M. (2008). Reforms at risk: What happens after major policy changes are enacted. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
73. Prewitt, K. (2010). The U.S. decennial census: Politics and political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 13, 237-254.
74. Ravitch, D. (2009). Student achievment in New York City: The NAEP results. In L. Haimson & A. Kjellberg (Eds.), New York City under Bloomberg and Klein: What parents, teachers, and policymakers need to know (pp. 23-30). New York, NY: Lulu.
75. Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system. New York, NY: Perseus.
76. Reenock, C. M., & Gerber, B. J. (2008). Political insulation, information exchange, and interest group access to the bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(3), 415-440.
77. Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (Eds.). (1994). The politics of problem definition: Shaping the. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
78. Rourke, F. (1969). Bureaucracy, politics and public policy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
79. Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334-347.
80. Scott, J. (Ed.). (1994). Power: Critical concepts. New York, NY: Routledge.
81. Shah, P., & Marschall, M. (2005). Keeping policy churn off the agenda: Urban education and civic capacity. Policy Studies Journal, 33(2), 161-180.
82. Sharkansky, I. (1968). Spending in the American states. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. Simon, H. A. (1985). Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology and political science. American Political Science Review, 79, 293-304.
83. Simon, H. A. (1985). Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology and political science. American Political Science Review, 79, 293-304.
84. Soss, J., Schram, S., Vartanian, T., & O'Brien, E. (2001). Setting the terms of relief: Explaining state policy choices in the devolution revolution. American Journal of Political Science, 45(2), 378-395.
85. Spillane, J. P. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387-431.
86. Stone, C., Henig, J. R., Jones, B. D., & Pierranunzi, C. (2001). Building civic capacity: Toward a new politics of urban school reform. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
87. Stone, C. N. (1989). Regime politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
88. Stone, D. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York, NY: Norton.
89. Towne, L., & Shavelson, R. J. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
90. Tucker, H. J. (1982). Incremental budgeting: Myth or model?. Western Political Quarterly, 35(3), 327-338.
91. Viteritti, J. P. (Ed.). (2009). When mayors take charge: School governance in the city. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
92. Walker, J. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63, 880-899.
93. Walters, P. B., Lareau, A., & Ranis, S. H. (Eds.). (2009). Education research on trial: Policy reform and the call for scientific rigor. New York, NY: Routledge.
94. Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-19.
95. Weiss, C. H. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39(5), 426-431.
96. Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation: Methods for studying programs & policies (2nd ed.). Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
97. Wildavsky, A. (1966). The political economy of efficiency: Cost-benefit analysis, systems analysis, and program budgeting. Public Administration Review, 26(4), 292-310.
98. Wildavsky, A. (1984). The politics of the budgetary process (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
99. Wood, B. D. (1990). Does politics make a difference at the EEOC?. American Journal of Political Science, 34(2), 503-530.